Development Staff Augmentation for Consulting Firm
- IT Staff Augmentation
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Oct. 2012 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"I continue to use them…. They have high-quality engineering and good communication."
- IT Services
- Bellmore, New York
- 1-10 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Vention (formerly iTechArt) works often as GFData Corp’s technology partner and go-to vendor providing both backend & frontend development and support. A recent project required a staff increase to grow capacity.
Equally adept at backend and frontend development, Vention (formerly iTechArt) is a trustworthy and proactive technology partner that thinks about the big picture while still delivering high-quality work on a daily basis. Communication is excellent, and deadlines are met on time or ahead of schedule.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m CEO of GFData Corp, a small tech consulting firm based in New York. We’ve been in business for 4 years.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with iTechArt?
We wanted to increase our capacity to deliver projects for our customers. We build a lot of custom software, usually line-of-business applications in the enterprise space. We do a lot of work with special services firms and some legal law firms. Many times I’m filling gaps between line-of-business systems, data integrations, mobile applications, custom software, etc. I do a lot of the envisioning. Sometimes on the development end and on the testing end, I have brought iTech in to supplement my team and help me deliver the project. They might also partner with my customers as their development arm moving forward.
iTechArt is my go-to vendor. I’ve been part of other software consulting firms since 2000 doing CRM and custom software like SharePoint websites, etc. I worked with a few staffing firms with limited success. In the business I’m in, predictability is important. I was looking for a reliable partner with whom I could work long term. I’d worked with other offshore teams but the quality wasn’t there. It took a couple of times to communicate the intent of what we were trying to build. There were mistakes, and we had to build that into our own pricing. The reliability factor drove me to find a new vendor and is what has kept me with iTech.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
I worked with them on iOS development and an ASP.NET program that was specifically to build out a SharePoint web page internally for a hospital network. We will have an Android phase in the future.
We collaborate with each other. We kick off a project with a face-to-face Skype meeting. We talk through project goals, timeline, and technology choices, usually with a tech lead and a developer from the team. I pick from some resumes before the meeting based on technical aptitude. They integrate seamlessly with my team. I’m the architect so I delegate the work out to the developers.
We built a mobile application for a hiring site to connect folks in the technology industry. It was a rough concept, and the client wasn’t very savvy with the design and build. iTechArt was instrumental in helping me build out the navigation. The app worked well and followed standards for the device. The developer we worked with took ownership of building something high-quality and offered suggestions along the way.
In the SharePoint space, it’s tough to design things well. I thought their ability not only to do the backend server work but also the frontend work was impressive. Usually you find teams that have one skill or the other. It’s good to see someone able to handle both sides.
What is the team dynamic?
There are 1 or 2 developers on the team. In the initial phase, I’ll be a developer on the project, and then I’ll have 1 or 2 developers from iTech working on it. We can ramp up or down depending on the success of the pilot. I work on it initially while they go into training mode. If the project takes off, they would bring in developers from iTech.
If a project requires a certain technology that we’re using, and they have developers in that space, they give me resumes I can review. I can have a phone interview with the developer if I have any questions. I pick the one with the best skillsets for the job, and we do a Skype call to kick off the project.
How did you come to work with iTechArt?
I was referred to them by a contact I had at Microsoft.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve spent between $120,000–$130,000 over the course of our relationship.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with them in October 2012, and the relationship is ongoing. I don’t have anything actively going with them now, but they might be working with some of my customers.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
I don’t have any metrics, but my clients might. When I build for my clients, it’s something mission critical. To a large degree, we’ve had positive results, and the software build was definitely impactful. They produce high-quality work. I have worked with a firm based overseas that did work from PSD to HTML. I also did some work with a local group who was more of a premium partner. But now when someone approaches me with a project, I go to iTechArt when I think I’m going to close the deal.
How did iTechArt perform from a project management standpoint?
I deal directly with the engineers. I will talk to them at least 3 times a week. They work midnight to noon EST, so I can talk to the developer at 7:00am to find out if there are any questions. I’m in touch with them through Slack or Skype. We usually have short timelines so there’s something new every week.
Communication is really important, and they are proactive in this regard. The tech leads reach out during the course of a project, and when I Skype with a developer, his boss will be there. When we were in the thick of development, there were times they would be on the phone with me after working hours.
They’ve never gone over budget, but I control that. They’ve always been on time or ahead of schedule. I give them a timeline, and they do it. If they come up against something unexpected, they let me know.
What did you find most impressive about them?
The positive contribution they have made to the application or software design is uncommon. A lot of times engineers just do what they’re told. Somebody who thinks about the bigger picture is a good team member.
Their ability to understand the business requirements and their communication, whether written or spoken, set them apart. The tricky thing in my business is that it’s complex both on the technical side and from a business standpoint. We’re trying to help businesses with complex business models. I’ve experienced painful situations with other companies that didn’t understand something but didn’t talk to me. They just built what they thought was the right thing. That’s the worst thing you could have when trying to stay on time and on budget.
Are there any areas they could improve?
When you’re building something that has never existed before, there’s discussion about how to do it. Although I felt they contributed well, there were times I had to push my point. They might take too much creative freedom with some areas of the project.
Are there any recommendations for potential clients?
If you think you need to hire a developer, you should have a good understanding of what you’re trying to accomplish, what your timeline is, and what your budget is. Sometimes people hire a developer first. iTech works well if you have a good sense of where you want to land and how much time you have. They will ask you those questions anyway, so it’s good to know that before you start.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
"They have high-quality engineering and good communication."
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
"They’ve always met the deadlines."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"They are a premium over other offshore firms I’ve worked with, but the value is worth it. They get the project done quicker and on time."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"I’ve referred them multiple times for a variety of software projects.