Visit Website

Agile Software Development

5.0
7 reviews

We are a software development company focused on helping entrepreneurs and startups build their ideas and products. We help them succeed by transforming product ideas into high quality working software solutions through innovation, embracing agile methodologies and delivering each project milestone on time and budget. 

WEB DEVELOPMENT: We bring web application ideas to life.

CLOUD & EMERGING TECH: We craft cloud services or explore and implement prototypes with new and emerging technologies.

MOBILE DEVELOPMENT: Android, iOS and hybrid applications.

READ MORE...
 
$25,000+
 
$100 - $149 / hr
 
2 - 9
 Founded
2015
Show all +
La Jolla, CA
headquarters

Portfolio

Key clients: 
  • Smithsonian Channel -
  • Moment -
  • Capital One -
  • Robolink -
  • Livepin.tv -
  • Dogs On The Run -
  • SOLOSHOT -
  • Clevos -
  • IntentExpert -
  • Purr -
  • SteelTrader

Reviews

5.0
7 reviews
Sort by

Android App Dev for Photography Firm

"What we asked of Empirical was extremely complex, but they delivered."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Confidential
 
Mar. 2018 - July 2018
Project summary: 

Provided with initial wireframes and design specs, Empirical developed an Android app that acts similarly to a professional camera. Features include adjusting shutter speed and shooting in RAW, among others.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Bend, Oregon
Kevin Korpi
Product Designer, Moment
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Empirical was instrumental in launching a beta version of the app, which is nearing the end of development. The app has already surpassed expectations in terms of downloads. Empirical was thorough in their communication and technical responsibilities, and they delivered an impressive product.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I am the product designer at Moment, which builds tools for mobile photographers and creators. We make high-end lenses that can attach to iPhone or Android devices via phone cases, along with various camera apps.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Empirical?

We have had an iPhone app for a while and we sold a fair amount of hardware and phone cases to Android users, but we didn’t have an Android app yet. This project was building a higher-end, professional-level, manual camera app from scratch on Android.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

I’m the primary designer for Moment, so the project implemented the wireframes and overall design that I created. Empirical was responsible for the software development.

With a normal camera app, users open it, press the shutter button, and the phone takes and saves the picture. There’s a lot of auto exposure and auto focusing involved. What our app does is allow users to use their phone like a DSLR camera. Users can manually focus and adjust shutter speed, ISO, exposure compensation, and white balance. Users can also shoot in RAW, which is a really large file format.

What is the team composition?

I’ve interfaced with the founder, who has a software development background and is one of the sharpest engineers and project managers I’ve worked with. I also had one primary software developer assigned to the project.

How did you come to work with Empirical?

I found them through a service called Crew.co. I’ve worked with them previously as a freelance designer. People can post a project and Crew looks for suitable matches that they have vetted. I didn’t want to work with a bigger agency. I wanted a smaller company where I could potentially work directly with the founder. I received that with Empirical.

What is the status of this engagement?

We began working together in March 2018. We are nearing the end of development. We are fixing the final bugs before it is released to the public.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Empirical has been helpful in setting up a beta launch through the Google Play store, and the response has been amazing. The amount of downloads and sales we’ve had has exceeded what we expected. The feedback from users has been mostly positive. The only negative feedback we’ve received pertains to features we didn’t implement, as opposed to what we did include and how it functions.

How did Empirical perform from a project management standpoint?

The CEO and software developer had daily standups with each other via video conferences. I was invited to all of those and attended three or four per week. The developer was based in Australia but altered his working hours when necessary to match my needs. In addition to the standups, we communicated through Trello, Github, Slack, and Google Hangouts.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The Android operating system is available on thousands of different phones, and they all operate a little bit differently. To develop an Android app that functions well on a great deal of them is a huge software development undertaking. What we asked of Empirical was extremely complex, but they delivered.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I would have welcomed a few more developers on this project, but I also specifically wanted a small team, and they did great work with what they had. They stayed to our budget really well, and they are fun to work with.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

MVP for Social Media Sharing Platform

"They were thorough and realistic of what could and could not be done, but they found solutions to all challenges."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Oct. 2017 - Jan 2018
Project summary: 

Empirical teamed with another vendor to develop an MVP of a social media sharing platform with audio, video, photo, and documenting capabilities. The deliverable utilizes RTC technology and Ruby on Rails.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Philadelphia, PA
Bismark Agbemble
CEO, Plugin
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Empirical coordinated well with a third-party vendor to create a functional MVP. Empirical’s team was professional and accessible. They had a commendable grasp of technical concepts and integration. They were mindful of budgetary and scheduling guidelines, and future collaboration is expected.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I am a co-founder of Plugin Corporation. We are a boutique software development firm focusing on web RTC technologies for small business and education.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Empirical?

We wanted to build a prototype beyond clickable screens but still functional using RTC technology so we could explain the concept of our product to our investors.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

The core functionality is allowing users to plug into a session and interact through videos, photos, documents, or audio. We collaborated with a company called Team 8, one of Empirical’s service providers. They worked together on the wireframe, and we customized it to show its features. They recommended the proper technologies and languages that would be fast, agile, and scalable. We decided on Ruby on Rails and worked screen-by-screen until it was complete.

What is the team composition?

We worked with a project manager and a few developers, but I did not interact with them. Team 8 was the liaison between me and the project manager, who relayed all development advances and challenges.

How did you come to work with Empirical?

Our lead contractor initially worked with QuirkyByte, which outsourced our work to Empirical. Eventually, it was decided that it was best for us to interact only with Empirical, so the project was transferred.

How much have you invested with them?

The budget for the project was $32,000, but I don’t know how much of that was allocated to them.

What is the status of this engagement?

We began working together in October 2017. The product was delivered in January 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

The MVP functions as we envisioned. It is reliable for its current stage. We have met our objective, and we’re testing with more than 600 users to receive the feedback we’re looking for.

How did Empirical perform from a project management standpoint?

They were professional, detail-oriented and responsive. The project manager made himself accessible beyond normal working hours. The whole team was flexible and finished within our timeline and our budget. They have made it an easy choice to work with them again. To communicate, we used Slack and Zoom, among other more traditional methods.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They were transparent with the capabilities of the product. They were thorough and realistic of what could and could not be done, but they found solutions to all challenges.

Any advice for potential customers?

If future clients are not well-versed in the technology space, they should at least be clear with what they envision for visual design and UX.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Mobile App Support for Boutique Software Firm

“Their team was very responsive and flexible, which made it easy to work with them.”

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Confidential
 
Nov. 2017 - Jan. 2018
Project summary: 

Empirical collaborated with other developers to build an iOS app with video playing capabilities and a media library. They used an existing user flow to write and implement the code, adding various functions.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Canada
COO, Boutique Software Firm
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Internal stakeholders praised the caliber of Empircal’s code. Despite complications with the project requirements (through no fault of their own), they adapted to the circumstances and maintained a professional approach. The team utilized their extensive technical skill to provide valuable counsel.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the COO of a boutique software development agency that specializes in legacy code products. We remove technical debt from older code bases, adding features to get them up to standard so that they can communicate with newer applications. Our core business involves squashing bugs and stabilizing older infrastructures.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Empirical?

We were working with a client who was in the early stages of building a mobile app, which wasn’t within our typical scope of work. We quickly realized that we could handle some parts of the project but not the entire work. In order to remain cost-efficient, we sought a vendor specializing in early-stage app development to augment our team.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We served as the liaison between Empirical and the client, while their team built the app. We provided the flowcharts, which they used to develop the functionalities and make it compatible with the App Store. Initially, the client wanted to develop native apps for both iOS and Android. But, due to conflicting requirements on the client’s side, they decided to build the app for iOS. The app featured an array of media-playing abilities such as video, and they added a content library. Beyond coding and implementation, they also leveraged their experience building new applications to give professional insights and guide the direction of the work.

What is the team composition?

I worked primarily with Sebastian (Founder, Empirical) who served as the project manager on their side. People from my side worked with two of their developers who wrote and executed the code.

How did you come to work with Empirical?

I believe our director of business development spoke to Sebastian, so we set up a brief interview with them. We felt that they would be a great cost-efficient solution for the components of the project that we weren’t specialized in.

What is the status of this engagement?

Their work lasted from November 2017–January 2018.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

As far as I know, the client placed the project on hold to receive extra funding, so we haven’t completed the app yet. However, our CTO praised their code for its high quality. Overall, they did extremely good work. They were helpful and professional, and we would hire them again for other projects.

How did Empirical perform from a project management standpoint?

We used Slack and Zoom to communicate. While they might have used their own internal platform to keep track of the tickets, I’m not sure and have no concrete insights on that.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Compared to other vendors we’ve worked with, their strong code and professionalism really amazed us. Their team was very responsive and flexible, which made it easy to work with them.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, nothing comes to mind.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Have open conversations with Sebastian about your project’s vision, budget, and prospects. Talk about what the necessary requirements are for a minimum viable product versus one where money was no object. It’s important to go through these points because Sebastian has good insights on how to reset those assumptions.

In our case, the client had lofty expectations, which is common during early stages of development. Sebastian drew from his knowledge and experience to help determine what was realistic or unrealistic.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They were extremely generous with us.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They went above and beyond in terms of communication and deliverables.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I would absolutely refer them.

MVP for Broadcasting Platform

"Their abilities to build a team from scratch and architect a concept are exceptional."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Confidential
 
Mar. 2017 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Empirical oversaw the onboarding of initial developers, created a project timeline, and built an MVP using AWS Lambda. 

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Greater New York City Area
CEO, Broadcasting Platform
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Empirical skillfully managed a team of developers to create a high-quality MVP. While they did underestimate some project timelines, their ability to transform a germ of an idea into a usable solution was laudable. As a result, they’re being considered for engagement on future development projects.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the CEO and founder of a live video platform that distributes a single feed across social media platforms and users' timelines.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Empirical?

We needed to utilize the correct stack in order to build a social media aggregator for live video distribution. By the time we met with Empirical, we wanted an interim CTO and a team to build the required framework.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We initially engaged with Empirical’s founder to help us build our minimum viable product (MVP) using AWS Lambda, which has since gone through various iterations. He assisted with the onboarding of our initial team members, structured the project, and created a timeline for the build. His involvement, and the involvement of the team he created, reassured us that we had a framework and the agility to deploy and develop upon the platform.

What is the team composition?

We worked mostly with their founder, who was able to contact developers he’d worked with previously to join the team. We contracted with those developers directly, and he managed the project.

How did you come to work with Empirical?

I met the founder via a Slack forum regarding a technology I wanted to utilize within our stack. After connecting, I met him in San Diego soon after to discuss our project and his potential involvement.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working together in March 2017, and although the partnership has slowed due to budgetary restraints, the project is ongoing. We have continued need for the team’s work and soon hope to develop a larger team that includes Empirical.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We were able to quickly iterate our ideas and test different technologies. Even though the process took longer than we’d hoped, their ability to turn an idea into an MVP illustrates their effectiveness.

How did Empirical perform from a project management standpoint?

They provided exceptional communication, transparency, and content management. We set weekly objectives and held daily standups to review our progress. Additionally, we used Trello and Slack to stay in contact with the Empirical team throughout the process.

Overall, the project took longer than expected, but that wasn't necessarily the fault of Empirical. We were testing technologies that were new to the market and that didn't have the maturity they needed at that time.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They offer experience and knowledge regarding project management and team leadership. Their abilities to build a team from scratch and architect a concept are exceptional.

Are there any areas they could improve?

We would have been aided by more effective time estimates. There were many elements that caused our product’s delayed release, many of which were outside Empirical’s control. However, I think research around certain parts of that technology would have indicated whether the market maturity was there.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

The company should determine the available technologies—those within Empirical’s skill set—before engaging with them. Ideally, you should engage the company to code and work efficiently and effectively, as opposed to going through a time-consuming learning process with them. Overall, make sure you stick with technologies that are within their capabilities or that have been proven and tested.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Chrome App Dev For Education Company

“The openness of communication and willingness to adjust along the way makes Empirical stand out.”

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
 
July - Oct. 2017
Project summary: 

Empirical developed an app compatible for Mac, PC, and Chromebooks via the Google Chrome browser. They used ReactJS for the frontend, JavaScript and Snap for the UI, and the Chrome library for drone connection.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
San Diego, California
Wes Hsu
VP of Design & UX, Robolink
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

A recent firmware update has significantly improved the app’s already impressive functionality and UX. Empirical met all deadlines, communicated well, and remained responsive throughout the project. They were willing to adapt to changes, and never promised things they couldn’t deliver.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the VP of design and user experience at Robolink, a company that teaches programming skills to kids using robots and drones. We have after-school programs in San Diego, and we also have robotics kits that we provide to schools so they can teach programming and engineering to kids in an engaging way. We find that programming education is much more effective when there’s something tangible to use. I handle website marketing material and the building of the user experience for the learning process.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Empirical?

We brought them onboard to help build the software behind the learning experience. In order to learn code, one must have the right software. Before we started working with Empirical, we started off using the Arduino platform, which is an open-source robotics programming environment. We wanted to create something that was a little more accessible and easy to use for teachers because many of them don’t come from a technical background. The new app is easy to use and compatible with the most common laptop in education, Chromebook.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We had a native version of the Snap programming language, which is based in a block environment and depicts programming in a visual form to expose younger kids to the concept. Although we had this native version, we wanted to be online as an app to broaden access to the educational community across different operating systems via the Chrome browser for Mac, PC, and Chromebook. Empirical was responsible for bringing the app online, and we’re currently working to make it a full-web application rather than just for Chrome.

We used ReactJS for the frontend and JavaScript for the Snap block coding and user interface. We also used the Chrome library for connecting the drone we have as one of our robotics kits to the app. Empirical used that library interface with the Bluetooth Low Energy connection to the drone.

Users can access the Chrome app to connect their serial port to our Bluetooth board, which then connects to the drone.

What is the team dynamic?

Sebastian [Founder, Empirical] was the project lead, and he was in charge of managing the technical side of the project. I was in charge of designs, layouts, mockups, and prototypes. I did all the designs, then sent all of it over to Empirical.

Pablo was responsible for the implementation and was actually in between the development and making sure things meshed up to the design I had made. He made sure that the people who designed the drone put in the latest firmware, and that this firmware was being pulled from the drone and launched in the Chrome store. Essentially, there were 2 people on their side, and 1 person on our side.

How did you come to work with Empirical?

I had previously worked on a project with Sebastian. I knew him through my network, and really enjoyed working with him, so he was one of the first people I thought of when this project came up.

How much have you invested with them?

For this particular project, the total ended up being around $7,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We finished the launch of the Chrome app earlier this month. The project started in July 2017, and it took about 3 months.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

It’s still too early to tell, so we haven’t fully inspected the analytics yet. We’re just testing it with early adopters right now and getting feedback. I don’t really have any concrete numbers yet. So far, we’ve had a few people who have had issues with the app running properly on Chromebooks, but we’ve also received feedback that the firmware update made it a lot easier. The user experience has also improved.

How did Empirical perform from a project management standpoint?

They exceeded expectations. They were good about keeping deadlines, communicating with us as needed, and being responsive to us. Everything was very good.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The openness of communication and willingness to adjust along the way makes Empirical stand out. These are also the reasons why I’ve always enjoyed working with Sebastian in particular. He understands the Agile approach to software development very well and makes sure to manage expectations properly so that he’s not promising things he isn’t capable of.

He usually ends up over-delivering because things that seemed fairly challenging at the beginning end up working out. Being able to connect to the drone with something that runs in a browser is pretty rare and new, and also something we were unsure of at the beginning. Now, we’re getting pretty consistent behavior within just a couple of months.

Do you have any advice for potential clients of Empirical?

They should know that the Empirical team, especially Sebastian, is very capable. They’ll impress clients with what they’re capable of. Even if things seem ambiguous at first, that’s the nature of a lot of projects in software and hardware. The ambiguity is something that people who work with him will need to be aware of, and I believe Sebastian does a good job of managing that.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    We had to push a little bit back towards the end because of some bugs we came across.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Booking System Development for Cat Sitting Service

"The quality was superb. ... Everything works like clockwork."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
Project summary: 

Empirical built a custom system using Ruby on Rails, which allowed clients to book and pay for pet-sitting services.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Chicago, Illinois
Robert Prouty
CEO, Purr Inc.
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The finished booking platform has worked flawlessly, which is a testament to Empirical’s attention to detail and solid code. When combined with impressive project management, these qualities set Empirical apart from other dev companies.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I work for Purr, Inc. which is an in-home pet sitting company in Chicago that caters to cats.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Empirical?

We had been using a non-custom booking service that allowed clients to book and pay online. However, we were quickly outgrowing the model that was being used. We were looking for a more customized build.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We built a custom booking system using Ruby on Rails. The system allows our clients to go online, book their service the way we prefer the booking to come in, and then pay for the service at the same time and get an email receipt. It also allows us to delegate the bookings to employees.

How did you come to work with Empirical?

I went through a service called Crew, based in Canada. I gave the details of my project, and they matched me up with three companies. I had a chat with each of them. I talked with Sebastian, at Empirical, and seemed like he related to the project. He wanted to know more about how I run my business and get a good understanding of it before starting to build a solution.

How much have you invested with Empirical?

It was $75 an hour when we started, and I think the total was about $24,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

The project began at least a year ago, but I don’t remember the exact timeline. The work is complete. I now have another on-call developer to make small tweaks to the site.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?

The quality was superb. I haven’t heard anything negative from the developer who is now working on it. Everything works like clockwork. We’re not getting error messages or crashes.

How did Empirical perform from a project management standpoint?

Empirical excelled in this area better than any developer with whom I’ve worked. Sebastian delivered work on Fridays, and we would go over the next tasks. They would go to work all week long, and if it was going to take longer, he would let me know ahead of time. I would know on Friday that my deliverables were ready, we would talk about them, and then move on. It was very good project management; I didn’t have to deal with it whatsoever.

What did you find most impressive about Empirical?

I’d say it’s the project management. I’ve always had to get more involved than I wanted in other projects. It seemed that Sebastian was able to take what was in my brain and put it into the results. I didn’t have to remind him of the details. They delivered on time and within budget, which was very nice. I only wish I could afford to continue the relationship with them. They’re a great company, and I definitely recommend them.

Are there any areas Empirical could improve?

I don’t think so.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    I wish I’d found Empirical sooner. I tried another American developer who charged higher, and it just did not work out.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

MVP Design & Consulting for Marketing Startup

"Empirical is determined to deliver a solution that works."

See More

5.0

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
Apr. 2016 - Dec. 2017
Project summary: 

Empirical designed and launched a marketing MVP to support evolving business needs, sharing strategies and brainstorming features in a consulting arrangement.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
New York, New York
Matthew Sargeant
Founder & CEO, Clevos
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Through Empirical’s assistance, the MVP launched successfully and has attracted a client base. The team’s transparency, reliable recommendations, and cohesive vision contributed to a beneficial relationship.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I'm the founder and CEO of Clevos, which creates personalized web and email experiences for e-commerce clients. We focus mostly on growing fashion brands that want to personalize every interaction for customers.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Empirical?

We were looking for someone to act as our CTO and take our concept from idea to reality.

What were your goals for this project?

We wanted a robust minimum viable product (MVP) that could scale to meet our business needs for the first two years. 

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

Empirical was recommended to me based on their experience and ability to communicate.

Describe the project in detail.

They designed, constructed, and launched the MVP, starting from the ground up. We listed the features we wanted and split the development into manageable sprints.

What was the team composition?

Sebastian (Founder & Software Engineer, Empirical) brought together a great team to meet the needs of our project. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What outcomes or results can you share that demonstrate progress and/or success?

Our business is now running and growing. Early issues were resolved quickly. We are building new features as needed to meet client preferences.

How effective was the project management?

I was impressed by Sebastian’s reliability and openness throughout the process. I think communication is key to solving problems as they arise.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

Empirical is determined to deliver a solution that works and meets the client’s needs.

What tips or recommendations do you have?

Sebastian should continue to do what he's been doing. 

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    Finding time to communicate was easy.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer