We bring your vision to life with world class apps

Mangosoft brings your vision to life — a software development house with the highest quality standards and a world class reputation to help you achieve your business goals in an ever-changing marketplace.

 
$10,000+
 
$25 - $49 / hr
 
50 - 249
 Founded
2012
Mangosoft
Louki Akrita 2
Nikosia 2333
Cyprus
Mangosoft
Ukraine

Portfolio

Meethoneybee

MeethoneyBee is the first fintech platform to allow 110 million working Americans, regardless of their credit history, to borrow against their accrued paid time off at no monthly interest to help with short-term financial crunches. With HoneyBee PTO Loans℠, employees can borrow against their paid time off at no monthly interest when faced with unexpected expenses, creating a new financial safety net for the employees’ value.

 

Technologies:

Java, Python.

AhorroLibre

Ahorro Libre is an internet platform for community financing. Ahorro Libre gives entrepreneurs and small business owners the power to finance their goals and objectives through their own community. This creates a “social savings network” with an organic credit score for each user, a new marketplace that provides instant and lower cost access to other traditional financial services. AhorroLibre has taken informal finance methods developed over generations, like ROSCAs, ASCAs and CrowdRecouping, and put them on a simpler, safer, transparent and more efficient mobile platform.

 

Technologies:

Front-end: HTML, SCSS, React.js, Redux.
Backend: Node.js, Rancher, Typescript.

Liveraise

LiveRaise is the best place to interact with your favorite YouTubers live.Use the FanLine to send the streamer a video or audio message to be featured live. Subscribe to become a VIP & stand out in the crowd. 

 

Technologies: 

Objective-c, Video-streaming, Rest. 

Veggie Weekend

Veggie Weekend is a recipe application with a modern interface and user experience. Enjoy a delicious and healthy Veggie Weekend with Filibaba. Veggie Weekend is free to download, with a total of 113 fresh and exciting recipes like Saffron Risotto, Chili con Frijoles, and Palak Tofu.

 

Technologies:

Apple-uikit-framework, Rest, Objective-c

Rage of Realms

Rage of Realms is an online strategy game for mobile platforms. The game was developed in Unity 3D engine. Back-end is written mainly in Java. It uses Amazon servers for hosting players’ servers and database. Complexity of the game was in synchronizing the real-time events with the back-end as well asprocessing of the data and proper interpretation on the clients’ devices.

 

Technologies:

Unity 3D, NON SQL database, Java – server.

Juice Fruits: Puzzle game

Juice Fruits is adventurous Match 3 Puzzle game. The core game is written in Unity 3D. The engine of the game could be used for re-skiing the game with different content that decreases time to market and total cost of every next game of this genre.

 

Technologies:

Unity 3D, Java.

Reviews

Sort by

Mobile Game Design & Porting for Videogaming Company

“They provided good feedback, and weren’t afraid to make suggestions that would improve the end product.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$1,000,000 - $9,999,999
 
2012 - 2014
Project summary: 

Addressing art and porting needs, Mangosoft supported the mobile division of a large videogame company. They migrated existing code to new Tizen OS, providing QA throughout the process.

The Reviewer
 
201-500 Employees
 
San Jose, California
James Kucera
Former Head of Mobile Development, Bandai Namco America
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Mangosoft’s flexibility and willingness to work quickly through any issues led to a successful product upon first review. They produced good work, and the end product has positive reviews and no major crashes.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I am the former vice president of the mobile gaming division of Bandai Namco America, a large videogame company.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Mangosoft?

We had two major challenges. The first was developing and coding a project in-game, and the second involved porting games from our existing mobile platform to the new Tizen OS for a major electronics company.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

They provided art and porting for both projects. They also learned the technical skills necessary to move our existing code over to the new OS. They made sure all of our art matched up and ran QA on the project. We had to port for eight different devices, which operated on C++, C#, Java, etc. They had to use multiple skill sets to port these products over and convert the code.

The other project they worked on was a wrestling style video game, with high-end arts animation, and 3D rendering and graphics. They provided the backend, serverside coding, and found a studio to work with us on the motion capturing. Mangosoft handled the art, and we handled the project management on our side.

What is the team composition?

It was a big project. I had over 100 people working in my division, and they had between 30 and 40 people at that time. I worked directly with Oleg [CEO, Co-Founder, Mangosoft], and our assigned producer worked with a producer on their end.

How did you come to work with Mangosoft?

I attended a show in Kiev to meet independent developers and studios for potential projects. I met Oleg and had a good feeling about him. He showed me some of their work, and we tested them on some smaller porting projects. Once they proved themselves, I gave them the bigger project.

How much have you invested with them?

We invested $2,000,000–$3,000,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We had them on multiple projects. We started in 2012 and finished the big project around November 2014.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

They finished everything on time, which was important for our release timelines. Tizen had just come out, and the electronics company kept changing it. We constantly had to rework the code, and Mangosoft was very flexible. They were developing a moving target, with little sympathy or information from the outside company, and still helped us make our release date.

Their QA was very good, and the electronics company passed their work for release within the first review. They did well, especially considering the devices and OS were all so new. The other product went to market as well, with a solid backend. We’ve had no major crashes, and we have positive reviews.

How did Mangosoft perform from a project management standpoint?

We used Jira for all our communications and tracking updates. I’d look at everything weekly to make sure we were on track. Their responsiveness is good, and I never had a problem with the time difference. I’ve worked internationally for a long time, so I know to send updates late in the day. I usually got an update the next morning. Occasionally we’d have an emergency in the middle of the day, but I could always get in touch with someone, even if it was late for them. They were quick to try to get things resolved.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They produce really great art and do excellent work. They’re very responsive and gave us more a better value than some western companies. They’re hungry for work and passionate about gaming. They provided good feedback and weren’t afraid to make suggestions that would improve the end product.

Are there any areas they could improve?

When we were working together, they hadn’t gotten up-to-date on the latest code systems and 3D rendering tools. I’d recommend investing in cutting-edge systems and keeping people trained. I know they’ve progressed since we worked together.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

This is a good group to work with. I’d recommend testing out any relationship; meet them in person to make sure they’re the right team for you.

5.0
Overall Score Overall, it was a very pleasant experience for me. They hit all the targets on budget, and I never had to go back to the boards.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They did a very good job, and were open and honest. They always gave enough notice to adjust as needed, and were on target with initial schedules.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They provided a good quality of work at a much lower cost than western or U.S. development companies.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    The quality was good, and I didn’t have to deal with a lot of bugs or fixes.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    Oleg [CEO, Mangosoft] is a good guy. They’re trustworthy, and have been in business for a while. I have every reason to recommend them.

Backend Web Dev for Fintech Lending Platform

“They’re not content with doing the bare minimum; they like to provide feedback and be a true partner.”

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
2016 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Mangosoft augments the current in-house development team, helping mainly with the backend. They also work on APIs, frontend, database, and security, as needed.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
San Francisco, California
CEO, Lending Platform
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Unlike previous providers, Mangosoft maintained clear and open communication, responding to inquiries within 24 hours. The in-house team highly appreciates their work, which never has bugs or glitches. They follow up and ensure their products are the best versions possible.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm the CEO of a lending platform.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Mangosoft?

We needed to augment our in-house development team, so we looked to outsourcing the work. Specifically, we needed help with our database, frontend, and backend.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

I’m not involved with Mangosoft on a day-to-day basis, but they help with numerous different projects. Most of their work is related to the backend of our web lending platform, but they’ve also worked on APIs and security.

What is the team dynamic?

We have a project manager and four developers, two of which are full-time.

How did you come to work with Mangosoft?

A colleague referred them. We looked at a few other companies, but Mangosoft was the most willing to give us feedback and get involved with the project.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent between $50,000$100,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We began working together in the middle of 2016, and we’re still partnered.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We haven’t had any issues with their products, and they’ve all been good-quality work. Our in-house development team is happy with their assistance, and the platform is incredibly easy to use.

How did Mangosoft perform from a project management standpoint?

Mangosoft always delivers what they promised. We maintain consistent contact, and they usually respond within 24 hours. They’re much more efficient than our past agencies, and they frequently follow up to keep us updated on their progress.

We generally communicate via phone and use Jira to manage tickets, but each project is a little different.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They always double check their work and make sure it’s done correctly. They don’t turn anything in that hasn’t been properly reviewed by their team.

Are there any areas they could improve?

Compared to the other companies we’ve used, they’re fantastic.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Mangosoft is going to take an active and involved role in the work you give them, so be prepared for that. They’re not content with doing the bare minimum; they like to provide feedback and be a true partner.

5.0
Overall Score Working with them has been great.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They're on time and always follow up.
  • 4.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They're a bit more expensive than others, but they're worth it.
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    95% of the time their work is great.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    We already have.