Custom Software Dev for Reusable Food Container Company
- Custom Software Development
- $10,000 to $49,999
- Jan. - Mar. 2021
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
“I was most impressed with their speed of building.”
- Other industries
- United Kingdom
- 1-10 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
AirDev is providing no-code development services for a reusable food container startup. Using Bubble, they're building a web application that'll serve as the partner's MVP.
The partner is happy with the solution and all of its functionalities are working properly. AirDev implemented an effective project management style, utilizing a custom internal tool. They managed the project well through an organized structure. Their team is customer-focused and attentive.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m starting a company called Re:User Ltd. It’s a reusable food and drink container system for the on-the-go, eat-in, and potentially takeaway delivery market. Someone would subscribe to the service, go to a food vendor or café, and get their food and drink in a reusable container which is logged via the web application.
They’d eat or drink their food and return the dirty container into a receptacle and log that again via a QR code. Re:User collects, cleans, and redistributes the container into the system. That’s the business in a nutshell, and I’m the founder and CEO.
We’re a pre-revenue startup that’s going to be launching in London, UK, and potentially in Austin, Texas as well. It’s pretty much just me right now with some paid consultants such as AirDev for tech development.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with AirDev?
I was trying to build an application for Re:User. I wanted an application that could keep track of the inventory as it goes through this circular economy system. The app would allow users to search out and find participating food vendors in a directory as well as log the checkout and return of the container or the borrowing and returning process.
There is a company, and I was in their accelerated program. I built a non-operational prototype with them. It’s essentially a sustainable delivery company with a reusable container system. However, I ultimately decided to launch with more of a lean approach and have the MVP as I described. We might add that down the line.
During my search and process, I found out about Bubble which is a no-code web application builder. Although it is a no-code platform, there’s still a lot of workflow design and such that needs to be optimized to help the application function properly and efficiently. I realized that I needed to hire a development firm to build the app in Bubble. That’s where AirDev comes into play.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
AirDev doesn’t use or sell any templates because they build a unique solution for each company. Their team does use a development platform called Canva which is kind of a template, but they use that for design. I ended up going with them and built the web app with them which is now ready to go.
In order to get the detailed technical scoping doc completed, I have to pay a $1,000 deposit which is refundable within a week of receiving the technical scoping doc. We had an initial one-to-two-hour call and on the back of that call, AirDev sent over a scope document which ended up being 19 pages. Then, there was some back and forth on that scope document in terms of finalizing and such. Once that was finalized, I paid the first half of the fee.
It took about three weeks from the time of paying to have the project start. There were two development sprints which were five-day periods where they were doing development. In the first sprint, there were 3–4 days of back and forth testing and then making some corrections.
Then, there was another one-week sprint. There was probably about a week of testing and requested changes and things of that nature. If I had questions about stuff, the developer always answered those or put things on hold for the next development phase.
What is the team composition?
I first started speaking with someone who was more of an initial sales rep. Then, I worked with a project manager, project director, and developer.
How did you come to work with AirDev?
When I decided on that strategic direction, the other company was quoting me a fixed cost for part of the development and then a bigger range. I thought what I wanted to build was quite a lean app. I didn’t think it should cost what they were quoting me for. I conducted a developer procurement process. I talked to a couple of other firms that were priced at pretty high rates, and these were all in the traditional development method.
After Bubble won me over, I looked to hire a development firm for Bubble. They list some partners on their website and I looked at AirDev as one of those partners. I probably reached out to about half of the partners on that website that looked good from the initial research I did on them.
I had an initial call with AirDev and reached out to other firms too. It was between them and another company based out of Moldova. The customer service experience from AirDev was so much better than the other firm. That other firm didn’t hit some of the self-declared deadlines that they had for delivering things to me. I felt I was getting a very templated approach from them, versus AirDev who was more customer service focused and also gave a unique type of approach to my specific need.
I ended up choosing AirDev because I thought they might be preeminent Bubble developers. They’re exclusively Bubble, and I heard their founder speak on a podcast. They seem to be the industry leader there. Being based in San Francisco, I thought they’d be a lot more expensive, but Bubble is still not that expensive and they have a rate for startups like myself.
How much have you invested in them?
The cost was $10,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
The scope doc discussion was in January 2021, and the last stages of development were in late March 2021.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
I’m in a weird position where I’m waiting on an entrepreneurial Visa to go back to the UK, and my business cannot be “trading”. I can’t receive revenue or book expenses to the business yet or else it’d be viewed as trading and that would be violating the Visa restrictions. That means that I, unfortunately, have this web app that’s ready to start taking subscribers. We’re ready to sign up restaurants, but it’s not going to be operationally live until sometime in May 2021.
I won’t begin getting the real-time feedback of the product out until that time. I’ve tested a bunch of scenarios and things on my own and it seems to be working properly. Additionally, I’m able to track the inventory through various situations. The checkout and return process works, and we have the QR codes generated. Everything should be working properly at this point and it will be ready to launch. In a way, I could say that I have now built the MVP and am able to use that as part of my fundraising collateral.
How did AirDev perform from a project management standpoint?
Project management worked well. Air Dev manages this own process on their own custom project management portal. My project manager wasn’t super responsive; the engagement was really me working directly with the developer and testing. The developer would ask the project manager and project director if she had some Bubble technical questions, and they were more or less supervising her work.
There were many other individuals from AirDev who were testing the product as well, given the log-in history of the app when we were testing; there were multiple other AirDev emails that have logged in. The developer wasn’t deciding what was best by herself. There were other people to bounce her ideas and questions off of. AirDev also has a structured onboarding program for any developer who is working for them.
Overall, the project was pretty good. I didn’t really talk to the project director besides one conversation. However, I know he was engaged by the project manager with specific questions about things as well as whether certain things could be included in the scope or if they would be extra. I think overall, they seemed pretty on top of it with managing the project and the chain of command and things like that. It was an organized and efficient project management structure.
They use Loom for recording videos of how to make a specific change. I’m getting this web app and for any future changes, I can reach out to AirDev to handle them or I can change certain things myself. The developer has recorded videos on Loom that are instructional showing how she did things, so I have those as a backup. Using Loom video is very useful.
AirDev uses another tool where if I am reviewing the web app, I can take a small screenshot or point something out on the screen and add some dialogue to it. When I make that comment, it makes a new thread in their review portal. I can’t remember what they’re using for that, but it was quite useful as well.
What did you find most impressive about them?
I was most impressed with their speed of building. This is partially based on the perks of Bubble but also on AirDev as well. I really liked the speed and price of development and that I could achieve by using AirDev and Bubble. It’s a very organized process that’s very customer-focused as well. AirDev provides good customer service.
Are there any areas they could improve?
The actual UI/UX design abilities of the app are fairly limited and maybe that’s due to Bubble or Canva. The whole idea of Canva is to have a uniform design and be able to quickly make some design changes. One of the downsides of Bubble and AirDev as well is just the ability to be very flexible with our design.
Their workflow and portal where they manage everything were good, but I gave them a few feedback points on it just because one annoying thing was if I’m taking a screenshot to paste into the portal, I can’t paste an image. That was annoying because I had to take a screenshot and save it to my computer and then attach it. There were a couple of other small nitpicky things.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Definitely test everything yourself because you’ll find things to change. Set aside enough time for the testing and review process. There are two one-week sprints, and I’d arguably say to set aside one week for testing back and forth for each of those sprints. Set aside 3–5 business days for the testing and requested changes as part of each of those sprints. Then, the same timeframe of three to five business days for the back and forth on the scoping doc.
Make sure the scoping doc has everything you can think of because that’s then treated as the bible of what will be developed. If something is not included in the scope doc that you have asked for, that could be an additional cost. AirDev is only on the hook for what’s in that scoping document so ensure everything in there is everything that you’ll need. There were some things that they did push back on and said would be better for a later improvement.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS