What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Someone wouldn’t even recognize it as the same application — it’s completely different and much better. We’ve done 100% of what we intended to do, and I’m very satisfied with the quality of Winalife’s work. The app is working as I originally intended it.
How did Winalife perform from a project management standpoint?
We have a close collaboration, with regular meetings. If anything needs to be discussed, we can do it immediately. Winalife has the same thinking as us in terms of how the app should look and flow. They’re not just code providers; they actively participate in determining what the best features and user flows should be.
They’re always on time. Given how software houses work, deadlines aren’t usually met, but this isn’t the case with Winalife. They allow me to plan more business development, knowing that I’ll be able to deliver from the technical side.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They’re flexible, share ideas, and meet deadlines so it’s a true collaboration. They actually think about what they’re doing, which is very important, and deliver quality work.
Are there any areas they could improve?
There’s nothing I can mention at this time. Everything’s been delivered on time and is of good quality.
Do you have any advice for future clients of theirs?
The client should listen to Winalife and take what they’re saying into consideration. They have good ideas, and the client can benefit from describing the whole project to them, not just the technical parts.