PerformaCode Inc.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m an executive at Flare AI, an AI-powered platform designed for financial institutions, helping banks and credit unions automate operations, boost revenue, and enhance compliance with rapid, outcome-focused solutions tailored for regulated environments.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with PerformaCode Inc.?

We needed to provide banks and credit unions with a secure, compliance-first AI platform that accelerates AI adoption, automates operational processes, improves customer engagement, generates measurable revenue growth, reduces costs, and enables financial institutions to deploy and scale AI solutions rapidly.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

PerformaCode Inc. has designed, developed, integrated, and deployed secure AI-powered solutions for banks and credit unions, including automation of operational workflows, compliance, financial intelligence, marketing, lead generation, customer engagement, data analysis, and AI governance. The team has also integrated systems, tested, deployed in production, monitored, and continuously optimized to improve efficiency, reduce costs, manage risk, and drive measurable business growth. PerformaCode Inc. has worked across the Flare platform and applications produced.

What is the team composition?

We’ve worked with 10 teammates from PerformaCode Inc.

How did you come to work with PerformaCode Inc.?

We found them through personal connections. We chose them over other options because they had a great culture fit, good value for cost, and aligned company values.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working with them in May 2023, and our engagement is ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

PerformaCode Inc. is great to work with.

How did PerformaCode Inc. perform from a project management standpoint?

PerformaCode Inc. has delivered on time. We communicate via virtual meetings, emails, and messaging apps.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The quality of the people and the quality of the work are impressive.

Are there any areas they could improve?

We are happy with our relationship all around. 

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

 I am the Head of Data of a non-profit company 

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

We are a charity that exists to advance evidence based medicine.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire PerformaCode Inc. to accomplish?

• Enhance, modernize, and extend a web-based platform supporting systematic reviews of medical publications, health evidence contribution workflows, and user account management.
• The project also focused on maintaining and improving the existing Java-based platform, modernizing legacy components, and gradually decommissioning systems that were no longer required.

SOLUTION

How did you find PerformaCode Inc.?

Online Search

Why did you select PerformaCode Inc. over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from PerformaCode Inc. were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

• Maintenance of a mission critical legacy monolithic application
• Developing replacement applications or adapting off the shelf technologies for individual capabilities of the monolith
• Carefully adapting the monolith to hand over responsibilities to these new applications, including data migrations
• Rebuilding a separate legacy application (Ruby on Rails) to our common technology baseline (Java / Spring boot)

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

We were eventually able to retire our legacy monolith without any negative impact on critical business processes, and the team also delivered important new functionality along the way, allowing us to turn one of our internal applications into a source of revenue.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

We worked together for many years and as you can imagine many unexpected things happened from all sides. They were always very professional and capable in handling these situations, for example adjusting team size to changing needs and budgets. They are also excellent at finding new engineers that are a good fit for the project and team and sprints ran smoothly day-to-day and month-to-month.

What was your primary form of communication with PerformaCode Inc.?

Virtual Meeting

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

They excell at finding the right people for the job and making sure the unexpected doesn't impact their customer's ability to deliver.

Are there any areas for improvement or something PerformaCode Inc. could have done differently?

Sometimes the engineers are reluctant to provide constructive criticism on proposed features and designs, e.g. in feature refinement. I think this could be encouraged more, although there is a trade-off involved. It is also something that usually improved with time on the project.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

 I am the Director of Engineering of a manufacturing company 

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

our company provides electrical connection and protection solutions that secure critical systems in data centers, industrial plants and commercial buildings.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire PerformaCode Inc. to accomplish?

• Provide Software and Firmware for our industrial products including modular computer systems, monitoring systems and data center cooling products

SOLUTION

How did you find PerformaCode Inc.?

Referral

Why did you select PerformaCode Inc. over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from PerformaCode Inc. were assigned to this project?

6-10 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

The scope involves the full-lifecycle development of embedded firmware for industrial computing units and specialized cooling control systems used in high-density datacenter environments. This includes initial hardware abstraction, implementation of control algorithms for thermal management, control loop optimization for cooling efficiency and ensuring long term system stability under industrial conditions.

Key deliverables are:

• firmware architecture
• production-ready code
• validation suite
• technical documentation
• lifecycle support

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

ddd

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The project is managed using and Agile approach with regular status updates. All key deliverables (architecture, code, documentation) are delivered on time according to the project schedule. Even when hardware prototypes were delayed, the team adjusted the development sprints to maintain the overall timeline.

Their responsiveness to our needs is excellent. We maintain a transparent communication channel using Teams, Outlook, Online/Onsite meetings which allows for quick feedback loops. Even when requirements change during the project, the team reacts proactively and proposes adjustments.

What was your primary form of communication with PerformaCode Inc.?

• In-Person Meeting
• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

Their proactive problem-solving approach is unique. Instead of just following a task list, they actively suggest optimizations that havent' been initially considered. It is more like a partnership than a typical supplier-client relationsship.

Are there any areas for improvement or something PerformaCode Inc. could have done differently?

The collaboration is very successful and the project is handled very professionally. There is no real area of improvement. An overall improvement could be an earlier involvement of the firmware team in the hardware design phase to optimize firmware-hardware alignment.