Mobile App Dev for Environmental Nonprofit
- Mobile App Development
- $200,000 to $999,999
- Apr. 2019 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 4.0
- Cost
- 4.5
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"The folks on the team really understood what we were trying to do."
- Other industries
- Washington, District of Columbia
- 501-1,000 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
3 SIDED CUBE developed an iOS and Android mobile app using React Native, as well as a corresponding website. They added functionality that matches reforesters with organizations that provide funding.
The app that 3 SIDED CUBE built reached its ideal audience and received much more engagement than expected, acquiring 250 users within the first month. The team possesses exceptional communication skills, and they're responsive despite the time difference. Overall, they're a supportive partner.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the platform manager at World Resources Institute. We are a global environmental nonprofit organization with offices around the world. I work in our forestry department, and more specifically, within that, on issues of forest and landscape restoration.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with 3 SIDED CUBE?
We needed someone to help us with app development.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Prior to working with 3 SIDED CUBE, we spent about nine months building out a prototype for our app with another firm. When we put out our RFP to which 3 SIDED CUBE replied and ended up winning, we were starting already with a pretty solid concept and some general designs already.
A lot of that changed quite a bit by working with them and flushing this out a little bit more. We developed the concept and built the app with 3 SIDED CUBE. They used React Native and built one source code that works for both iOS and Android. It was also made for the web.
It’s an app that is sort of like a dating site for reforestation. It allows those folks doing the reforestations to match with those organizations and companies that are looking to fund that kind of work.
One of the functionalities we have is a standardized form that both funders — groups looking to fund or invest in these projects — and project developers — who are the folks who implement it — have to fill out with different pieces of information.
This is standardized so that every project developer is filling out the same information which makes it easy to compare projects to each other. The app as it stands now for the MVP that we just built, is really just focused on the matchmaking.
Throughout the course of development and in conversations, we are seeing that there is a lot of demand and potential to build this out to match other types of units of value, not just money for projects.
The site is free but it’s not publicly available. All the functionalities are behind a registration wall, so we are vetting all of the groups that register on the site. The idea here is that by doing this vetting, we can make sure that the groups that are on there are real organizations and are really involved and invested in the reforestation space.
A great feature is that instead of just allowing folks to put in their information and then going and searching, and putting on different filters, we use a little pretty simple matching algorithm between those so if someone is a funder and they put in, what we call a funding offer, they can put in a bunch of different factors.
So, instead of having to go to the project page and seeing all the different filters and seeing what pops up, they can put in projects that match a certain funding offer so it will automatically apply all those filters and show the projects that have the best match. It allows funders to manage their type of portfolio.
What is the team composition?
It has been really great working with them. The specific team that we work with consists of Annette (Senior Project Manager) who I remain in contact with on a daily basis as well as a UX team member.
We’ve also worked with one or two people from their design team. I’m not sure exactly how many because they were bringing on resources as needed, but there were a number of different people and one to two main leads for both the front- and backend development.
How did you come to work with 3 SIDED CUBE?
Within our forest department, there is another team that focuses primarily on the deforestation side of things and how to monitor the loss of forests. That team had already been working on a platform for about a year and a half, and they were working with 3 SIDED CUBE.
Theirs was completely mobile so when they did their RFP they were looking for mobile-only developers who were very strong in the mobile space, and they landed on 3 SIDED CUBE. When we began our search, we went around to get a sense from the different teams of who they were working with, depending on the developer’s skill set and what we were trying to do, and 3 SIDED CUBE was one of those.
It wasn’t a completely public RFP but we did invite six or seven organizations that either other teams within the company were already working with or just through some contacts that were recommended or found through a Google search. 3 SIDED CUBE was one of them, and, because one of our teams had already been working with them, we had a little bit of background on how it had gone.
How much have you invested in them?
So far, it’s pretty close to about $300,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We signed our contract with them in April 2019. The app, which is called TerraMatch, was launched in June 2020. Our main development contract with them has expired and we are now waiting for additional funding for continuous improvement, but we are still partnering with them for ongoing bug fixes and maintenance of the site.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
It has been a little over a month since launch. We really had no idea how much interest there would be in the site. We were anticipating maybe in the first month to get 50 or so users. We have about 250 users registered on the site now.
There has been a huge interest and influx from the ground, and we have about 30 or so different projects from those users that have come on. We haven’t had any matches yet and that is going to be our measure of success, but it’s still fairly new.
Another measure of success was when we built this, we understood the fragmentation in the space, but also we knew that there were hundreds or thousands of groups around the world doing this reforestation work, but they were so local and don’t have a big reputation.
We built it with that in mind and of the 250 users that have signed up, I would say the majority of them are groups we have never heard of before; they are hyper-local. We essentially have reached the groups that we were hoping to be able to raise their voices and bring to the fore. On one aspect, that is a pretty good success metric.
How did 3 SIDED CUBE perform from a project management standpoint?
Communication with them is great. Our standard line of communication has been Slack, and we are on there all the time. They are based in the UK, so there is a bit of a time difference, but they are usually pretty responsive even in their evening when it is our afternoon.
We have been able to really keep track of conversations through Slack and have a really good response and feedback that way. In terms of project management, Annette has been amazing. She is really organized, knows which folks on the team to pull in, and is knowledgeable enough about the technical aspects to be able to walk us through some them but also pull in the experts when needed.
We have really enjoyed working with her. 3 SIDED CUBE was able to stay on the timeline or let us know enough in advance that there were delays and explain what the delays were and how they would impact our project timelines.
They would then work with us to work around it if we had a specific deadline. The team went out of their way to build either a one-off view or different ways for us to be able to use it for our purposes while the site was being finalized. I have really positive feedback.
What did you find most impressive about them?
3 SIDED CUBE was really helpful in the early stages when it came to thinking through how to make some of the features that we really wanted to have on there as useful and intuitive to the user as possible. When we were doing the RFP, one of the things that made them stand out was that we had already developed our prototype, but when we did the RFP we actually didn’t share any of the prototype materials we had.
We gave a written description of how we wanted the site to work. It was very detailed, but it was all just a narrative of how we wanted the site to work. Of all the responses we got from the different organizations and the different mock-ups of how this might look, 3 SIDED CUBE really got it.
The folks on the team really understood what we were trying to do. They came back to us with a mock-up and even added some additional features in there that we hadn’t even thought of but have now been integrated into the final platform. We were just really impressed with their response to the RFP and they really seemed to understand what we were hoping to achieve with this.
Are there any areas they could improve?
I am a little newer to the arena of the product management and I don’t have a lot of experience to pull from in terms of what to expect for cost, but I think for us, a little bit better understanding of the cost for the ongoing maintenance of the site would be helpful.
When we got to that point and we were going through it, I think the breakdown of what the cost would be per month was an estimate based on what they expected the use to be, and to us, it felt a little bit higher. We had a little bit of a negotiation and there is an opportunity to renegotiate that price once we have had a couple of months of maintenance to see what the demand is.
It wasn’t very clear upfront about how that would work. Besides that, I’ve been extremely happy with it. 3 SIDED CUBE has gone above and beyond, sometimes doing more than what we paid them to do because they really want to help us. Overall, we are really satisfied.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
4.0On time / deadlines
"We were a little bit delayed."
-
Cost
4.5Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS