Web & Software Development for Business Promotion Company
-
Custom Software Development Web Development
- $10,000 to $49,999
- Jan. - Oct. 2025
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"What stood out was their willingness to understand the organization behind the software."
- Non-profit
- Andorra la Vella, Andorra
- 51-200 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
Flyte Solutions Ltd. provided software and web development for a business promotion company. The team created a centralized project management and reporting platform and rebuilt the public-facing website.
Flyte Solutions Ltd. delivered a system that made project information easier to find and maintain, resulting in a more consistent reporting process. The team had structured project management and adapted to changing requirements. Flyte Solutions Ltd. was willing to understand the client's business.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and position.
I am the CEO of BOMOSA
Describe what your company does in a single sentence.
The BOMOSA Universe, created by Bonaventura Mora Saguรฉs, promotes business projects in Andorra with the aim of allocating all profits obtained to philanthropic projects through BOMOSA Foundation. The Hive Five coworking space, Bio Bio organic food, BMS Strategic Consulting, the EcoFamily Office รspid and the Maxtar store are companies by BOMOSA that share the goal of creating a supportive Andorran society and a better future in a sustainable and lasting ecosystem.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What specific goals or objectives did you hire Flyte Solutions Ltd. to accomplish?
- Bring our philanthropic project information into one working system
- Create a more useful public web presence
- Improve internal reporting and coordination
SOLUTION
How did you find Flyte Solutions Ltd.?
- Online Search
- Clutch Site
Why did you select Flyte Solutions Ltd. over others?
- Pricing fit our budget
- Good value for cost
- Company values aligned
How many teammates from Flyte Solutions Ltd. were assigned to this project?
6-10 Employees
Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.
We brought Flyte Solutions in because our challenge was not simply that we needed a new website. BOMOSA has several activities operating under the same wider vision, and the information around our projects was becoming difficult to manage consistently. We needed something that could work for management internally while also presenting the organization properly to people outside it. Flyte Solutions handled the custom software development and web development work as one connected project. The first stage involved understanding how we actually worked. Their team went through our existing information, the way projects were tracked, how different people accessed records, what management needed to see, and what information should be available publicly. This was useful because they did not start by pushing us toward a predefined system. The main internal deliverable was a centralized project management and reporting platform. It gave us structured records for philanthropic initiatives, project descriptions, responsible people, partner information, supporting documents, activity updates, milestones, and reporting notes. We also had clearer controls around who could access and update different types of information. On the web side, Flyte rebuilt the relevant public-facing sections around a more structured content model. We could present the BOMOSA philosophy, explain the relationship between our business activities and philanthropic work, highlight sustainability initiatives, and keep project information organized without having to treat every update as a completely separate web exercise. They also worked on the administrative side of the system. That included dashboards, searchable records, document handling, user access controls, data organization, forms, notifications, and the connections between the internal platform and the website. Testing covered the main user journeys as well as different access levels. One thing that mattered to us was making the system practical for people who were not technical. A project manager should not need a developer every time they need to update a project record or publish a straightforward piece of information. Flyte spent time refining those workflows after we tested them ourselves.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
The clearest result was that our project information became much easier to find and maintain. Before the new system, people could spend considerable time checking different files or asking another team member where the latest information was stored. After implementation, the central records gave management a much quicker way to see project status, responsible teams, recent activity, and supporting documentation. Our reporting process also became more consistent. Project updates followed a defined structure rather than arriving in completely different formats. This reduced the amount of manual work required before management reviews. The website gave us a more organized way to explain the BOMOSA Universe and present our philanthropic work. New information could be added through the administration area instead of requiring technical changes for every routine content update. We also saw fewer situations where two people were working from different versions of the same project information. That sounds like a simple improvement, but for an organization with several initiatives and business activities running at the same time, it made day-to-day coordination much easier. Another practical result was faster access to historical project information. When we needed to look back at an initiative, a partner, a document, or a previous update, the information was available in the relevant record instead of requiring someone to search through old correspondence.
Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?
Their project management was structured without becoming difficult for us to work with. We had regular discussions around the current development stage, items that needed our approval, and changes we wanted to make after seeing working versions. The most useful part was being able to react to something tangible. Rather than reviewing everything as a theoretical specification, we could look at working sections, test them with our own processes, and tell the team where something did not make sense from an operational standpoint. There were a few points where our requirements changed after we saw the first versions. That was normal for this type of project. Flyte did not treat those conversations as a problem. They discussed the effect of the changes, adjusted the relevant work, and kept the main schedule moving. The larger deliverables were completed within the agreed project window, and the team kept us informed when something needed additional clarification from our side. We never felt that communication disappeared once development started.
What was your primary form of communication with Flyte Solutions Ltd.?
- Virtual Meeting
- Email or Messaging App
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
What stood out was their willingness to understand the organization behind the software. BOMOSA is not a straightforward single-purpose business. We have commercial activities, philanthropic objectives, sustainability considerations, and several initiatives operating under a common vision. A generic project management system would not have addressed the way we needed to work. Flyte spent time understanding those relationships before finalizing the workflows. I particularly appreciated the discussions around what management actually needed to see versus what could simply remain as background information in the system. They were also comfortable receiving feedback from people who were thinking about the project from a business and organizational perspective rather than from a technical one. We could say, "This looks fine, but this is not how our team actually works," and the conversation would move toward solving that practical problem. That made the engagement feel collaborative rather than like we were simply handing requirements to an external development team.
Are there any areas for improvement or something Flyte Solutions Ltd. could have done differently?
The main area we would improve is the amount of time spent finalizing some requirements before development moved into the next stage. Because our organization has several different activities and stakeholders, we occasionally revisited decisions after seeing a working version of a feature.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS