Galaxy Mind Thinking

Gold
VERIFIED

We are a digital consultancy. Our purpose is to benefit our clients — their people, products, and services. Our core strengths are technology, strategy, and design. Our difference is perspective. We are guided by a clear view on the promise and limitations of technology.

Founded in 2002, we’re headquartered in New York City, and supported by a global team of talented, committed professionals.

 

Benefit from our hyper-competent software, insight-driven strategy, and award-winning design practices. Morgan Stanley benefited. As did AIG, FreshDirect, HP, and hundreds of other organizations.

Examples of what we do:

  • Design and build high-performance, complex software — the kind that runs your entire organization, even industry ecosystems.  
  • Design and build transactional portals that connect you with your customers, suppliers, affiliates, or staff.
  • Deliver compelling web and mobile experiences that engage and move your audiences to action.
  • Create the digital strategy and transformation roadmap that suits your organization’s objectives and enables value-driven prioritization.

We bring empathy and the spirit of collaboration to all of our client relationships. And, galaxy mind thinking provides us with the clarity and perspective to deliver the promise of digital.

 
$25,000+
 
$150 - $199 / hr
 
50 - 249
 Founded
2002
Show all +
New York, NY
headquarters
  • 22 Cortlandt St Suite 1101
    New York, NY 10007
    United States
other locations
  • Ukraine

Portfolio

Key clients: 

AIG, Everest, HP, Freedom Mortgage, Stillwell-Hansen, Hamilton, FreshDirect, Attune, Clinique, Morgan Stanley, Coty

Knowify SaaS ERP for Contractor Firms

Full lifecycle job management software for contracting and service professionals

DOOR3 partnered with Knowify’s founding team to create the initial version of the Knowify platform.

Knowify enables its customers to quickly and easily manage their project workflows across all their devices all with a world class user experience.

Just some of the features of the software include:

Bids and Estimates

Materials Costing, Ordering, and Tracking

Budget Management

Contract Management

Time Tracking & Scheduling

Reporting and dashboards

Fully Integrated with Quickbooks

Qello Historical Concerts

DOOR3 partnered with Qello to develop:

We partnered with Qello over several product generations to provide wraparound service from digital strategy and software architecture through design and development of:

  • Online video streaming application
  • Multi-device – Tablet, Smartphone & TV
  • Web, iOS, Android, Samsung, Google apps
  • Top app in the store
  • Transactional (commerce)
  • Advanced video integration
  • Powerful social media integration

“DOOR3 has consistently shown themselves to be ahead of the competition . . . DOOR3 and delivering on promise should be considered synonymous.”

- Matt Carona, VP of Product and Business Development, Qello

Elsevier - Knovel Redesign

Elsevier hired DOOR3 to re-design Knovel, their premier product for the chemical engineering industry. This project employed an iterative approach that put users – and experience - first.

This means we began the project brainstorming all possible features... then talking to actual customers to hear their thoughts on which features they found valuable.
 

Based on these conversations we were able to prioritize these features and as a next step, we created simple wireframes for customers to review – ‘testing’ our feature assumptions.

After each design iteration, returned to these customers and obtained feedback on the designs. Once wireframes and requirements were tightly defined, we moved into visual design.

DOOR3's work with Elsevier earned us the coveted WMA WebAward for outstanding achievement in Web development.

Coty Drupal Framework Architecture and Development

Marketing's IT Partner

Developed "CotyCore," a standardized framework on top of DrupalCore in order to enable high-volume, economical deployment of marketing sites and microsites for Coty's brands across multiple marketing activations and geographies (including regulatory requirements, laguage and localization, etc.)

40+ brands (with multiple microsites) – standardized on single CMS, Web and mobile projects

Best practices oversight

Architecture

User experience

Mobile solutions

Code review, support, enhancements and upgrades

Agency regulations

Roadmap planning / FY IT  planning

External and internal projects

Kasina WalletShare

FinTech Product Development for Data Visualization & Reporting

UX Design & Front End Implementation with API Specifications for new product development.

Created a centralized data storage and presentation solution for multiple structured data sources.

Applied best practices to create a set of data management and presentation interfaces.

AIG - Data Visualization System

DOOR3 created high-quality data visualization and dashboarding best practices for the firm’s new evidence-based department, AIG Science.

AIG is an American multinational insurance corporation serving 98% of Fortune 500 companies. AIG’s Science Team is made up of statisticians, computer engineers, and modelers who create automated solutions that address business strategies with available data.   DOOR3 developed a standardized design and technology approach to optimize usability and accessibility for business critical dashboards created by the department.   Deliverables
  • Best practices for data visualization and dashboarding
  • Information architecture & interaction design best practices
  • Brand & style guidelines
  • Reusable code framework
Highlights
  • Consistent and user-friendly visual design applicable to all AIG...

Reviews

Sort by

Development for Business Software Company

“All their work looks current, and they understand marketing and UX very well.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
Dec. 2012 - 2013
Project summary: 

DOOR3 developed a platform for a business management software company. Working very closely with the internal team, they built the entire platform up from scratch in ASP.NET and Angular.js.

The Reviewer
 
New York, New York
Daniel de Roulet
Co-founder, Knowify
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Everything DOOR3 provided goes into daily operations, and the end result serves over a thousand users. Their expertise and knowledge ensured a platform that is both attractive and user-friendly, and the business would not be as successful without their early support.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

We sell fast business management software to construction companies. I’m one of two co-founders.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We were just starting our business and didn’t have a team in place to develop our platform. We decided to find a UX and design resource to help us develop modern-looking software before hiring an internal team.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We wanted a team that could offer strong business analysis and build the whole thing from the start. We brought them the high-level scope of what we hoped to accomplish and signed a deal that gave us access to all the resources they offered. They translated our concepts into an object model that met our code and general requirements. That included back- and frontend development, UX, and design.

We worked together for about four to five months, and they built everything out as we sent them the specs. The backend was built in ASP.NET, and the frontend was mostly Angular.js, though we used other technologies as needed.

What is the team composition?

We had two half-time business analysts, a project manager for a few of our projects, a full-time backend resource, two full-time frontend resources, and a full-time user experience specialist.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

We wanted a local resource in New York. We found some qualified firms and interviewed a few of them. We saw how beautiful DOOR3’s work was and decided to work with them. Their products were clean, attractive, and intuitive, and that really tipped the scales in their favor.

How much have you invested with them?

All of our work with them cost about $800,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

The major chunk of our engagement was from the end of 2012 through the middle of 2013, but we still go back to them occasionally for projects.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We got some really good products out of the collaboration, and we wouldn’t have a business without them. Over a thousand companies use our platform, and that number is growing. We get a lot of good feedback from our users. The platform looks good and is easy to use. Everything they did for us contributes to our daily operations.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

We were very involved in this process, and our primary communication was all in person. We were in their offices four to six hours a day during the development. Ultimately, we managed the project, but they brought a lot of expertise to the process. Their project management is fine, but this was an unusual type of engagement.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Everything they make is very modern and attractive. All their work looks current, and they understand marketing and UX very well.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, we're satisfied with everything they delivered.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

I don’t have any recommendations specific to collaborations with DOOR3. With any project, it’s important to know what you want so your partners have a clear direction.

5.0
Overall Score We like working with them.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    The costs are high, but they provide good value.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I've used them multiple times and would gladly recommend them.

Wireframing for a Health Insurance Software Company

“They found the best solution and delivered it in a sensible timeframe.”    

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Confidential
 
Apr. - July 2018
Project summary: 

Using InVision, DOOR3 designed detailed wireframes to speed up an in-house engineering team’s development of a CX enterprise application’s broker portal. They laid out the navigation and planned features. 

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Brooklyn, New York
Head of Product, Health Insurance Software Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

DOOR3 rapidly produced sophisticated wireframes that empowered the in-house team to meet government-mandated deadlines and preempt revenue loss. Innovative and talented, they leveraged their expertise and industry-specific knowledge to intuitively design a solution to satisfy nuanced requirements. 

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

Our company delivers a customer experience (CX) platform. We offer 12 products, including suites of CRM and digital experience solutions. 

As the head of product, I'm responsible for our overall product strategy as well as the related frontend design and development.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

Our digital experience product line is a suite of consumer portals that serve the health insurance market, including ones for health plan members, brokers, employers, and providers.

We were a bit crunched for time with the schedule for a particular project. DOOR3 came in as a resource to work alongside our small, lean design team and provide the expertise and horsepower we needed. 

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

DOOR3 helped us create visual interaction design for the latest version for one of our portals. They collaborated with our in-house teams to understand the existing challenges with our current solution and the problem we were trying to solve. Using InVision, they created initial wireframes that laid out all the features and navigation for the next portal iteration. 

Following our internal designers' guidelines, they added an additional layer of visual design. They handed off these deliverables to our engineering team to actually build. 

What is the team composition? 

We embedded a strong designer from DOOR3 into our internal team. They got along well with everyone and worked on site quite frequently. The other resource we interfaced with was a project manager.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

I happened to meet one of the partners and founders of DOOR3 at a networking event for product leaders in the New York area. After getting to know him, I found out about the company and reviewed some examples of work he shared with me. 

When I was considered who to hire, I needed a team who understood both the design space and the relevant subsets of specialties within it. Our complex enterprise application requires more specific expertise. Based on our conversations and their portfolio, DOOR3’s value add was a sensitivity to the challenges of working in our highly regulated environment.

What is the status of this engagement?

Our project began in early April 2019, and we finished it around July 2018. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We measured the project's success by our ability to deliver the broker portal solution before open enrollment, which is a hard, government-driven deadline for health insurance. Solutions like these are opened up to attract new membership. Meeting that deadline was critical to avoid disruption to potential incremental revenue for our health plan. 

The core wireframes they created enabled us to stick to our timeline. This achievement was a testament to DOOR3's overall success and the help they provided us.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

DOOR3 actively engaged with us to ensure everything stayed on track. We didn't use the project-based method I know they traditionally do, so there was less overhead than usual. 

Since we embedded their designer into our in-house team, we didn't need the heavy oversight bringing on a full outsourced team a predefined project would have required. They were highly responsive and accommodating with any issues we encountered. 

What did you find most impressive about them?

DOOR3 has a thorough understanding of how to design for enterprise applications. They found the best solution and delivered it in a sensible timeframe. They helped our engineering team move faster. Together, we made the right design decisions and could subsequently defend them. 

Are there any areas they could improve?

Nothing stands out to me. DOOR3 was very flexible about taking a staff augmentation approach, which is different than how they typically work, which is more project-based. I appreciated how much they accommodated us and helped us deliver. 

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

When you have the opportunity to bring in their high-powered expertise for a specific solution, particularly on the design side, it's important to engage DOOR3 as early in the process as possible. I suggest integrating someone from DOOR3 into your team right at the start to help identify potential challenges that could cause issues down the line. 

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Drupal Design for Higher Education Institution

“Everyone who saw the website was thrilled with it.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
July 2017 - Mar. 2018
Project summary: 

After creating wireframes, DOOR3 redesigned a Drupal website, focusing mostly on the frontend. They also identified weaknesses in branding and developed a content strategy.

The Reviewer
 
1,001 - 5,000 Employees
 
Newark, New Jersey
Director of Web Services, New Jersey Institute of Technology
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The website got rave reviews from the end users and the in-house team is impressed with the quality of work. DOOR3 met all needs, while their expertise and ability to back up their decisions with research made them stand out among competitors.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm the director of web services at New Jersey Institute of Technology.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We had a very stagnant website, so we were looking for a vendor to help us update it. We also wanted to figure out the weaknesses in our branding and our strategy.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

DOOR3 created the wireframes and redesigned our Drupal website. They mostly worked on the frontend, while our in-house team handled the backend. They also developed a content strategy, helping us identify weaknesses in our current website and providing valuable recommendations.

What is the team composition?

I worked with 5–6 members of their team, including our project manager.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

We sent out a request for proposal and received over a dozen of responses. We liked the presentation that DOOR3 delivered, so we chose them.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent about $230,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working with them in July 2017, and the project was completed in March 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Everyone who saw the website was thrilled with it. We've received fantastic feedback from our users.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

They kept the project on track and informed us about the progress. We had a phone call every other day and they came on campus a couple of times. We also used a project management software for various tasks and comments.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They rely heavily on research and provide data to back up their decisions. That is the primary reason we chose them over other design firms.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, I can’t think of anything. They demonstrated great customer service. If we had any concerns, they were quick to address them.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

They're very receptive to feedback, so keep an open line of communication throughout the entire process and let them know if you want them to change anything.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Web App Dev for Pharmaceutical Company

"We were satisfied with the high-quality solution and would work with them again."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Apr. - Nov. 2018
Project summary: 

DOOR3 built an online database repository for a third party. The team created wireframes and developed referencing functionalities for the web application.

The Reviewer
 
10,001+ Employees
 
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Vinay Mehta
Epidemiologist, Merck
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The web app received unanimously positive feedback. Throughout the partnership, DOOR3 was responsive, professional, and flexible. They were open to feedback and accommodated requests. The team communicated well over a variety of platforms.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m an epidemiologist at Merck.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We wanted to build an online database repository. Our vendor subcontracted DOOR3 to help develop the web application.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

The solution needed to summarize attributes about existing databases. Our vendor limited DOOR3’s involvement to web app development. The team created wireframes and we reviewed their work before moving forward. DOOR3 then built a set of functionalities that enabled us to identify potential databases for a specific oncology study.

What is the team composition?

We interacted with two people including the owner and a main point of contact. They had a team working behind the scenes.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

Our vendor hired DOOR3 because they had worked together before.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent between $15,000–$20,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We worked together from April–November 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We had nothing but positive feedback. Every user and stakeholder was satisfied with the app.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

Due to the third-party relationship, we were not involved with DOOR3 from a project management standpoint. The team was flexible and willing to make any adaptations that would help us meet our needs. We didn’t have any complaints about the partnership. The teams communicated via phone, email, and teleconference meetings.

What did you find most impressive about them?

DOOR3 provided professional, responsive, and courteous service. We were satisfied with the high-quality solution and would work with them again.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, I can’t think of anything.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Communicate with them early and review wireframes carefully.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Web Dev for Marketing & Ad Agency

“Their active interest in our project was very reassuring, and we felt they’d be easy to work with.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
June 2010 - Oct. 2011
Project summary: 

After a discovery session, DOOR3 designed a standardized solution that combined a marketing firm’s collection of existing management tools. Once finalized, they built out the new product and helped with sales.

The Reviewer
 
10,001+ Employees
 
New York, New York
Former VP, Marketing & Strategy, Business Communications Firm
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Both internal staff and external clients praise the solution for is UI design and performance. The DOOR3 team managed a smooth and transparent engagement, communicating responsively and sharing updates regularly. The overall quality of their services left a positive and lasting impression.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the former VP of a marketing and communications firm. I managed client relations for my division.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We’d been in business for 12 years at the time of this project. At that point, we’d acquired a sizable number of custom-developed tools and products that we used to manage our business. We needed to standardize our processes, so we decided to integrate all of the individual software into a single solution with an upgraded and more accessible user interface for both clients and internal employees. We have an in-house IT department, but we needed a vendor that had experience in creating high-quality UX/UI work using new technologies.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We shared our existing customer communication applications for producing statements, managing enrollment books, customizing marketing pieces, and other self-service configuration tools with DOOR3. They assessed them and looked over our list of business requirements for this project, then came back with a full proposal for a new platform that met all of our needs. Their plan contained numerous modules, so we divided them up between our internal IT team and DOOR3’s team. Over an extended period of time, we completed each individual piece.

We started by putting together a prototype for the user interface. After several iterations and proofs of concept, we finalized the design. DOOR3 collaborated with internal staff to determine the most efficient structure for the platform and how each separate component would come together cohesively. We integrated everything; then the DOOR3 team worked with our marketing team to create a sales strategy. We wanted to secure new clients by promoting the new solution’s core tools and their uses in the marketplace. Finally, their team built a demo site that we could use to train internal staff and share with potential clients.

What is the team composition?

I worked directly with three people—one for the UI, one for our technical needs, and one for sales and marketing support. They each helped with different aspects of the project and had their own support teams in the background.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

They were highly recommended by one of our core team members. We reached out and scheduled an interview that doubled as a discovery discussion. They seemed to understand our vision, and they asked all the right questions. Their active interest in our project was very reassuring, and we felt they’d be easy to work with. They weren’t overbearing or authoritative, but still showed a high level of confidence. They were professional in that they documented everything we discussed and clearly articulated their ideas. After that interaction, it was an easy decision.

How much have you invested with them?

Each component of the project was priced individually. In total, we spent between $50,000–$200,000 on their services while I was there.

What is the status of this engagement?

In the middle of the project, our company was acquired by a larger organization who made their own changes to the platform and rebranded it. I wasn’t with the company when the engagement with DOOR3 officially ended, but I personally worked with them from June 2010–October 2011.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We did several roadshows and held demos with major clients at different points in the development process to introduce the solution incrementally. We wanted to make sure we were staying in line with their wants and needs, and we didn’t want to surprise them with a brand-new solution. Overall, the product was very well received. We also held an internal event to promote the solution and increase excitement. That also went well. Both internal and external users praised the product’s design and performance.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

They were very strong. They used several software tools to track the status of the project and share updates. We had access to all of the information through Basecamp. They scheduled calls to discuss their work, and where they were in relation to completing the overall project. There was an open dialogue between team members on both sides. It was a very positive engagement.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Overall, I’m happy with the entire experience. This was several years ago, and I still remember it fondly, which speaks to the quality of their services.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I really can’t think of anything negative.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Web & CRM Development for Legal Services Company

"It’s hard to imagine if we hadn’t transitioned, it would have cost us a tremendous amount of time."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$1,000,000 - $9,999,999
 
2012 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

DOOR3 created a contract management system, which integrates into a larger JMS application that organizes communication via email, scheduling, client services, and billing and payments.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
New York, New York
VP of Operations, TSG Reporting
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The system created has saved numerous hours of time, and thus proved essential to the daily workflow. It saves on average 15 minutes per job, and with 100 jobs per day it adds up. They provided consistent communication on every step of the project. With DOOR3, nothing was impossible.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I work for TSC Reporting. We're a litigation support service company and hire court reporters, videographers, and other types of services that attorneys might require in their discovery phase. We cover many different depositions and arbitrations on any given day.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenges were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We needed a new system that could manage our calendar and production output, and on the other end, our whole billing and payment system. We were growing fast and living in the past as far as our systems go. Our calendar and job management system suited us fine when we were a smaller organization, but we had outgrown that. The challenge was to address the current growth and optimize a few critical workflows, and also build for the future, expecting to continue to grow. We needed a system that could handle not just the present, but the future challenges that we had as well.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

They came and listened to what we needed. It was clear that we had many challenges, and we had many ideas to address those challenges, but we needed to prioritize. They helped us organize our challenges and ideas. We picked out 1 or 2 targeted areas, and the first thing was to recreate our contact management system (CRM). The intention was that it would tie into the job management system which they would also create, and it does.

The backbone of the CRM is Microsoft Dynamics. It ties into JMS, which is the larger application and is a .NET framework. The CRM has been integrated into our exchange environment; we're a heavy e-mail organization and we use Outlook, and we handle email 24 hours a day across all teams. The CRM was tied into our Outlook traffic so that emails are tracked to the contacts in CRM database, which then we can view and work off of in our larger JMS application.

They built the JMS application from scratch. As mentioned, Dynamics is the backbone of the CRM but everything else was built by DOOR3 which includes workflows, job grids, and whole administration panel of options. I can manage the system internally, while they support it externally and it carries a lot of big features like jobs, standing orders, the client list, the client location list, and service list vendors. Then there's a bunch of logic that ties into how all those parts play together.

They also updated our website, which was an earlier project. Previously, the website had no tie into the system, and the new website it much fresher. The important piece, however, is that clients can log on and look at the data in our JMS system which refers to other jobs that they've scheduled or booked in the past. It gives them the ability to schedule online, taking into account their firm's standing orders for any given case. It all then goes right into our system and gives us an immediate alert that the client has scheduled, as well ties into our fast-paced email flow. People are aware of the bookings, any questions are being brought to the forefront, and we can address our client needs right off the bat.

What is the team dynamic?

It's been an evolution of team members, but it’s been a small group all along the way which has been good because it keeps us nimble. It allows me to really work with the developers in phases that normally a client wouldn't be involved in. I think that's been a good a good fit overall, it matches our pace. The team size is usually around 5 or 6. Izzy is the project manager. We had 1 main architect, and then we've got a group of developers and QA testers who rotate in and out of the project.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

We had hired a small development firm in the past, and had done a very small project, but were extremely disappointed with the results. We needed to improve upon that, and time was of the essence. I looked online for others reviews, experiences, and asked around for recommendations.

We contacted a few different companies after a reasonable amount of research online. I spoke with Alex [Founder & President, DOOR3] first, and he seemed to be really in tune with our needs and how they would be addressed. It seemed like a good fit, from the way he received what I had to say. We brought in a number of others, but I felt most comfortable working with the DOOR3 team.

After several more meetings and conversations, we decided to go for a small commitment prototype launch, which gave us something functional right away. That was a good experience working with the development team, and there was never any reason not to continue forward.

How much have you invested with them?

Over $1,000,0000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We began working together in 2012, and that engagement is ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

It’s given us a huge amount of returns in terms of what we're able to accomplish with the small team of people that we are. It's definitely provided so much more insight than we had before and we were spending weeks having people divert their time from their core responsibilities to try to create a meaningful report of some kind. Fortunately, we've been able to install the systems making the whole process automatic now which has been great.

Once the client hits submit, the system is emailing us that the job already exists in our system. The information is completely there, and everyone associated with the job has been notified. The rates and agreements we have with a firm are also already linked to the job, so it’s saving us a huge amount of time. It saves about 15 minutes per job and with 100 jobs a day that adds up fast.

The new method is so much faster for us because when clients are logging in, it's integrating their firm's preferences. This means, if they are on a case for which they have a preference for a certain group of services, those services are pre-selected at the point when the client selects the case of their scheduling for.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

They've been very good about communication. They were a pretty demanding client when it comes to communication and information. We prefer to know a lot more than other clients often care to, and are definitely very much involved in what's going on. That took some time for them to adjust to naturally, but they've done a great job with that. Now we've got a really good pace going with communication, and a good understanding of where we stand.

We primarily use email, and also have a weekly call with our project manager, but are still in contact throughout the week anyway. We also use Jira, so there are a lot of options. I get a good view of all the items that they're working on in a given sprint, what status they're in, and when they’re to a point where they’re testable I also have access to that. They involve us at a little bit of an earlier stage than other clients might, and it’s really helped us keep our efforts and projects at a reasonable run rate.

They definitely delivered an acceptable amount of work on time and on budget. There's always going to be challenges and unforeseen circumstances, but we have a more flexible relationship and trust each other. We’re always in constant contact and there are really no surprises when something is going to be delivered to us, which is the main point that really matters.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Often I’ve come up with these crazy ideas, but it always seems to be true anything is possible when it comes to development with them. We've thought of all different kinds of ways to address certain needs. They created a pretty massive and complex program that does a whole lot of work for us, and I’m amazed that it’s been able to come together and really work for us. It doesn’t just keep us afloat, but it's definitely transcended the way we do business which is excellent.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I don’t really have any complaints where they need to improve upon. It’s pretty much all been done.

4.5
Overall Score I’m really happy with what they’ve done.
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    It's been nearly perfect.
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    I view this entire endeavor as being critical to our organization.
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    Our project manager has done a great job of working with the developers, to present a viable product from the first look. They’ve done a great job with that.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    They treat us well and care about our business, and I know they will do the same for anybody I recommend.

Mobile App Dev for Venture Capital Holding Company

"We couldn't have hoped for anything better."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
Feb. 2017 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

DOOR3 created a POC model and now provides software engineering for mobile app development with a focus on UI/UX and marketing coordination targeted towards investors. The app is in early development. 

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
New York, New York
Matthew Pirraglia & John Poulmentis
Co-Owners, KENSHIN Holding Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

DOOR3 has helped maximize investment incentive through technological innovation and intricate marketing visuals. They offer an efficient, responsive, and accurate process that continues to impress both clients and investors. 

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

We’re co-owners of KENSHIN Holding Company, and we’re working on the development of mobile messaging technology. 

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

Respondent 1: We’re developing Glass, a messaging app for iOS and Android devices. 

Respondent 2: We did the business and financial planning for this project, but we needed a development agency to build the app because we have minimal development experience.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Respondent 1: We finished the POC (proof of concept) after the proposal effort. As we developed the app in collaboration with investors, DOOR3 focused on UX design and co-marketing. They created 3 user stories for the investor presentation slide deck detailing functionality and graphics.

There’s a process in place for defining certain UX interfaces. We just finished Phase 1 of development, and are about to commence Phase 2.

Respondent 2: DOOR3 proved the feasibility of the idea and determined a list of items and critical elements necessary for a minimum viable product (MVP). They also developed the UX and demonstrated potential options for the UI, which were useful for us as we pitched to investors. Moving forward, they will build an MVP and improve it as we grow.

What is the team dynamic?

Respondent 1: We worked with program and engineering teams, and met at least once a week. Alex [CEO, DOOR3] was available for additional consultation 24/7.

Respondent 2: We also worked with Ahmed [Senior Developer, DOOR3], a junior developer, their head of UX development, and 2 project managers.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

Respondent 1: My former business partner and professor recommend them to me during our search for a New York-based software engineering company. I spoke with others who knew the agency, and they put me in touch with Alex.

Respondent 2: We were referred to, and considered, several other companies, who seemed to understand the project, but didn’t show great confidence in their abilities to execute it. One of those companies suggested we consider DOOR3, and when we did, they seemed like a perfect fit. 

How much have you invested with them?

Respondent 1: The POC cost $56,000.

Respondent 2: For the POC phase, which is all that's been completed, we invested approximately $70,000. For the forthcoming MVP development stage, we expect to spend between $300,000–$500,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We contacted them in February 2017, and the engagement is ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Respondent 1: So far, we’ve improved the technology from an engineering standpoint, and have maximized marketing efforts and objectives. The presentation deck was key in securing capital to finish development. The presentation’s aesthetics were not only incredible, but also finished promptly. This is only one example of them delivering more than we requested.

Respondent 2: The feedback from showing the investor deck and the functional “alpha” code has been overwhelmingly positive. We couldn't have hoped for anything better.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

Respondent 1: The engineering team accommodated all of our needs and concerns. They built great interface visuals by utilizing well-defined, intuitive, and attentive processes. They used JIRA and other tools that enabled me to track their progress in real time. In addition to Alex’s unlimited availability, their teams were very responsive.

Respondent 2: They’re always very timely and consistent with project updates, and make sure to incorporate our feedback. They've been accommodating, and we haven't felt disconnected from the project at all. Ahmed and Patty [Head of User Experience, DOOR3] were both particularly helpful and easy to work with.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Respondent 1: They have a phenomenal empathetic approach to design, and know how to incorporate all perspectives while implementing the customer’s vision.

Respondent 2: Their passion for the project and willingness to go beyond the scope was extremely valuable.

Are there any areas they could improve?

We didn’t see anything that they should do differently.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Respondent 1: In-person meetings are very important because they improve team coordination. Make time to meet Alex and his colleagues in their space.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Development for Freelance Platform

"They are an extremely professional and knowledgeable company."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
Sept 2016-Dec 2016, Jan 2019-ongoing
Project summary: 

DOOR3 helped to conceptualize, strategize and develop an online freelancer marketplace. They returned to the project as a long-term partner to ideate new functionality and resolve bugs with the old system. The review was updated by the client on February 27, 2019.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
New York, New York
Paula Balzer
CEO, gigHire
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

DOOR3's project management and strategic advice were beneficial to the original task. Their intelligence and collaborative nature make them a good long-term partner, and they returned frequently to assist between contracts.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your organization and your role there. 

I am the co-founder and CEO of eHire Talent, an online platform which recruits and places tier-one freelancers for experiential events.  We are a start-up still in the development and creation of our online platform. Our goal is to have the platform up and running by Spring 2017.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

So we are a startup business, and we are building an online platform to place top level freelancers in the event world. So whether you’re an agency or corporation who’s looking to put on a live event, you would come to our online platform, become a client of ours, and then be able to utilize our database to find appropriate staffing. So right now, our idea is just that—it’s an idea. So we have been working with DOOR3 to bring the idea to life, defining all the functionalities, and what the platform should be. That was phase 1. And now we’re going into phase 2 which is actually the designing and building of that platform.

We hired DOOR3 to assist us in the development and prioritization of the functional requirements for our platform. DOOR3 also developed the platform roadmap and developed the roll-out strategy for platform's services and function.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

I would say not much conceptually because we already had the idea. But what they helped us with was framing out how that idea would work and really give the best online product to our audience. They were extremely helpful in that. At this point in time, we’re using something called an Agile format in how we’re building the entire platform. We haven’t gotten into actually building yet and coding it and language. But in the discovery stage, it was all this Agile thinking and format that we were following.

What is the status of this engagement?

The project lasted approximately 2.5 months. At this point in time, DOOR3 will definitely be a part of phase 2, which is the coding, and we’re kind of determining exactly how that’s going to work.

How did you come to work with DOOR3? 

We are members of a professional organization, Vistage, and Alex Asianov, CEO of DOOR3 is also a member.  As a result, we have spent time with Alex and had the opportunity to learn about his organization and its capabilities.  We were very impressed not only with Alex's business savvy and insights but also with his team at DOOR3. 

DOOR3 was the driver and curator of our development processes.  We had several in-depth sessions to define the purpose of eHire Talent, the market is serving as well as the products and services it will provide.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?

Unfortunately, it is very early on so there is no ROI or any kind of specific benchmarks that promote either a qualitative or even quantitative standpoint that I can share. It’s too early on in the project. But everything so far has been done on time and within the budget that we discussed.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

They appointed a project manager to our business who was our main liaison who orchestrated the timeline and the planning with both our team and their team.

They are an extremely professional and knowledgeable company.  Not only did they guide us in structuring the development process of our platform they also provided savvy advice on the strategic direction of our company, which included helping us define our niche in the marketplace.

DOOR3 delivered the agreed to scope of work on time and on budget.

What did you most impressive about DOOR3?

I think the thing I most appreciated about them was that we were dealing with experienced senior-level talent on their side, so it was people who had done this on other occasions and were familiar with startup businesses. So they really helped advise us, not only from building a digital platform but also understanding the pitfalls and the challenges that a startup can face.

Are there any areas DOOR3 could improve?

I don’t think so at this point of time. We are very pleased with their service.

Updated Review

This review was updated on February 27, 2019 by the client. New content is below.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

We changed our company name since my last review. I am the co-founder of the company.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We originally hired them in 2016 to help us ideate and plan out the design of our platform. We used an offshore resource for development but ran into a series of problems. They’ve come to our rescue multiple times to help us work through bugs and strategic gaps.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We initially used them on a project basis, but they are becoming a more dependable long-term resource. They’re currently doing an analysis of the platform to help us move to the next building phase. The platform is .NET and runs on Azor. They are helping us expand our road map and feature set for future updates. They give us ideas to make sure the platform stays flexible and cost-effective, while keeping up with all the changes within the technology world.

How much have you invested with them?

We’ve spent in the low six figures for their work.

What is the status of this engagement?

We officially started this new engagement in early 2019, but have called on them every quarter since 2016. Going forward, we plan to engage in a more permanent long-term relationship.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What did you find most impressive about DOOR3?

They’re a very smart group of individuals. They’re collaborative, strategic, and intelligent. As a startup, those qualities are very important.

Are there any areas they could improve?

There is always room for improvement in any relationship, but I don’t have any specific areas of deficiency to point out.

5.0
Overall Score I'm very pleased with their service and the deliverables.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They delivered everything on time.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They stayed within our budget.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They are an intelligent and experienced team.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I have no reservations about referring them.

Systems Analysis and Strategy for Law Firm

"I was particularly impressed with the amount of time DOOR3 spent one-on-one with firm personnel."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Sept. 2016 - Dec. 2016
Project summary: 

DOOR3 did an analysis of a case management system and network. They provided their expert advice on strategy moving forward to make it more efficient. 

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
New York City, New York
Jonathan Frank
Partner, Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

DOOR3's research report analytics work resulted in a strategic plan to upgrade the system. Their responsiveness holistic approach to the project was highlighted. 

BACKGROUND

I am a partner at Dunnington, Bartholow & Miller LLP, a law firm located in midtown New York.  We are a general service firm in our 96th year of service. 

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

My firm was looking for an upgrade in case management software, document management software, and time and billing software which ideally should be interlinked on our law firm’s backend. Our overall system network was not enabling the firm to maximize its potential. 

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

DOOR3 did an analysis of what we would need to do with our existing systems in our existing network. They gave suggestions with respect to third-party legal vendors that provide these management platforms and ways we could implement them. Their analysis also included some troubleshooting issues we were having in our system. They looked into our website as well. We have certain wants and desires for our website after we deal with the backend system. They discussed with us the architecture that we need on the backend for what we want to do with our website as far as publishing articles and things of that nature. We retained DOOR3 given their experience in the legal field, including their build of an award-winning intranet for a prior law firm client.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

I knew them through past relationships.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?

They product they gave us was a proper research report analysis on a holistic level with respect to our system. It put everything in perspective. We’re looking to upgrade certain systems now, others later and some don’t need to be upgraded. They gave us a map and understanding of what it takes to get where we need to go.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

They were great. They were responsive and they provided a high-level team. If they needed people to come in to do more ground work, those people are there. If they need people to do more high-level discussions, those folks would come in.

What did you find most impressive about DOOR3?

They were very accessible and willing to spend extra time with me. They gave me personal attention that everyone wants in a service relationship.

DOOR3 leveled a holistic analysis of our systems and met with our professionals and staff to gain a deeper understanding of the issues, desired changes and goals.  I was particularly impressed with the amount of time DOOR3 spent one-on-one with firm personnel.  I believe this is what lead to a keen understanding of what was best suited for the firm.  Overall, DOOR3 was very responsive and worked quickly to provide the analysis, which clearly laid out the strategy, options and steps required in order to obtain the end-goal.  Their knowledge of the legal industry was very helpful.       

Are there any areas DOOR3 could improve?

No.

What tips or recommendations could you share that might increase the likelihood of success with DOOR3?

I would recommend them. We were pleased with the engagement.

5.0
Overall Score 10s across the board.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    DOOR3 met all deadlines.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    Cost was minimal given the deliverable.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    All firm personnel was impressed with the service and analysis.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    Can attest to DOOR3's ability with respect to the project leveled for our firm.

Web Redesign for Medical Devices Company

"[T]hey did a really good job of helping facilitate the process of getting everybody on the same page."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
4.0
Cost: 
3.5
Willing to refer: 
3.5
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
Project summary: 

DOOR3 conducted a thorough discovery and defining phase, assisting a device manufacturer in a complete overhaul of three U.S.-facing customer websites.

The Reviewer
 
1001-10,000 Employees
 
Pennsylvania
Former Digital Marketing Manager, Medical Devices Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

DOOR3’s contributions led to a significant increase in leads and vastly improved the company's online presence. Although the agency was critiqued for their lack of defined deliverables, the end product was outstanding. The team earned praise for their strong management and focus on user experience.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

When I worked with DOOR3, I was at a medical devices company. I was the Manager for E-Marketing Strategy and Analytics.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We were actually doing a complete overhaul of our US-facing customer websites. At the time, we had three different sites. One was for one part of our surgical business, one was for another part of our surgical business, and one for our gastroenterology and respiratory business. The intent was to work with them from the customer experience perspective to have a single facing site for the medical group in the US.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Predominantly, we had DOOR3 get up to speed on our business and our customers. We developed about a 50-page discovery document with an executive overview single page. From that, we then got internal approvals that this is what executive management was looking for, and then worked with them to determine the site navigation as well as the wireframes for the site itself. Ultimately, the site was built using Drupal, but DOOR3 was not a part of that. It was all a discovery and defining phase.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

It was probably in November of 2010. When we had gotten approval for the website, we looked at a variety of different companies. Some were proprietary, some were open-source. DOOR3 had done a project that somebody within our team had been aware of, so we reached out to them and invited them in for the initial round of vendor review. They had a very strong user experience side, so we decided to split the project into user experience and then development under a separate contract. We wound up using the Drupal web content management system and wanted to go with a company that specialized in Drupal, so that was the only reason why we used them for one part, but not the whole because they worked in a variety of platforms.

How much have you invested with DOOR3?

It was around $30,000 to $40,000 for the discovery work.

What is the status of this engagement?

The work is completed. It lasted about 4 months.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Could you share any results of the engagement?

We had a junk web presence with multiple sites. These don’t sound huge for consumer side numbers, but from a B2B [business-to-business] perspective, we went from about 1,000 marketing leads a month to a little bit over 4,000. quIt was a little bit over a 250% increase in leads as a result of the way the site was structured by DOOR3.

One of the important aspects of it for us was that our customers were very aware of our imaging platform, but they didn’t always realize we had a lot of accessory products. The site was built in a way that we focused on our nine major medical specialty areas, and then within each of those areas, we highlighted the procedures, and for each procedure, the product suite that we offered in addition to what everybody knew we offered.

We really wanted to upsell through the site and remind people that we offered all these different medical devices and different products as opposed to just the imaging platform. That was a really big part of it. For the people that were aware of our products, we wanted to make sure that it was easily accessible to get directly to the product they were looking for. We wanted to balance growing awareness and specifically being able to get to the product that you were looking for.

How did DOOR3 perform from a project management standpoint?

DOOR3 was very good. We actually did a lot of onsite work at their office. So instead of having their team travel out, I went to them and did a lot of onboarding to get them up to speed before they came onsite to meet with the rest of our marketing team. There was definitely a learning curve there. They picked that up pretty quickly, so that was good.

We actually had a situation where our surgical business was in Boston, our ENT [ear, nose, & throat] business was in Tennessee, and our respiratory and gastroenterology business was in Pennsylvania. The kickoff meeting that we had for the website that DOOR3 conducted was actually the first time those parties all sat in the same room at the same time, which is hard to believe, but they did a really good job of helping facilitate the process of getting everybody on the same page. The concern was that our GI [gastrointestinal] business was so big that it would have different needs than some of our other businesses that maybe didn’t have a massive market share. What we decided to do, which DOOR3 facilitated, was to split the groups up, have them go through what their priorities were for the site, and then brought everybody back together, talked through, and reconciled the priorities. They found that they were actually pretty well aligned, even though they all thought they were going to be very different.

That had a huge impact on the project simply because the groups realized that their goals were actually very equal, and it wasn’t one part of the business getting something that the other part wasn’t. That was a big early hurdle to get over. The company actually implemented an annual joint marketing meeting, so every year now they all get together and talk about what they’re doing. The very first time they did was for the web project that DOOR3 helped us lead for the discovery and defining phase.

What did you find most impressive about DOOR3?

We selected them because we felt, during the presentation, that they had a really strong user experience approach, and I think the output that we had on the site definitely validated that. From that perspective, I can definitely speak. Again, we didn’t use them on the technical side, so I can’t talk to that aspect of it.

Are there any areas DOOR3 could improve?

From the actual work perspective, I thought they did an excellent job. They did bring one of the team members on a few weeks into the project, and they missed a lot of the onboarding. As a result, I had to talk through a lot of what we had already talked through, so there was a bit of repetition due to that. The business development person at the time had their take on why they did that, but from my perspective in managing the vendor, I don’t want to have to do that twice and spend the hours to have to repeat what we had already gone over at the start. That was definitely something that I think could’ve been handled better. Maybe they just didn’t have the person in place. I know they did hire him for that project; I don’t know if he stayed on after that or not.

The other area was in the defining of what was going to be delivered. There was a lot of back and forth in the sense that there were some things written within the contract that should be delivered, that they felt were not deliverables. Ultimately we got everything we needed, but if there are areas of constructive criticism, that would be it. I don’t know if it was a case where they ran out of hours, which I’m theorizing that they may have invested more hours than they thought they were going to, so as a result, they tried to talk themselves out of some of the things. It was not a big deal. We got what we needed, so from that perspective, it’s not a problem. The budget was the budget. We didn’t get into having to pay more for things or anything like that.

I’d say those were the two biggest areas where I thought there was a little frustration. Otherwise, the output and the product was fantastic, and it was split groups, so it wasn’t like we were negotiating with the user experience designer or anything. It was two different conversations; I just happened to be in both of them.

4.0
Overall Score They were very good people to work with. Their team was very good. It was really just those two instances that I mentioned. Unfortunately, with the deliverables, that was toward the end of the project, so that sticks with you a little more.
  • 4.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 3.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    For the reasons I just gave in terms of what the expectation was.
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They met everything that we wanted out of the experience side.
  • 3.5 NPS
    Willing to refer
    For the user experience, with the caution of making sure that the contract was extremely clear.
Verification

Clutch verification provides an additional layer of data to help you make the right purchasing decsion of business services. Learn more

Verification Level
Gold
VERIFIED
Business Entity
Status
Active
Jurisdiction of Formation
Delaware
ID
30-0133230
Date of Formation
Nov 22, 2002
Source
State of Delaware
Last Updated
Feb 22, 2019
Payment & Legal Filings
Bankruptcy
No
Tax Lien Filings
0
Judgement Filings
0
Collections Count
0
Client Reviews
VERIFIED CLIENT REVIEWS
14
OVERALL REVIEW RATING
4.8
Source
Clutch
LAST UPDATED
March 6, 2019