Cyberk

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the CTO of Citadel Base, an IT company. We build a Base-native DePIN storage network that gives autonomous AI agents a private, encrypted, censorship-resistant memory layer.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Cyberk?

We needed help building our MVP.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We hired Cyberk to build the Citadel Base MVP end-to-end. They architected and implemented the Base-native DePIN storage network (libp2p node stack, sharding/erasure coding + encryption pipeline, proof-of-storage and payout logic). They also integrated micropayments (USDC/CTDL) and account abstraction for near-instant store/retrieve settlement.
Cyberk designed the system architecture and protocol for a Base-native DePIN storage network optimized for small, high-frequency agent data (logs, keystores, memory states). They also developed node software for two roles.For the bunker node (storage), Cyberk built an encryption-at-edge pipeline, sharding/erasure coding, shard distribution, storage management, retrieval, and file reconstruction.
For the on-chain components on Base, Cyberk developed smart contracts for proof-of-storage submissions, reward accounting, USDC/CTDL payouts, and slashing/penalty primitives (where applicable).

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings, their pricing fit our budget, and they offered good value for the cost.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent around $50,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from January–February 2025.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We shipped the MVP in 27 days from the kickoff to a working testnet (bunker + sentinel nodes, store/retrieve flow, and on-chain settlement on Base). We onboarded 180+ node operators in the first month (62 bunkers, 121 sentinels) across 14 countries.We had a 99.1% successful retrieval rate over ~52,000 store/retrieve requests in staged + public testnet runs.We set clear MVP benchmarks, and Cyberk met or exceeded them across the board:

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was extremely reliable. They had clear sprint plans, frequent progress updates, fast handling of blockers, and proactive risk calls instead of surprises.We communicated via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Their speed was impressive. Cyberk shipped complex web3 infrastructure insanely fast.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, there weren’t any.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Node interest was higher than expected. We planned for ~100 nodes in the first month and quickly exceeded that, which helped us stress-test networking, proof cadence, and payout logic earlier than planned.Large concurrent retrieval bursts highlighted the need for rate limits, backpressure, and better chunk scheduling to keep p95 latency stable.
High proof vole exposed optimization opportunities (batching, reducing redundant proofs, more efficient verification paths) to lower chain and infrastructure overhead.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the head of growth at Skyforge Network, a Singapore-based real-world asset (RWA) protocol that tokenizes US treasuries and corporate securities for institutional clients.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Cyberk?

We needed help enabling compliant tokenization of US treasuries and corporate securities with secure issuance/redemption, permissioned access (KYC/KYB + whitelisting), custody and settlement integrations, and proof-of-reserves transparency.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk has designed the protocol architecture and security for our project. They’ve created the full system design for an institutional, permissioned RWA stack, including roles, upgrade paths, audit trails, and separation of duties. Cyberk has also developed smart contracts (Base/EVM) for our core tokenization contracts for minting, redeeming, whitelist-gated transfers, role-based access control, fee modules, and emergency controls (pause/guardian). They’ve delivered nine contracts (~3,800 lines of code) with deployment scripts. Moreover, Cyberk has created a compliance layer (KYC/KYB) for our project. They’ve developed a whitelisting service with policy rules (country restrictions, entity type, risk flags) plus admin approvals and audit logging. This service is integrated with two KYC providers (one primary and one fallback). In addition to the protocol and compliance layers, Cyberk has implemented the key custody and settlement integrations needed for institutional operations.

What is the team composition?

We’ve worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

Cyberk was referred to me. I chose them over other options because they had high ratings and good value for the cost.

How much have you invested with them?

We’ve spent around $50,000 with Cyberk.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked with Cyberk in March 2023-May 2023.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk has delivered a minimum viable product (MVP) in 29 days from the kickoff to an end-to-end working protocol (on-chain minting, redeeming, compliance, and operations dashboard). The protocol is ready, and Cyberk has shipped nine core contracts with ~96% unit test coverage and zero critical findings in an internal pre-audit review. Moreover, the operational performance of the protocol is good. The median minting and redeeming completion is 11.8 seconds, and the p95 is 14.6 seconds across 22,000 staging simulations. We’ve also onboarded 18 institutional entities to the sandbox, completed seven full custody and settlement setups, and executed four live pilot minting and redeeming cycles. We’ve reached a $52.4 million pilot total value locked (TVL) across early allocators within six weeks of MVP delivery. We’ve also reduced manual treasury operations time from ~2 hours per day to 20 minutes per day via the admin console, automated queues, and reconciliation exports.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk has delivered on time (our MVP has shipped in under 30 days) and stayed on schedule even as we refined compliance and custody workflow requirements mid-build. We communicate via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Cyberk has the deepest Web3 knowledge we’ve seen. They’ve shipped an institutional RWA protocol MVP insanely fast.

Are there any areas they could improve?

There’s very little Cyberk can improve on.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the product owner of AgentX402, an IT company. We make x402 payments practical for developers and AI agents, with USDC settlement on Base — while keeping the integration dead simple.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for AgentX402?

We hired Cyberk to rapidly build a production-shaped MVP of AgentX402 — an x402 payment facilitator that enables AI agents to autonomously pay for API access using USDC on Base — covering the end-to-end flow (HTTP 402 challenge/response, on-chain payment verification, middleware/API services, and a clean developer onboarding experience) so we could launch quickly and validate real developer demand.

SOLUTION

Can you describe the scope of work Cyberk handled for this project?

Cyberk owned the end-to-end MVP build for AgentX402. The team delivered the system architecture and technical design for an x402 payment facilitator (agent → HTTP 402 challenge → USDC payment on Base → proof verification → access granted). Cyberk also developed the backend and API to handle developer onboarding, API key issuance, request validation, and payment header/proof-of-payment verification.Moreover, Cyberk created a middleware/integration layer that developers can add with minimal code changes to enforce paid endpoints and generate standardized 402 responses. The team also built on-chain components (smart contract/transaction patterns as needed) to support USDC settlement flows and verifiable payment receipts on Base. Finally, Cyberk delivered payment verification and reliability logic, including handling edge cases like unpaid requests, partial failures, retries, and confirmation timing.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings and good value for cost.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from May–June 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk shipped the MVP in 24 days from the kickoff to a working end-to-end x402 flow (agent → 402 challenge → USDC on Base → proof verified → access granted). The team reduced the integration effort to ~10 minutes for a typical developer (from ~2–3 days if building the flow in-house), with a 1–3 lines-of-code middleware setup.Moreover, 68 developers requested access; 44 were approved, and 29 (66%) completed integration within seven days. In addition, 21 developers (72% of integrators) processed at least one successful paid request in the first week after integration. After three weeks, 15 developers remained active weekly (~71% of activated users).We also conducted a post-integration survey (n=24), which averaged 4.7/5 overall, with 92% rating the integration as “easy” or “very easy.” The median reported setup time was 12 minutes (most teams: “copy/paste + env vars”).

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was sharp and very founder-friendly. The team had clear milestones, a fast turnaround on feedback, and frequent progress updates with no surprises. We communicated via virtual meetings and email or messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive or unique about them?

Cyberk’s deep, up-to-the-minute knowledge of blockchain trends was impressive — especially emerging standards like x402.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, there weren’t any.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the CEO and co-founder of Landlayer Realty Group, a company that designs and builds compliant, institutional-grade blockchain platforms for tokenizing Singapore real estate. We enable secure fractional ownership, on-chain yield distribution, and scalable digital asset infrastructure.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for your real estate tokenization platform?

We needed to build a platform that included compliant asset tokenization, fractional ownership mechanics, on-chain yield distribution, and a secure, scalable system capable of supporting institutional-grade real estate assets.

SOLUTION

Can you describe the scope of work Cyberk handled for this project? Please include the main deliverables, such as aspects of the blockchain platform or digital asset infrastructure.

Cyberk handled the end-to-end design and development of the core blockchain infrastructure for our Singapore real estate tokenization platform. This included smart contract architecture for fractional ownership, on-chain asset issuance, yield distribution mechanisms, and secure wallet interactions.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found them through an online search, a referral, and the Clutch site. We chose them because they were close to our geographic location, offered good value for the cost, and were referred to us.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent around $50,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from January–February 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

The platform successfully supported multiple live assets with 100% smart contract execution success during testing, stable yield calculations (3.5–4.2% APY), and the technical capacity to onboard thousands of investors while maintaining security and compliance requirements.We measured the platform's ability to onboard thousands of investors through stress testing and simulated onboarding, not full retail-scale live usage. 
Cyberk conducted load and performance tests on the smart contracts and backend integrations to validate wallet creation, token issuance, and yield distribution at scale.We verified the 100% smart contract execution success rate through structured testnet deployments and controlled mainnet simulations, where every token issuance, transfer, and yield distribution transaction was logged and monitored on-chain.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was structured and dependable, with clear milestones, regular progress updates, and proactive communication. We communicated through in-person and virtual meetings.

What did you find most impressive or unique about them?

Cyberk’s deep expertise in RWA, particularly in real estate tokenization, was impressive.

Are there any areas they could improve?

Overall, the project was executed very well.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m a project manager at Solventis Capital, a Singapore-based, institutional-only real-world asset platform that tokenizes short-duration trade finance assets and delivers asset-backed yield through a permissioned, compliant on-chain infrastructure.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for your business?

We engaged Cyberk to design and build the core institutional infrastructure for our company, including the tokenization of trade finance receivables, a permissioned investor access model, secure asset representation, and stablecoin-based settlement aligned with regulatory and institutional requirements.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk developed our on-chain tokenization framework, compliance and whitelisting modules, secure smart contracts, and technical documentation supporting institutional deployment.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through an online search and a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings and good value for the cost.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent around $50,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from January–March 2025.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Through our collaboration with Cyberk, we successfully delivered a production-ready MVP within 10–12 weeks, including a fully functional trade finance tokenization framework, permissioned investor access, and stablecoin-based settlement flows. The platform was designed to support pools of trade receivables with 30–90-day durations, target yields of 6–9% APR, and institutional ticket sizes starting from $250,000.We tracked institutional KPIs such as 99.9%+ platform uptime, 100% smart contract execution success during pilot issuance and settlement, and reduced institutional onboarding time to under 10 business days, confirming the platform’s readiness for live trade finance deployment.

How did the company perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was structured and reliable, with clear milestones, transparent communication, and realistic timelines. We communicated in person, virtually, and through emails and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Cyberk’s security-first mindset was the most impressive, with strong attention to smart contract safety, access controls, and institutional-grade risk management throughout the project.

Are there any areas they could improve?

The project was executed well overall. The only area for improvement would be providing more high-level summaries earlier in the process to complement the detailed technical discussions.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm the founder of Anchor Capital, a full-scale on-chain RWA lending platform that bridges traditional finance and DeFi by tokenizing real-world assets and providing transparent, permissionless lending.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for Anchor Capital?

We hired Cyberk to deliver both the technical foundation and the product experience needed to launch Anchor Capital to real lenders and businesses.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk handled the full end-to-end development of Anchor Capital's on-chain lending platform, including smart contract engineering, backend architecture, frontend UI, admin dashboard, borrower/lender onboarding flows, risk monitoring modules, and full deployment across staging and mainnet. The team delivered all parts equally, from frontend, backend, and smart contracts to data integrations and admin tools. Every module received the same level of attention and polish.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through an online search and a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings, their pricing fit our budget, they offered good value for the cost, and they were referred to me.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from August–October 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered a fully functional platform in under 30 days, enabling us to onboard early users immediately and process our first investment flows without issues. We onboarded over 1,200 early users in the first weeks and processed more than $3.5 million in initial investment flows. We also monitored daily active users, onboarding completion rate, session duration, and investment allocation conversions.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk's project management was exceptionally organized and reliable. They delivered the full platform exactly on schedule, even while handling a complex financial product. We communicated via in-person meetings, virtual meetings, and email or messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

A partner we could fully trust. The team was willing to work overtime endlessly to ensure everything was perfect.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, everything was handled smoothly and professionally.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm the CEO of Blixt Editor, a screen recording and screenshot editing tool for content creators.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Cyberk?

We wanted to bring our tool to market, so we needed to create the whole SaaS tool from scratch.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk has built our editor, editor app, payment flow, and subscription management page. The team has also handled backend development, integrations, and ongoing maintenance.

What is the team composition?

We've worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

Cyberk was referred to me, and their pricing fit our budget.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working with Cyberk in August 2025, and our engagement is ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk has delivered a complete product that allows us to onboard users. The team has also delivered a working payment and subscription flow and a finished MVP product. We measure the success of the MVP and onboarding process by tracking the number of new users and how well the product works in general. We've gotten a lot of good feedback from people testing it out, and we want to continue to build and improve the tool.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk has delivered on time. We communicate via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Cyberk updates me every day with the status and progress of the project, including blockers.

Are there any areas they could improve?

Cyberk has managed expectations very clearly from the beginning.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the operations manager of Fairy Launch, a next-generation fair launch and token discovery platform on Solana.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire Cyberk to accomplish for Fairy Lunch?

We hired Cyberk to build the full Fairy Lunch platform from idea to a live, user-ready product. The core goal was to create a fun, trusted, and beginner-friendly fair launch experience on Solana.

SOLUTION

Can you describe the scope of work Cyberk handled for this project?

Cyberk handled the entire end-to-end build of Fairy Lunch, turning the concept into a fully functioning product ready for users. The team designed the full “fairy-core” visual identity, user journeys, and UI for both creators and traders. Cyberk also built a smooth, fast, and playful interface for token discovery, tracking, and launch participation.Moreover, Cyberk developed the step-by-step launch wizard for creators to set up their token, branding, socials, and fair launch parameters. The team also implemented the data layer, APIs, on-chain integrations, and admin tools for platform operations.

What is the team composition?

We worked with 2–5 teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through an online search and a referral. We chose them over other options because they had high ratings, their pricing fit our budget, and they were referred to me.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent more than $10,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked with Cyberk from February–March 2025.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered the full platform in just 30 days. Within the first two weeks after launch, we saw clear traction: 15+ tokens were successfully launched, over 5,000 early users were onboarded, and we received strong user feedback on the product experience. We had a 9/10 average UX satisfaction rating.Moreover, we maintained 99.9% uptime and saw over 60% of users return in the first week.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was smooth, structured, and very proactive. They delivered exactly on time. We communicated via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Their Web3 product expertise stood out. They knew exactly what to build and what to avoid.

Are there any areas they could improve?

There was nothing they could have done better.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm the Head of Growth at Polygram. We offer a no-code platform that enables users to build web applications, automate workflows, and deploy blockchain smart contracts using an AI-powered visual interface, making advanced development accessible to non-coders.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Cyberk?

We hired Cyberk to build the full backend and interface architecture for Polygram’s hosted blockchain indexer platform. Our goal was to deliver a robust, scalable solution that would allow clients to access indexed data across multiple blockchains without managing their own infrastructure.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk handled all parts of the project end-to-end. This included developing a clean, structured API layer to deliver indexed data across multiple chains, building real-time pipelines for token and NFT pricing, holders, balances, and aggregate market charts, and integrating a multi-chain data ingestion stack. They also delivered a dashboard and SDK for clients, ensuring the platform was built for growth, reliability, and minimal operational overhead.

What is the team composition?

Cyberk assigned between 2 and 5 teammates to our project.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

We found Cyberk through a combination of a referral and the Clutch site. We chose them because their pricing fit our budget, they came highly recommended, and their company values aligned with ours.

How much have you invested with them?

We invested between $50,000 and $199,999.

What is the status of this engagement?

The project started in February 2025 and finished in May 2025

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Within the first month post-launch, Polygram processed over 500 million on-chain data points and onboarded dozens of developers across major ecosystems like Solana, Aptos, and Ethereum. The platform’s speed improved indexing times by over 60% compared to traditional self-hosted setups, demonstrating both scalability and market fit.

After launch, we tracked developer satisfaction, API retention, and uptime metrics. Over 80% of developers remained active users beyond the first month, and the platform maintained high uptime and data accuracy.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk’s project management was outstanding. They were clear, structured, and incredibly responsive throughout the engagement. We communicated via in-person and virtual meetings, emails, and messages.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Every decision Cyberk made balanced speed, scalability, and long-term vision, which is rare to find in a development partner.

Are there any areas they could improve?

There was nothing I would have wanted Cyberk to do differently during the project.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m a product manager at The Oracler, an AI-driven on-chain analytics and signal platform focused on aggregating market data, predicting trends, and offering trading insights for both retail and institutional users.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Cyberk?

We hired Cyberk to build a secure, high-speed oracle platform. Our main goals were to ensure data integrity, low latency, and scalability while creating a clean, intuitive interface that makes complex on-chain analytics accessible to everyday users.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Cyberk designed a decentralized oracle system capable of low-latency data delivery and high throughput. They built a real-time data ingestion engine with validation, aggregation, and publishing pipelines. The team created secure on-chain contracts to feed verified data to partner protocols. Cyberk also designed and developed a clean, data-rich UI for visualizing live metrics and oracle performance.

What is the team composition?

We worked with two teammates from Cyberk.

How did you come to work with Cyberk?

Cyberk was referred to me. They had high ratings.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent around $50,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from September–December 2024.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Cyberk delivered the full oracle system in just six weeks, achieving 99.98% uptime and processing over 1.5 million data updates in the first month post-launch. Response latency dropped by 40%. We tracked several key KPIs, including data update speed, uptime reliability, and integration growth. The Oracler maintained an average latency of under two seconds and onboarded 10+ DeFi protocols within the first month.

How did Cyberk perform from a project management standpoint?

Cyberk was highly organized, communicative, and agile. They kept every sprint transparent, provided frequent updates, and adapted quickly to feedback. We communicated in person, virtually, and through email and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Cyberk’s deep understanding of how startups operate was impressive. They moved fast, stayed flexible, and made decisions with the same urgency and ownership as if they were part of our internal team.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, there weren’t any.