PR, Media Buying & Outreach for Fitness Accessories Co
- Digital Strategy Media Planning & Buying Public Relations
- $10,000 to $49,999
- Jan. 2005 - Dec. 2025
- Quality
- 0.5
- Schedule
- 0.5
- Cost
- 0.5
- Willing to Refer
- 0.5
"My experience working with TLK Fusion was extremely disappointing and ultimately financially damaging."
- eCommerce
- Rancho Cucamonga, California
- 1-10 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
TLK Fusion was hired to provide PR, media buying, and retail outreach services for a fitness accessories company. The team was tasked with reaching out to 15 retailers monthly.
The engagement with TLK Fusion was disappointing, and the client saw no measurable results. The team provided monthly reports that lacked timelines, deliverables, and progress updates. After the client posted a negative review, TLK Fusion filed a $500,000 arbitration claim against them.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and position.
I am the Owner of Lutava
Describe what your company does in a single sentence.
We make antimicrobial fitness acessories and sell through e-commerce and retail partners.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What specific goals or objectives did you hire TLK Fusion to accomplish?
- PR
- Retail Outreach
- Media Buy
SOLUTION
How did you find TLK Fusion?
Emailed me
Why did you select TLK Fusion over others?
High ratings
How many teammates from TLK Fusion were assigned to this project?
6-10 Employees
Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.
I hired TLK for Social, PR, Retail Outreach and media buyy. They were to deliver different deliverables on each but primarily outreach to 15 retailers each month. They used the likeness of past clients like Kim Kardashian and Gucci to influence my descision to work with them.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
My experience working with TLK Fusion was extremely disappointing and ultimately financially damaging to my small business.
During our 12-month engagement, I repeatedly requested clarity about what work was being performed, including timelines and documentation of outreach to retailers. Only after I withheld payment and discussed cancellation did TLK Fusion provide a generalized list of activity covering several months. This list had never been shared during the engagement and contained no dates, no documentation of outreach, and no measurable outcomes.
When I asked questions about inconsistencies — including the same retailers appearing in multiple monthly updates — I did not receive clear answers. In one exchange, I was told, “Do you think I need your $2,000 retainer to pay my Rolls-Royce payment?” and “I’m sure you’re not struggling to put food on the table.” I found those comments inappropriate in a professional client relationship.
Communication became increasingly limited while monthly billing continued and reminders to pay remained consistent. I also attended a scheduled in-person meeting after being told Ken would stop by to say hello. I drove two hours for this meeting, but he did not appear.
I was told the contract was based on “best efforts.” However, from my perspective there was very little transparency about what those efforts actually consisted of. When I later asked for documentation of work performed, I was told they were not legally required to provide written records. Based on my experience, I did not see verifiable results that I could clearly attribute to TLK Fusion’s work.
In July, I was advised that stopping payments could cause me to “lose out” on opportunities with retailers such as Nordstrom and Macy’s. This influenced my decision to continue paying. Six months later, I still had not seen results, and I ultimately secured a Nordstrom opportunity on my own through my own outreach.
When I later requested a refund for fees paid after July — a period during which communication had significantly declined — TLK Fusion declined the request.
After I indicated that I intended to share my honest experience publicly, their attorney contacted me and warned that doing so would be “unwise” and that they were prepared to litigate.
a few days after posting my review on a few different platforms, I was forced to retain legal counsel after TLK filed a $500,000 arbitration claim against me through JAMS. I believe this action was intended to intimidate me into removing my review. I incurred over $20,000+ in legal fees defending my right to speak about my business experience (this was as of January, and those fees have since increased substantially as the matter has continued) — all over an honest review.
The company then filed an emergency Temporary Restraining Order against my business, forcing me to appear in court within 24 hours and submit a written opposition on extremely short notice in an attempt to silence me. The California Superior Court denied their request, finding they failed to present sufficient factual evidence of harm and noting that the relief they sought implicated important First Amendment rights. The court also acknowledged that enforcing a contractual clause limiting speech raises serious public policy concerns regarding the restriction of lawful criticism.
Since then, TLK Fusion has publicly stated in responses to my posts that they “support free speech.” However, at the same time, my Google review has become hidden and my Reddit posts have been removed multiple times after being reported as false.
In their responses, TLK Fusion has also claimed that they secured PR placements for my brand. This is the first time I have heard that claim. If such placements exist, I would welcome them to share the specific publications and dates publicly so that I can better understand what work was performed.
These actions have placed significant financial and operational strain on my small business and family. I am a woman-owned, minority-owned small business owner and working mother who believes strongly in standing up for what is right.
I am sharing my experience so that other small business owners can make informed decisions when evaluating service providers.
Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?
Over the course of our engagement, TLK Fusion provided monthly reports via Basecamp. However, these reports lacked clear timelines, defined deliverables, or measurable outcomes. Each month typically listed retailer names without any substantive updates or documented progress. Since then, my access to Basecamp has been removed, and I no longer have visibility into those records.
After September, written updates largely stopped. I received one final summary in late December only after we began discussing cancellation.
Within the first few months, I scaled back services — including PR and media buying — and retained only retail outreach, as I had not seen any meaningful results or evidence that the services were producing outcomes.
For example, I was told I would be featured in Men’s Journal in February for an April placement. When April arrived, I followed up and was told they had no record of that conversation, and later that Men’s Journal had “changed their mind.” There was no documentation provided to support that opportunity.
I was also encouraged to continue making payments with the understanding that stopping could jeopardize ongoing discussions with major retailers and impact work I had already paid for.
At the conclusion of the 12-month engagement, I did not see measurable results from any of the services I had hired TLK Fusion to perform.
What was your primary form of communication with TLK Fusion?
Email or Messaging App
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
I initially found it notable that TLK Fusion maintains consistently high ratings across review platforms. However, based on my experience, I have concerns about how those ratings may be maintained or earned.
After I shared my own review, several individuals reached out to me privately stating they had similar experiences and felt discouraged from speaking publicly due to threats of legal action. Some shared that they removed their reviews because they could not afford to defend themselves, particularly after already investing significant retainer fees. Others expressed that the situation had a serious impact on their businesses, which I found deeply concerning.
While I cannot independently verify every individual claim, the consistency of these messages raised concerns for me about whether negative feedback is being suppressed. I also question the authenticity of some positive reviews, as my experience was markedly different.
Are there any areas for improvement or something TLK Fusion could have done differently?
As a business owner myself, I believe that when a client is unhappy, it presents an opportunity to listen, take accountability, and improve. That is how strong companies build trust and long-term relationships.
In my case, instead of engaging in a constructive dialogue, the response was an immediate escalation to legal action. From my perspective, this felt less like an effort to resolve concerns and more like retaliation.
When I requested a refund after not receiving clear documentation of outreach or measurable deliverables, my request was declined outright.
That experience — combined with the lack of transparency and the response to feedback — raised serious concerns for me about how this business operates and obtains new clients.
RATINGS
-
Quality
0.5Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
0.5On time / deadlines
-
Cost
0.5Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
0.5NPS
"I would encourage anyone considering their services to conduct thorough due diligence. They present as very friendly and approachable.