What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
They’re working on our main product at all times. We follow how they spend money and how much time it takes, adjusting those metrics all the time. The quality is good, and we’re happy with it.
How did Sangre perform from a project management standpoint?
We want to develop the service in an agile way, so we have multiple ongoing tasks. There are long-term goals, with which they help to plan the big-picture technical architecture as well as new feature development. For those, we work on a project basis, setting goals and deadlines. There is also a third layer, for urgent bug fixes, which is ongoing.
Their team is very flexible. We’ve had some unnatural schedules for them, and they survived that. They’re also very responsive if we need something done by the next morning. We’ve made some overnight changes, and they adapted to those needs.
What did you find most impressive about them?
We have a long history, and they know our product very well. That means that we can work with them openly and with plenty of trust. As a product owner, I don’t have to spend too much time or effort on giving technical specifications, writing them down in a lot of detail. They understand my ideas and can transform them into designs.
Their team is the right size to strike a balance between having enough resources, while still responding quickly and maintaining good communication. We trust Sangre, and it works very well.
Are there any areas they could improve?
I don’t know. We’re quite happy with them at the moment.
Do you have any advice for future clients of theirs?
I would definitely recommend them for their professional attitude and good combination of consultancy and hard work. All layers are covered, from design to full-stack development.