ASP.NET Development for Interior Design Startup
- Custom Software Development
- Confidential
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 4.5
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"I never had problems with the quality of Trust Sourcing's work."
- Business services
- Los Angeles, California
- 1-10 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Using ASP.net, Trust Sourcing redesigned a site for enhanced user experience on the front- and back-end. A long-term relationship led to other projects, such as site support and iOS app development.
The initial product met high quality standards. Trust Sourcing continually communicated about project status, providing frequent status reports and design suggestions. The development team was always available, and constantly evolved to meet the project's changing needs.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your organization.
We were a startup company building a social network with a number of advertising and communication components for the home remodeling industry. We had a good idea, but didn't quite know how to approach it. We started seven years ago when mobile was just in its very beginnings.
What is your position?
I'm one of the founders.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What business challenge you were trying to address with Trust Sourcing?
We had an in-house designer to start with, so we would develop the ideas and the logic here in the U.S., then we would send the design collateral and technical requirements to Trust Sourcing in Ukraine, and they would go ahead and program from there. Basically, we're an ASP.NET platform, and they have a lot of expertise with Microsoft technologies, which we were trying to leverage.
SOLUTION
Please describe the scope of their involvement in greater detail.
Probably about a year and a half or two years ago, we needed to modernize our site. After a few years, it started to have an older look to it, so Trust Sourcing came up with some ideas to redesign our pages, and update our content layout to make it more Web 3.0 or 4.0. We got rid of our own designers and use them now.
I don't remember whether we had 11 people or 19 people, or somewhere in between working strictly exclusively on our project. The number would go up and down based on our needs. There have been times where there would be hefty groups doing nothing but QA [quality assurance], and fewer developers. Then, there would be other times where we had just a load of developers and no QA specialists. We preferred to have one project manager at any given time and let them serve as the quarterback on the football team and call all the shots.
They did both front-end and back-end work. We did develop two iOS apps with them. I know at one point in time, we migrated all of our multimedia files from our own server to Amazon Web Services, which required additional assistance because it was an enormous project. We had millions of photos that had to be moved and resized.
How did you come to work with Trust Sourcing?
I don't even know exactly how it all started with Trust Sourcing, but we got involved with them for a long-term relationship. It's actually still an ongoing relationship.
Could you provide a sense of the size of the initiative in financial terms?
I'm a private company, and I'd like to keep that confidential.
What is the status of this engagement?
We went live about six years ago, but it's never really completed. It changes so much each day. We're rebuilding most of the site, databases, functionality, and search so we can enhance the overall user experience and drive more business.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Could you share any statistics, metrics or user feedback from this engagement?
Again, because we're a private company, I'm not comfortable giving you any real statistics from our business or operations. I can tell you that they were very orderly. At the end of each day, they would report to us by email their status report. We'd wake up with their report, we'd get a midday report, which was the end of their day, and it'd usually be filled with questions for each one of our departments. I was very pleased with the workflow that we established, and I never had problems with the quality of Trust Sourcing's work.
What distinguishes Trust Sourcing from other providers?
We had originally started with another company. We would send them pictures of what we wanted, and they built it, but they never gave us any input. When we switched to Trust Sourcing, we'd come up with an idea and send it to them. A day later, we'd get this phone call from them offering suggestions on how to do it differently. About 90 percent of the time they did that, they were right on with their suggestions. The added value that came from Trust Sourcing was their ability to look at something and make it better, drawing on their collective experience. We weren't paying them for that type of advice. It ended up just being part of the package, kind of a bonus.
We tried developing a chain of microsites for cheap, and we decided to outsource the job to an Indian company. It turned out to be a disaster. Trust Sourcing went ahead and rebuilt each of the microsites for us.
The only reason we went to the other company to begin with was because it was slightly cheaper, and we didn't want to wait for Trust Sourcing to be able to pick up the project. We assumed everybody was going to treat us like Trust Sourcing, but that was not the case.
In hindsight, are there areas in which they could improve, or things you might do differently?
The 10-hour time difference between us isn't really Trust Sourcing's problem because we choose to be here. There are times when you get frustrated because you want something done right away. We've woken them up at three in the morning, and they've done stuff, or they've stayed in the office all night long to accommodate us on a launch or a new publication. It took us a long time to get used to the time difference. In the end, the cost of using a team at Trust Sourcing was cheaper than me hiring a top-level one-man developer in Los Angeles.
Our screw up as a company was that they would send us questions, and we wouldn't respond for two or three days. We weren't thinking about the fact that they were sitting there waiting for us to answer before they could to the next thing. We were actually more of a hindrance to our own productivity in the beginning than they were.
What advice, if any, would you give a future client of theirs?
Have your requirements straight when you send them to Trust Sourcing. They trained us to give specific directions, and we all got better as we gave them better information. What we learned was, the tighter requirements we gave them, the more things picked up.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
"It's hard for me give anybody five stars."
-
Schedule
4.5On time / deadlines
"Approximately 90 percent of the time, if we missed a deadline, it was our fault by not answering things. If they were late, it was usually because we screwed up, truthfully...I'm not going to say that they didn't because they did."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"We just referred a very large platform to them. Actually, I referred two people to them, so we have no problem referring them at all.