Global product development & design company

Innovate with Wizeline

Wizeline is a global product development company that helps clients solve their biggest challenges with design and technology.

We work with technology leaders to help them build software that captures new markets, innovates business models, and leverages data.

With Silicon Valley DNA and exceptional global talent, we have built a practice uniquely equipped to this task.

 
$25,000+
 
$50 - $99 / hr
 
250 - 999
 Founded
2014
Show all +
San Francisco, CA
headquarters
  • 456 Montgomery St #2200
    San Francisco, CA 94104
    United States
other locations
  • Av Mariano Otero 408, Jardines del Sol
    Zapopan 45050
    Mexico
  • Av. Álvaro Obregón 190, Roma Nte.
    Ciudad de México 06700
    Mexico
  • 195 Điện Biên Phủ, Phường 15
    Bình Thạnh
    Vietnam
  • Calle Cto. Alamos 55, Alamos 2da Secc
    Santiago de Querétaro 76160
    Mexico
  • Sydney
    Australia
  • New York
    United States
  • Los Angeles
    United States
  • Guadalajara 44100
    Mexico

Portfolio

Key clients: 

Wizeline helps companies of all sizes innovate and see business growth through their digital investments.

  • WSJ
  • Mastercard
  • Dover Corporation
  • Unity Technologies
  • Barron's
  • USA Rugby
  • Digital Arts Network
  • Shape Security
  • Dell
  • pmNerds

Reviews

Sort by

Web Experience for Tailgate Reservation System

"They work in concert and make sure we’re taken care of throughout the process."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
Apr. 2018 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Wizeline scoped, designed, and built a customized web platform for managing tailgate groups at college football games. Key features include a to-scale mapping ability.

The Reviewer
 
10,000+ Employees
 
Los Angeles, CA
Adam Rosen
University of Southern California
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The number of reservations has increased markedly since Wizeline was first engaged. Expertise and meticulousness are hallmarks of their work. Their consistent communication, creativity, and understanding of the business model justify the investment and make them a valuable partner.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I serve as the Associate VP of Cultural Relations & University Events for the University of Southern California, a private research university in Los Angeles.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Wizeline?

We needed help to create a new web experience for our football tailgate reservations.

What were your goals for this project?

Internally, we wanted to reduce the time spent working on tailgate reservations. We also wanted to streamline the process for the external audience.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

They were referred by a friend in the tech industry.

Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.

Wizeline works with our team to scope, design, build, and evolve our tailgate reservations system. The new system gives us the ability to accurately plot the tailgates into a map that is to scale.

What was the team composition?

We work with a team of 6–8 on the technical side and two people from the sales side.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

The reservations received from the system have increased dramatically. The map function increased the occupancy of the campus and allowed for more reservations to be placed. The biggest impact was time savings. We went from two staff members spending 60 hours per week on reservations to one person spending 15–25 hours. Though we are not a revenue dependent group, the revenue for reservations pays for the system and part of a staff member. Additionally, it’s now a better experience for the fans.

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

We have a project manager from the sales side and one on the technical team. They work in concert and make sure we’re taken care of throughout the process.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

The way they work to conceptualize the product is different — and better — than other teams I’ve worked with before. By creating personas based around the needs and stories of our system, they came to really understand our business and our needs.

Are there any areas for improvement?

Timeline was the only thing that got a little lost in the process. Overall, we’re happy with the result and their flexibility of resources to make it all happen.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    We never had any issues with scheduling.
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    We're happy with their overall costs.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They delivered a top-notch experience for staff and fans.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Social Media Chatbot for Rugby Tournament

“One of the biggest benefits of working with them was their hands-on approach.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
June - July 2018
Project summary: 

Wizeline expedited the design and development of a chatbot for Facebook Messenger that responded to queries about an international sports event.

The Reviewer
 
201-500 Employees
 
San Francisco Bay Area
Everett Jacobs
VP of Regional Partnerships, USA Rugby
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The chatbot successfully fielded hundreds of inquiries, with 99% repeat users. Wizeline’s meticulous project management and proactive approach contributed to impressive results.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

Our team organized the Rugby World Cup Sevens (RWC7s) 2018 tournament in San Francisco, which took place last July 20–22. I was the VP of regional partnerships for this event.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Wizeline?

RWC7s hired Wizeline to create a local tournament chatbot.

What were your goals for this project?

Our goal was to provide easy-to-find event information that would enhance the fan experience, including tournament schedule, updates, and general stadium facts.

SOLUTION

Can you go into detail about the services they provided and the scope of the project?

We spent ample time researching the project and defining the scope until we determined feasibility. Wizeline then developed, designed, and implemented the local tournament chatbot through USA Rugby's Facebook Messenger platform. They handled everything, from the project timeline to getting approval from Facebook to activate the bot on Facebook Messenger. Wizeline also provided weekly updates and demos on the status of the local tournament chatbot in real time.

What was the team composition?

Wizeline’s project team was comprised of 8–10 people from their San Francisco and Mexico offices. They provided expertise in development, marketing, and design.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

We had 1,100 unique users recorded on Facebook Analytics, of which 1,090 or 99% returned to the bot every day. The chatbot received 4,015 messages during a four-day span. Over 400 messages were specifically for men's matches, our most popular topic.

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

They took the lead in all aspects of project management, so our team did not have to worry about it. They delivered everything within a fairly tight deadline. Their project management was extremely effective and essential to our success.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

One of the biggest benefits of working with them was their hands-on approach. The team communicated proactively from start to finish, so it was extremely easy to work with them.

Are there any areas where they can improve?

If we had more time and resources, we could have developed a strong promotional campaign around the bot to increase our numbers. However, this was the first time USA Rugby ever used a chatbot for an event of this magnitude.

5.0
Overall Score They were outstanding.
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They either met our deadlines or delivered ahead of time.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    The cost was quite reasonable. They exceeded expectations in terms of value.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    The quality was exceptional.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    It's quite likely.

AI Project Consulting for Software Firm

“They had some of the best project management I've seen.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Apr. 2018
Project summary: 

Wizeline consulted on an AI and ML project, validating the offering and creating a data scientist persona. They provided a report and presentation to review their findings.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Alameda, CA
Christian Barraza
SVP of Product, Jitterbit
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Wizeline is incredibly communicative and responsive. They have a transparent workflow and follow a tight schedule to accomplish tasks on time. Their project management is highly impressive, keeping things organized and efficient.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the senior vice president of product at Jitterbit, a cloud-based integration Platform as a Service (PaaS) for enterprise companies. We provide access to various data sources and applications via APIs, synchronize data between systems, and compose business process orchestration to manage data. I’m responsible for the product strategy, product management, R&D, engineering, and QA.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Wizeline?

We wanted to leverage machine learning (ML) and AI more effectively in our products. We wanted our customers to be able to take their data from disparate sources and feed them into a commercial AI engine that would synchronize the data into whatever ML platform they use. We didn’t have much experience in that field, but we came up with a few ideas and needed an outside expert to validate our offerings.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Wizeline didn’t do any development; we just had them look over our idea and let us know what was good and what needed to be improved. We wanted market validation for a data scientist persona and what they care about. Wizeline gave us a high-level breakdown of what an offering should look like on a data integration platform and what the product should include. Their final deliverables were a report and presentation along with the persona documents. They helped us establish the baseline concerns and capabilities that a data scientist would have about our minimum viable product (MVP).

What is the team composition?

I had an account rep, project lead coordinator, and a team of 5–7 other people who ranged from UX designers to data scientists and architects. The coordinator was my main point of contact.

How did you come to work with Wizeline?

Our board of directors recommended Wizeline. They’d use them at some of their other portfolio companies, and they’d done great work.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent $25,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

The project lasted for two weeks in April 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

They validated that there was an open space in the market that we could fill. They also gave us ideas we could consider for the product that would make it a much more compelling offering.

How did Wizeline perform from a project management standpoint?

They had some of the best project management I've seen. They were responsive and had extremely open communication. The documentation was also excellent.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They delivered on their promises and let us know if something would be late. Out of all the vendors I’ve worked with, they’re definitely one of the top three. They have a prescribed framework, which makes things simple and organized. We knew exactly what the plan was, and everything went smoothly.

Do you have any advice for future clients of theirs?

They don’t know your particular market or product, so make sure you can succinctly and sufficiently explain what you want. If you don’t clearly tell them your goals and expected outcomes, then it becomes hard for them to deliver a high-quality product.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I'd absolutely recommend them.

Chatbot Dev for Homebuilding Enterprise

"I requested an extensive level of communication, and they exceeded my expectations."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
Aug. 2017 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Wizeline developed a custom chatbot for Android, iOS, and web in order to create a richer user experience. The chatbot utilizes Bluetooth beacon technology to provide contextual awareness.

The Reviewer
 
5,001-10,000 Employees
 
Miami Metro Area
Lead Engineer, Home Construction Enterprise
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The chatbot is structured well and has impressive potential for use in other locations. Wizeline prioritized customization and usefulness, as opposed to simply selling a software package. Their team was communicative and had several layers of support, ensuring the project’s success.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

At the time of the project, I was the lead Emerging Information Technology engineer for a prominent home building company in the United States.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Wizeline?

We’re constantly trying to improve our customer experience. We thought that a chatbot could tell guests the story about our company and take them on a tour of our facilities.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

They conducted extensive research into not only how we wanted the chatbot to function, but also why we thought the chatbot was the right choice for our company. They helped us build out that idea. They built us custom chatbots that are native to Android and iOS, as well as a web app, that leveraged their core platform but were customized to our needs on top. The bot development incorporated machine learning and natural language processing technologies. They added a layer that allows the chatbot to utilize beacon technologies to recognize the geographical boundaries of our campus and operate therein.

What is the team composition?

Their developers collaborated in small groups or pods based on the technologies they worked with, and there was a project manager that oversaw their progress. There were also several other layers of oversight.

How did you come to work with Wizeline?

We were in communication originally with more established technology companies, but their workflows didn’t align with ours. The bigger firms tried to sell us on what features our chatbot needed. Wizeline worked with us to determine why the chatbot would be useful, and then we collaborated on the features that could make it worthwhile.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent somewhere in the range of $700,000–$900,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

The engagement began in August 2017, and it is ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Everything was done for the right reason. The chatbot was built very intelligently. We consider the project a success, and we believe the product is scalable to eventually use to show customers around homes.

How did Wizeline perform from a project management standpoint?

I requested an extensive level of communication, and they exceeded my expectations. We had 15-minute daily standups with me and the rest of the team, video conferencing, and formal email updates. Their detail was extraordinary. They layered support on top of the support. They would have a project manager and a business relationship manager review work with a customer success manager and the director of customer success. They didn’t leave anything to chance.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Independent from their hard work on our project, I found that they spend a lot of time educating their community on the best practices for web development or UX or design thinking. They’re spreading knowledge for the sake of knowledge, not for any vanity reasons.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I would be hard-pressed to suggest any improvements. We had portions of our project that needed correcting, as most projects do, but the rate at which they addressed those issues was impressive. They corrected everything over the course of the project.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Entertainment Application Development and Design

"They do a great job, take pride in their work, and never deliver unfinished products."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
4.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$1,000,000 - $9,999,999
 
Oct. 2017 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Wizeline is working to maintain and improve an entertainment company’s content management system in an ongoing partnership. The team works with React and Node.js, while assisting with UI and monitoring tools.

The Reviewer
Senior Product Manager, Entertainment Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Wizeline’s quality, skill level, and collaborative nature have stood out over the course of the relationship. Despite some changes to team membership, Wizeline continues to show pride and dedication to their work, helping this ongoing partnership continue to be a success.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I am the product manager of the internal content management system for an entertainment company’s digital consumer group.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Wizeline?

We hired Wizeline to help us maintain and improve our content management system.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

The team initially spent some time getting to know our backend system, the content management system, our users, the UI, and building up proto-personas. From there, they have assisted us with multiple initiatives such as integrating Okta for single sign-on. We are currently making some changes to the UI and adding monitoring tools, and they continuously support us with ongoing maintenance. They work with React on our app and Node.js for other projects.

What is the team composition?

I work with a business contact, a team of developers, a designer, a tech writer, and a project manager.

How much have you invested with them?

We spend $120,000 on their services per month.

What is the status of this engagement?

We have been working together since October 2017.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

I have been really happy with them so far. They have quickly learned our system, made helpful suggestions, and been very collaborative. Anytime I ask them to do something, they pick it up and run with it. We are just starting on a big redesign, and I am very happy with the direction they are heading.

How did Wizeline perform from a project management standpoint?

They are very good at staying organized and communicative. Because I am a product owner, I have daily contact with the whole team, including daily stand-ups and chats on Slack.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The thing I find most impressive is that the team has a real pride of ownership. They do a great job, take pride in their work, and never deliver unfinished products.

Are there any areas they could improve?

The only complaint I have is that they have changed the people on our team a couple of times. I really built a good working relationship with them and was sad to see them go, but the people they were replaced with have been perfectly fine.

Any advice for potential customers?

Try and get as good of a team as mine, because they are really great.

5.0
Overall Score I have been really happy with them.
  • 4.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Custom CMS Development for News Network

“They worked well with our team, and we couldn’t have launched the project without them.”

Quality: 
4.0
Schedule: 
4.0
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$1,000,000 - $9,999,999
 
Apr. 2017 - Apr. 2018
Project summary: 

Wizeline built a custom CMS solution that integrated a variety of components (e.g., WordPress, AWS, Elasticsearch). They oversaw a complete data migration and built a layout manager and rendering engine.

The Reviewer
 
1,001-5,000 Employees
 
New York Metro Area
Manager of Digital Product Strategy, News Broadcast Firm
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Wizeline maintained constant communication and routinely updated stakeholders on their progress. They did more than was asked for, proactively finding ways to improve the project and process. They didn’t just want to do a job; they wanted to build the best product possible.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the manager of digital product strategy for a news broadcast network. I look after all the digital products and platforms such as apps, TV, and editorial tools.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Wizeline?

We wanted to move to a new CMS and had specific requirements for the architecture and how to build it.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We asked Wizeline to build a headless CMS solution, which isn’t bound to any one CMS platform. For example, this means the CMS the editors use to write stories isn’t the same as the one that delivers the page to the end users. Wizeline built out a layout manager and rendering engine to take the story from the tool and get it out to the public. The system is API driven, integrating various features such as the WordPress CMS, AWS, and Elasticsearch. Wizeline built and customized tools and did a full content migration.

What is the team composition?

We had a project manager and a team of about 10–12 people.

How did you come to work with Wizeline?

One of our partners recommended them.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent between $1 million–$5 million.

What is the status of this engagement?

This project lasted from April 2017–April 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

They worked well with our team, and we couldn’t have launched the project without them. They helped us hit our deadline and please our internal stakeholders. We’ve had few issues with this CMS compared to other firms’ solutions. We’re all happy with their work.

How did Wizeline perform from a project management standpoint?

Wizeline integrated well with our team, and the project managers were in frequent contact on Slack. They held meetings with our executive team every other week and had check-ins on a daily basis with our lead developers. We’re roughly in the same time zone, so that made them highly available and communicative.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They were eager to help out and make a fantastic product. Our team was running behind schedule on a few things, and Wizeline asked what they could do to speed things up. They were highly invested in our project.

Are there any areas they could improve?

They’re good at identifying risks, but they should be more vocal in presenting solutions before the problem gets too big.

Do you have any advice for future clients of theirs?

We originally just wanted them for an architecture solution, but they work best as part of your dev team.

4.0
Overall Score
  • 4.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    In order to meet deadlines, the work sometimes didn’t meet expectations.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer