Visit Website

Quality is never too much

4.9
8 reviews
SILVER VERIFIED

TestMatick is a leading provider of top quality software testing services. The company was founded in 2009 and headquartered in New York, USA. Our strong team of testers can start testing your project of any complexity within 24 hours.

 
$1,000+
 
< $25 / hr
 
50 - 249
 Founded
2009
Show all +
New York, NY
headquarters
other locations

Portfolio

Key clients: 

Hubrick, KEYPR, Sweetrush, oneUp, PageSuite, Grape, Doppler Labs, Redmadrobot, Global-e

Reviews

4.9
8 reviews
Sort by

Testing Services for IT Consultancy

"They work very efficiently, they are friendly, they are cost-effective, and they are thorough."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Jan. 2015 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Testmatick implements testing services across a variety of software. This has involved regression, performance, penetration, application, Salesforce, cross-browser, and usability testing.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
London, United Kingdom
Peter Pedersen
Principal Consultant, Equanimity (UK) Ltd.
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

While the results of the engagement are confidential, stakeholders report the testing services have had a positive impact. The vendor's communication style has been a highlight. They have a detail-oriented working style.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

Testmatick are always my goto partner for any software testing programmes that I manage for any of my clients. They work efficiently, they are friendly, they are cost effective, they are thorough and provide detailed defect reports. I never hesitate to ask for their assistance and I always get a speedy response.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Testmatick?

Website regression testing performance testing Penetration Testing Application Testing Salesforce Testing Functional and usability testing Cross browser testing and more

What were your goals for this project?

Finding and correcting any defects across all projects quickly

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

I originally selected this vendor during a visit and inspection of their capabilities.

Describe the project in detail.

a variety of software testing projects across all disciplines.

What was the team composition?

Varying composition, project by project

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Client Outcomes are all confidential. But highly successful

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

Very seemless communication between the teams working on every project

What did you find most impressive about this company?

They work very efficiently, they are friendly, they are cost-effective, and they are thorough. Also, they provide detailed defect reports.

Are there any areas for improvement?

They have always delivered to my full satisfaction - so I have no areas of improvement to suggest. Perfect partner

5.0
Overall Score They work as a complementary partner
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    very professional
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    very cost effective
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    Perfect partner
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    without hesitation

Load Testing for Crowdfunding Company

"They are very responsive."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
 
Aug. - Nov. 2019
Project summary: 

Testmatick provided the start-to-finish application testing for a crowdfunding company. Their project included conceptualizing, writing, and configuring the test.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Emek Hefer, Israel
CTO, Crowdfunding Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The test ran successfully and can be repeated as needed. Testmatick provided effective QA, load, and automation tests. The teams maintained reliable communication and an effective workflow.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

Our company has different crowdfunding websites. I am the CTO of the company with a very small dev team.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Testmatick?

We had to do load & stress tests for our websites to make sure we are able to deal with the amount of users we wanted to.

What were your goals for this project?

To be able to run the load tests on our own servers whenever we want to or need to and after every change that might have an impact on performance.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

We posted a job on UpWork and they contacted us.

Describe the project in detail.

The project was creating load tests for our websites. It included writing the actual test, making sure we can configure the url, number of concurrent users and other needed configuration.

They also needed to install the load tests on a given server in google cloud and make sure we can run it on our own. We provided the instructions and the test case by emails.

What was the team composition?

I have no idea if they involved anyone from the team, we spoke with the COO and another team leader.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Our experience was successful - we ran the test successfully and the best thing is I can run it again whenever I wish to check the websites.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

We had someone from my team in charge on explaining everything and making sure it is happening. We mostly communicated by emails & zoom meetings.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

They have everything from QA testing to load testing to automation testing. They are very responsive.

Are there any areas for improvement?

Sometimes it's better to write everything down in an email/doc to make sure everyone understood their task after a skype/zoom call.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Outsourced Application Testing for Software Developer

"The team at Testmatick is my personal choice for QA work."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Nov. 2019 – Ongoing
Project summary: 

Testmatick provides QA services and testing for an outsourcing firm’s client. They were tasked with testing a banking service.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Kyiv, Ukraine
Vadim Lupashku
Head of Delivery, Prostir
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Testmatick delivers an excellent service that benefits groups significantly. They go above and beyond for their clients. Their responsiveness is noteworthy. Customers can expect a collaborative and flexible team of QA engineers.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the head of delivery at Prostir. We specialize in selecting teams of developers for different projects through outsourcing. I’m responsible for the delivery of resources.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Testmatick?

We hired Testmatick to perform testing for one of our partners.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We were responsible for finding resources for one of our clients. They were testing a banking service. After the interview, our responsibilities with Testmatick ended.

What is the team composition?

Initially, the client hired two testers and added more along the way. Currently, four people are working on the project.

How did you come to work with Testmatick?

We needed QA resources and contacted more than a dozen companies. Of the two companies that replied, one had higher rates while Testmatick was in our target price range.

How much have you invested with them?

The cost is around $10,000 per month.

What is the status of this engagement?

Our engagement with Testmatick started in November 2019.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

For this project, the client is satisfied, and some of the work is ongoing. Once that work is completed, Testmatick will transfer their QA services to another party.

The team at Testmatick is my personal choice for QA work. We’ve had a great experience with the company and are working with them regularly. What I like about Testmatick is how responsive and reliable they are.

How did Testmatick perform from a project management standpoint?

I greatly appreciate their project management style. I can message them at any time, and they have a great response rate, which means a lot to us. Testmatick has one of the best budget solutions for QA that I’ve experienced on the market.

What did you find most impressive about them?

I’m impressed with their willingness to cooperate. Our client initially wanted them for three months, but they ended up needing to cut it to a month and a half. I went back to Testmatick, and they didn’t even try to change the pricing. They’re willing to engage in long-term collaborations, rather than get easy and fast money.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I don’t have any issues at the moment.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Out of all the development and QA suppliers I’ve worked with, Testmatick has gone above my expectations. At the moment, it’s perfect in every way.

5.0
Overall Score I’m thankful for this experience. Testmatick set the bar high for testing services.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    I don’t handle scheduling, so this is based on client feedback.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    Their cost is the lowest on the market at the moment.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    I’ve gotten high feedback from every client that interviewed Testmatick’s resources.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    Testmatick is the only QA company I’m recommending.

Integration Testing for Email Marketing Platform

“…they were committed to the project and had an engaged approach.”

See More

4.5

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Jan. 2017 - Dec. 2018
Project summary: 

Testmatick led a comprehensive end-to-end integration test and user acceptance test for an email marketing platform. The team reported bugs, wrote test cases, and gave user feedback.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Israel
VP Product, Email Marketing Provider
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Internal stakeholders praised Testmatick for their meticulous testing and dedication. They organized the project well and completed the task to satisfaction.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I’m the VP of product for an integrated multi-service email marketing provider. We offer a robust feature set for campaign management, including mail design, list management, segmentation and behavioral targeting, autoresponders, and A/B testing.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Testmatick?

We needed resources to handle QA and regression testing for our email marketing platform, which consists of a public site and a SaaS app (both on the front- and backend).

What were your goals for this project?

Our objective was to enhance our site and app quality.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

When I joined the company, we were already working with Testmatick, so I’m not sure how we found them.

Describe the project in detail.

They performed complete end-to-end integration testing and user acceptance testing for our email marketing platform. Their team was responsible for reporting and reviewing bugs in addition to writing test cases to validate our business workflow.

What was the team composition?

They assigned a full-time senior QA engineer and a part-time junior QA engineer.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Testmatick’s QA service was detail-oriented and professionally organized. Their specialists also gave us user experience feedback, which was immensely helpful. I particularly enjoyed working with them because they provided comprehensive testing. What’s more, they were committed to the project and had an engaged approach.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

Considering the fact that we’re located across multiple countries, we shared a very good workflow.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

It’s plain and simple; they did the work. There’s no need for more.

Are there any areas for improvement?

No, there was nothing in particular that stood out. It takes time to find the right balance and fine-tune the workflow, which can always be improved.

4.5
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

QA Testing for E-Learning Performance Improvement Company

“We've never had a problem with Testmatick. … We're very pleased with their services.”

 

See More

4.5

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Confidential
 
Aug. 2013 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Testmatick performs QA testing of online courses on mobile devices, including iPhones and tablets. They test the functionality and the links.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
San Francisco, California
QA Manager, E-Learning Manager
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Successfully finding and eliminating bugs, Testmatick helps improve the quality of the code. They go above and beyond to meet all needs, while their ability to work quickly and efficiently contributed to the long-term partnership.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm a QA manager at an E-learning company.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Testmatick?

We build online courses and some of our clients request mobile testing. We needed a company to help us with QA testing.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We do all the desktop testing in-house. Once the content has been validated, we send Testmatick a link and they test the functionality on iPhones, tablets, or other devices our clients ask us to test. They check all the buttons and make sure all the links work, which takes about two hours per device.

What is the team composition?

I have one main point of contact.

How did you come to work with them?

The relationship started before I joined the company.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working with Testmatick in August 2013 and the relationship is ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We're very pleased with their services. We track all the bugs that are being erased and pass this information on to our developers who are building the courses. We've never had a problem with Testmatick, which is why we continue working with them.

How did they perform from a project management standpoint?

We usually use email and Skype to communicate and they're very responsive.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Whenever I send them a link to be tested, they get back to me the following day. That is very important to us because we often work on a tight deadline.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I can't think of anything.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Be patient with them at the beginning.

4.5
Overall Score
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    Most of the time, they meet our deadlines.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

QA Testing for Telecom Operator

“Both of our teams worked together as one.”

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Mar. 2016 - May 2017
Project summary: 

Testmatick conducted quality testing on new interfaces for an e-Faxing solution. In their comprehensive approach, the team tested different scenarios to improve the platform’s performance.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Istanbul, Turkey
Head of Software Development, Telecom Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Testmatick’s guidance improved the accessibility and operative performance of the interfaces. The collaboration was balanced, organized, and productive. Their team’s work ethic generated quality results, with minimal delays.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I’m the head of software development for a licensed telecom operator. We’re based in Turkey with offices throughout Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, but we work with customers around the globe.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Testmatick?

We needed a company to conduct QA testing on our new e-Faxing solution interfaces.

What were your goals for this project?

Ultimately, we wanted to provide more alternatives for our users to connect with our platform.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

We found a couple of candidates online. After a few interviews, we selected Testmatick.

Describe the project in detail.

Following a few meetings, Testmatick researched our solution and drafted a test plan for various scenarios and cases, while adhering to our team’s schedule and development cycles.

What was the team composition?

We worked with a senior QA engineer and a QA manager.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

With the help of the Testmatick specialists, we’ve considerably improved the accessibility of our user interfaces. Additionally, with their guidance, we’ve avoided some issues we would’ve hit in production.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

Both of our teams worked together as one. We scheduled meetings once a week and build releases every other week. To manage the project, we used Atlassian and in terms of QA, we used TestFlight, Jing, and VMware.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

They showed a high level of dedication and efficient collaborative skills.

Are there any areas for improvement?

Of the minimal complications, most were because of changes made on our side.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Magento Extension Testing for Subscription SaaS

"Testmatick was amazing to work with."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
4.5
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Jan. 2017 - Dec. 2020
Project summary: 

Testmatick tested a variety of Magento extensions for a SaaS that's a subscription-management platform. They aimed to empower the client in releasing a high-quality product.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Baltimore, Maryland
Garth Brantley
Founder, Subscribe Pro
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Testmatick was an amazing partner to work with. Their remarkable communication skills and transparency made the engagement a breeze. The team's attention to detail was also greatly appreciated. 

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

Founder @ Subscribe Pro

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Testmatick?

Testing a variety of Magento extensions.

What were your goals for this project?

Release a very high quality product.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

Worked with some key employees previously.

Describe the project in detail.

Highly technical extension setup and testing.

What was the team composition?

Project manager and testers.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Testmatick was amazing to work with.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

Communication was great.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

Transparency and attention to detail were impressive.

Are there any areas for improvement?

We were very satisfied with the project.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 4.5 NPS
    Willing to refer

Testing for Service Desk Mgmt App

"Their willingness to do things that are not common was stellar."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
4.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
 
May 2018 - Oct. 2019
Project summary: 

Testmatick was responsible for testing the stability, deployment, life cycle, and data collection ability of a service desk management app. The team consisted of a test engineer and a network administrator.

The Reviewer
 
1,001-5,000 Employees
 
Netanya, Israel
Or Lavy
Director of Engineering, Solarwinds
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Testmatick allowed for the successful execution of the app, which has been deployed for use by hundreds of customers. The test engineer's communication skills, in particular, were phenomenal. While they could've improved their tech stack, their willingness to complete challenging tasks was stellar.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

Solarwinds Service Desk is an application used by IT departments to manage their service desk and asset management

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Testmatick?

network discovery application used to populate the service desk inventory

What were your goals for this project?

testing the stability, deployment, and life cycle and data collection of the network discovery tool

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

we worked with Testmatic in the past and were satisfied from the cooperation and results. Moving on to the new project seemed natural.

Describe the project in detail.

We initiated the project by describing our needs. Once the project was running we communicated when it was needed.

What was the team composition?

one test engineer and one network administrator

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

the product was released successfully and is already deployed on hundreds of customers.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

the communication with the test engineer was very good. the network administrator english was less good and sometimes we got into misunderstandings.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

Their willingness to do things that are not common was stellar. like getting the network administrator to participate in the project and and the flexibility

Are there any areas for improvement?

the required technical knowledge of this specific project was sometimes not enough. for example the configuration of SCCM database was not sufficient.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
Verification

Clutch verification provides an additional layer of data to help you make the right purchasing decsion of business services. Learn more

SILVER VERIFIED
Business Entity
Business Entity Name
Testmatick
Status
Active
Jurisdiction of Formation
Ukraine
Id
39793378
Date of Formation
May 16, 2009
Last updated
Mar 23, 2019
Payment & Legal Filings
International Credit Risk Assessment

Per our methodology, the International Credit Risk Assessment rating is determined by our analysis of a credit report and third-party data.

Very Low Risk
Source
Creditsafe
Last updated
Aug 1, 2019
Client Reviews
VERIFIED CLIENT REVIEWS
8
OVERALL REVIEW RATING
4.9
Source
Clutch
LAST UPDATED
February 10, 2020