OnHires

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the CEO of Tаlаndo

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Talando is an IT recruitment and HR consulting agency providing specialist talent acquisition, executive search, and hiring advisory services for companies across international markets.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• Support six specialized recruitment searches covering embedded engineering, cloud infrastructure, sales leadership, and recruiting.
• Add targeted sourcing capacity for hardware positions based in Poland and a DevOps search across Europe
• Help maintain candidate outreach and selection momentum while Talando managed its wider client recruitment portfolio.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

We needed an additional sourcing partner capable of handling distinct recruiting briefs at the same

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

Our teams collaborated on six recruitment searches spanning several very different hiring markets. Three were for a hardware development team in Poland: C & C++ Video Streaming Engineer, Embedded Software Engineer (Robotics), and C & C++ Embedded Engineer. 

Additional searches covered a Head of Sales in Kyiv, a Cloud Service – DevOps position with a Europe-wide location scope, and a Junior Recruiter for an IT solutions team in Ukraine. The diversity of these assignments required different sourcing approaches. Embedded engineering candidates needed relevant low-level software experience; the video-streaming and robotics positions added more specific technical considerations. 

The DevOps brief called for cloud operations expertise, while the sales leadership and recruitment roles involved different professional networks and assessment priorities. The vacancy records show opening and closing dates between March and July 2026 and a total of 308 applications across the six requisitions. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Our joint work covered six vacancy searches between March and July 2026, spanning embedded engineering, sales leadership, cloud infrastructure and recruitment. The vacancy tracker records 308 applications across these six roles: 36 for C/C++ Video Streaming Engineer, 14 for Embedded Software Engineer (Robotics), 39 for C/C++ Embedded Engineer, 1 for Head of Sales, 163 for Cloud Service – DevOps and 55 for Junior Recruiter. 

All six requisitions were marked closed in the tracker by the end of July. Collaboration across these different specializations gave us additional reach in both narrow technical markets and broader talent pools.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

Recruitment partnerships run best when everyone knows who owns the next action. We had a straightforward working arrangement: candidate search and communication were coordinated with our recruiters, and interview feedback was shared as roles progressed. With assignments in Poland, Ukraine and elsewhere in Europe, this helped us keep track of different time zones and hiring priorities. The interaction was professional and responsive.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

The variety of markets we could cover together was particularly valuable. Finding an embedded C/C++ specialist for video streaming is nothing like searching for a DevOps professional or a commercial leader. Having another recruitment team involved made it easier to approach each assignment with the appropriate sourcing channels while our team retained oversight of the broader client relationship.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

A shared dashboard separating applicants, qualified profiles, interviews and final outcomes would make future cross-agency work even easier to analyze. We had a good working relationship, and this would simply give both teams a clearer view of progress on every brief.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Founder & CEO of a DevOps company

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Our company provides DevOps and site reliability engineering services, helping technology businesses strengthen cloud infrastructure, deployment pipelines, monitoring, and production resilience.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• Recruit a Middle / Senior DevOps Engineer to support cloud infrastructure, automation, and delivery pipelines
• Hire a Site Reliability Engineer (SRE) with expertise in observability, incident management, and production stability
• Give our technical leadership more capacity to focus on architecture and customer systems while recruitment progressed

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Online Search

Why did you select OnHires over others?

Their proposed process gave our engineers direct ownership of technical assessments

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

1 Employee

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We needed to add two engineers whose work would sit very close to the infrastructure our customers rely on. For us, that means more than configuring servers: we care about releases that can be rolled back, monitoring that catches problems early, and systems that can cope with sudden traffic changes. 

OnHires supported recruitment for a Middle / Senior DevOps Engineer and a Site Reliability Engineer (SRE). The DevOps opening focused on cloud environments, infrastructure as code, Kubernetes, and CI/CD automation. For the SRE opening, we were particularly interested in observability, troubleshooting production incidents, reliability practices, and how engineers make operational trade-offs.

Our team defined the technical requirements and conducted the in-depth assessments. OnHires handled candidate outreach, initial conversations, shortlist preparation, and interview arrangements. Having one partner coordinate the process allowed us to evaluate candidates in a more deliberate way without interrupting ongoing infrastructure work. Both positions were filled through this engagement.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

We successfully brought in two technical specialists: a Middle / Senior DevOps Engineer and a Site Reliability Engineer.

For our business, these are complementary but distinct roles.
The DevOps hire adds capacity for infrastructure automation and predictable deployments, while the SRE hire supports the operational side of availability, monitoring, and incident readiness. Hiring for both functions means responsibilities can be distributed more sensibly instead of concentrating every production issue on the same engineer.

The immediate measurable outcome was two completed hires. An additional benefit was the time our internal specialists did not have to spend on the earliest stages of candidate sourcing and scheduling.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

We had a fairly simple working arrangement: we provided feedback on the candidates, and OnHires handled the recruitment logistics and follow-through. That suited us. In infrastructure work, switching contexts repeatedly can be expensive, so we appreciated having conversations and interview steps kept in one place.

The key to making the collaboration work was a clear exchange of feedback. When we wanted to explore an engineer's production responsibilities in greater detail, we could communicate that before committing time to the next interview. It made the selection process easier to navigate.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

Virtual Meeting

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

They understood that someone who can deploy a Kubernetes cluster is not automatically the person you want responsible for it during an outage. 

That distinction mattered to us. We wanted to hear how candidates think about rollbacks, alert fatigue, root-cause analysis, and failure recovery, not just which tools appear on their resumes. The recruitment discussions left room for that kind of operational judgment rather than reducing the search to a checklist of technologies.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

A useful addition for future projects would be a more consistent summary of each candidate's on-call experience, including what kinds of incidents they personally handled and what their responsibilities were after recovery. That would help us compare practical reliability experience earlier in the process. 

It is a refinement we would welcome, rather than a major concern with the collaboration

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Founder of Supasaito.com

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Supasaito is a B2B customer acquisition platform. We help companies improve their visibility in traditional and AI search, run marketing campaigns, and generate leads through their websites. We also provide implementation and ongoing marketing support.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• Hire a Technical Implementation Specialist to help customers set up and use Supasaito
• Hire a Senior Product Engineer to develop our AI search capabilities and build product integrations.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Online Search

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• High ratings
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires on two searches. For the Technical Implementation Specialist, we needed someone who could understand customer requirements and translate them into a practical platform setup. For the Senior Product Engineer, we needed someone who could own engineering work across AI search and integrations. OnHires helped us find candidates for both roles.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

We wanted one recruiting partner who could handle both searches. One required a mix of technical and customer-facing skills, while the other called for senior product engineering experience in AI search and integrations.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

OnHires kept the two searches separate, which made it easier to discuss candidates and give feedback based on what mattered for each position.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What stood out was how OnHires handled two different technical profiles. They understood that we needed someone comfortable working directly with customers for implementation and someone who could own product development for AI search and integrations.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

No, everything went really well. There’s nothing specific we would have asked OnHires to do differently.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Recruiter, HR of Corpsoft Solutions

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

We provide end-to-end software development with built-in compliance.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To strengthen our software delivery team by hiring two developers and one Project Manager.
• To find specialists who could support active web, AI, and enterprise SaaS projects and work effectively in a client-focused environment.
• To complete the hiring process within the planned timeframe and budget while our internal team remained focused on product delivery.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Online Search

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We engaged OnHires to strengthen our software delivery team by hiring two developers and one Project Manager.The roles were important for expanding our engineering capacity and adding project-management support while active client projects continued in parallel. 

OnHires helped us define the hiring requirements, identify relevant candidates, conduct initial screening, prepare candidate shortlists, and coordinate interviews and feedback. They supported both the technical searches and the Project Manager search within one recruitment engagement .  

The key deliverable was the successful hiring of all 3 specialists within the agreed period and budget. This gave our team additional development capacity and stronger coordination for ongoing software projects. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us hire 2 software developers and one Project Manager. All three positions were filled during the engagement, which ran from June to August 2026, with a total recruitment budget of $12,000. 

The new hires expanded our development capacity and added project-management support for delivery coordination. The process also reduced the time our internal team needed to spend on sourcing and initial candidate screening, allowing our leads to focus on final interviews and active software projects.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The recruitment process was structured and easy to follow. OnHires kept communication focused on candidate status, interviews, feedback, and next steps. They managed the searches for the Developer and Project Manager positions in parallel and adapted the process to the requirements of each role.

The team remained responsive throughout the engagement and completed the hiring project within the planned June to August 2026 timeframe.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What stood out was OnHires’ ability to recruit for both engineering and project-management positions within one engagement. They understood that the developers needed strong technical skills, while the Project Manager also needed the communication and coordination skills required for client-focused software delivery. This made the candidate selection process more relevant and helped us complete three different hires without managing separate recruitment providers.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, we were satisfied with the collaboration! For future searches, receiving additional market information about candidate availability and compensation at the beginning of the engagement could make workforce planning even easier.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Co-founder of DestiLabs

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

DestiLabs builds agentic AI solutions for businesses, including custom AI agents, voicebots, chatbots, computer vision systems, and machine learning solutions that automate operations and scale business outcomes.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• Find AI engineering talent with practical experience in production-grade LLM and agentic AI systems.
• Hire a product manager who could translate business workflows into clear AI product requirements and delivery priorities.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• High ratings
• Referred to me

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires to hire two important roles for our AI delivery team: an AI Engineer and a Product Manager. The AI Engineer profile required more than general software development experience. We needed someone who understood LLM-based products, AI agents, integrations with business tools, prompt and workflow logic, evaluation of model outputs, and the practical realities of moving AI prototypes into reliable production systems. The Product Manager role was equally specific.

 OnHires supported the full hiring process: role calibration, talent mapping, sourcing, first-stage screening, candidate communication, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. Their team helped us separate candidates who only had surface-level AI exposure from those who had actually worked with AI products or complex technical systems.

The key deliverables were qualified shortlists for both roles, structured candidate notes, interview coordination, and hiring support until the final decision stage. Their work helped us move from a broad hiring idea to a much clearer and more manageable recruitment process. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us close two roles: an AI Engineer and a Product Manager. The AI Engineer strengthened our technical capacity around AI agents, integrations, and production-ready automation workflows. The Product Manager helped bring more structure to requirements, prioritization, and communication between business needs and technical execution. A meaningful result was the quality of the screening process. We did not spend time reviewing large numbers of candidates who only used AI as a buzzword. The candidates who reached our interviews had more relevant experience and were easier for our technical team to evaluate. The cooperation also reduced the amount of founder time spent on early sourcing and candidate filtering, which was important for us because our team was actively working on client AI systems at the same time. 

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

yes, everything was perfect, OnHires kept the process clear and lightweight. They gave us regular updates on the pipeline, explained where the market was strong or limited, and asked for feedback at the right points. When we realized that the AI Engineer role needed a stronger focus on agentic workflows and integrations, they adjusted the search direction quickly. For the Product Manager role, they also helped us refine what we really needed: not just a coordinator, but someone who could work with technical ambiguity and turn client problems into concrete product decisions. The process stayed organized, and communication was practical throughout the collaboration. 

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

OnHires did not approach the search as a simple keyword-matching task. For an AI company, this matters a lot. Many candidates mention LLMs, chatbots, or automation, but far fewer understand what it takes to build systems that work reliably with real users, real business processes, and changing client requirements. OnHires paid attention to that difference. They asked about our delivery model, our client work, the level of independence we expected, and how each hire would contribute to the team. Because of that, the conversations with candidates were more relevant from the beginning.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, the collaboration was positive and useful for us. One thing that could make future searches even stronger would be adding a short technical summary for each AI engineering candidate at the top of the profile, focused specifically on AI stack, integrations, model experience, and production exposure. The information was available in the profiles, but having it summarized upfront would make internal review even faster. Other than that, the team was responsive, thoughtful, and easy to work with.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Founder of BigTree108

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

BigTree108 is a Ukrainian software development company that builds and operates software for product companies in Europe and North America. Its services include .NET and Python development, front-end and mobile development, cloud and DevOps, QA and test automation, UI/UX design, Webflow and WordPress development, and dedicated teams.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• Hire a Python Developer with relevant backend engineering experience who could contribute to active software projects.
• Find a Node.js Developer capable of building and supporting reliable backend services and integrations.
• Add a designer who could support UI/UX work and collaborate effectively with developers, project stakeholders, and clients.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires to strengthen our delivery capacity by hiring three specialists: a Python Developer, a Node.js Developer, and a UI/UX Designer. The engineering roles required solid backend experience, an ability to work with existing systems and integrations, and clear communication within distributed product teams. For the design position, we needed someone who could create practical interfaces, work in Figma, and collaborate closely with developers.

OnHires supported the full recruitment process. Their team helped refine the requirements, sourced candidates, conducted initial screening, prepared focused shortlists, and coordinated interviews and feedback. Candidate profiles included useful context about technical experience, relevant projects, communication, and availability.

The engagement resulted in three successful hires who expanded our backend engineering and design capacity.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The primary outcome was the successful hiring of all three specialists: a Python Developer, a Node.js Developer, and a UI/UX Designer. The two engineers increased our backend delivery capacity across Python- and JavaScript-based work, while the designer strengthened collaboration between product, design, and engineering.

The shortlists were relevant and well filtered, which reduced the time our technical leads spent reviewing unsuitable profiles. OnHires handled sourcing and early-stage qualification, allowing our team to focus on technical interviews and final decisions. The new hires gave us additional capacity to support active client projects and distribute work more effectively.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The recruitment process was structured and easy to follow. OnHires provided regular updates, coordinated interviews efficiently, and kept us informed about candidate availability and next steps. When we clarified or adjusted a requirement, the team incorporated the feedback quickly and refined the search.

Communication was responsive and practical throughout the engagement. The team maintained momentum without creating unnecessary administrative work for us.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What stood out was their ability to work across both technical and creative roles within a single engagement. The requirements for a Python Developer, Node.js Developer, and UI/UX Designer were different, but the candidate profiles remained relevant across all three searches.

OnHires looked beyond keywords and considered project experience, communication style, and the ability to work in a distributed delivery environment. This made the interview process more focused and saved time for our internal team.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, we were satisfied with the collaboration. For future technical searches, a short market overview at the start, including candidate availability and compensation expectations for each stack, would make initial planning even easier. The team provided useful context during the process, but earlier visibility would be valuable.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the COO& Co-Founder of Yarandin

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Yarandin is an AI-first software development company that helps startups and SMBs build, integrate, and scale digital products. We provide custom software development, business process automation, SaaS development, system integrations, and AI-enabled solutions

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To expand our engineering capacity for several SaaS, AI, and business automation projects running in parallel.
• To hire a Senior Backend Developer, Node.js Developer, and Data Engineer with strong production experience in scalable systems, integrations, APIs, and data infrastructure
• To add a Technical Project Manager who could coordinate technical delivery, communicate with clients, and keep distributed teams aligned around scope, priorities, and timelines.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

• Online Search
• Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires to strengthen our engineering and delivery team while several client products and automation projects were moving forward at the same time. The positions included a Senior Backend Developer, Node.js Developer, Technical Project Manager, and Data Engineer. The engineering roles required experience with production-grade backend systems, APIs, third-party integrations, scalable architecture, and reliable data pipelines. For the Technical Project Manager role, we needed someone who could understand technical constraints, communicate clearly with clients, and coordinate delivery across backend, data, and product teams. OnHires helped us refine the role profiles, distinguish the must-have requirements from the preferred skills, source candidates, conduct initial screening, and coordinate interviews. Their candidate summaries gave us a concise view of each person’s technical background, relevant projects, motivation, availability, and expectations before we moved to the technical interview stage. The team collected feedback after each interview, adjusted the search when necessary, and supported the process through final selection, offer discussions, and onboarding. This allowed our technical leads to focus on architecture and final evaluation rather than spending time on early-stage sourcing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us successfully close all four positions: Senior Backend Developer, Node.js Developer, Technical Project Manager, and Data Engineer. The strongest result was the relevance of the shortlists. The backend and Node.js candidates had experience with real production systems and integrations, while the Data Engineer profiles were aligned with our need for dependable data infrastructure rather than only analytics experience. The new team members joined active projects and contributed to backend development, API integrations, data pipeline work, delivery planning, and client communication. This increased our capacity and helped us keep several product streams moving without compromising the quality of delivery. We also reduced the time our internal team spent on sourcing, initial screening, and interview coordination. Our leads could concentrate on the final technical assessment and selecting the strongest candidates.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The recruitment process was structured, transparent, and easy to follow. OnHires provided regular updates, coordinated interviews promptly, and kept the next steps clear. When our technical leads refined the requirements or gave feedback on a candidate, the team incorporated it into the next round of sourcing and returned with more targeted profiles. They were reliable with timelines and realistic about candidate availability and market conditions. Communication stayed practical throughout the engagement, which made it easy to manage four searches without unnecessary overhead.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What impressed us most was OnHires’ ability to understand the difference between candidates who know a technology and candidates who can use it effectively in a product delivery environment. They paid attention to architecture, integrations, data reliability, maintainability, and communication skills. This was important for us because our specialists work on products that need to scale, integrate with existing systems, and remain maintainable after launch. Their screening was especially useful across four different profiles. The candidate pipelines felt tailored to each role rather than built from the same generic technology checklist.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, we were satisfied with the collaboration. The Data Engineer search required additional calibration because candidates often had very different combinations of data platform, infrastructure, and analytics experience. A deeper alignment on the preferred data stack at the very beginning could have made the first shortlist even more precise. OnHires responded well to our feedback and adjusted the search quickly

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

 I am the VP of Strategic Partnerships of an information technology company 

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Ours is a digital product and web development studio that builds custom software, websites, mobile applications, SEO solutions, MVPs, and design systems for businesses worldwide. 

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To reinforce our production team with developers and QA specialists who could support several client projects at the same time.
• To find people who were comfortable working across practical business websites, custom web apps, e-commerce builds, and mobile interfaces.
• To add a structured hiring layer while our internal team stayed focused on project delivery, client communication, and launch deadlines.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

• Online Search
• Professional network

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We started working with OnHires when our project workload increased and we needed to expand the team without slowing down production. The search covered several roles: WordPress / WooCommerce Developer, React.js Frontend Developer, Flutter Developer, QA Engineer, and SEO Project Manager. These positions were important because our projects are very different from one another. Some clients need a fast and clean business website, others need an e-commerce setup, mobile app, dashboard, or more technical web application. OnHires first helped us narrow down what each role should actually cover. For example, for the WordPress / WooCommerce position, we needed someone who could work independently with themes, plugins, integrations, and performance issues. For the Flutter role, we needed mobile experience but also an understanding of business-focused apps. For QA, we wanted someone who could test websites and applications in a practical, release-oriented way. Their team took over sourcing, first conversations, candidate qualification, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. The profiles they sent were easy to review because each candidate came with a short explanation of their relevant experience, availability, and where they could fit into our delivery flow. The main deliverable was not just a list of candidates, but a working hiring pipeline that helped us add people to the team while keeping client projects moving.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us hire several specialists who supported development, QA, mobile, e-commerce, and SEO-related work. The new team members helped us take on more delivery tasks without stretching the existing team too thin. We were able to keep moving on client websites, web applications, mobile features, and testing work while the hiring process continued in parallel. One concrete improvement was the quality of time spent by our internal leads. Instead of reviewing broad and inconsistent applications, they were able to focus on people who already passed an initial relevance check. This made interviews more productive and reduced the amount of internal coordination required. It also helped us keep project planning more stable because we had a clearer view of who could join and when.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

 The cooperation was organized without feeling heavy. OnHires kept us updated on the search, but they did not turn the process into endless meetings. Most communication was practical: candidate status, feedback needed from us, interview scheduling, and next actions. When we changed priorities between roles, they handled it calmly. At one point, we needed to move the QA search forward faster because of upcoming releases, while another developer role became less urgent. Their team adjusted the pipeline and kept the right focus. They were responsive, consistent, and easy to coordinate with.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

 The most useful thing was how quickly they understood that our hiring needs were not limited to one technology stack. As a studio, we may work on WordPress one week, React or Flutter the next, and then switch to SEO or QA tasks depending on the client. OnHires paid attention to that variety and looked for people who could handle real project work, not just match a list of tools. They also understood that for us, communication and independence matter almost as much as technical skills. That made the shortlists more relevant.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

The collaboration worked well for us. One small improvement would be to include more examples of previous project types directly in the first candidate summaries. Since our projects vary a lot, it is helpful to immediately see whether someone has worked on e-commerce, dashboards, mobile apps, or business websites before. After we mentioned this, OnHires added more context to the profiles, and the review process became faster.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Department Head of NVCoding

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

 NVCoding provides software development, consulting, and tech team augmentation services for companies that need dedicated engineering specialists and scalable development support.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To add recruitment support for several engineering and delivery roles that were important for our team augmentation projects.
• To hire specialists who could work with external client teams and adapt to different development environments.
• To make our hiring process more predictable while we were managing several client requests at the same time.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We involved OnHires when our internal recruiting bandwidth was not enough to support several open roles in parallel.

The positions included a Senior .NET Developer, Angular Frontend Developer, Cloud Solutions Engineer, Technical Recruiter / Talent Partner, and Delivery Manager. These roles were connected to both our internal operations and client-facing team augmentation projects, so we needed candidates who were technically capable, independent, and comfortable working in distributed environments.

OnHires helped us clarify the requirements for each role before launching the search. They paid attention not only to technology stack, but also to communication style, ability to work with client teams, availability, and expected level of ownership.

Their team managed sourcing, first-stage screening, candidate communication, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. The shortlists were compact and practical, which helped us avoid spending time on profiles that looked relevant only on paper.

The cooperation gave us a more stable hiring flow and helped us move several roles forward without interrupting our delivery work.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us fill several roles across engineering, cloud, recruiting, and delivery coordination.

The new specialists strengthened our ability to support client projects and manage team extension requests more consistently. We were able to review candidates faster, involve our technical team only at the right stages, and keep several searches active at the same time.

A clear result was better control over the hiring pipeline. Instead of having disconnected candidate conversations, we had structured updates, clear candidate statuses, and a more organized interview flow.

This helped us reduce internal recruiting pressure and keep our client delivery commitments stable. 

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The process was steady and well-coordinated.

OnHires did not make the cooperation feel heavy. They kept us informed, asked for feedback at the right moments, and made it clear which candidates needed our attention.

When we needed to change the priority between technical roles and the Delivery Manager position, they adjusted the search order quickly. That flexibility mattered because our hiring priorities depended on incoming client needs.

They were responsive, organized, and comfortable to work with from the first stage to the final interviews. 

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What we appreciated most was their understanding of candidate context.

For our model, a strong developer is not always enough. The person also needs to be able to join an external team, communicate clearly, work with different processes, and represent our company well in a client environment.

OnHires considered those details during screening. They helped us focus on candidates who had the right mix of technical skills, maturity, and client-facing readiness. 

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

The cooperation met our expectations.

One thing that could make future projects even better would be adding a short availability and notice-period summary directly at the top of every candidate profile. This information was always provided, but having it highlighted immediately would make internal review even faster.

Other than that, the process was clear, professional, and effective. 

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the CEO of Equinox Dynamics LDA

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Equinox Dynamics is an AI SEO and GEO agency helping e-commerce and scaling brands grow organic visibility, improve technical SEO, build authority, and turn search traffic into revenue.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To hire sales specialists who could communicate the value of SEO, GEO, and organic growth services to international clients.
• To find a Sales Team Lead capable of building structure around our outbound and inbound sales process.
• To bring in a Project Manager who could help keep client delivery organized as our pipeline and active accounts were growing.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Online Search

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

 We worked with OnHires when we needed to add more structure to both our sales and delivery operations. At that stage, we were looking for three key hires: a Senior Sales Specialist, a Sales Team Lead, and a Project Manager. These roles were important for different reasons. The sales roles required people who could understand technical SEO, search visibility, lead generation, and long-term organic growth well enough to speak with business owners and decision-makers. The Project Manager role required someone who could keep internal tasks, client communication, timelines, and deliverables under control. OnHires helped us turn these needs into clear hiring profiles. They spent time understanding how we sell, what kind of clients we work with, what makes our service different, and what type of communication style would fit our team. Their team managed sourcing, first conversations with candidates, qualification, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. They did not simply forward CVs. They helped us understand why each candidate might be relevant, where the risks were, and which candidates were worth prioritizing. As a result, we were able to review a focused pipeline and move faster with candidates who matched the actual business context, not just the job title.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

 OnHires helped us hire a Senior Sales Specialist, a Sales Team Lead, and a Project Manager. These hires gave us more capacity in areas that were becoming increasingly important for the business: client acquisition, sales process ownership, and project coordination. The Senior Sales Specialist helped strengthen our client communication and prospecting activity. The Sales Team Lead brought more structure to how we qualify opportunities and move prospects through the funnel. The Project Manager helped improve internal coordination across SEO, content, technical tasks, and client updates. The biggest measurable improvement was that our leadership team spent less time managing every small sales or delivery step manually. We were able to delegate more, keep communication more organized, and handle a growing number of conversations and client tasks with better consistency.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

 The recruitment process was organized in a way that made decision-making easier for us. OnHires kept the communication clear and practical. They shared candidate updates, explained what they were seeing in the market, and followed up when our feedback was needed. We did not feel like we had to chase the process. What we appreciated most was that they adjusted the search based on real conversations, not only based on the original job description. For example, once we realized that the Sales Team Lead needed stronger process-building experience than we initially expected, they refined the search and brought candidates closer to that profile. They respected our time and kept the process moving without unnecessary complexity.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

OnHires was good at understanding the difference between hiring for an agency role and hiring for our business model. For sales, we did not need people who could only “sell marketing.” We needed people who could understand SEO as a long-term growth channel, explain value without overpromising, and speak with clients who care about revenue, rankings, technical issues, and visibility. For project management, we needed someone who could work with multiple moving parts: technical SEO, content, link building, reporting, and client expectations. OnHires paid attention to these differences, and that made the candidate selection more relevant.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

 The collaboration was positive overall. One thing that could make the process even stronger in the future would be to include a few more examples of candidate market feedback earlier in the search. For sales roles, it is useful to understand how candidates perceive the offer, compensation model, and growth opportunities before moving too far into interviews. That said, OnHires was responsive once we discussed this, and the overall process remained well-managed.