Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?
Offering Android apps to our users was a huge benefit, but I don’t have any numbers for our success. We basically went from zero to our present standing.
Android users had been asking for an app for a long time, but it’s basically a port, with no functionalities specific to it alone.
How did Dynamic Leap perform from a project management standpoint?
They worked alongside our team in order to integrate everything. From my perspective, I found Dynamic Leap to be proactive in working with us to find and solve issues. Their QA was good, and they collaborated with our own QA people, making sure our bugs were addressed and the user-acceptance criteria was met. Dynamic Leap provided a lot of extra support, and allowed us to be hands-off until we came to the integration piece. Everything seemed to flow well.
We used JIRA and Slack to communicate. We started the collaboration with standups and weekly meetings, but found that we were having too much communication, so we restricted it to strictly necessary items. Dynamic Leap provided weekly reports which explained all the work they did, and the task breakdown. This was more than enough for us.
What did you find most impressive about Dynamic Leap?
The level of project management supplied was helpful, and allowed us to be more hands-off when we needed to be. We had our own things to work on, so Dynamic Leap’s members were left on their own for the most part. We could trust that they’d do the work well and quickly, better than other vendors we’d used in the past.
Are there any areas Dynamic Leap could improve?
I can’t think of anything.
Dynamic Leap consistently had quality deliverables, on time. They were proactive in helping solve problems, and provided a lot of extra support. They exceled in QA testing, and their project management skills allowed them to work independently up until the internal teams were needed for launch.