What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
In general, we are very satisfied with the work and QA they provide. They are more than a software factory; they go to great lengths to understand what we’re trying to achieve and how we want things built.
The team also has strong opinions on good solutions, as well as pitfalls. They have some hardcore people on the team who are able to dive deep and create good products.
How did Setronica perform from a project management standpoint?
We handle a lot of the project management internally, setting deadlines and delegating tasks. Their leadership is quite good, and the developers are on the right path. We use Jira and work with agile principles using scrum methodology.
What did you find most impressive about them?
Setronica has very strong skills with enterprise software development in the Java space. They’ve acquired a lot of knowledge on how to work in a modern, cloud-based environment.
They also take full ownership of their solutions during production and are willing to work as long as it takes to provide what the client needs.
Are there any areas they could improve?
They could focus more on smooth delivery. They sometimes struggle to adapt quickly enough to keep the smooth delivery model we like. It’s not a major issue, though.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
They work best as an interactive partner, so I would advise not to hand a project over to them and wait for them to deliver.
Setronica is made up of a knowledgeable team that has strong QA skills, understands the business' needs, and is able to produce solid deliverables. In addition to having notable leadership capabilities, they take ownership of the production process to ensure client satisfaction.