Cyberk

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the partnerships manager of Aiptos.fun, a fair-launch token platform that lets anyone create, trade, and discover new tokens on a bonding curve with instant liquidity and creator incentives.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for your fair-launch token platform?

We hired Cyberk to design and build the core fair-launch infrastructure, covering the bonding curve trading system, token creation logic, fee mechanics, and seamless integration with Hyperion Swap to enable a secure, instant-liquidity token launch experience.

SOLUTION

Can you describe the scope of work Cyberk handled for your project at Aiptos.fun? Please include the main deliverables if you can.

Cyberk handled the end-to-end development of Aiptos.fun, covering both the core protocol and user-facing platform. The main deliverables included a token creation system, bonding curve trading engine, fee and reward mechanics, backend services and APIs, and a frontend platform (web app). Cyberk built the core protocol and trading infrastructure from scratch, including the token creation logic and fair-launch mechanics, the bonding curve engine for pricing and instant liquidity, the fee and creator reward system, and the migration flow from bonding curve to Hyperion.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through an online search and a referral. We chose them because their pricing fit our budget, they offered good value for the cost, and they were referred to me.

How much have you invested with them?

The project cost is confidential.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from June–July 2025.

How many people from the service provider's team were involved in the project?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you communicate?

We used virtual meetings and email or messaging apps.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from your project with Cyberk that showed progress or success for Aiptos.fun?

Cyberk launched the MVP in under 30 days. We created 1,000+ tokens within the first weeks and executed 50,000+ trades on the bonding curve. We tracked several core KPIs to evaluate performance and growth, including the number of tokens created (daily/weekly), trading volume and number of trades on the bonding curve, and active users (DAU/WAU).We saw several strong early trends: token creation grew rapidly, with daily launches increasing week over week as awareness spread. Trading volume and activity scaled quickly, with more repeat traders entering after the first week. User retention improved, driven by creators returning to launch multiple tokens.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was structured, responsive, and execution-focused. They delivered on time, even while handling evolving requirements and ensuring the platform remained stable under real user activity.

What did you find most impressive or unique about them?

Cyberk moved fast enough to help us catch the market trend at the right time, which was critical for a token launch platform.

Are there any areas they could improve?

We were very satisfied with Cyberk’s delivery and overall execution.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm a product manager at Visible Brands, an advertising and marketing company. We help companies track, analyze, and improve how they are cited and recommended across AI platforms and search systems.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for Visible Brands?

We hired Cyberk to build the core platform for Visible Brands, including the development of the data pipeline, AI analysis engine, and dashboard needed to track, analyze, and optimize how brands are cited across AI systems.

SOLUTION

Can you describe the scope of their involvement in this project?

Cyberk handled the full technical build of Visible Brands, from data infrastructure to the user-facing product. The main deliverables included an AI analysis engine, backend APIs and processing layer, and dashboard and UI. Overall, Cyberk delivered a complete MVP of Visible Brands as an AI-powered visibility intelligence platform ready for real-world usage.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through an online search and a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings, their pricing fit our budget, they had a great culture fit, and they were referred to me.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from September–October 2025.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered the MVP in under 30 days. They also delivered 10,000+ brand mentions indexed and analyzed in the initial datasets, 95%+ accuracy in citation detection and attribution, less than 2-second dashboard load time for real-time insights, and 20+ brands onboarded during early testing.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk's project management was highly responsive and well-structured. They delivered on time, even with multiple change requests and evolving requirements throughout the project. We primarily communicated through virtual meetings and emails or messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

What stood out most was their ability to adapt quickly. Cyberk handled changing requirements smoothly while still maintaining speed and quality in delivery.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, we were fully satisfied.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the co-founder of Fluxion Quest, a contribution platform that replaces click-farm quests with verifiable, skill-based participation. We let users earn real value by training AI agents, validating DePIN networks, or stress-testing advanced Web3 infrastructure.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for your contribution platform?

We hired Cyberk to design and build the core Fluxion Quest platform. They needed to create the full contribution engine, verification logic, and UX needed to support skill-based, verifiable tasks across AI agents, DePIN networks, and advanced Web3 protocols.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk handled the end-to-end build of Fluxion Quest, covering both the platform logic and the user-facing experience. The main deliverables included:

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through a referral and the Clutch site. We chose them because they offered good value for the cost.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from January–February 2025.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered clear, measurable results that showed real progress. We launched the MVP in 27 days, covering the contribution engine, verification layer, APIs, and frontend. We also processed 3,200+ verified contributions during pilot campaigns. The verification accuracy was >99% across AI, DePIN, and protocol-testing tasks. We onboarded 12 partner campaigns in the first month. User retention was +45% compared to traditional quest-style flows. We measured retention by tracking returning users across contribution cycles, not just single-session activity. Specifically, we compared traditional quest-style pilots (follow/retweet, one-off tasks) vs. Fluxion Quest pilots built by Cyberk using verifiable, skill-based contributions. The metric we used was the 7-day and 14-day return rate. A user was counted as “retained” if they returned to complete at least one additional contribution after their first verified task. Moreover, every submitted contribution (AI training input, DePIN validation, protocol interaction) generated a pass/fail result with detailed reason codes. We tracked mismatches between expected proofs (on-chain events, data hashes, activity signatures) and actual submissions. Fewer than 1% of submissions triggered verification errors or false positives. For quality control, we manually reviewed a random sample (~8–10%) of verified contributions across different task types. These audits checked whether the system-approved submissions genuinely met the task criteria. The manual review confirmed alignment with automated results in virtually all cases.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was very structured and execution-focused, with clear milestones, fast feedback loops, and transparent progress tracking. They delivered on time — the Fluxion Quest MVP was completed within the planned timeline and launched as scheduled. We communicated through virtualk meetings, email, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive or unique about them?

Their time management was outstanding. Cyberk planned work efficiently, prioritized the right tasks, and consistently delivered without delays.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, everything was perfect.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m a project manager at Cypherus Capital, an IT company. We’re a decentralized “Know Your Agent” protocol that assigns on-chain credit scores to AI agents, enabling secure under-collateralized lending and reputation-based finance in the agent economy.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for your business?

We hired Cyberk to design and build our core infrastructure, including the CypherID identity standard, on-chain credit scoring contracts, ZK-based reputation verification, and the backend APIs and dashboards needed to make Cypherus a functional credit layer for AI agents.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk handled the full technical and product scope for Cypherus, from protocol architecture to the operational platform. The main deliverables included:Additionally, Cyberk developed the backend APIs and dashboards in-house.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through an online search, a referral, and the Clutch site. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings, good value for cost, and were referred to me.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent around $100,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from April–May 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We delivered the MVP in under 30 days, covering CypherID, the scoring engine, APIs, and dashboards. We also onboarded 1,500+ simulated AI agents and issued CypherID identities in test environments. Moreover, we achieved 99.7% accuracy in credit score updates across staged trading and liquidation scenarios. Finally, we had less than 2-second latency for credit score queries via the API, meeting DeFi integration requirements.We tracked several clear KPIs to measure real adoption and performance after launch. For example, active agents with CypherID (weekly/monthly growth) grew from 120 to 680+ agents in the first four weeks (~5.6x growth).Moreover, credit score queries increased from ~3,500 to 21,000+ API calls/week, driven by DeFi protocol testing. Integration partners also expanded from three to nine protocols in sandbox or pilot mode. Finally, average API latency stabilized at ~1.3 seconds, well below the 2-second target.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was highly structured and efficient. They worked with clear milestones, weekly sprints, and transparent reporting, which made it easy for us to track progress and adjust priorities. Moreover, they delivered on time — the Cypherus MVP was completed within the planned timeline, with all core modules.Our primary form of communication was virtual meetings and emails or messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive or unique about them?

What impressed us most was Cyberk’s ability to handle extremely complex Web3 and AI-agent concepts and turn them into a working product very quickly. They combined deep protocol knowledge with strong execution speed.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, overall, we were very satisfied with Cyberk’s delivery and collaboration. The project met our expectations in terms of speed, quality, and technical depth.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the product owner of Apex Layer, a financial services company. We tokenize physical gold held in Singapore and Hong Kong into a compliant, ultra-fast on-chain asset that lets institutions unlock liquidity, collateralize, and settle globally in real-time without selling their gold.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for Apex Layer Investment?

We hired Cyberk to design and build the core Apex Layer infrastructure. We wanted to launch a production-ready platform for real-time liquidity, lending, and cross-border settlement backed by physical gold.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk handled the end-to-end technical scope for Apex Layer, delivering both the protocol foundation and the institutional product stack. The main deliverables included:
$APXG token protocol on Solana
Implemented the gold-backed token using SPL Token-2022, including mint/burn logic, supply controls, and upgrade paths.

Compliance & permissioning layer
Built transfer hooks and whitelist enforcement so every transaction checks KYC status before execution, making the token safe for institutional use.

Privacy features
Designed and integrated confidential transfer mechanisms to mask transaction amounts while preserving on-chain validity, meeting institutional privacy expectations.

In addition to the above, Cyberk also developed the institutional dashboards and APIs.

What is the team composition?

We worked with three teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through an online search and a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings, their pricing fit our budget, and they offered good value for the cost.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent around $50,000–$200,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from May–June 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered the MVP in under 30 days. The $APXG token is now live on Solana with compliance hooks. Moreover, we have a 99%+ transaction success rate in test runs.We also track a small set of practical KPIs post-launch, including active institutional wallets using $APXG, mint/redeem volume per week, average settlement time (consistently sub-second), and collateral usage rate in lending pilots. We haven’t encountered any challenges or issues with these KPIs; everything has gone smoothly.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was highly structured and reliable, with clear milestones and proactive communication throughout the build. We primarily communicated through virtual meetings and emails or messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Cyberk’s prior experience in building similar institutional-grade Web3 systems was impressive — they clearly knew what they were doing from day one.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, they were good.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the growth manager of Zoned Protocol, an AI-powered wealth management platform that autonomously tracks, optimizes, and protects crypto portfolios across chains using smart accounts and real-time on-chain intelligence.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for Zoned Protocol?

We hired Cyberk to build the core technical foundation of Zoned Protocol, including designing and implementing the multi-chain portfolio platform, AI agent execution layer, smart account infrastructure, and backend systems needed to turn on-chain data into actionable, automated wealth management.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk handled all the technical build for Zoned Protocol, covering both user-facing products and the underlying automation infrastructure. The main deliverables included:

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through a referral. We chose them because their pricing fit our budget and offered good value for the cost.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent $20,000 with Cyberk.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked with Cyberk from October–November 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered clear, measurable results that showed real progress toward a functioning AI-powered wealth management platform. We set clear KPIs at the beginning so success could be measured objectively, and Cyberk met or exceeded all of them:

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was very professional. They worked with clear sprint plans, frequent progress updates, and fast feedback loops, which kept the project moving smoothly. We communicated via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

We were most impressed by Cyberk’s work ethic. They consistently worked hard, stayed highly committed, and went the extra mile to get things done right and on time.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, we were fully satisfied.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm a product owner at Terra Block, a Singapore-based digital banking platform for DAOs and Web3 companies. We unify multisig treasury management, automated crypto-to-fiat payroll and tax payments, and instant access to yield-bearing tokenized U.S. Treasuries into a single compliant neobank interface.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Cyberk?

We needed to build our platform end-to-end as a compliant digital banking platform for DAOs. We wanted to launch quickly in Singapore with a production-ready product.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk has developed our platform, including the multisig treasury layer, automated crypto-to-fiat payroll and tax workflows, tokenized U.S. Treasury yield integration, and the full frontend dashboard. The team has delivered the core product stack for TerraBlock, not just isolated components. Specifically, they've completed:

• Frontend dashboard: the full treasury UI covering multi-chain asset views, transaction categorization, cash-flow analytics, payroll configuration, and reporting exports.
• Treasury & multisig layer: integration with non-custodial multisig wallets, including account-abstraction features like session keys and role-based permissions.
• Auto-Tax Off-ramp engine: logic to automatically convert a defined percentage of outgoing crypto payments into fiat and route it into segregated tax sub-accounts.
• RWA yield automation: the “Idle-to-Earn” sweep module that moves excess stablecoin balances into tokenized U.S. Treasuries with instant redemption support.

What is the team composition?

We've worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through an online search and a referral. We chose them over other options because they offered good value for the cost.

How much have you invested with them?

We've spent around $50,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from February–March 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk has delivered an MVP in 28 days, covering the full dashboard, treasury automation, Auto-Tax Off-ramp, and RWA yield modules. We've seen efficiency gains, reducing manual treasury and tax-prep workload by ~65% compared to spreadsheet-based workflows. We measured this by tracking the time our ops and finance team spent on core treasury tasks before and after using TerraBlock.

Before Cyberk's solution, tasks like categorizing transactions, preparing payroll splits, calculating tax reserves, and reconciling wallets took roughly 10–12 hours per week per DAO treasury operator. After switching to the automated dashboard, Auto-Tax Off-ramp, and reporting modules that Cyberk has built, the same workflow takes about 3–4 hours per week.

Moreover, we've validated the yield of the “Idle-to-Earn” module, which successfully routes excess stablecoins into tokenized T-Bills, achieving 4–5% simulated APY with instant redemption. We've run controlled pilot simulations using historical on-chain data and live testnet pricing feeds to validate the “Idle-to-Earn” logic that Cyberk has built.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk's project management is highly organized and transparent, with clear sprint plans, frequent progress updates, and quick turnaround on feedback. The team has delivered on time — the full TerraBlock MVP was completed within the original four-week timeline. We communicate via virtual meetings and email or messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

I was impressed by Cyberk's dedication; they consistently went above and beyond, even working overtime when needed to ensure the project stays on track.

Are there any areas they could improve?

Sometimes their pace is so fast that we have to adjust our internal process to keep up.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the COO of Swipechain, an IT company. We allow individuals to monetize their unused internet bandwidth by transforming their devices into secure exit nodes.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for Swipechain Solutions?

We hired Cyberk to design and build Swipechain as a real decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) protocol, covering the on-chain $SWIPE token, staking and slashing logic, proof-of-connectivity (PoC) verification, and the core networking architecture.

SOLUTION

Can you describe the scope of work Cyberk handled for this project?

Cyberk handled the full technical scope to bring Swipechain from concept to working prototype. Their main deliverables included:

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings and good value for cost.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from July–August 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

The project delivered strong, measurable results that proved Swipechain could work as a real DePIN network:We set KPIs at the start of the project to measure these outcomes:Cyberk met or exceeded every benchmark, giving us confidence that Swipechain’s privacy and incentive model can scale.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

They delivered on time (we hit the MVP target in under 30 days) and kept the project moving smoothly even as we refined requirements during development. We communicated via virtual meetings and email or messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive or unique about them?

Cyberk turned a complex DePIN privacy network into a working system in weeks; that’s very impressive!

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, there wasn’t anything.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm the co-founder of Stone Reserve Group, an IT company. We build a DePIN protocol that verifies and tokenizes real-world renewable energy usage into on-chain carbon credits for Bitcoin miners and AI data centers.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Cyberk?

We needed help turning Stone Reserve from a concept into a real, buildable DePIN protocol.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk designed the Lithos Node architecture for tamper-proof energy data capture and built the blockchain layer for ZK-verified energy telemetry. The team handled the full end-to-end scope for Stone Reserve, covering hardware architecture, data verification, on-chain tokenization, and the carbon credit marketplace. Their main deliverables included Lithos Node architecture and firmware design, energy telemetry ingestion pipeline, and ZK-based verification framework.Moreover, Cyberk developed the blockchain smart contracts for governance, validator staking, and carbon credit minting. The team also built the user-facing marketplace foundation where verified carbon credits can be viewed, traded, and audited. Their work went beyond backend systems — they delivered the on-chain protocol layer, the data-verification pipeline, and the frontend components needed to make the marketplace usable by miners, data-center operators, and ESG partners.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 6-10 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through an online search and a referral. We chose them over other options because they had a great culture fit, good value for cost, and were referred to me.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent $50,000 to $199,999.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from July–August 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Our collaboration with Cyberk produced clear, measurable outcomes that validated Stone Reserve as a real on-chain carbon credit protocol. Cyberk delivered the MVP architecture in 28 days, covering Lithos Node firmware design, energy telemetry pipeline, ZK verification flow, smart contracts, and marketplace foundation.

Moreover, the team validated the tokenization logic by successfully minting 5,200+ $vCARB credits in the testnet, each representing 1 MWh of verified renewable energy.We tracked a focused set of KPIs to validate both the ZK verification layer and the carbon credit marketplace. For the ZK verification KPIs, we measured the proof generation time, which was a median of 1.3 seconds and a 95th percentile of 1.9 seconds per energy batch. We also measured the data integrity rate, which was a 100% match between off-chain telemetry batches and on-chain minted $vCARB tokens during test runs.

For the marketplace KPIs, we measured the credit mint-to-list latency, which was a median of 3.2 seconds from verified proof to tradable $vCARB token. We also measured the settlement finality, which was an average on-chain settlement under 12 seconds per trade. Lastly, we measured the audit traceability, which was 100% of credits traceable back to the original device and timestamp in the audit logs.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk's project management was disciplined and highly reliable. They worked in clear sprints, communicated progress transparently, and flagged risks early instead of reacting late. We mainly communicated via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

What impressed us most was Cyberk's ability to handle an unusually complex stack: hardware abstraction, DePIN networking, ZK verification, tokenization, and a user-facing marketplace. The team still delivered everything quickly with production-level quality.

Are there any areas they could improve?

There was very little Cyberk could have done better.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the head of growth at HappyHold Technologies, an information technology company. We’re a multi-chain crypto portfolio and trading app that helps users securely manage, earn, and grow their digital assets.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for your crypto portfolio and trading app?

We hired Cyberk to design and build the full-stack product for HappyHold, from the core wallet and MPC security architecture to the multi-chain portfolio, trading, and yield features.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk designed and developed our mobile and web app UI/UX, a multi-chain wallet with MPC key management, portfolio tracking across 10+ chains, DEX aggregation for swaps, cross-chain bridge integrations, and advanced and quick trade modules. The team handled the end-to-end scope of the project, covering both frontend and backend development.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

I found them through a referral and the Clutch site. I chose them over other options because they had high ratings, were referred to me, and their company values aligned with ours.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from August–October 2023.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered a fully functional MVP in under four weeks, including wallet, trading, and analytics features. Within the first 30 days of internal testing, the app successfully indexed 10+ blockchains, processed 50,000+ test transactions with a >99.9% success rate, and achieved up to 30% gas savings through their routing and fee optimization logic.We tracked a clear set of KPIs focused on adoption, performance, and reliability after launch. On the user side, we monitored wallet connections, daily active users (DAU), and feature adoption, especially swaps, cross-chain transfers, and yield strategies. Within the first few weeks, over 65% of active users engaged with at least one trading or earning feature.On the system side, we tracked transaction success rate, gas savings, and execution latency. The app consistently maintained a >99.9% transaction success rate, average swap execution times under two seconds, and 20–30% lower gas costs compared to baseline DEX routing.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was highly structured and efficient. They delivered all major milestones on time or ahead of schedule. We communicated via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

We were most impressed by how trustworthy and autonomous Cyberk was. After just a few alignment calls, they fully owned the execution, made the right technical decisions, and delivered without constant oversight.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, there weren’t any.