TestFort QA Lab

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

We are a digital financial service platform. I'm the CTO

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire TestFort QA Lab, and what were your goals?

For the initial setup of our company landing page we had a need for design and development support. Goal was to create a website UI & UX design and to develop the website in Wordpress.

SOLUTION

How did you select TestFort QA Lab and what were the deciding factors?

I did some research on the Internet and found 2 suitable companies. I got in touch with both. During the initial discussions, the TestFort / QArea team was very knowledgable, found quick solutions and was always ready to help. These were the aspects I based on my decision.

Describe the scope of work in detail, including the project steps, key deliverables, and technologies used.

We started with a kickoff meeting where I attended together with the whole Qarea team. We discussed the scope and project plan. First, the UI / UX design was created based on slide decks I provided. After few iterations, we had done the final design. Based on the design, development of the website started.

I had the chance to interact regularly and see progress on test environment. After my final approval, Qarea moved the website from testing to production. I only had to provide infrastructure. Everything else was taken care of by Qarea.

How many people from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?

I had direct contact to 3 people. But I'm aware that there were (at least to some extend) more people involved. I was in contact with the client relationship manager, the designer and the web developer.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any measurable outcomes of the project or general feedback about the deliverables?

The website is productive and running. The website is highly critical for our business success. We will continue to extend the website. Qarea is still involved and will play an important role.

Describe their project management style, including communication tools and timelines.

For this project we had regular interactions. We had calls at the beginning and at the end. In between, I had my personal Skype chat with direct contact to the developer and designer. I could always ask or provide feedback and received a response within minutes. That was excellent.

Qarea used state-of-the-art tools for design creation and for giving me the opportunity to provide feedback. The timeline was very tight but Qarea did everything they could to make the project happen. Thanks a lot!

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

I found it very impressive that in the kickoff call there were many people attending. I had the feeling that Qarea really wanted to make sure that right people will support the project and that the result will meet my expectations.

It is impressive that I have my personal chat where I can interact with my project team and receive answers within minutes although this is not a full time project. That is very good. All people I met from the team are very friendly, have a very good know-how and are extremely willing to help. That's awesome!

Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?

It would be great if there are other communication channels available. I mostly use MS Teams and not Skype anymore. Teams can also give a structure to interact on a project, upload/download files and have a (video) chat anyway. But this is just a hint for improvement.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I'm a project manager at CHI Software. CHI is a full-cycle development company. We craft software solutions for startups and well-established companies that need a technologically innovative partner.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire TestFort QA Lab, and what were your goals?

We hired TestFort to help with QA on a project for a state agency in Oceania. They needed to develop a fintech platform that would deal with pensions and savings of their citizens. All our in-house QA engineers were engaged on projects so we needed extra hands. We decided to outstaff.

SOLUTION

How did you select TestFort QA Lab and what were the deciding factors?

We conducted a thorough assessment of multiple vendors considering technical skills, flexibility, communication, availability, and shared values while offering competitive cost options. TestFort met our requirements and matched our values and goals.

Describe the scope of work in detail, including the project steps, key deliverables, and technologies used.

Once our in-house team defined the scope of work and new release process, we onboarded the part of the TestFort team for a pilot run that included usability, performance, integration, and compatibility testing. When features were added, the TestFort team also began doing unit testing and regression testing. After two release iterations we collected feedback from several groups to adjust the workflows and processes. Once that was settled, we onboarded the rest of the QA team and embedded them into our in-house team’s processes. The TestFort team worked closely with our developers, creating technical users stories, test cases. Their key focus is increasing test coverage and automation for critical product features.

How many people from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?

Organization and planning were supported by the project manager from our side (me). The project consisted of mobile and software development. Each development team consisted of 2-3 Developers and a QA Engineer. We later added a Product Designer for one of the teams working on UX functionality.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any measurable outcomes of the project or general feedback about the deliverables?

Our platform is highly improved, thanks to the work of TestFort’s QA engineers. They thoroughly tested each new feature, helping us maintain high-quality standards with each new release of the platform.

Describe their project management style, including communication tools and timelines.

The project was managed on our side, and we followed agile principles. Their engineers worked remotely, but we had regular meetups and sprint sessions. That helped us to address current tasks and plan the next phases of development and testing.

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

Their level of communication sets them apart. We've had excellent cooperation throughout the entire history of our working with them.

Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?

The team met all of our expectations during our time working together. The cooperation was fruitful, and it's difficult for me to point out any areas for improvement.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the VP of product, and we're a company that builds mobile applications as well as advertising attribution solutions.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with TestFort QA Lab?

We were experiencing pervasive quality issues in our mobile app. Since we lacked an internal QA team, we were looking to onboard a QA team as fast as possible, the app was already on the market.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Serving as an extension of our own team, they define regression tests for our mobile app and provide us with very detailed reports. While we haven’t formally engaged them for other projects, we’re talking to them about work for other apps, as well.

What is the team composition?

Two of their test engineers are embedded in our internal team. There’s an account manager who oversees the work on occasion, but the test engineers have truly become part of our team.

How did you come to work with TestFort QA Lab?

I found them on Clutch. We shortlisted them, along with two other companies, and gave them test projects. The quality of TestFort’s work blew the others out of the water, so we immediately committed to working with them.

How much have you invested with them?

We’ve spent somewhere between $50,000–$75,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

The engagement began in December 2018 and is still ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement? 

The quality of our app—and our software releases—has improved significantly since we started working together. Their work has also led to a 75–80% bug reduction, which is phenomenal.

How did TestFort QA Lab perform from a project management standpoint?

We’ve had no problems. While we oversee most of the project management, they sufficiently manage their own workload. They’re flexible to work with, and they communicate really well. The difference in time zone can be a challenge, but we’ve been able to work around it.

We utilize Slack and Google Hangouts to communicate. We also used JIRA to track software bugs.

What did you find most impressive about them?

I was impressed by their attention to detail, and their use of visual aids to support written communication. They especially do an excellent job at the latter, which has been very helpful since they’re a remote team. They’re skilled at eliminating and overcoming cultural and linguistic barriers.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I can’t really think of anything. They may want to consider having some team members available during our core hours—that would be very helpful for us, but it isn't that important. 

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Engage them on a small task that can be completed in a single sprint. That gives you two weeks to become familiar with them and their working style. It’ll also give you a sense of their output.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Principal Consultant of The Blueprint Consult, LLC

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Specialize in bridging the gap between business and technology across industries including media, telecommunications, professional services and consulting.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• To begin introducing non customer facing AI-driven features into our consulting workflows.
• To understand how reliable these AI outputs actually are in real scenarios.
• To obtain a clearer picture of where the system performs well and where it becomes inconsistent

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

• Online Search
• Referral
• Clutch Site

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

TestFort focused on validating AI-generated outputs used in our internal consulting processes: things like summaries, recommendations, and structured insights based on input data. They tested different variations of inputs to see how stable the outputs were and how sensitive the system was to small changes. 
A useful part of their approach was documenting patterns, not just individual bugs, but cases where the AI would behave inconsistently under similar conditions. Deliverables included detailed observations, structured feedback on AI behavior, and suggestions on how to make the system more predictable.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The main result was better predictability. Before the project, we often saw variations in AI outputs that were hard to explain. After the testing phase, we had a much clearer understanding of where those inconsistencies come from. In practical terms, the number of cases where outputs required manual correction dropped by around 30%. We also reduced the time spent reviewing AI-generated content, since the system became more stable in typical use cases.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The process was steady and without unnecessary complexity. They shared findings regularly, and we didn’t have to chase updates. When we adjusted the scope, they adapted without pushing back or slowing things down.

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

They were comfortable working with uncertainty. Instead of trying to force clear “pass/fail” results where they don’t really apply, they focused on understanding patterns and behavior. That was exactly what we needed.

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

At times, we would have benefited from slightly more structured summaries of findings, especially for internal stakeholders who were not involved in the process day to day. Overall though, the collaboration felt thoughtful and grounded.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

 I am the CTO of a Spending Management Company

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Spending management solution

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• TestFort QA Lab was tasked with testing our invoice management feature. Our goal was to confirm that the platform worked as intended, with no critical bugs. The folk behind TestFort did an excellent job. They helped validate the platform’s functionality by covering a wide range of payment scenarios using test automation tools, which gave us confidence in our system and accelerated the product launch.

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

Referral

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• Great culture fit
• Referred to me
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

Before we started, we had a series of meetings with our product and technical teams to understand the ins and outs of the feature and set clear testing objectives. Next, we made a detailed plan, including various test scenarios, test cases, test approach, and an established test environment. For testing, the team used tools such as Java, Maven, TestNG, Selendine, and Allure, and engaged three roles — team lead, senior and middle testers. 
Over the next three weeks, we ran tests and worked on all issues found along the way. As a result of the collaboration, we’ve not only validated our invoice management feature but also improved it from a UX point of view.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

In addition to established metrics, we regularly measured test coverage and received demos and reports.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

We’ve never had any problem with the team, as they were always proactive in addressing any concerns or changes we brought up and worked ahead of schedule. It helped a lot that we could actually talk to each other through virtual meetings.

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

Virtual Meeting

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

Their proactive approach has actually stunned us. Most of the issues were solved even before we recognized them as potential problems. They really know what they’re doing and are committed to delivering great service.

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

We can’t think of anything. Perhaps, we’d like the price to be cheaper, but then, quality can’t be cheap, and quality is what matters when it comes to testing.