OnHires

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Co-founder of DestiLabs

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

DestiLabs builds agentic AI solutions for businesses, including custom AI agents, voicebots, chatbots, computer vision systems, and machine learning solutions that automate operations and scale business outcomes.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• Find AI engineering talent with practical experience in production-grade LLM and agentic AI systems.
• Hire a product manager who could translate business workflows into clear AI product requirements and delivery priorities.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• High ratings
• Referred to me

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires to hire two important roles for our AI delivery team: an AI Engineer and a Product Manager. The AI Engineer profile required more than general software development experience. We needed someone who understood LLM-based products, AI agents, integrations with business tools, prompt and workflow logic, evaluation of model outputs, and the practical realities of moving AI prototypes into reliable production systems. The Product Manager role was equally specific.

 OnHires supported the full hiring process: role calibration, talent mapping, sourcing, first-stage screening, candidate communication, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. Their team helped us separate candidates who only had surface-level AI exposure from those who had actually worked with AI products or complex technical systems.

The key deliverables were qualified shortlists for both roles, structured candidate notes, interview coordination, and hiring support until the final decision stage. Their work helped us move from a broad hiring idea to a much clearer and more manageable recruitment process. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us close two roles: an AI Engineer and a Product Manager. The AI Engineer strengthened our technical capacity around AI agents, integrations, and production-ready automation workflows. The Product Manager helped bring more structure to requirements, prioritization, and communication between business needs and technical execution. A meaningful result was the quality of the screening process. We did not spend time reviewing large numbers of candidates who only used AI as a buzzword. The candidates who reached our interviews had more relevant experience and were easier for our technical team to evaluate. The cooperation also reduced the amount of founder time spent on early sourcing and candidate filtering, which was important for us because our team was actively working on client AI systems at the same time. 

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

yes, everything was perfect, OnHires kept the process clear and lightweight. They gave us regular updates on the pipeline, explained where the market was strong or limited, and asked for feedback at the right points. When we realized that the AI Engineer role needed a stronger focus on agentic workflows and integrations, they adjusted the search direction quickly. For the Product Manager role, they also helped us refine what we really needed: not just a coordinator, but someone who could work with technical ambiguity and turn client problems into concrete product decisions. The process stayed organized, and communication was practical throughout the collaboration. 

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

OnHires did not approach the search as a simple keyword-matching task. For an AI company, this matters a lot. Many candidates mention LLMs, chatbots, or automation, but far fewer understand what it takes to build systems that work reliably with real users, real business processes, and changing client requirements. OnHires paid attention to that difference. They asked about our delivery model, our client work, the level of independence we expected, and how each hire would contribute to the team. Because of that, the conversations with candidates were more relevant from the beginning.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, the collaboration was positive and useful for us. One thing that could make future searches even stronger would be adding a short technical summary for each AI engineering candidate at the top of the profile, focused specifically on AI stack, integrations, model experience, and production exposure. The information was available in the profiles, but having it summarized upfront would make internal review even faster. Other than that, the team was responsive, thoughtful, and easy to work with.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Founder of BigTree108

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

BigTree108 is a Ukrainian software development company that builds and operates software for product companies in Europe and North America. Its services include .NET and Python development, front-end and mobile development, cloud and DevOps, QA and test automation, UI/UX design, Webflow and WordPress development, and dedicated teams.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• Hire a Python Developer with relevant backend engineering experience who could contribute to active software projects.
• Find a Node.js Developer capable of building and supporting reliable backend services and integrations.
• Add a designer who could support UI/UX work and collaborate effectively with developers, project stakeholders, and clients.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires to strengthen our delivery capacity by hiring three specialists: a Python Developer, a Node.js Developer, and a UI/UX Designer. The engineering roles required solid backend experience, an ability to work with existing systems and integrations, and clear communication within distributed product teams. For the design position, we needed someone who could create practical interfaces, work in Figma, and collaborate closely with developers.

OnHires supported the full recruitment process. Their team helped refine the requirements, sourced candidates, conducted initial screening, prepared focused shortlists, and coordinated interviews and feedback. Candidate profiles included useful context about technical experience, relevant projects, communication, and availability.

The engagement resulted in three successful hires who expanded our backend engineering and design capacity.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The primary outcome was the successful hiring of all three specialists: a Python Developer, a Node.js Developer, and a UI/UX Designer. The two engineers increased our backend delivery capacity across Python- and JavaScript-based work, while the designer strengthened collaboration between product, design, and engineering.

The shortlists were relevant and well filtered, which reduced the time our technical leads spent reviewing unsuitable profiles. OnHires handled sourcing and early-stage qualification, allowing our team to focus on technical interviews and final decisions. The new hires gave us additional capacity to support active client projects and distribute work more effectively.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The recruitment process was structured and easy to follow. OnHires provided regular updates, coordinated interviews efficiently, and kept us informed about candidate availability and next steps. When we clarified or adjusted a requirement, the team incorporated the feedback quickly and refined the search.

Communication was responsive and practical throughout the engagement. The team maintained momentum without creating unnecessary administrative work for us.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What stood out was their ability to work across both technical and creative roles within a single engagement. The requirements for a Python Developer, Node.js Developer, and UI/UX Designer were different, but the candidate profiles remained relevant across all three searches.

OnHires looked beyond keywords and considered project experience, communication style, and the ability to work in a distributed delivery environment. This made the interview process more focused and saved time for our internal team.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, we were satisfied with the collaboration. For future technical searches, a short market overview at the start, including candidate availability and compensation expectations for each stack, would make initial planning even easier. The team provided useful context during the process, but earlier visibility would be valuable.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the COO& Co-Founder of Yarandin

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Yarandin is an AI-first software development company that helps startups and SMBs build, integrate, and scale digital products. We provide custom software development, business process automation, SaaS development, system integrations, and AI-enabled solutions

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To expand our engineering capacity for several SaaS, AI, and business automation projects running in parallel.
• To hire a Senior Backend Developer, Node.js Developer, and Data Engineer with strong production experience in scalable systems, integrations, APIs, and data infrastructure
• To add a Technical Project Manager who could coordinate technical delivery, communicate with clients, and keep distributed teams aligned around scope, priorities, and timelines.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

• Online Search
• Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires to strengthen our engineering and delivery team while several client products and automation projects were moving forward at the same time. The positions included a Senior Backend Developer, Node.js Developer, Technical Project Manager, and Data Engineer. The engineering roles required experience with production-grade backend systems, APIs, third-party integrations, scalable architecture, and reliable data pipelines. For the Technical Project Manager role, we needed someone who could understand technical constraints, communicate clearly with clients, and coordinate delivery across backend, data, and product teams. OnHires helped us refine the role profiles, distinguish the must-have requirements from the preferred skills, source candidates, conduct initial screening, and coordinate interviews. Their candidate summaries gave us a concise view of each person’s technical background, relevant projects, motivation, availability, and expectations before we moved to the technical interview stage. The team collected feedback after each interview, adjusted the search when necessary, and supported the process through final selection, offer discussions, and onboarding. This allowed our technical leads to focus on architecture and final evaluation rather than spending time on early-stage sourcing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us successfully close all four positions: Senior Backend Developer, Node.js Developer, Technical Project Manager, and Data Engineer. The strongest result was the relevance of the shortlists. The backend and Node.js candidates had experience with real production systems and integrations, while the Data Engineer profiles were aligned with our need for dependable data infrastructure rather than only analytics experience. The new team members joined active projects and contributed to backend development, API integrations, data pipeline work, delivery planning, and client communication. This increased our capacity and helped us keep several product streams moving without compromising the quality of delivery. We also reduced the time our internal team spent on sourcing, initial screening, and interview coordination. Our leads could concentrate on the final technical assessment and selecting the strongest candidates.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The recruitment process was structured, transparent, and easy to follow. OnHires provided regular updates, coordinated interviews promptly, and kept the next steps clear. When our technical leads refined the requirements or gave feedback on a candidate, the team incorporated it into the next round of sourcing and returned with more targeted profiles. They were reliable with timelines and realistic about candidate availability and market conditions. Communication stayed practical throughout the engagement, which made it easy to manage four searches without unnecessary overhead.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What impressed us most was OnHires’ ability to understand the difference between candidates who know a technology and candidates who can use it effectively in a product delivery environment. They paid attention to architecture, integrations, data reliability, maintainability, and communication skills. This was important for us because our specialists work on products that need to scale, integrate with existing systems, and remain maintainable after launch. Their screening was especially useful across four different profiles. The candidate pipelines felt tailored to each role rather than built from the same generic technology checklist.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, we were satisfied with the collaboration. The Data Engineer search required additional calibration because candidates often had very different combinations of data platform, infrastructure, and analytics experience. A deeper alignment on the preferred data stack at the very beginning could have made the first shortlist even more precise. OnHires responded well to our feedback and adjusted the search quickly

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

 I am the VP of Strategic Partnerships of an information technology company 

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Ours is a digital product and web development studio that builds custom software, websites, mobile applications, SEO solutions, MVPs, and design systems for businesses worldwide. 

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To reinforce our production team with developers and QA specialists who could support several client projects at the same time.
• To find people who were comfortable working across practical business websites, custom web apps, e-commerce builds, and mobile interfaces.
• To add a structured hiring layer while our internal team stayed focused on project delivery, client communication, and launch deadlines.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

• Online Search
• Professional network

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We started working with OnHires when our project workload increased and we needed to expand the team without slowing down production. The search covered several roles: WordPress / WooCommerce Developer, React.js Frontend Developer, Flutter Developer, QA Engineer, and SEO Project Manager. These positions were important because our projects are very different from one another. Some clients need a fast and clean business website, others need an e-commerce setup, mobile app, dashboard, or more technical web application. OnHires first helped us narrow down what each role should actually cover. For example, for the WordPress / WooCommerce position, we needed someone who could work independently with themes, plugins, integrations, and performance issues. For the Flutter role, we needed mobile experience but also an understanding of business-focused apps. For QA, we wanted someone who could test websites and applications in a practical, release-oriented way. Their team took over sourcing, first conversations, candidate qualification, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. The profiles they sent were easy to review because each candidate came with a short explanation of their relevant experience, availability, and where they could fit into our delivery flow. The main deliverable was not just a list of candidates, but a working hiring pipeline that helped us add people to the team while keeping client projects moving.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us hire several specialists who supported development, QA, mobile, e-commerce, and SEO-related work. The new team members helped us take on more delivery tasks without stretching the existing team too thin. We were able to keep moving on client websites, web applications, mobile features, and testing work while the hiring process continued in parallel. One concrete improvement was the quality of time spent by our internal leads. Instead of reviewing broad and inconsistent applications, they were able to focus on people who already passed an initial relevance check. This made interviews more productive and reduced the amount of internal coordination required. It also helped us keep project planning more stable because we had a clearer view of who could join and when.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

 The cooperation was organized without feeling heavy. OnHires kept us updated on the search, but they did not turn the process into endless meetings. Most communication was practical: candidate status, feedback needed from us, interview scheduling, and next actions. When we changed priorities between roles, they handled it calmly. At one point, we needed to move the QA search forward faster because of upcoming releases, while another developer role became less urgent. Their team adjusted the pipeline and kept the right focus. They were responsive, consistent, and easy to coordinate with.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

 The most useful thing was how quickly they understood that our hiring needs were not limited to one technology stack. As a studio, we may work on WordPress one week, React or Flutter the next, and then switch to SEO or QA tasks depending on the client. OnHires paid attention to that variety and looked for people who could handle real project work, not just match a list of tools. They also understood that for us, communication and independence matter almost as much as technical skills. That made the shortlists more relevant.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

The collaboration worked well for us. One small improvement would be to include more examples of previous project types directly in the first candidate summaries. Since our projects vary a lot, it is helpful to immediately see whether someone has worked on e-commerce, dashboards, mobile apps, or business websites before. After we mentioned this, OnHires added more context to the profiles, and the review process became faster.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Department Head of NVCoding

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

 NVCoding provides software development, consulting, and tech team augmentation services for companies that need dedicated engineering specialists and scalable development support.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To add recruitment support for several engineering and delivery roles that were important for our team augmentation projects.
• To hire specialists who could work with external client teams and adapt to different development environments.
• To make our hiring process more predictable while we were managing several client requests at the same time.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Referral

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We involved OnHires when our internal recruiting bandwidth was not enough to support several open roles in parallel.

The positions included a Senior .NET Developer, Angular Frontend Developer, Cloud Solutions Engineer, Technical Recruiter / Talent Partner, and Delivery Manager. These roles were connected to both our internal operations and client-facing team augmentation projects, so we needed candidates who were technically capable, independent, and comfortable working in distributed environments.

OnHires helped us clarify the requirements for each role before launching the search. They paid attention not only to technology stack, but also to communication style, ability to work with client teams, availability, and expected level of ownership.

Their team managed sourcing, first-stage screening, candidate communication, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. The shortlists were compact and practical, which helped us avoid spending time on profiles that looked relevant only on paper.

The cooperation gave us a more stable hiring flow and helped us move several roles forward without interrupting our delivery work.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us fill several roles across engineering, cloud, recruiting, and delivery coordination.

The new specialists strengthened our ability to support client projects and manage team extension requests more consistently. We were able to review candidates faster, involve our technical team only at the right stages, and keep several searches active at the same time.

A clear result was better control over the hiring pipeline. Instead of having disconnected candidate conversations, we had structured updates, clear candidate statuses, and a more organized interview flow.

This helped us reduce internal recruiting pressure and keep our client delivery commitments stable. 

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The process was steady and well-coordinated.

OnHires did not make the cooperation feel heavy. They kept us informed, asked for feedback at the right moments, and made it clear which candidates needed our attention.

When we needed to change the priority between technical roles and the Delivery Manager position, they adjusted the search order quickly. That flexibility mattered because our hiring priorities depended on incoming client needs.

They were responsive, organized, and comfortable to work with from the first stage to the final interviews. 

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What we appreciated most was their understanding of candidate context.

For our model, a strong developer is not always enough. The person also needs to be able to join an external team, communicate clearly, work with different processes, and represent our company well in a client environment.

OnHires considered those details during screening. They helped us focus on candidates who had the right mix of technical skills, maturity, and client-facing readiness. 

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

The cooperation met our expectations.

One thing that could make future projects even better would be adding a short availability and notice-period summary directly at the top of every candidate profile. This information was always provided, but having it highlighted immediately would make internal review even faster.

Other than that, the process was clear, professional, and effective. 

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the CEO of Equinox Dynamics LDA

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Equinox Dynamics is an AI SEO and GEO agency helping e-commerce and scaling brands grow organic visibility, improve technical SEO, build authority, and turn search traffic into revenue.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To hire sales specialists who could communicate the value of SEO, GEO, and organic growth services to international clients.
• To find a Sales Team Lead capable of building structure around our outbound and inbound sales process.
• To bring in a Project Manager who could help keep client delivery organized as our pipeline and active accounts were growing.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Online Search

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

 We worked with OnHires when we needed to add more structure to both our sales and delivery operations. At that stage, we were looking for three key hires: a Senior Sales Specialist, a Sales Team Lead, and a Project Manager. These roles were important for different reasons. The sales roles required people who could understand technical SEO, search visibility, lead generation, and long-term organic growth well enough to speak with business owners and decision-makers. The Project Manager role required someone who could keep internal tasks, client communication, timelines, and deliverables under control. OnHires helped us turn these needs into clear hiring profiles. They spent time understanding how we sell, what kind of clients we work with, what makes our service different, and what type of communication style would fit our team. Their team managed sourcing, first conversations with candidates, qualification, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. They did not simply forward CVs. They helped us understand why each candidate might be relevant, where the risks were, and which candidates were worth prioritizing. As a result, we were able to review a focused pipeline and move faster with candidates who matched the actual business context, not just the job title.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

 OnHires helped us hire a Senior Sales Specialist, a Sales Team Lead, and a Project Manager. These hires gave us more capacity in areas that were becoming increasingly important for the business: client acquisition, sales process ownership, and project coordination. The Senior Sales Specialist helped strengthen our client communication and prospecting activity. The Sales Team Lead brought more structure to how we qualify opportunities and move prospects through the funnel. The Project Manager helped improve internal coordination across SEO, content, technical tasks, and client updates. The biggest measurable improvement was that our leadership team spent less time managing every small sales or delivery step manually. We were able to delegate more, keep communication more organized, and handle a growing number of conversations and client tasks with better consistency.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

 The recruitment process was organized in a way that made decision-making easier for us. OnHires kept the communication clear and practical. They shared candidate updates, explained what they were seeing in the market, and followed up when our feedback was needed. We did not feel like we had to chase the process. What we appreciated most was that they adjusted the search based on real conversations, not only based on the original job description. For example, once we realized that the Sales Team Lead needed stronger process-building experience than we initially expected, they refined the search and brought candidates closer to that profile. They respected our time and kept the process moving without unnecessary complexity.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

OnHires was good at understanding the difference between hiring for an agency role and hiring for our business model. For sales, we did not need people who could only “sell marketing.” We needed people who could understand SEO as a long-term growth channel, explain value without overpromising, and speak with clients who care about revenue, rankings, technical issues, and visibility. For project management, we needed someone who could work with multiple moving parts: technical SEO, content, link building, reporting, and client expectations. OnHires paid attention to these differences, and that made the candidate selection more relevant.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

 The collaboration was positive overall. One thing that could make the process even stronger in the future would be to include a few more examples of candidate market feedback earlier in the search. For sales roles, it is useful to understand how candidates perceive the offer, compensation model, and growth opportunities before moving too far into interviews. That said, OnHires was responsive once we discussed this, and the overall process remained well-managed.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the CEO of Coding House Studio LLC

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Coding House helps advertising agencies and small to mid-size businesses launch focused, production-ready MVPs across web, mobile, AI, health tech, edtech, and e-commerce.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To add technical hiring support while our internal team was focused on active MVP builds and client delivery.
• To find developers and product-minded engineers who could work in short delivery cycles and contribute quickly.
• To hire people with experience across mobile development, cloud infrastructure, AI-enabled products, and full-stack web applications.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

Online Search

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

OnHires helped us hire a Flutter Developer, AI Product Engineer, Full-Stack MVP Developer, Cloud / AWS Engineer, and Technical Project Coordinator. These roles were important because our work often requires people who can move quickly, make practical technical decisions, and understand the balance between speed, product quality, and budget. The OnHires team helped us define what “good fit” meant for each role. For some positions, we needed strong execution skills. For others, we needed people who could ask product questions, communicate with clients, and avoid overbuilding features that were not necessary for an MVP. They supported sourcing, first-round screening, candidate communication, shortlist preparation, and interview coordination. The candidate summaries were clear and useful, especially because they highlighted not only technical skills but also delivery style, communication, and availability. Their involvement helped us keep hiring active without distracting our core team from client work.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

 OnHires helped us hire several specialists who became involved in mobile, AI, cloud, and full-stack product work. The main result was that we were able to keep delivery moving while filling roles in the background. The new hires contributed to MVP builds, technical planning, implementation, and project coordination. This gave us more flexibility when client requests changed or when several projects needed attention at the same time. We also spent less time sorting through candidates who looked good on paper but were not suited for MVP-style work. The shortlists were more focused, and our technical team could spend time on meaningful interviews instead of basic screening.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

 Working with OnHires felt lightweight and organized. They did not turn the hiring process into something overly formal or slow. We had clear updates, quick follow-ups, and practical conversations about what was working in the market. When we changed the priority of one role because a client project shifted, they adjusted the search without making it complicated. That was important for us because our hiring needs can change quickly depending on project timelines. They kept the process moving and made it easy for us to stay involved only where needed.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

They understood that for us, hiring is not just about matching a tech stack. In an MVP environment, a developer has to make decisions with limited time, avoid unnecessary complexity, and still build something reliable enough for real users. OnHires paid attention to that mindset when screening candidates. The profiles they sent felt closer to people who could actually work in our delivery model, not just people who had the right tools listed in their CV.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, we were happy with the cooperation. If we had to mention one thing, it would be helpful to receive more candidate availability details even earlier in the process, especially for roles where start date matters. Once we discussed this, the team added more context to the profiles and the process became even smoother. It was a small adjustment rather than a real issue.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Product Lead of a mobile app development company.

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Mobile App Development

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To find mobile development specialists who could support our cross-platform app projects.
• To hire candidates with practical experience in React Native, Flutter, mobile QA, UI/UX, and backend services for mobile products.
• To reduce the amount of time our internal team spent on sourcing and early candidate filtering.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

• Online Search
• Professional Network

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We worked with OnHires to hire several specialists for mobile application projects.

The roles included a React Native Developer, Flutter Developer, Mobile QA Engineer, UI/UX Designer, and Backend Developer for mobile APIs. Each role had slightly different requirements, but all of them were connected to real product delivery: building mobile interfaces, testing app functionality, supporting backend logic, and improving the overall user experience.

OnHires helped us define the hiring criteria before starting the search. They clarified what level of independence we expected from candidates, what experience was important for mobile app projects, and which skills were nice to have rather than mandatory.

Their team then handled candidate sourcing, first-stage screening, interview coordination, and communication with candidates. The profiles they shared were concise and easy to evaluate, which helped our team review candidates without spending too much time on early filtering.

The main deliverable was a qualified pipeline of mobile and product specialists, several of whom progressed through our interview process and joined our project teams. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

OnHires helped us build a stronger pipeline for mobile development and product-related roles.

The candidates they presented were relevant to the app development work we had planned. We were able to move faster from initial review to technical interviews because the profiles already matched the key requirements for cross-platform mobile projects.

The hired specialists contributed to mobile development, interface design, QA, and backend support. This helped us distribute workload across the team more effectively and keep several app projects moving without delays.

We also saved internal time because our project leads were involved mainly at the evaluation stage, not during the entire sourcing process. 

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

OnHires kept the process structured but not overloaded.

We received candidate updates, short summaries, and clear next steps throughout the collaboration. When we needed to change the emphasis from one mobile stack to another, they adjusted the search direction and candidate pipeline accordingly.

They were responsive in communication and realistic about what could be delivered within each stage of the search. That helped us plan interviews and make decisions without unnecessary delays. 

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

The most valuable part was OnHires' attention to the mobile product context.

They did not evaluate candidates only by technologies listed in a CV. They also looked at whether a person had experience working with app releases, mobile UX constraints, testing across devices, and coordination with product or design teams.

That made the candidate shortlists more useful for our team and reduced the number of interviews that were clearly not the right fit. 

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

The collaboration was positive overall.

One thing that could make future searches even more efficient would be adding a short written comparison between final-stage candidates, especially when several people are close in skill level. It would help internal stakeholders make decisions faster.

That said, the recruitment process itself was well-managed, and we were satisfied with the results. 

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the CMO of ZentixSoft

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

A forward-thinking company specializing in Mobile and Web development services, catering to a diverse clientele, including established businesses, innovative startups, and individual clients.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To find specialists who could work in client-facing delivery environments and adapt quickly to different product contexts.
• To add recruiting support for roles that required a mix of technical depth, ownership, and clear communication.
• To expand our engineering capacity for several active AI, web, and mobile development projects.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

• Referral
• Clutch Site

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• High ratings
• Good value for cost
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We involved OnHires when our internal hiring load started growing faster than expected. At that time, we needed to cover several different profiles: an AI/ML Engineer, Data Engineer, React Native Developer, Laravel / PHP Backend Developer, and Technical Delivery Coordinator. The challenge was not only to find people with the right technical background, but also to identify candidates who could work in a service-based environment, communicate clearly with project teams, and switch between client requirements without losing structure. OnHires helped us break down each position into practical hiring criteria. They supported the search process, handled the first candidate conversations, prepared shortlists, and coordinated interviews with our internal team. What made the process useful for us was the way they filtered candidates before sending them over. The profiles were not just technically relevant; they also included context around availability, motivation, communication style, and the kind of projects each person would fit best. Their work gave our team more room to focus on delivery while keeping hiring active in the background.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The cooperation helped us hire several people across engineering, data, mobile, and delivery-related roles. The biggest improvement for us was consistency in the hiring pipeline. Before working with OnHires, some searches moved quickly while others slowed down because our team did not always have time to keep sourcing active. OnHires helped keep momentum across all open roles. The hired specialists joined active projects and supported work related to AI development, backend architecture, mobile delivery, and client coordination. This helped us reduce hiring pressure internally and keep project staffing more predictable. We also spent less time on early-stage screening, because the candidates we received were already closer to our actual expectations.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The collaboration was practical and well-paced. OnHires did not overload us with unnecessary calls or long status reports. Instead, they kept the process focused: who was in the pipeline, what feedback was needed, and what should happen next. When one of the roles became less urgent on our side, they shifted attention to the positions that mattered most at that moment. That flexibility was helpful because our priorities changed depending on project timelines. Overall, they were responsive, organized, and easy to coordinate with.

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

OnHires' strongest point was how they approached candidate fit. For us, hiring is not only about matching a technology stack. A candidate can know React Native, Laravel, or AI tools, but still not be the right person for a client-facing development team. OnHires understood that distinction and paid attention to how people communicate, how independent they are, and whether they can work in changing project environments. That made the shortlists more useful and reduced the number of interviews that felt like a poor match.

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

Overall, the experience was positive. One thing that could be improved is adding even more market insight at the beginning of each search, especially around salary expectations and candidate availability for niche technical roles. The recruitment itself was handled well, but earlier market calibration would have helped us make a few decisions faster. That said, the team was open to feedback and adjusted the process quickly once we discussed it.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Co-Founder of a cybersecurity app company.

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

We offer an online cybersecurity app that helps users detect and prevent digital threats via scam calls and scam sms blocking, databrokers removals and darkweb monitoring.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire OnHires to accomplish?

• To support us with targeted executive and senior-level hiring for product, payments, and technology leadership roles.
• To identify candidates from a specific ecosystem who had relevant experience in scaling digital products, payments, and operational infrastructure.
• To build a focused candidate pipeline for hard-to-reach profiles instead of relying only on broad market sourcing.

SOLUTION

How did you find OnHires?

• Referral
• Network

Why did you select OnHires over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from OnHires were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We engaged OnHires to support us with a focused executive search project for several senior roles connected to product growth, payments, and technology leadership.

The initial roles included a Head of Payments and Product Marketing Manager. Later, we also added a CTO search.

The main requirement was to source candidates specifically from a specific ecosystem, because we were looking for people with relevant product, fintech, payments, and scaling experience.

OnHires helped us clarify the role requirements, define the target candidate profile, research the market, and approach relevant specialists directly. 

Their team prepared candidate pipelines, handled initial outreach, screened interested candidates, and shared recommendations with context.

One of the strongest results so far was the recommendation of a Head of Payments candidate who matched our expectations well and with whom we decided to move forward in the process.

For the Product Marketing Manager role, they also built a pipeline of relevant candidates, although the process slowed down due to market conditions and response rates within the target ecosystem.

The collaboration is still ongoing, and OnHires is now supporting us with the CTO role as well. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The most valuable outcome so far has been the quality and relevance of the candidate pipeline.

OnHires helped us reach candidates from a specific ecosystem, which was important for this project.

They recommended a strong Head of Payments candidate who fit our expectations and moved forward in our hiring process.

For the Product Marketing Manager role, they also generated a relevant pipeline, though the process required more time due to the specific market situation and lower response rates from some target candidates.

Overall, their work helped us validate the market, understand candidate availability, and move forward with stronger confidence on senior hiring decisions. 

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The process has been transparent and easy to follow. OnHires kept us informed about pipeline progress, candidate responses, and market feedback.

They were honest when a role required more time or when response rates were lower than expected, which helped us adjust expectations and priorities.

They also adapted quickly when we added the CTO role and shifted part of the search toward a new senior technical profile.

Communication has been direct, practical, and consistent throughout the collaboration. 

What was your primary form of communication with OnHires?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What stood out was their ability to work with a very specific sourcing request. We were not looking for a broad list of candidates from the open market.

We needed people from a particular ecosystem, with relevant experience and a strong understanding of product, payments, and growth environments.

OnHires approached the search carefully and did not overpromise.

They gave us realistic feedback, showed where the market was responsive, and helped us focus on candidates who were actually worth reviewing. 

Are there any areas for improvement or something OnHires could have done differently?

The collaboration has been positive so far. The only area that could be improved is speed in cases where the target candidate pool is very narrow.

However, this was partly connected to the specific ecosystem we wanted to target and external market conditions.

OnHires stayed transparent about this and continued adjusting the search, so overall we are satisfied with the cooperation.