Quality. Performance. Mature
We are professional team of software developers from Ukraine.
Our main competences are:
- Web development (PHP, Laravel, Codeignitor, NodeJs)
- Database reporting (Oracle, MS SQL, MySQL, PostgreSQL)
We participated in the modernization of 12 state registries of Ukraine, 4 of them developed from scratch. As of January 2017, the total number of internal users is 16473, external - 28764. All of the registers are highly loaded web-oriented document management systems.
If you need to develop complex application in strict terms we are the right partner to work with.
We provide all the steps of full application life cycle:
- Requirements gathering
- Web development
- Application deployment
- Performance optimization
- Product stage support and maintenance
We are eager to bring value to your business!
Focus
Portfolio
PCADE - Digital marketing platform
- Create an easy to use and convenient user interface.
- Allow ppc managers to create, store, and search through internal objects representing Google Ad Words objects.
- Maintain full sync between PCADE and Google Ad Words in both directions.
- Provide features for previewing and discussing ppc campaigns and all their objects.
We introduced a review project as the key point of all multi-stage approval process and created a set of visual features to maintain this process.
Result PCADE successfully addressed all the challenges and got the most positive feedback from digital agencies. According to them, the average overall time needed to create and launch a complex ppc campaign from scratch decreased by 35%.
Reviews
the project
Custom Development for Open-Source Platform
"They were responsible, working with us without holding our hand."
the reviewer
the review
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the director of an open-source platform that provides information to the public about the organization, rules, and procedures of state institutions. The public can find information about the institution, contacts, location as well as draft their documents and locate a database of legislation.
What challenge were you trying to address with QPMSoft?
We needed help with custom development for our web platform.
What was the scope of their involvement?
They developed our open-source platform. It has internal IP telephony, a legislation database, and work done by other developers. Their team created the web portal, database, interface, authorization, and electronic signature. The software library was designed by other developers. All other basic software features were developed by them.
The project isn't finished because we have plans to add more functionality. Now, we mostly work on improving the database.
What is the team composition?
There was a team leader who organized the team as well as one lead software designer, one analytics specialist, a database person, 2-3 software designers, and a resource that wrote instructions.
How did you come to work with QPMSoft?
Somebody from our team knew about them.
How much have you invested with them?
We spent about $100,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working together in 2015 and finished it at the end of 2016.
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Their work was done quickly and well. Even the first version contained very few mistakes. For the first version, we presented it to the public within six months.
I recently contacted them to help with a new job relating to electronic judgments. We plan on using them for that too.
How did QPMSoft perform from a project management standpoint?
Project management was done well. We drafted requirements, but they led us from there. They proposed some technical features like electronic hearing and electronic signature, along with what technologies to use. They gave us technology choices that helped us save money.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They were responsible, working with us without holding our hand. Starting from technical requirements, they guided us toward the final product. That was good for us because most of our team doesn't have a lot of time to spend on the design of the system. They gave us the code and the intellectual property rights for the product at the final stage.
Are there any areas they could improve?
There’s nothing I’d have them improve.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
It was comfortable working with them because of our flexible model. They took extra time testing because they wouldn’t receive the final payment until we received the finished product. If it was necessary to change something, they did it within our budget.
The team delivered quality work from start to finish, producing very few errors even in the first iterations of the solution. They provided their partner with innovative technological ideas, allowing them to further innovate on the platform. Their services were cost-effective.