UX/UI Design for Global Mentoring Marketplace
- UX/UI Design
- Less than $10,000
- June - Aug. 2024
- Quality
- 1.0
- Schedule
- 1.0
- Cost
- 1.0
- Willing to Refer
- 2.0
"Their lack of professionalism overshadowed any positive aspects we might have expected from them."
- Other industries
- Sydney, Australia
- 1-10 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
Chakor was hired to design and develop a web app for a global mentoring marketplace. The team was responsible for UI/UX design, end-to-end testing, documentation, and features implementation.
Chakor failed to deliver the designs the client requested, much to their dismay. The team was dismissive in their communication, and internal stakeholders were particularly disappointed in the service provider's lack of ownership and attentiveness to the project's needs. This review includes the service provider's response.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and position.
I am the Founder of Emergi Mentors
Describe what your company does in a single sentence.
Emergi Mentors is an online marketplace, currently under development, aimed at
connecting global mentors with local Australians to build a highly skilled workforce in
emerging technologies.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What specific goals or objectives did you hire Chakor to accomplish?
- UI/UX Design: Create a high-fidelity, intuitive, and user-centered design that aligns with our product vision, enhancing user engagement and overall satisfaction.
- Web Development: Build a fully functional and responsive web application tailored to our specific requirements, ensuring robust performance and scalability.
SOLUTION
How did you find Chakor?
Online Search
Why did you select Chakor over others?
High ratings
How many teammates from Chakor were assigned to this project?
2-5 Employees
Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.
Detailed scoping and deliverables schedule
- Create high fidelity Figma Designs
- Breakdown whole project in user stories
- Produce detailed documents for each user story
- Back and forth calls with client to lock the details of scope
- Setup project in Jira and produce a gantt chart to show case due dates of each
deliverable (user stories)
- Development with unit level testing
- End-to-End Testing
- Transfer Ownership, attach domain, go live
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
The project had a clear scope and detailed deliverables schedule, which included the following measurable outcomes:
- Create High-Fidelity Figma Designs: The project required the delivery of high-fidelity UI/UX designs in Figma, which unfortunately was not achieved. Despite multiple rounds of feedback and extra time provided, the designs failed to meet the agreed-upon standards.
- Breakdown of Project into User Stories: A thorough breakdown of the project into user stories was completed to ensure structured development and clarity of the deliverables.
- Detailed Documentation for Each User Story: Detailed documents were prepared for each user story, which outlined the specific functionalities, ensuring clear communication and expectation alignment with the development team.
- Back-and-Forth Calls to Finalize Scope: Regular calls were held with the client to refine and lock the project scope, ensuring that both parties were aligned on expectations and requirements.
- Project Setup in Jira with Gantt Chart for Deliverables: The project was properly set up in Jira, and a Gantt chart was created to display due dates and progress timelines for each user story.
- Development with Unit-Level Testing: Initial stages of development were aligned with unit-level testing to ensure the robustness of code as it progressed.
- End-to-End Testing: Comprehensive end-to-end testing was planned to ensure seamless integration of all components once developed.
- Ownership Transfer, Domain Attachment, and Go Live: The project aimed to transfer ownership and deploy the application upon completion, though this was never reached due to the failure during the UI/UX stage.
- Outcome: Unfortunately, the project stalled and failed at the UI/UX stage. The designer was unable to deliver high-fidelity Figma designs as agreed, which derailed the entire project. This significant failure in one of the early stages prevented the rest of the project from moving forward.
Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?
The project management was unfortunately a complete failure. Despite having a clear timeline and deliverables schedule, the team failed to deliver the high-fidelity UI/UX designs within the agreed time frame. In fact, the project experienced significant delays, and even after providing additional time, the work was far from acceptable.
Their responsiveness to our needs was inadequate. When we raised concerns about the lack of progress, they were unwilling to acknowledge that the project was failing. Instead of addressing the issues constructively, their tech lead displayed a dismissive attitude and was notably rude in communications. This lack of professionalism and refusal to accept accountability greatly affected the overall project experience and led to a breakdown in trust.
The failure to deliver on time, coupled with poor communication and unprofessional behavior, demonstrated a serious lack of effective project management.
What was your primary form of communication with Chakor?
- Virtual Meeting
- Email or Messaging App
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
Unfortunately, there was nothing impressive or unique about the company. Despite their claims of professionalism, the reality was quite the opposite. Their team exhibited rude behavior, particularly their tech lead, and their unwillingness to acknowledge and address the project's issues left a lot to be desired. Their lack of professionalism overshadowed any positive aspects we might have expected from them.
Are there any areas for improvement or something Chakor could have done differently?
There are several key areas where Chakor could improve:
- Communication and Responsiveness: The team must be more open to feedback and responsive to client concerns. Dismissing client feedback and being unprofessional in communication, as we experienced, is not conducive to a positive working relationship.
- Accountability: Chakor could benefit from taking ownership when things go wrong. Acknowledging issues early on and working collaboratively to resolve them would have demonstrated a commitment to the project’s success.
- Adherence to Deadlines: Timely delivery of agreed-upon deliverables is critical. Delays in the UI/UX design stage, despite granting additional time, significantly derailed the project and affected our overall timeline.
- Professionalism: The team, especially leadership, should maintain a professional and respectful tone in all communications. The tech lead's rude behavior contributed to a poor client experience and damaged trust.
By focusing on these areas, Chakor could greatly improve their project management and client relationships moving forward.
Company Responses
The service provider responded on March 11, 2026.
Thank you for sharing your feedback. This project required regular feedback and approvals during the UI/UX phase.
Unfortunately, we experienced extended delays in receiving feedback from the client, along with additional scope requests, which made it difficult to maintain the planned timeline. We stayed in communication throughout and ultimately agreed on a partial refund to resolve the matter amicably.
We’ve since further strengthened our processes by documenting feedback timelines and approvals more clearly in our service agreements.
RATINGS
-
Quality
1.0Service & Deliverables
"Failed to deliver."
-
Schedule
1.0On time / deadlines
"Significant project delays."
-
Cost
1.0Value / within estimates
"Overcharged for failure."
-
Willing to Refer
2.0NPS