Website Redesign for Computing & Programming Company
- Web Design
- Less than $10,000
- Sep. - Oct. 2020
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"We consider the project successful, not to get too emotional, but because everyone here liked it."
- Education
- Moscow, Russia
- 201-500 Employees
- Online Review
Embacy provided a website redesign for a company that teaches kids basic computing and programming. The team worked on the main page, as well as detailing their course pages.
Embacy was successful in redesigning the site. The client noted an increase in new enrollees and a better conversion rate. The team was able to take and manage feedback impressively. Their design process was effective.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
Kodland is a coding school for children. We teach kids basic computing and different programming languages, to make games, apps, sites, etc. We have our own platform where the classes take place with personal accounts, tasks, and gamification. I'm in charge of the marketing department, with our entire marketing being my responsibility, including our website.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire Embacy?
To make a new main page for our website, and a page detailing the courses.
What were your goals for this project?
The main goal was to show to the visitors all the relevant information about the school. As a startup, we change rapidly — we often change both our courses and the platform, and our old site had outdated info, as we've made it back when we founded the school.
A lot has changed since then, and we wanted to provide up-to-date information in an accessible, understandable, and pleasing way. The other goal was to make a website where our visitors could easily find answers to their questions and save us plenty of time on calls and sales.
We could respond to easy questions with a link to our website, or our potential clients wouldn't even ask those as they'd already read the information on the website.
By the time we get to the sale, they're informed and warmed up to us, and we would spend time talking about more particular details about the education. The final goal, an emotional one, was to get a "wow" effect from the website. To make it look fun and cool and to set us aside from the competitors.
SOLUTION
How did you select Embacy?
That was one of the criteria by which we picked agencies, we'd looked at their previous project and whether that "wow" effect was there. But if we don't take into consideration the portfolio, their previous clients, what projects they did, what finally made us choose this vendor is the structure of the communication we had.
We had a call over tasks and goals, how will the project be handled and how would that work, that every single day I'd be able to see the progress. That I wouldn't have to ask different people, but that I could clearly and easily see the work done each day, and what's next.
That was very important, as we've had bad experiences before when deadlines got delayed, and you didn't know how they work, and that's just frustrating. But here the process is clear, transparent, and I didn't have to worry about the results.
Describe the project in detail.
They came up with three different concepts for the website and picked a spotlight. A spotlight that lights the way of the student and this learning way is made of code and various IT elements. We've span this idea in various ways, tried different options, and finally decided on illustration style and that the spotlight would color these illustrations, and sometimes we would use illustrations with the photos of our students, mixing the real and the virtual. The first week we were jumping too much between wildly different options, and that was somewhat worrying as I couldn't clearly picture the final result. But after that, we've figured it out and we're very satisfied with the final result.
What was the team composition?
I don't know anyone on the team other than the project manager. We communicated directly and I think that's the way to go, as it was very convenient to not have to split my attention between different people.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
Not sure about the success as the new website just released and it's too soon to talk about conversion rates. But overall, I see plenty of new pupils applying, and it seems that the new website got better conversation than the old one. And lead-generation wasn't the website's goal.
The website is to provide information, produce that "WOW" effect, and for leads we use different tools. We consider the project successful, not to get too emotional, but because everyone here liked it. We've shown it to our employees, our clients, and we all like it a lot better than the old one.
Way better, way more contemporary, way fresher. Right now we consider it successful because we like it, and we'll look at the conversion rates later.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
The design process was effective. Guys structured Figma really nice so it was easy for me to show the results to my colleagues. In the end of the project there was a small delay in Weblow development but overall everything was nice
What did you find most impressive about this company?
Every time they suggested creative options. Didn't think in cliches, even if that's a cliche to say. In the first week we didn't just think of the final design direction and kept moving, but every time there were more developments, new ideas, and we've tried plenty of different things.
And if they didn't work, they were easily discarded, but at least we've tried. And plenty of them did work, and they've made the website more distinguishable. The other thing that personally impressed me is how well they took our feedback. I think we're a rather critical team.
I took feedback from our team, structured it, and decided on what to bring up. We've discussed with the project manager what options we could take, what needs to be fixed and what doesn't, and all that was in speaking tone, no one got hurt (we've had bad experiences before), and the communication went great.
Are there any areas for improvement?
We didn't really understand that situation with your vacation. We didn't discuss it in August and then all of a sudden we couldn't get the final website by previously agreed deadlines. I didn't really understand what happened there, otherwise, everything would've been perfect, but that happened. So the area for improvement is to warn in advance over possible delays.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS