Data-driven solutions for your business

Divectors is a custom software development and data services company. On average, our team members have over 11 years of experience in the industry. We help businesses make intelligent, data-driven decisions by making a sense out of large volumes of data they have and turning them into valuable insights. We specialize in data services, custom software development, and experience design.

 Divectors offers end-to-end solutions from creating a concept, identifying requirements and UX design to implementation, testing, and support. Our team includes data architects, data analysts, BI, and big data developers, experienced SCRUM masters and project managers. On top of that, we’ve got software developers and experience designers.

 
$25,000+
 
$25 - $49 / hr
 
10 - 49
 Founded
2018
Show all +
Tallinn, Estonia
headquarters

Portfolio

Key clients: 
A pharmaceutical company
A single tenant solution that allows running multiple studies simultaneously Image

A single tenant solution that allows running multiple studies simultaneously

Health decisions is a clinical trial management company that provides its services for running and maintaining clinical trials.

Divectors was commissioned  to build a single-tenant solution that would allow running multiple studies at the same time. 

The main challenge was that electronic data records had to be highly protected and isolated while each study had to support multiple

environments where changes applied to the study could be developed, tested and approved.

 

We designed the system using .NET stack of technologies. The system consists of a web application and several services responsible for database and data management. We created separate dynamic language runtime (DLR) that allows writing custom equations within the system to manipulate data and change the structure of a trial based on the data entered. 

As a result, now our client successfully runs multiple studies using their own platform.

To read a full case study, please visit Divectors website. 

https://www.divectors.com/cases/health-decisions/

Building centralized data repositories to drive valuable insights from data Image

Building centralized data repositories to drive valuable insights from data

Our client, a global alliance of healthcare and technological companies built around the idea of digitizing different kinds of health data and utilizing AI to derive insights from that data, had a tremendous amount of data which was accumulated during a long period of time and was not concentrated in one location. The data was not utilized for business insights or decision-making purposes.

This

created a need to build centralized data repositories to support data exploration and analytics workload, as well as data sources for other repositories.

 

Data Lake (DL) and Data Warehouse (DWH) were built as a pair of company-wide reference data repositories. DL used as a centralized storage of non-structured and semi-structured information, as well as the storage for “raw” structured data from individual products. DWH, in opposite, used as a repository of well-prepared, trusted datasets for data analysis and self-service analytics.

To read a full case study, please visit Divectors website. 

https://www.divectors.com/cases/centralized-data-repositories/

Creating a centralized place for all the integrated data sources for a pharmaceutical company Image

Creating a centralized place for all the integrated data sources for a pharmaceutical company

Our client is a leading technology-enabled life science services company that simplifies how patients get on and stay on drug therapies. 

After acquisition the company faced challenges with integrating data from various data sources. Due to the diversity of data, data analysis became difficult and time-consuming.

As a solution to the problem we proposed to design and implement Data Warehouse aimed to serve as

central repository for all integrated data sources. Since customer required to gather data from diverse data sources like flat files and different databases, we had to define  the approach for data integration
  • Structured and up-to-date key data co-location in cloud EDW 
  • Separate cloud DB to load and store low value or inconsistent data for further review and analysis 
  • Ability to review data load progress and track the process
  • PHI sensitive data de-identified

To read a full case study, please visit Divectors website. 

https://www.divectors.com/cases/connective-rx/

Building a reliable and scalable solution for real-time stock data processing. Image

Building a reliable and scalable solution for real-time stock data processing.

Our client is a big player on stock exchange market. They approached us to help them build an ecosystem for market data processing.

The data had to be extracted, aggregated, notification rules applied and emails sent to the stakeholders. Another requirement was that the storage ecosystem/data processors had to be located in Azure Cloud.

Taking into account our customer’s requirement

to avoid whenever possible custom code development, we have built streaming application based on Talend for Big Data in the scope of our work.

 

To read a full case study, please visit Divectors website. 

https://www.divectors.com/cases/market-data-processing/

 

Automated data exchange solution Image

Automated data exchange solution

Our client is a world’s leading disability advocacy organization.

As a requirement from the state, their goal was to eliminate manual data processing and provide secure automated data exchange with the state.

We have suggested to build a set of technological solutions to support its fiscal intermediary services (FIS). This included a set of XML, JSON and reporting interfaces between

the organization’s  internal technology systems and the entities of the state they operate in. 

Another step was to replace a traditional manual workflow with automated systems and introduce centralized repository for the key business data entities and file exchange storage.

Results:

  • Manual data processing in terms of data received from state  was decreased by 70%;
  • The file transfer was automated and data quality significantly improved.

To read a full case study, please visit Divectors website. 

https://www.divectors.com/cases/automated-data-exchange/

 

Reviews

Sort by

Platform Development for FinTech Startup

"They're better than other companies I've worked with in the past."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
Nov. 2019 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Divectors developed an MVP for a debt solution mobile application and widget. They assisted with UX design. 

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Sweden
CEO, FinTech Startup
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Divectors developed a functioning prototype that satisfied the client’s needs. Their technological expertise is impressive. The team was also flexible and adaptable which made the project run smoothly.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the CEO of Malmo Software Development. It’s a small organization working to develop an application.  

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Divectors?

We were searching for developers to work closely with us through the entire development journey of an application. We were dealing with a sensitive product and service requiring a high level of security.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We spent a few weeks together working to come up with the technical specifications and work out details of the project.

They’re doing the entire development, backend, and UX. They created an MVP and developed the app in a user-friendly manner, working closely with required authorities. They secured each step, working in sprints. 

The app helps people who have problems with debt and are unable to pay it. The widget they developed is for creditors. The solution is for both B2B and B2C.

What is the team composition?

There were 16–19 people who worked on the project.

How did you come to work with Divectors?

Our previous CTO had worked with them on a project in another company and had a good experience. We contacted several companies initially before narrowing it down to two. 

The Divectors team had the flexibility and adaptability we were looking for, as well as good relations within the university landscape. That was a positive for us as we deal with complicated algorithms, and those connections would be useful. They also were flexible when solidifying the contract, which took about four months of negotiations.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent between $500,000–$1,000,000. 

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working together in November 2019, with the goal of launching in a year. COVID-19 has affected the project, but we’re still working together.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement? 

We’re very pleased with the collaboration. The look and feel of the prototype are good. I would say their technological skill is superior to their UX skill, which is still good.

How did Divectors perform from a project management standpoint?

There are different nationalities involved in the solution, and there were some communication issues initially with how to address problems or challenges. Working in the Scrum method helped the flow of the project. Their way of reporting and providing information to the team, and team leaders, works great. We use different shared platforms and had our meetings in Zoom.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Their way of visualizing the project while approaching it with the flexibility to adapt and change throughout the process really stands out to me. They’re better than other companies I’ve worked with in the past. I would say that technology and development are their greatest skills.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, not really. We had minor issues in terms of what is doable or not, and reporting that in time, but I believe it’s partly a cultural thing due to the various nationalities working together.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Be extremely specific about what you want, and give them all the requirements and expectations. It’s okay to not know all the technical answers, but know what you expect from the finished product.

4.5
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

System Dev Support for Clinical Researcher

"I was impressed by their timeliness and the quality of service delivered."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
July 2019 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Divectors maintained and supported system development for a clinical research company by processing desk tickets, evaluating client change requests, and supporting development in a new platform release.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Durham, North Carolina
Patrick Phillips BSc(Hons) D.Phil.
CEO, Health Decisions
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Divectors provided quality services that prevented system disruptions. Timely, they’re highly recommended.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

CEO of a clinical research services company

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Divectors?

Health Decisions ( the company), had developed a proprietary electronic data capture platform. Divectors were involved in the original architecture build and code development. We hired Divectors to support both system maintenance and system development

What were your goals for this project?

To ensure continuity of service to our clients utilizing the eDC platform

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

Divectors were a known entity. They had been intimately involved in the development of our software platform.

Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.

In simple terms there were 3 service aras they provided:

  1. Esure all system help desk tickets were addressed to avoid any disruption in client service
  2. Evaluate and address mid study change requests coming from the internal project teams
  3. Support code development for the next release of the platform

What was the team composition?

There were 2 developers deployed to provide support for approximately 25h/week.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

I can tell you that without Divectors support, there would have been a disruption to services managed through the eDC platform. Divectors have provided outstanding service and enable full service continuity whilst addressing key enhancements at both ther study and system level

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

Project management was supported via our main IT contractor

What did you find most impressive about this company?

I was impressed by their timeliness and the quality of service delivered. 

Are there any areas for improvement?

None

4.5
Overall Score
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    Divectors are highly cost competitive
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    Divectors have provided outstanding customer service. They have helped us avoid signifcant service disruption challenges and are highly recommended
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

AWS Enterprise Data Warehouse Dev for Healthcare Firm

"The focus of their effort was intense."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
4.5
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
Nov. 2017 - Mar. 2018
Project summary: 

Divectors created an enterprise data warehouse by consolidating data sources in an AWS platform. Their team helped design the product, developed the infrastructure, and tested functionalities.

The Reviewer
 
501-1,000 Employees
 
Morristown, New Jersey
David Yak
Chief Technology Officer, Digital Services Agency
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Divectors successfully completed the project. They displayed an array of different skills and were proficient in all of them. Their team was highly focused and communicated daily with the client's team. 

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I am CTO at a healthcare services firm in New Jersey USA. We provide digital services to pharmaceutical companies in the United States.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Divectors?

We needed to build an Enterprise Data Warehouse.

What were your goals for this project?

We have multiple internal data sources that needed to get consolidated into Amazon AWS Redshift. As well we needed ETL services to gather, clean and load the data.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

Personal referral through a long time colleague.

Describe the project in detail.

The project involved understanding, profiling, mapping and developing the data models and the loading programs to build our EDW. The project involved customer interaction, analysis, design, development, testing and deployment.

What was the team composition?

We supplied a product owner, data architect, developer and infrastructure. DiVectors supplied a project manager, business analyst, lead developer, developers, and QA staff.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The EDW went live and was successful.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

We had daily standups (virtual) so we had extremely frequent and deep conversations, all the time.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

The focus of their effort was intense.

Are there any areas for improvement?

Maybe a little more on-site early in the project so they could climb the learning curve more quickly.

4.5
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 4.5 NPS
    Willing to refer