Custom Software Development for Software Company
-
API Development Custom Software Development IoT Development
- Confidential
- Oct. 2019 - Oct. 2026
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"We always know where things stand, and problems are raised early rather than discovered late."
- Telecommunications
- New Rochelle, New York
- 11-50 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
Eastern Peak developed a smart access-control and property-automation platform for a software company. The team built mobile apps, web dashboards, and self-guided tour functionalities, among other things.
Eastern Peak's work led to a 25% reduction in vacancy loss, a 5-7% increase in NOI, a 35% reduction in staffing costs, and a 20% reduction in HVAC energy costs. Their project management approach was organized, transparent, and dependable. They delivered on time and were highly responsive.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and position.
I am the CTO/CPO of WalkIN IQ
Describe what your company does in a single sentence.
Walk In IQ is a smart access control and property automation platform built by operators for operators. Originally developed in-house to automate a portfolio of more than 7,000 units, it now helps multifamily, student housing, build-to-rent, and senior living owners cut costs and increase profitability through self-guided tours, keyless access, turnover management, and energy management.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What specific goals or objectives did you hire Eastern Peak to accomplish?
- Smart Access Control and Property Automation Platform
SOLUTION
How did you find Eastern Peak?
Referral
Why did you select Eastern Peak over others?
- Pricing fit our budget
- Referred to me
How many teammates from Eastern Peak were assigned to this project?
6-10 Employees
Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.
Over six years, the team has served as our extended development arm for the Walk In IQ platform, a smart access control and property automation system used across multifamily, student housing, build-to-rent, and senior living properties. Their work has covered the full product lifecycle, from initial builds to ongoing enhancement and maintenance.
Key deliverables included:
Mobile applications: Development of the resident and prospect mobile apps, including keyless unlock and the SelfTour IQ app for scheduling, touring, and applying.
Web dashboards: The agent and property manager portals for lead tracking, prospect communication, access management, and reporting.
Self-guided tour functionality: End-to-end workflows covering scheduling, identity verification, temporary access, and lead capture.
Access control and turn management automation: Logic that automatically issues and revokes digital keys for residents, staff, and contractors across the unit lifecycle.
Third-party integrations: Connections to property management systems, access control hardware and locks, and energy management devices, with data kept in sync across systems.
Energy management features: Thermostat fleet management, vacant-unit monitoring, and alerting for extreme temperatures and overuse.
Reporting and analytics: Dashboards for leads, tour activity, and access logs. Ongoing maintenance and support: Regular releases, performance improvements, and rapid response to production issues.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
The platform the team helped build has delivered measurable results for our portfolio and our customers. In our flagship deployment across 26 properties and more than 7,000 units, we’ve seen: 25% reduction in vacancy loss, driven by self-guided tours that expand showing hours and increase tours, leads, and applications 5-7% increase in NOI, from lower operating costs and faster unit turns 35% reduction in staffing costs, as automated access control and turn management replaced manual key and scheduling tasks Up to 20% reduction in HVAC energy costs, through vacant-unit energy management and usage alerts
On the engineering side, the quality of the team’s code has reduced our QA costs by [X%], and production issues are typically resolved within [timeframe]. Over six years, that consistency has let us ship releases with confidence and keep our own team focused on product priorities. Before you submit Fill in the brackets with real figures, even rough ones. If you don’t have exact numbers, an honest estimate such as “roughly a third” is better than a precise-sounding invented one.
Check attribution. If you’d rather not imply the subcontractor is responsible for the business metrics, you can open with “Our platform has delivered...” and keep the subcontractor-specific credit to the QA and response-time lines. Consider adding delivery metrics if you track them, such as uptime, release frequency, bug rates, or on-time delivery percentage. Clutch reviewers tend to value these because they tie directly to the vendor’s work.
Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?
Project management has been one of the team’s biggest strengths. Over six years, they’ve been consistently organized, transparent, and dependable. We always know what’s in progress, what’s coming next, and whether anything is at risk, so there are no surprises on scope or timelines. They deliver on time as a rule.
When they commit to a date, we can plan our own releases and customer commitments around it. On the rare occasions a timeline has shifted, they’ve flagged it early, explained the cause, and proposed a clear path forward rather than letting us find out late. They’ve also been very responsive to our needs. Requests and priority changes are handled quickly and without friction, and the team adapts as our roadmap evolves. When something does go wrong in production, they respond fast, take ownership, and fix it without finger-pointing.
That reliability is a big reason the relationship has lasted six years, and why I treat them as an extension of our own engineering team. To make it more specific, consider adding: Your working process, such as two-week sprints, weekly syncs, or a shared Jira or Slack channel An on-time figure, even a rough one (e.g., “roughly 90% of releases delivered on the committed date”) A response-time example, such as “a critical production issue acknowledged within minutes and resolved the same day” A time they adapted to a change, like a shifted priority or a tight deadline they helped you meet
What was your primary form of communication with Eastern Peak?
- Virtual Meeting
- Email or Messaging App
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
What sets this team apart is that they deliver on all three fronts, consistently, for six years. Quality of work: Their code is clean, well-structured, and reliable from the first delivery. It arrives so close to production-ready that it has noticeably lowered our QA costs. We spend far less time chasing defects than we ever did with other vendors. Communication: They’re proactive, transparent, and easy to reach.
We always know where things stand, and problems are raised early rather than discovered late. It feels like working with an internal team, not an outside vendor. Speed and accuracy of deliverables: They get it right the first time, so we rarely go through rounds of rework. And when something does go wrong, as it eventually does in any software project, they respond quickly, diagnose accurately, and fix the issue without finger-pointing. What I find most impressive is the trust that comes from this combination. After six years, I don’t second-guess their work, and that frees my team to focus on product priorities instead of managing a vendor. To make it more distinctive
Add one concrete story, such as a critical production issue they fixed within hours or a tight deadline they helped you meet. Specific examples are what set a review apart on Clutch. Quantify the accuracy, if you can, with something like “fewer than X defects per release” or “QA time down roughly X%.” Name what’s unique compared with other vendors you’ve used, such as retaining the same core team for six years or proposing improvements without being asked, if either applies.
Are there any areas for improvement or something Eastern Peak could have done differently?
I am happy with the way they operate.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS