UTOR is an easily managed QA team that sets up mature processes and expands your QA capabilities to enhance your product.
Our team consists of 60 QA experts, including project managers and DevOps, and has an average of 5+ years of experience, and solid infrastructure to ensure the high quality of your end product. We not only work by completing tasks but also actively participate in your development process and provide expertise on how to make this process more effective.
Here is our collaboration process:
1️⃣ Initial call. We discuss your project requirements and define quality goals.
2️⃣ Creating a strategy. Our experts explore your current project status, and business specifications to create a quality strategy that fits your project.
3️⃣ Onboarding. We integrate into your team, join your workspace, and set up tools/environments if needed. To stay transparent with your team, we sent daily/weekly reports with task statuses, and document the whole test activity.
4️⃣ Support and Retrospective. After a certain period, we review the work done, analyze reports, and, based on results, provide further strategy.
✅ Our QA services include: ✅
- Creating a QA strategy
- QA outstaffing
- Dedicated QA team
- Building and optimizing QA processes
- Augment team with QA experts and resources
- Automation framework development and setting up CI/CD
- DevOps
Min project size
$5,000+
Hourly rate
$25 - $49 / hr
Employees
50 - 249
Year founded
Founded 2016
No have been added yet...
Pricing Snapshot
Min. project size
$5,000+
Avg. hourly rate
$25 - $49
/hr
Rating for cost
4.9
/5
What Clients Have Said
Clients praised QA UTOR for their affordable pricing and exceptional value, often mentioning costs under $10,000 for comprehensive QA services. They appreciate the flexibility and responsiveness of the team, indicating a strong return on investment.
QA UTOR's commitment to continuous improvement was noted by clients. They appreciated the team's efforts to consistently enhance the quality of their cooperation and deliverables.
Flexibility and Scalability
QA UTOR's ability to scale resources up or down based on project needs was highly valued. Clients noted the team's flexibility in adapting to various project requirements and timelines.
Empathy and Customer Care
QA UTOR's empathetic approach and customer care were appreciated by clients. Their ability to understand client needs and provide tailored solutions was a recurring theme.
Strong Problem-Solving Skills
Clients appreciated QA UTOR's ability to identify and resolve complex issues. Their problem-solving skills contributed to smoother project executions and higher quality releases.
Detailed and Structured Reporting
The detailed and structured reporting provided by QA UTOR was highly valued. Clients found their reports comprehensive and useful for improving their products.
UTOR was hired to set up a QA process for a software development company's product. After running into a challenge, they're creating a regression test plan, finding any bugs, and developing E2E Framework.
UTOR's work contributed to a projected faster release than anticipated. Their bug report allowed users to avoid catching bugs and they have initial QA documentation. The team has good communication skills and an effective workflow, which is made possible by their high skill level.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I’m CTO of a software development company which has its own product. It’s a digital signage and promotional platform designed to help convenience stores thrive via informing customers about deals and specials in the fastest way.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
For setting up the proper QA process on our product.
What were your goals for this project?
The goal was to build a proper pre-release regression flow. So we needed somebody to develop a framework to automate regression testing. Also we needed creating the testing documentation.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
We decided to move forward with UTOR because of their empathic approach and customer care as well as skills of their QA Engineers.
Describe the project in detail.
We faced a challenge - cause of rapidly grooving of our Advertising product users caught bugs. So we felt the lack of the robust QA process inside our development flow. After discussion with UTOR team we agreed the plan which included: 1. Creating regression test plan (Checklist); 2. Finding as many bugs as possible manually; 3. Developing Automation E2E Framework from scratch to automate regression testing (Stack: NodeJS, Webdriver.io, WebStorm, Postman).
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
Everything we agreed with the UTOR team at the start was made in life by their high-skilled QA Engineers. 1. The regression test plan was created by QA Analyst. So we have initial QA documentation on our product. Good beginning the way to proper QA process. 2. Bug Report was made by QA Analyst and bugs were fixed by our dev team. It allowed our users to avoid catching bugs and made them happier. 3. Automation E2E Framework was developed. We have the scalable Automation solution for exactly what we need. So our releases will be faster and we can scale the solution when the product grows.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
Good communication skills, high-level hard skills and extra free hours from UTOR made the workflow great.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
They're empathetic and flexible.
Are there any areas for improvement?
No way, that’s all great.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"For everyone whom it may concern :)
QA Testing for Software Development Company
Application Testing
$10,000 to $49,999
May 2019 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"On top of having high-quality QA skills, UTOR is willing to work in a proper partnership."
Feb 9, 2020
COO, Software Development Company
Anonymous
Verified
Information technology
London, England
51-200 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR provided QA testing for a software development company. This included manual QA testing for a marketplace app and automation testing on a medical data platform and a B2B SaaS platform.
The testing services met the expectations of the internal team, leading to a successful longterm partnership. UTOR is communicative and collaborative, ensuring a smooth workflow. The team is transparent and knowledgeable.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I am the COO of a software development company, serving customers predominantly in the UK. We have a team of over 60 working on a range of projects covering B2B and B2S SaaS, IoT, marketplaces, and on both web applications and native apps.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
We wanted to expand our QA capabilities, both in terms of skills in manual QA as well as automation testing. The projects we have used UTOR, to date, include picking up the slack in manual QA on a marketplace app, as well as implementing automation testing on a medical data platform, and a B2B SaaS platform.
What were your goals for this project?
We needed to find a reliable partner where we could scale up and down depending on project volume and crunch periods. We also wanted someone we could properly integrate with, and ensure we're embedded in our own working practices. We also insisted on knowledge share back to our core team.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
We have several different ways of selecting this resource, from full time inhouse, freelanceer and then working with a partner company. We benchmarked the different approaches and identified that UTOR provided the best value, both in terms of cost, as well a reliability.
Describe the project in detail.
Each project we have worked on with UTOR has been different, but we always review their candidates upfront, for suitability. If there are any issues or problems with compatibility, UTOR find a new candidate quickly, and anyway all the work is overseen by the UTOR CTO.
Once onboarded, the UTOR QA works as part of the team, and is fully integrated into our processes, with oversight and recommendations provided by the UTOR CTO.
What was the team composition?
We have 3 or 4 UTOR QAs at any point in time, covering both manual QA and automated QA, depending on the needs of the projects we have ongoing.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
The key outcome is that we continue using UTOR for our specialist needs and for overflow QA work! As described above, we have used UTOR on several projects now, and we have 3 or 4 QA engineers from them at any particular point in time.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
Remote working, by its definition, requires over-communication and a proactive approach. UTOR always communicated well, and often were the ones feeding back to us if the workflow wasn't working well enough, either into the project team, escalating to me or via their CTO in our review meetings. Working with UTOR helped us pinpoint problems with our own workflow.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
On top of having high-quality QA skills, UTOR is willing to work in a proper partnership. This has involved lots of transparency, knowledge share back and forth, and acknowledgement when things haven't gone wrong, as they inevitably do!
Are there any areas for improvement?
Not too much really, I think the only thing is that they were a bit polite to start off with in terms of raising issues with my own team, whereas I welcome the feedback and we could have gotten to the deep partnership sooner.
RATINGS
5.0
"Overall really enjoy working with UTOR, and value them as partners."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"Excellent skills and proactive input."
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"Good availability, always got the resources when we need them."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"Excellent value, and prepared to invest in the relationship."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"Very happy to refer to a friend, hope they get the same service!
Test Automation Setup for Customer-Facing Web App
Application Testing
Less than $10,000
Dec. 2019 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"Their QA engineers allow us to be confident in the quality of our application."
Feb 5, 2020
Chief Product Officer, No-Code App Dev Company
Anonymous
Verified
Other industries
Helsinki, Finland
11-50 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR assisted in building automation tests using a custom Cypress.io setup. Their tests were for an existing consumer app project. They've also supported functional testing for web and mobile solutions.
The new testing covers the entire functionality of the app, and UTOR regularly updates the framework setup. Within the past month alone, they've identified about 50 harmful issues to resolve. The proactive team has even suggested UI improvements to the product.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
Chief Product Officer in a no-code app development platform company. We also have a professional services unit that delivers custom-made multi-platform apps to different customers using our tech.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
We were looking for a QA partner to help us build automation tests for an existing, mission-critical customer app project, as well as do functional testing on both web and mobile
What were your goals for this project?
Get good automated test coverage using an appropriate technology for the web app, and a good set of test scenarios so that the mobile apps can be manually tested in a comprehensive fashion.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
We published a job on Upwork and chose UTOR from many companies. The reason was instant availability, good communication skills and top-rated feedback.
Describe the project in detail.
We started by mapping out the user stories / test scenarios we wanted to cover, which was done by UTOR's engineer proactively using the software. After we had a good set of test scenarios covered, we started implementing them with a few different technologies, eventually settling for a custom Cypress.io setup.
What was the team composition?
Functional and automation QA engineers.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
The entire functionality of the application is covered with tests. The automation framework setup works well and regularly updates. Test suites and categories have been created for the convenience and ease of performing manual checks.
Over the past month QA Engineers found around 50 harmful issues which have since been fixed by developers Also UTOR QA engineers have provided suggestions about improving the user interface, including how the user is notified about events.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
We appreciate the efforts of the UTOR team very much. Their QA engineers allow us to be confident in the quality of our application.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
The ability to provide us QA personnel in an on-demand basis, plus a proactive role in suggesting how to holistically improve the test coverage from all aspects.
Are there any areas for improvement?
Nothing significant, perhaps at times it was a bit unclear what was going to be worked on next and what the hour allocation for that would be, but that was also due to us not being able to devote enough time to establish e.g. a clear weekly/daily comms schedule.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Software Testing for Product Dev Company
Application Testing
$10,000 to $49,999
Feb. 2019 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.5
Willing to Refer
5.0
"UTOR team is so friendly, flexible and empathetic."
Feb 5, 2020
CEO, Futuro Team
Artem Portugalsky
Verified
Information technology
Berlin, Germany
11-50 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR provides ongoing software testing and consulting services.
Due to their QA efforts, third-party clients' solutions are high-quality. UTOR is a professional group with a timely workflow. In particular, they excel at meeting tight deadlines. Their responsiveness to inquiries has been a highlight.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I'm CEO at Futuro Team – Product Development company based in Berlin. We help startups and mid sized companies to build digital products that make sense and to transform from legacy monolith solutions to microservices.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
We needed a partner in the Software testing domain. Somebody who could provide us high-class QA engineers and QA consulting services.
What were your goals for this project?
As a company we provide a high-end services and some of our clients have an extremely high demand on quality. That's why we strive to zero bugs. This is our main goal when we talk about the testing.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
I've heard a lot about this guys. I think someone recommend them to me. And for me was important that they are "QA only" company with a strict focus.
Describe the project in detail.
There are around 5+ projects where UTOR QA team has improved quality for our clients.
What was the team composition?
1-2 QA Engineers per project.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
I’m very happy that we have chosen UTOR as our QA Partner, we had 5+ projects done - and we are very satisfied with their quality, timing, and professionalism. Guys know how to get an appropriate professional to project with a short period of time. Thank you so much guys for your value!
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
Maximum flexibility and effectiveness.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
UTOR team is so friendly, flexible and empathetic. They always respond quickly to our requests and provide us very professional QA Engineers and Analysts.
Are there any areas for improvement?
So good so far. No objections from our side here.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"Top quality"
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"According to deadlines"
Cost
4.5
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"100%
Software Testing for Telecom Platform
Application Testing
$10,000 to $49,999
Jan. - July 2019
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"They provided a good knowledge sharing session for my team."
Nov 19, 2019
CEO, TrinityTV Sweet TV
Evhen Kapkanets
Telecommunications
Ukraine
51-200 Employees
Online Review
UTOR provided manual software QA testing for a cross-platform telecommunications platform. They tested the project on television boxes, Android, iOS, and a website.
UTOR successfully tested the product with different browsers. They also worked with the UI, API, and performance-based testing. The project improved due to their efforts. The project management was effective and their team supplied positive value.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
We develop a platform for telecom.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
Software Testing services. We needed a detailed test report for our project status.
What were your goals for this project?
The main goal was to be sure that our product is the highest quality on all platforms (TV, Android, IOS, web). Didn’t want our users to face issues which we couldn’t catch ourselves.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
My partner recommended contacting the CEO of UTOR - Sergey.
Describe the project in detail.
The project contained 5 types of devices to test: TV platform TV box Android application IOS application Website UTOR engineers passed functional, UI, browser, API, compatibility and performance test.
At the end of testing, they provided a very detailed test report which helped our in-house engineers to improve our product. Moreover, they provided a consulting session with our in-house engineers where they shared their thoughts about improvements in our internal QA processes.
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
The outcome is good and I can sleep at night! Our users are happy, we have a 5-star feedbacks and product improved from a quality point of view.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
Easy and flexible.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
They provided a good knowledge sharing session for my team. Also, they always tried to provide real positive value and impact on a business. That was impressive!!
Are there any areas for improvement?
Hmm.. for me everything was clear in communication. I got the value from UTOR. The job was done.
RATINGS
5.0
"Will work with them"
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"Nice reports"
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"5 stars"
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"nice"
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"year
Automation Testing of Mobile App and Frameworks
Application Testing
$10,000 to $49,999
Feb. 2018 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"Everyone understood what to do and how to do it."
Apr 26, 2019
CEO, Web and Mobile Development Firm
Anonymous
Verified
Information technology
Ukraine
11-50 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR tested a mobile automation framework and a GSM modem written in Python. They also tested against a remote Unix node through a Paramiko SSH module.
Their end-to-end automation testing validated the quality of the selected features. UTOR responds quickly within a reliable partner. Other team strengths include project management and quality.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I’m the CEO and founder of Wamisoftware, an outsourcing firm for web and mobile development.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
I needed automation testing for our product, which I needed to release by a deadline.
What were your goals for this project?
I wanted to ensure the quality of our product and its features.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
I reviewed their profile on Clutch, then found their CEO on Facebook and discussed a possible cooperation.
Describe the project in detail.
They tested two automation frameworks written in Python. They used Pytest, Appium, and Selenium to test mobile automation and unittest, REST client, and Bash to test our GSM modems. They also tested against a remote Unix node through a Paramiko SSH module and executed on a time basis using Jenkins with remote workers.
What was the team composition?
Their team included a technical lead and two automation testing engineers.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
They ensured the quality of most of our features through their end-to-end automation tests.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
We communicated well and received fast responses from each team member. Everyone understood what to do and how to do it.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
Their quality and project management stood out.
Are there any areas for improvement?
No, we’re very satisfied.
RATINGS
5.0
"I look forward to working together again."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"They offer qualified and experienced specialists."
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"They delivered on time."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"They offer good value."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I'm sure I will refer them.
Web-Based QA for Philanthropy Company
Application Testing
Less than $10,000
Oct. 2018 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"...I was pleasantly surprised by the quality, speed, and cost of services."
Apr 25, 2019
Head of Engineering, Elbi
Anonymous
Verified
Information technology
London, England
11-50 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR implements a variety of manual and automated tests (e.g. regression, performance, compatibility, and security) on a web-based product.
The vendor’s QA services have uncovered many issues, which has improved the product's performance. UTOR has been responsive and disciplined throughout the timeline.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I am a Head of Engineering in a charity company.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
We have a development team without QA engineers. So, we wanted to be sure that our product is of high quality and decided to find a partner who could cover all QA & Testing activities to join the team (Test Strategy/ Functional testing/ UI testing/ compatibility testing/ security and performance).
To put it shortly, we requested the following: - Manual testing of all the old and new features - Regression test cases - Automate Regression testing - Security and Performance testing
What were your goals for this project?
- To release the product in time without major issues on the production - To test in all the possible resolutions with multiple browsers and devices - To cover the features by automated tests
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
I found UTOR via Google. Checked their profiles with feedback, and they were really good and impressed me. I decided to contact CEO Sergey Smaglyuk via email, and we had a call, where he explained to me all the possible types of cooperations, flow, etc. They are super flexible. I like it.
Describe the project in detail.
We needed as soon as possible to conduct a comprehensive testing of the project from all sides - manual, security, performance and automation testing. UTOR quickly understood all of our goals and proposed an action plan.
What was the team composition?
4 QA engineers: Manual tester - Ihor Security engineer - Yan Performance engineer - Artem Automation engineer - Andrew
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
They found a lot of issues which were later fixed by our developers. They also covered all the features by automated tests.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
Easily managed, fast response, quality and structured communication.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
This was my first experience with such companies and I was pleasantly surprised by the quality, speed, and cost of services. We will pleasantly work in the future with UTOR and will recommend to friends.
Are there any areas for improvement?
We were very satisfied with their work every step of the way.
RATINGS
5.0
"Enjoying the cooperation"
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"Good quality"
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"According to deadlines"
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"Suitable for us"
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"Already did it
Platform Testing for Customer Communication Service
Application Testing
Less than $10,000
Nov. - Jan. 2018
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"Their quality, friendliness, detailed reports stood out to us."
Feb 8, 2019
CEO, Customer Communication Platform
Anonymous
Verified
Information technology
Dover, Delaware
11-50 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR provided testing services for a web platform. They were responsible for a variety of tests including performance, UI, compatibility, and security. Results were compiled and delivered in reports.
A significant number of bugs were found thanks to UTOR’s comprehensive testing and reporting procedures. UTOR responded to messages rapidly and was personable in all their interactions. Customers can expect a robust quoting process that manages expectations and builds trust.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I’m the CEO of mssg.me. We offer a customer communication web application that helps Instagram sellers contact their customers.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
Initially, we brought UTOR on to provide a range of testing services for our web application. Soon, we’re going to engage them again, utilizing their QA process/engineers.
What were your goals for this project?
I wanted my product to function properly without my clients experiencing major issues.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
Several people recommended Sergey (Founder, UTOR).
Describe the project in detail.
They provided several different testing services including functional, UI, performance, security, and compatibility. I received reports that laid out any issues they found, which we then delivered to our developers.
What was the team composition?
I worked with three QA engineers: a security engineer, a performance engineer, and a manual tester.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
They identified over 200 issues, which we passed on to our development team to discuss and remedy.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
Before we began, they quickly provided me with a quote detailing what they would test and how many hours it would require. Communication was well-structured, and responses came quickly.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
Their quality, friendliness, and detailed reports stood out to us.
Are there any areas for improvement?
No, not that I saw.
RATINGS
5.0
"I enjoyed our cooperation and am looking forward to working with them again."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"They're well-versed specialists."
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"They worked according to our time frame."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"They provided high value for the money."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I'd recommend them 100%.
QA Testing for Web and Mobile Development Company
Application Testing
Less than $10,000
Jan. 2017 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“UTOR was extremely involved in our project and put in more effort than anyone could have expected.”
Feb 4, 2019
CTO, Mushket Mobile
Aleksandr Vdovichenko
Verified
Arts, entertainment & music
Dnipro, Ukraine
11-50 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR partnered with a web and development firm to support their efforts of building apps for other companies. The team of QA engineers worked in collaboration as an integrated part of the process.
UTOR delivered a full-fledged document with a categorized and color-coded list of errors, explanations, and resolutions from the QA process. The report both laid out their findings and answered overarching questions. Diligent and informed, the team supplemented execution with consultation.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I am the CTO of Front.Bend. Our company helps startups and IT companies create new applications.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire UTOR?
We wanted to connect with a QA partner who could help us test all our apps before market release. Our plan was to integrate UTOR’s QA engineers right into the development process.
What were your goals for this project?
Our main objective was to ensure that our platform works without issues. We didn’t want our users to experience any glitches while using our site.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor?
I found UTOR through their founder and selected them based on FB.
Describe the project in detail.
We worked on a few projects together. Two specific ones focused on a music player and an iOS app featuring GPS. In addition to application and platform testing, they helped us with verification.
What was the team composition?
The team from UTOR included two iOS developers, two backend developers, a project manager, a team lead, a UI/UX designer, and two QA specialists.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
UTOR's primary deliverables were testing reports that came in the form of color-coded Google Spreadsheets. Each item is labeled with a headline, sorted by status, priority and issue type with a full set of validators to account for different variables. Every issue also lays out the expected and actual result, states the steps to reproduce the error, and links to a corresponding screenshot. On the second tab, there are parallel lists of questions with answers from UTOR.
At the end of our latest engagement, UTOR produced a detailed report on all the issues and improvements. In one example for an Android and iOS mobile app, they identified and fixed or closed 43 issues ranging in level of severity and priority. Three of these were areas for improvement, four items were critical, three were minor, and the rest were flagged as major issues. By category, they solved 31 functional concerns, two GUI flaws, and eight problems that had been impacting usability.
How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?
UTOR’s management performs at a high level. I understood the flow of our cooperation during each step of the project. Based solely on the applications we provided for testing, they returned with a detailed estimation before the project even started.
What did you find most impressive about this company?
They provided us with not only QA testing, but also suggestions on how to improve our product. It was very important to us that they offered this advice. UTOR was extremely involved in our project and put in more effort than anyone could have expected.
Are there any areas for improvement?
Perfection has no limits.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
QA Testing for Digital Product Company
Mobile App Development
Less than $10,000
June - July 2018
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“They delivered an exceedingly comprehensive QA report, which allowed us to refine the apps before the launch date.”
Jan 16, 2019
Founder, WERSTARS
Anonymous
Verified
Other industries
Toronto, Ontario
1-10 Employees
Online Review
Verified
UTOR assisted the app development process by conducting QA tests. After evaluating the web and mobile apps on multiple devices, they compiled a thorough report of the detected bugs and glitches.
The QA report included an incredibly detailed list of issues, which proved to be highly beneficial to the apps’ launch. UTOR leveraged their wide-ranging technology to uncover bugs that in-house tests aren’t able to detect. Their engineers managed the project with complete agility and transparency.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the founder and CEO of a digital platform that allows users to save special life moments through photos, videos, and journals.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with UTOR?
In preparation of launching our web and mobile apps, we needed third-party assistance with QA testing.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
We brought UTOR on board to ensure that our platform was bug-free and compatible with all devices. Using their extensive collection of phones, tablets, and computers, they evaluated our web and mobile apps and compiled a report of outstanding issues.
What is the team composition?
Their team consisted of a project manager, a QA engineer, and a few developers.
How did you come to work with UTOR?
Their founder reached out to us after viewing our listing on Upwork. They were the best fit out of all of the companies that contacted us.
How much have you invested with them?
We spent less than $10,000 for their services.
What is the status of this engagement?
They worked with us from June–July 2018.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
They delivered an exceedingly comprehensive QA report, which allowed us to refine the apps before the launch date.
How did UTOR perform from a project management standpoint?
It was quite easy to work with them because they maintained an open line of communication.
What did you find most impressive about them?
Their communication efforts were impeccable. We’re always hesitant about working with companies that we find online, but UTOR exceeded our expectations.
Are there any areas they could improve?
We didn’t experience any issues with them.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
I highly recommend working with UTOR.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Showing 11-20 of
29 Reviews
Contact QA UTOR
If you’re not seeing exactly what you need here, send this company a custom message.
You can talk about your project needs, price, and timeline to get started on your project.
Sign in to see which brands trust QA UTOR.
Get connected to see updates from QA UTOR like new case studies, latest reviews, their latest masterpieces in their portfolio, delivered straight to you.