Your QA team spends 3 hours documenting each bug. Ours does it in 5 minutes.
BetterQA is an independent QA service company with 50+ engineers who prevent your code from embarrassing you in production. Founded in 2018 in Cluj-Napoca, Romania, we've caught 2,400+ critical bugs across 12 platform mergers before they could damage our clients' businesses.
What Makes Us Different We build our own QA tools. While other QA companies make their testers struggle with generic tools, our founder coded BugBoard - an AI that turns any bug screenshot into complete documentation in under 5 minutes. We've built 6+ proprietary platforms that let our engineers work 36x faster than traditional QA teams.
What We Actually Do
Full QA team augmentation (5-50+ engineers)
Integration testing for platform mergers
Security testing (NATO-certified NCIA #42405442)
Test automation that actually finds bugs
AI-powered bug detection and documentation
Independent code audits (no conflict of interest)
Who Hires Us Enterprise software companies, SaaS platforms doing major integrations, and anyone who's been burned by their dev agency marking their own homework. We work with Fortune 500 companies, defense contractors, and high-growth startups who understand that broken code in production costs more than proper QA.
Why Trust Us
NATO security clearance for defense-level projects
ISO 9001/27001/14001/13485 certified
100% independent (we only test, never develop)
EU-based team you'll know by name
Technical leadership that still codes daily
The Bottom Line Your developers testing their own code is like students grading their own exams. We're the teachers with red pens. One client fired their dev agency after we exposed 6 months of hidden bugs - but kept us.
If your QA vendor couldn't build BugBoard, why are they testing your software?
Min project size
$5,000+
Hourly rate
Undisclosed
Employees
50 - 249
Locations
Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Year founded
Founded 2018
Languages
Timezones
6 Languages that we service
English
Spanish
German
French
Turkish
Romanian
3 Timezones that we service
CET
Central European Time (CET)
EET
Eastern European Time (EET)
UTC
Universal Coordinated Time (UTC)
1 Locations
Cluj-Napoca , Romania
No have been added yet...
Pricing Snapshot
Min. project size
$5,000+
Avg. hourly rate
Undisclosed
Rating for cost
4.9
/5
What Clients Have Said
BetterQA is known for providing good value for cost, with many clients highlighting that their pricing fits within budget. Specific project costs range from €4,000–€5,000 to €50,000–€100,000. Clients appreciate their responsiveness and timely delivery, indicating a strong ROI on QA investments.
Many clients choose BetterQA for their cultural and value alignment, which complements the technical expertise and enhances the overall working relationship.
Areas for Improvement: Talent Acquisition Speed
A few clients suggested that BetterQA could improve the speed of talent acquisition to meet rapid resource demands. While the quality of work is high, faster onboarding could enhance service delivery.
Client-Centric Approach
BetterQA's client-centric approach is evident in their willingness to tailor services to specific client needs. They prioritize client satisfaction and work closely to achieve desired outcomes.
Positive Impact on Client Projects
Numerous reviews indicate that BetterQA's involvement in projects leads to improved product quality, reduced defects, and enhanced user satisfaction. Their thorough testing processes contribute to successful project outcomes.
Integration into Client Teams
BetterQA is noted for effectively integrating into client teams, working as an extension of the in-house staff. Their collaborative approach fosters trust and improves project outcomes.
Professionalism and Commitment
Clients appreciate BetterQA's professionalism and commitment to their projects. Their dedication to delivering high-quality results and their ability to integrate seamlessly into client teams are noted strengths.
Application TestingIT Managed ServicesOther IT Consulting and SI
$10,000 to $49,999
Nov. 2021 - Jan. 2022
4.5
Quality
4.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Willing to Refer
4.0
"They had high level QA services. They were also very responsive alongside their thoughtful communication."
Mar 1, 2022
Head of Engineering. Yearbook Production Company
Luke O'Neill
Verified
Other industries
London, England
1-10 Employees
Online Review
Verified
BetterQA was tasked with conducting QA tests for a yearbook production company. They were asked to find issues in the platform before they integrated it into their CI system.
BetterQA had a simple but effective workflow throughout the partnership. They discovered a number of issues in their system before the client deployed it. In the end, they were able to deploy new features faster with more faith in the stability of the company's system.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
Head of Engineering
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire BetterQA?
Automated testing of our web application using Cypress
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor and what were the deciding factors?
Spoke with the owner, and then ran a small test project to determine suitability. They provided immediate value and understood our problems well.
Describe the project in detail and walk through the stages of the project.
Building automated Cypress tests for our web application. It was split into one area at a time, and they delivered a suite of tests which were integrated into our CI system.
How many resources from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?
We worked with 1 automated tester, and they founder/CEO who helped problem solve certain issues and guide the development process.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
We have caught a number of regressions introduced by new code thanks to the automated test suite running on every commit. We also discovered a number of issues during the development process of the tests that have been fixed. Overall, we are able to deploy new features faster and with more faith in the stability of our system.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
We had a simple workflow, using tickets that described the features and ad-hoc problem solving sessions to dive deeper on the details as needed.
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
They had high level QA services. They were also very responsive alongside their thoughtful communication.
Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?
No
RATINGS
4.5
Quality
4.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
4.5
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
4.0
NPS
Manual & Automated QA Testing for Big Data Project
Application Testing
$50,000 to $199,999
Jan. - Dec. 2018
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"Everything was explained and documented, and processes were used and improved throughout the project lifespan."
Jun 5, 2020
Test Manager, Infosys
Andy Bakcsy
Verified
Advertising & marketing
Duesseldorf, Germany
10,001+ Employees
Online Review
Verified
BetterQA provided QA services for a web-based app. In addition to manual testing throughout the entire product's life cycle, they documented their processes, wrote automated scripts, and reported findings.
Improved app performance led to better customer retention and higher revenue. They were transparent, communicative, and committed to their work. While they could be faster in finding QA talent, they made up for it in quality of work.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
Digital change and complete It services Test Manager in the delivery team
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire BetterQA?
Web based Application integrating BigData and latest technologies
What were your goals for this project?
To improve the overall quality of our products
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
Based on professionalism and their good reviews. The rates are irrelevant when the quality received is higher than what was expected
Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.
Web App modules for different data manipulations. Services offered:
Documentation of the processes
Manual testing during the entire life cycle
Recruitments testing
Automated scripts
API testing framework
Reporting and documentation
What was the team composition?
Team lead + 6 QA Engineers
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?
Revenues went up because of improved performance and quality + customer retention + better reporting
How was project management arranged and how effective was it?
All meetings took place via skype Communication went directly to the team lead after contract start
What did you find most impressive about this company?
Transparency + communication + commitment + real professionals in their field
Are there any areas for improvement?
Talent acquisition speed can be needed for rapid resource demand. But, than again, quality is why somebody would choose BetterQA
RATINGS
5.0
"As a young company there is always something to learn"
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"Everything was explained and documented, and processes were used and improved throughout the project lifespan."
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"Everything was as expected. Problems came from our side."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"Costs were not out concerns but you could always find something cheaper with less professionalism"
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"Again and again!
Software QA & UX/UI for Healthcare Company
UX/UI Design
$10,000 to $49,999
Mar. 2019 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
4.5
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"He turns the work very quickly and is a source of energy in terms of bug fixes."
Nov 6, 2019
Product Employee, CardiaSync
Shawn Kumar
Verified
Other industries
Houston, Texas
1-10 Employees
Online Review
Verified
Better Quality Assurance provides web-based consulting regarding bugs, new features, and UX/UI. This has involved cross-browser testing and creating videos of errors they've found.
Software releases have had fewer bugs, and the UX of the product has been improved. Better Quality Assurance has an organized, accommodating workflow. They eagerly offer insight into previously unidentified bugs.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I am a co-founder and chief product officer of the company.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire Better Quality Assurance?
We hired BQA for QA testing of our new releases.
What were your goals for this project?
Our goal was to make the product more reliable and have better UX/UI. In addition we seek to add value-add features.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
They were recommended to me by a friend/software developer.
Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.
We assigned them a new feature to debug, and they post a variety of bug issues that they found. They cross-browser tested depending on our request. They also posted videos of the bugs to help us see exactly how the problem was created, which was very helpful in figuring out the solution. They also provided UX/UI feedback.
What was the team composition?
I interacted only with Brad Tudor, though I believe he has a team behind him.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?
We improved our ability to release software without bugs and improved user's experience using the product. We were not finally able to support multiple platforms (Chrome, iOS, and Firefox). Brad discovered bugs on older features we weren't even aware of.
How was project management arranged and how effective was it?
Project management was very effective - Brad is very organized and posts all bugs in Github with milestones and notes. We asked him to change his process a bit to allow our team to prioritize the bugs and he accommodated this request.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
Brad's passion for finding bugs and getting them fixed is very impressive. He turns the work around very quickly and is a source of energy in terms of bug fixes.
Are there any areas for improvement?
We've been very satisfied with his work - a more thorough discussion earlier about how to display/resolve bugs would've helped us develop our current process sooner, but this may be more of a reflection of our lack of time to set up meetings!
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
4.5
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Showing 61-63 of
63 Reviews
Our Story
Started BetterQA in 2018 after watching QA teams waste 3 hours per bug report while broken code shipped anyway. So I built BugBoard - AI that does it in 5 minutes. Then built 5 more tools because existing QA software is garbage.
Now we're 50+ engineers who build our own tools instead of wrestling with Jira. NATO-certified, ISO-certified, and obsessed with catching bugs 36x faster than traditional QA.
If a tool doesn't exist, we build it. If your devs test their own code, we're your reality check
Clutch verification provides an additional layer of data to help you make the right purchasing decision of business services.
If you’re not seeing exactly what you need here, send this company a custom message.
You can talk about your project needs, price, and timeline to get started on your project.
Get connected to see updates from BetterQA like new case studies, latest reviews, their latest masterpieces in their portfolio, delivered straight to you.
