How SaaS Founders Are Approaching AI Adoption in 2026?

Explore survey insights from SaaS founders and product leaders on how they’re navigating AI adoption in 2026, highlighting where AI is creating real value, what’s holding teams back, and how non-technical and technical founders approach product decisions differently.

AI adoption in SaaS isn’t just hype; it’s reshaping how teams build products, prioritize features, and define competitive differentiation. Based on a cross‑industry survey of founders, product leaders, and operators, this article highlights how SaaS teams are thinking about AI, what opportunities they see, and how they are validating AI‑powered ideas today.

To understand how SaaS companies are building with AI today, we surveyed founders, product managers, and operators from sectors including healthcare, marketing, sports tech, IoT, B2B tools, and platform‑as‑a‑service products. Our goal wasn’t to glorify AI or warn against it, but to map how teams are learning and adapting in real time.

SaaS teams are actively integrating it into products and workflows. But adoption is uneven. Technical and non‑technical founders view AI through different lenses, and teams are cautious about how and when to embed it.

→ Explore the full guide to see how AI is reshaping SaaS product strategy.

How Do Technical and Non-Technical Founders Approach AI Differently?

In conversations with non-technical founders, insights were gathered on how they are adapting to AI-driven disruption in their business models, exploring their confidence levels, the challenges they face, and the support they wish had been available earlier.

A key finding from the study is that background influences AI thinking:

• Technical founders (engineering, product, development backgrounds) tend to focus on implementation challenges:
  • How AI impacts existing architecture
  • Compute and maintenance costs
  • Data accessibility and control
• Non‑technical founders (business, product, operations) emphasize outcomes:
  • Where AI creates user value
  • How does it differentiate the product
  • Concerns about reliability or building the wrong feature

This split isn’t a divide; it’s actually complementary. Together, these perspectives shape how teams prioritize AI in their roadmaps.

Where Do Founders Believe AI Can Help Most?

Across industries and company stages, the answers consistently pointed toward practical, efficiency-focused applications rather than flashy, experimental AI features.

Founders are seeking ways to automate manual tasks, accelerate customer value, and make more informed product decisions.

1. Internal Automation and Operational Efficiency

• Automating billing, reconciliation, manual workflows
• Supporting QA automation
• Reducing repetitive admin tasks
• Streamlining internal decision‑making

→ This reflects a growing realization: AI doesn’t need to be customer–facing to generate value.

2. AI‑Assisted Workflows for Productivity

• Automating analysis and insight generation
• Drafting, summarizing, or tagging content
• Reducing steps in complex workflows

→ This indicates a preference for tools that remove friction rather than add complexity.

3. Smarter Onboarding and Personalized Guidance

• Adaptive onboarding
• Context‑aware recommendations
• Intelligent user support

→ This aligns with broader SaaS trends: the faster users achieve value, the better retention and product engagement become.

4. Predictive Analytics and Customer Insights

• Forecasting trends
• Identifying risk or opportunity signals early
• Informing product or business decisions

Users can easily integrate AI tools that enhance automation and work as a decision support.

What are the Core Worries Behind AI Adoption?

When asked about their biggest concern, founders didn’t focus on whether AI is “trendy”, they focused on risk, clarity, and execution.

• Building the wrong thing too early: Wasting time on unvalidated AI features
• Maintenance and scalability: Ongoing costs, model updates, and reliability
• Overcomplicating the product: Introducing friction or confusing UX
• Security and data privacy: Particularly around sensitive data and compliance, and protecting user trust when introducing AI into core workflows.

These concerns suggest that founders aren’t resistant to AI; they are just cautious. They want clarity on timing, ROI, and execution risk before fully committing.

What Signals Make Founders Feel It’s Time to Adopt AI?

When evaluating AI tools, founders prioritized validation and strategic clarity. Market hype did not override the need for real use cases and measurable impact.

• There is clear user demand or repeated requests for a specific AI-driven capability.
• The use case ties directly to measurable outcomes, such as time saved, costs reduced, or engagement improved.
• The team has clean, reliable data and a clear integration path.
• AI supports an existing workflow rather than introducing an entirely new one.

For teams navigating AI decisions today, the pattern is clear: AI adoption isn’t about moving first, but intentionally, when the risk is manageable. They are deliberately cautious, waiting for clearer signals around ROI, readiness, and integration complexity.

How Founders Prioritize Features and Shape Roadmaps?

We asked founders how they decide what to build next, how much AI trends influence those decisions, and how teams validate AI-powered ideas before committing to them.

• Customer feedback and requests
• Internal workflow pain points
• Revenue or retention impact
• Competitive pressure

Founders emphasized practical needs over theoretical innovation. AI trends influence awareness and discovery, but they rarely drive decisions alone.

This underscores that leaders ask not “Can we build this?” but “Should we build this now?”

How do Teams Prototype and Validate AI Features?

Founders approach AI experimentation with methodology.

Key priorities when prototyping:

• Speed of learning: Early insights over perfect products
• Vision alignment: AI must fit with what the product stands for
• UX clarity: AI interactions should feel obvious, not magical
• Ethical considerations: Trust matters even in early tests

Common validation methods include internal dogfooding to catch issues early, limited betas to observe real user behavior, and public iteration to shorten feedback cycles. Rather than obsessing over perfect releases, effective teams iterate based on direct user feedback and measurable outcomes.

What AI Features Do Founders Want but Haven’t Built Yet?

When asked about AI capabilities they wish they had, founders say they wish they had.

Intelligent automation

• Auto-generated task lists from natural language
• Workflow automation to reduce manual effort

Smarter insights and summaries

• Performance recaps and decision-support tools
• Clear dashboards that surface what matters most

UX-enhancing capabilities

• Touchscreen memory
• Context-aware interfaces
• Simpler, more intuitive experiences powered by AI

These features remain unbuilt due to a lack of technical confidence or capacity, unclear ROI vs. effort, and the risk of over-automation.

Founders are not short on AI ideas, but they are disciplined about execution. Many teams recognize the potential of intelligent automation and insights, but choose to wait until they have the right technical foundation, cost clarity, and confidence that the feature will genuinely improve user outcomes rather than add complexity.

Why Is Scaling a Growth and Execution Challenge for Founders?

Founders described scaling as a growth and execution challenge, not a product-idea problem.

• Customer acquisition at scale: Moving from early adopters to a repeatable, predictable growth engine.
• Sales and go-to-market clarity: Defining who the product is really for and how to sell it consistently.
• Resource constraints: Limited engineering, operational bandwidth, or funding are slowing momentum.
• Internal alignment: Balancing investor expectations, roadmap pressure, and team capacity.

Interestingly, AI was rarely cited as a primary differentiator. Instead, teams focused on niche specialization, workflow and UX improvements, strong service and support quality, and simplicity over breadth. Across the survey, a clear pattern emerges: scaling is not a product idea concern but a growth and execution challenge. AI can enhance differentiation, but it does not replace the fundamentals of product–market fit and user experience.

What Needs and Pain Points Do Non-Technical Founders Face?

Non-technical founders, rather, someone had better explain the long-term implications of AI technology decisions. Mainly regarding:

• Hidden and long-term costs: Clearer visibility into ongoing expenses, including model training, infrastructure scaling, compliance, and maintenance.
• Architectural implications: Uncertainty about using current AI frameworks, future-proofing products, and avoiding the risk of choosing the wrong technical path.
• Learning curve and decision confidence: How to evaluate tradeoffs without a technical background.

Overall, the frustration wasn’t about using AI; it was about understanding what they were committing to in the long term.

Intentional AI, Not Automatic AI

AI is now a permanent part of the SaaS landscape. Used well, it can automate repetitive tasks, surface insights faster, and remove friction for both internal teams and end users. Ignored entirely, it becomes a missed opportunity. Overused or rushed, it can just as easily introduce complexity, inflate costs, and distract teams from solving the right problems. That balance matters.

AI works best as an enabler, not a headline feature by default. Just because AI can be added to a product doesn’t mean it should sit at the front of the roadmap or define the core value proposition. In many cases, the most impactful AI implementations happen quietly in the background, improving workflows, accelerating decision-making, or reducing operational drag without fundamentally changing how the product feels to users.

About the Author

Keith Shields Partner at Designli

Keith Shields is a partner with Designli, a digital product studio dedicated to helping entrepreneurs and startup-minded enterprises launch transformative apps and web-apps. Designli's proprietary SolutionLab process brings non-technical product founders from a concept to a fully defined, designed, and prototyped "software blueprint" that is entirely development-ready - forming the foundation for a successful app launch.

See full profile