Web Application UI\UX Redesign
- UX/UI Design
- $10,000 to $49,999
- Jan. 2014 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"They were really good about moving with the flow of the project and constantly reevaluating what the needs were."
- Other industries
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- 1-10 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
Phuse redesigned a niche website. The project had a very tight deadline, so they employed one- or two-day production sprints. One key element was clarifying user flows based on a Google Maps integration.
Phuse’s founder steers the ship with a values-based approach that permeates the team’s attitudes. There was a sense of collaboration throughout. They utilized project management software to maximize efficiency. Users appreciate the aesthetics and flow of the new website.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the founder of salt.io, a strategy firm that advises and works on full stack tech solutions. I took on a client who needed a partial rebuild of an existing Estate web platform that serves the commercial real estate securitization market. My role was to scope out and lead the project to successful implementation under a very tight schedule.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Phuse?
Part of the challenge was to do a UI/UX redesign on an extremely niche product in a niche market. The existing functionality was designed for extremely experienced financial analysts and very hard to understand for most tech folks without a background in finance. Given the tight (and non-negotiable) timeline, the prospect for an extended ramp up for the tech team was limited, as was the possibility of engaging the existing users for feedback and user flow validation throughout the process.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
I think they have a standardized process that they follow, but it’s super flexible. They sort of tailor their process to match my process. I run a development team, and I have a very specific process I like to use. I like them so much because they meld into my system as opposed to making me default to their process.
We do very fast iterative development. We push to production every one or two days. We organize the design work around one-week sprints. That was the shortest sprint that made sense for the kind of pages that we were doing. We sort of melded their process and our process, to come up with the hybrid that works for the project. We organized the sprints and left flexibility to reevaluate at the end of every week and totally change what the next week’s sprint was going to be or not.
As that went along, the first sprint we hit exactly. For the next one, we decided to double our time into two sprints on the same topic because it was more important and needed more depth. The next sprint, we decided to do in half the time because we wanted to be a little bit more shallow. They were really good about moving with the flow of the project and constantly reevaluating what the needs were to make sure we were happy.
The first app dropped everybody into one page and there were 12 different things you could do on that page. So three different users doing three different things end up on the same page and use it differently. There was a high training bar to know all the things you can do on that page. Phuse helped us identify distinct user flows or distinct users and try to come up with a number of flows that can lead to that page or to other pages that were more specific to the flow. Some of them just clarified the flows on that page. The page had a Google Map on it, and you could do all kinds of things with a map. They really helped us understand that the things that make sense to do with the map should happen on that page, and the things where the map does not add a lot of value, don’t need to be on that page. The map would be a distraction from whatever they’re trying to accomplish. That lead us to create a second page, and a lot of people would just go there in the new design and never even get to the Maps page because what they are trying to do didn’t really require a map in the first place. That makes it a lot simpler.
There was one designer working on the project, Cody. They have a project manager, Marisa, who managed it. The founder would pop in from time to time. There were more people available. They do design reviews with us and we give feedback, but then they also do design reviews internally for their team and would come back with changes that their other designers would recommend for best practices. While I only interfaced with probably three people, I believe that more people had eyes on the design.
They’ve worked on two other projects with us. They did my website. I always say that of all the projects I do, the thing that I get most complimented on is my website and I barely had anything to do with that because Phuse did it. People like my website better than anything I’ve done for them. They started to build an application for me but I ended up terminating that but that had nothing to do with them. I have occasion to work with other design firms or my clients work with other design firms. The reason I like Phuse is I don’t agree fundamentally with the process other firms use, and they kind of lock you into that. Phuse is really cool about being flexible.
How did you come to work with Phuse?
I don’t know how I came across them. I feel like I must’ve seen their work.
How much have you invested with Phuse?
We have spent between $10,000 and $50,000 for the current project.
What is the status of this engagement?
The first project was built in 2014. They are finishing the project this week. They may get extended. There may be future phases of this project or they may be done for good. They’ve actually completed more than the original scope, and so we’re finding new things for them to do after this last week.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?
The internal feedback has been positive. We’re a finance company and our users aren't typically of tech-savvy, so the feedback from users is more around what the site looks like. The screens look way better. It hasn’t been rolled out live yet, and so while I would say that the redesign is transformational and it is going to directly impact the success of this product, there are no metrics to back that up yet because there are no external users on it right now.
How did Phuse perform from a project management standpoint?
They’re very organized. They have a Trello board and a project manager. In terms of keeping everyone on the team informed of when the sprints are, what the scope is, what the price is, what the budget is, it’s all very organized and pretty smooth. They work so closely with you that you just feel like you’re on the same team. It eliminates that sort of feeling that there are different teams operating in distinct ways, and it’s just kind of an extension to your team.
The Phuse designers dove in and worked hard to overcome the learning curve associated with the niche market and the functionality. The reskin was completed on time and on budget and looks amazing. I have witnessed first hand the struggles most developers and designers have when working with technology projects in niche areas such as finance. The Phuse designers are professionals and were not discouraged or deterred.
What did you find most impressive about Phuse?
I think their founder is a strength. James [Costa, CEO] is a super neat guy. He writes on the topics of leadership; I love reading his work. He has believes in culture and how to grow and shape a team. In terms of the mission, culture, and tone set by the founder, I think it’s really a model for other companies, my own company included.
Are there any areas Phuse could improve?
Everyone can improve in everything, but I can’t think of anything specific.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
"I appreciate their attention to detail. Quality is exceptional and their flexibility is unmatched."
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
"On deadline every single time."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"On budget every single time."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"Always my first referral for UI\UX projects and my go to when I need help there.