Web Dev for Language Courses Business Listing
- Web Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Apr. 2017 - Feb. 2020
- Quality
- 1.5
- Schedule
- 0.5
- Cost
- 2.0
- Willing to Refer
- 0.5
"The most impressive thing was the knowledge and quality of the developers and the second project manager."
- Education
- Vilnius, Lithuania
- 1-10 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
The Software House was hired by a business listing for language courses for their web development services. The goal was to create the client's platform from scratch.
The Software House was able to provide good deliverables but were weeks delayed. They also used the wrong programming language for the project. The communication was hard due to previous errors. This review includes the vendor's response.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I am co-owner of Language Advisor. The company is a business listing for language courses, offering a personalised search for language courses, matching interested students with schools and teachers.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire The Software House, and what were your goals?
We hired them to build the platform from scratch. The goal was to have a working platform after a few months and schedule an update/ refinement the second year.
SOLUTION
How did you select The Software House and what were the deciding factors?
We found TSH through your website. We selected a short list from developers in Poland, Lithuania and Ukraine. The deciding factor was their promises, proactive way coming forward and size of the company.
Describe the scope of work in detail, including the project steps, key deliverables, and technologies used.
The scope was set detailing two outcomes, from 3,5 to 4,5 months, giving a range between two prices. The elements which were to be delivered were;
architecture, API, Mail engine, File Upload, Online payment gate, Search engine, Login/ register, Account settings, Password reminder, Social media registration, Create profile, update profile, map search, public profile, attaching user as an damin or a teacher, contact form, newsletter, whish list, reviews, user dashboard, school/ teacher dashboard, and business dashboard.
Furthermore, a system admin, statistiscs, CMS, mail templates, financial section, save search result, share, add/ edit for publications, search publications, view publications.
The approach was minimalistic, design was included as considered important. No commitments/ specifications on technologies were made. Work was due to start April/ May 2017. As not all deliverables were delivered, we had to schedule 3 other scopes, the last one ending in November 2019/ January 2020. The website in the end was developed in angular, php and javascript.
How many people from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?
Front end and backend developers, designer, devops , project manager, business analist, and testers. In total, for all scopes we met 11/13 different team members.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any measurable outcomes of the project or general feedback about the deliverables?
The project was a disaster. 1st scope 5/ 6 weeks delay, and only part of deliverables was delivered. Quality of deliverables was good, but as not all deliverables were delivered we required a second, third and fourth scope. 2nd/ 3th scope was done by an excellent Project manager and a lot of work was done and done well. The other Project managers and business analyst.
Describe their project management style, including communication tools and timelines.
1st scope we used basecamp, 2nd/ 3th scope trello and 4th scope jira. 1st Project manager who wrote scope was overruled by business analist who had his own agenda, became project manager. The original project manager halfway resigned, and the new project manager/ business analist left halfway the project to become head of design.
New project manager halfway 1st scope became head of PHP (but not immediately). 2nd and third scope was another Project manager, nobody of the previous developers was working for the company anymore. This project manager was really good. The 4th Project manager was inexperienced and had little input himself.
The 1st was very proactive, to a degree that he hijacked the project and implemented mainly his own idea, the second was very critical and asked the right questions the 4th was passive. None of the project was delivered in time.
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
The most impressive thing was the knowledge and quality of the developers and the second project manager.
Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?
Where do I start? The BA started without project charter and pushing his own idea and abandoned the project halfway for a different position. Our project was used for his own career, a year later he was fired as well. The first PM left frustrated soon after project start.
Deliverables and deadlines weren't met, and worst the wrong program language was used (Angular) making it virtually impossible to perform SEO, combining this with little attention to site structure (category pages, breadcrumbs, landing pages, etc.) which meant the project could never attract any real traffic as it was virtually impossible to index.
Only empty pages (rendering) were indexed and subsequently all pages were empty and had the same meta-data.
The 4th scope was intended to fix this problem, but to little and to late and executed poorly. Renderton was applied and installed, causing for a huge cost increase and after that the wrong time-interval was set. Communicating honestly was hard for them, probably because of previous errors had to be swept under the carpet.
Company Responses
The vendor responded on March 10, 2021.
Dear Client,
As discussed already in private, we are very sorry about your bad experience. We are known not only for technical expertise but also for great customer care, and we regret that we missed the mark. Your feedback is important to us. We have already implemented multiple improvements to our process to ensure that a similar situation does not occur in the future.
Your claims have been addressed in private and as a result, we have reached and signed a settlement agreement. We wish you all the best in your future endeavors.
RATINGS
-
Quality
1.5Service & Deliverables
"Great programmers and kind people, but initially very bad project management"
-
Schedule
0.5On time / deadlines
"They are responsable for the failure of the project."
-
Cost
2.0Value / within estimates
"Fairly priced in the beginning, but has several deliverables weren't delivered, it became expensive."
-
Willing to Refer
0.5NPS
"No way.