Updated March 24, 2025
Artificial intelligence (AI) appears to be making site reliability engineering (SRE) more efficient. However, AI is only worth it if you pick solutions that fit into existing SRE workflows. Otherwise, AI may actually create more work.
On the surface, artificial intelligence (AI) enhances site reliability engineering (SRE) practices. Besides automating repetitive tasks, it automatically detects and resolves irregularities and system failures. This frees up more time and energy for site reliability engineers to focus on higher-level tasks.
However, a closer look at site reliability engineers’ AI usage suggests that AI is just changing how engineers do their jobs. While AI can automate repetitive tasks, incident detection and resolution, and performance optimization, engineers still have to go back and fix mistakes most of the time.
Looking for a Artificial Intelligence agency?
Compare our list of top Artificial Intelligence companies near you
This begs the question: Is AI actually worth it? Yes — but only if you pick the right solutions and make sure they fit into existing SRE workflows. Otherwise, AI may lead to more work.
Read this guide to learn more about AI’s impact on SREs and the challenges of integrating AI into SRE processes. You’ll also learn how AI isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution and what the future of AI in SRE could look like.
The goal of site reliability engineering is to ensure systems are operating effectively and consistently, and AI often can be a useful tool to streamline this process.
Because AI can process system metrics, logs, and telemetry data in real-time, it can often detect patterns, anomalies, and trends more quickly than SREs on their own. AI can also automate repetitive tasks like monitoring, scaling, and incident response, improving efficiency and reducing human error.
For that reason, SREs will often use AI for:
While AI can automate repetitive tasks, speed up incident detection and resolution, and simplify performance optimization and capacity planning, it’s far from perfect. In fact, when implemented poorly, it can cause even more work than had an SRE professional done it themselves.
"Even though AI has become more and more advanced, it still needs monitoring and optimization,” explains Dmytro Sirant, CTO of OpsWork Co. “Teams must deal with model drift, excessive alerting, and unpredictable auto-scaling, which can create more problems than it solves. Additionally, a misconfigured AI system can trigger unnecessary responses, overload observability tools, or even introduce new failure points."
While automating processes, in theory, should streamline SRE workflows, the reality is that it can cause even more challenges. A recent report containing feedback from 300 SRE professionals said that while AI adoption is increasing, so is “toil.” As new tech is implemented, existing issues remain unfixed, and SREs spend more and more time addressing both new and preexisting problems, all while monitoring the AI systems themselves.
These problems can occur for a variety of reasons. Here are some common challenges teams may experience when implementing AI in SRE functions:
Despite the challenges of integrating AI in SRE processes, AI can still positively impact SRE. “When chosen wisely and implemented correctly, AI could be a perfect tool to make faster, data-driven decisions,” explains Sirant. “But the key here is to choose the right solutions and make sure they fit into existing SRE workflows.”
In other words, if teams choose the right AI tool, implement it correctly, and make sure it fits into existing SRE workflows, they can unlock AI's full potential. They'll be able to see how AI enhances SRE workflows by automating repetitive tasks, improving real-time system monitoring, and providing predictive insights that teams can use to act proactively.
Ultimately, AI can help SRE teams minimize downtime, optimize resource allocation, and improve performance. Here are some tips for picking and implementing the right AI tool that fits into existing SRE workflows:
Before picking a tool, you must determine what you’re trying to achieve by integrating AI. For instance, are you looking for improved accuracy, efficiency, or something else? Once you’ve defined your goals, you can start planning how to change and adapt your SRE workflow.
Analyze your current SRE workflow to see how AI can potentially reduce errors and streamline processes. Look at each task in the workflow and evaluate how time-consuming it is and whether it should be automated with AI technology.
Now that you’ve identified areas where AI can make an impact, it's time to pick a tool that best suits your organization's needs.
You also need to consider the following factors before making a decision:
After choosing the best AI solution for your SRE process, you need to implement it. Tell all relevant staff and stakeholders why you’re implementing this new tool, what its benefits are, and what changes will happen after implementation. You should also touch on potential risks associated with making the shift.
Once the AI solution has been implemented into your SRE workflow, your team must continuously monitor its performance. Track key SRE metrics and compare them against pre-implementation benchmarks to be sure the AI solution delivers measurable improvements to SRE workflows.
Here are the key SRE metrics to monitor:
SRE teams can also better understand AI's impact on SRE workflows by analyzing its effects on workload distribution, automation success rates, and incident response times.
If the AI solution reduces manual intervention, improves prediction accuracy, and optimizes system reliability, it effectively enhances SRE workflows. Continuous monitoring and improvements will ensure the AI solution remains valuable in SRE workflows.
We can expect significant transformations as AI continues to develop and be integrated into SRE processes.
First, teams using AI in SRE will probably focus more on strategic planning, decision-making, and optimization rather than day-to-day troubleshooting. As AI develops and skill gaps close due to AI training, teams will start using AI more strategically, continuously validating, checking, and aligning with best practices.
We can also expect to see more AI-driven innovation in SRE tools, including:
Finally, as AI-powered tools continue to be refined, they should be able to handle more aspects of SRE independently. These include incident anti-fragility and resilience, technical debt management, and improved code generation and documentation.
Human SRE roles will likely evolve when this happens, focusing on system architecture and higher-level problem-solving.
Conclusion: Implementing AI Strategically Is Key for Sustainability in SRE
AI has enhanced SRE processes in many ways, including automating repetitive tasks, accelerating incident detection and resolution, and enabling proactive scaling based on predictive analysis.
However, AI isn’t a one-size-fits-all solution. SRE teams face multiple challenges when integrating AI into SRE processes, including biased or inaccurate AI models and skills gaps.
To work efficiently and effectively, SRE teams must choose the right AI tool, implement it properly, and make sure it fits into existing SRE processes.