Founded in 1997, DataArt is a global software engineering firm that has continually evolved to become the trusted technology partner of market leaders. Led by our people-first principle, our world-class team designs and engineers data-driven, cloud-native solutions to create immediate and enduring business value. Through our 20+ domain-specific Labs dedicated to R&D and strategic innovation, we work together with our clients as partners for progress to ensure they stay on the leading edge.
Headquartered in New York City, DataArt is comprised of 5,700+ professionals across 40+ locations in the US, Europe, Latin America, India, and the Middle East, with clients including major global brands like Priceline, Ocado Technology, and Flutter Entertainment. Recognized as a 2023 Newsweek Most Loved Global Workplace and 13 times as an Inc. 5000 Fastest Growing Private Company, we are proud of our reputation as a great place to work and partner with.
Our key services:
Custom Software Development & Technology Consulting
Infrastructure & System Modernization
Cybersecurity Services
Quality Assurance
Managed Support
Industry 4.0
Our Centers of Competence:
AI / ML
AR / VR
Big Data
Blockchain
Business Intelligence
Business Analysis
Cloud Computing
CRM / Salesforce
Data Visualization
DevOps
IoT
Performance Evaluation
QA Automation
Security Testing
Usability
VoIP / WebRTC / Video
Partnerships:
Microsoft Gold Partner and Azure Consulting Partner
Advanced Consulting Partner in Amazon Partner Network (APN)
Google Cloud Premium Partner
Salesforce Partner (4.9/5 - rating on AppExchange) - DataArt is a Salesforce - Consulting Partner proficient in all Clouds, a verified specialist in Sales and Service Clouds, Einstein AI, and Educations Institutes. Experience-driven expertise in Service Cloud Voice - backed by satisfied clients, recognized by Salesforce.
Min project size
$100,000+
Hourly rate
$50 - $99 / hr
Employees
1,000 - 9,999
Locations
New York, NY
Year founded
Founded 1997
5 Locations
New York , NY
London , England
München , Germany
Dubai , United Arab Emirates
Irving , TX
No have been added yet...
Pricing Snapshot
Min. project size
$100,000+
Avg. hourly rate
$50 - $99
/hr
Rating for cost
4.5
/5
What Clients Have Said
DataArt's pricing is perceived as high, with project costs ranging from $12,000 to over $3 million. Clients emphasize the value for money due to high-quality deliverables and effective project management. Long-term relationships are common, indicating consistent satisfaction with their services.
Clients appreciate DataArt's clear and consistent communication. The team is noted for being responsive, transparent, and proactive in addressing issues and providing updates.
Attention to Detail
DataArt's attention to detail in both development and QA processes is frequently mentioned. Clients noted that their deliverables are often bug-free and well-documented.
Strong QA Processes
DataArt's QA processes are highly effective, ensuring that deliverables are of high quality and meet client requirements. Their thorough testing and quick bug resolution are frequently mentioned.
Strong Project Management
Multiple reviews emphasize DataArt's excellent project management skills, highlighting their ability to keep projects on track, on budget, and within scope. Clients appreciated their use of tools like Jira and Confluence and their structured communication processes.
Proficiency in Emerging Technologies
DataArt is recognized for staying up-to-date with emerging technologies, which allows them to offer innovative solutions and maintain a competitive edge.
High Cost but Worth It
While some clients noted that DataArt's services can be expensive, they also emphasized that the quality and reliability of the deliverables justify the cost.
Backend Dev for Biotechnology Data Analytics Platform
Custom Software Development
Confidential
Mar. - Sep. 2017
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"Their work increased the functionality of our site and how much data we are able to show."
Jun 1, 2018
Former CTO, Bering Science
Sam Blinstein
Chemicals & Biotechnology
San Francisco, California
1-10 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
DataArt (formerly Logicify) provided backend development of a site to host a graph database. The infrastructure was built using Neo4j, Python, and Django. The site allows for natural-language searches of 50 million nodes.
DataArt's (formerly Logicify's) efforts helped grow infrastructure and data-housing capabilities. They adjusted to an expedited work schedule and performed admirably. DataArt's team of developers were well-versed in modern technological practices, and they were fully capable of maintaining complex projects.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the former CTO at Bering, which is a data analytics platform for science. We gathered different datasets on scientific research, starting with biomedicine but expanding to include other areas.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Logicify?
We wanted to build a graph database that included hundreds of millions of nodes, but the challenge was a site with the infrastructure to house it all. It had to be in a cluster, it had to be in the cloud, but we needed to advance our backend.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
I worked on code with them, but they owned the infrastructure. It was our design, but they implemented it. They built the backend pipelines to retrieve raw data from publications and implement them into the graph. The backend could also parse a user’s search query, access the graph for that data, and present it to the user. Everything was Python-based and Django-based. They used Neo4j as the graph database management system, and they utilized Elasticsearch and Semantic search to allow searches using natural, non-technical language. Logicify used AWS for certain tasks, and they used Terraform to manage the infrastructure’s code.
What is the team composition?
In addition to our project manager, we worked with one Django and Python developer, two infrastructure developers, and a part-time frontend manager.
How did you come to work with Logicify?
I met their CTO and CEO at a startup accelerator program, and we connected immediately because we could both speak Russian. They came very highly recommended, and I liked them personally. I was impressed with their demeanor—they were very professional. And they spoke English perfectly, so we had no trouble communicating.
What is the status of this engagement?
We worked together from March 2017 through September 2017. We tapered off because we needed to raise more funds, but we’re still active with them and working together.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We haven’t launched yet, but they helped us grow our infrastructure tremendously. Their work increased the functionality of our site and how much data we are able to show. We had no graph database before, and now we have one that has 100 million connections and 50 million nodes.
How did Logicify perform from a project management standpoint?
We didn’t ask for a project manager as a cost-saving measure, but they provided one at no cost anyway. I was skeptical about it, thinking we didn’t need one, but he was helpful and professional. He kept the project on track with daily calls. They foresaw the necessity for a project manager better than we did, and they performed very well. They used Jira regularly and accurately so that I could track their logged hours and tasks.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They are fully modern and advanced developers. They work quickly, and they’re agile. They cost less than many other firms, but their quality is among the best. We always trusted them to accomplish their work.
Are there any areas they could improve?
They could use more creative discretion in their revisions. Not all projects have to be done to the letter of our specifications if there is room for improvement. Also, they wrote quality code, but it could have included more comments to make maintenance easier in the future. That said, we were operating with a fast timeline, and they adapted to that schedule, so comments were not a priority.
Any advice for potential customers?
I haven’t worked much with their frontend staff, so I cannot comment on the quality of their designers, but if you come to them with a technology need and tell them your goal, they’ll be able to fill in the steps to get there.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"They built everything we needed and did it well."
Schedule
4.5
On time / deadlines
"Our quick timelines could have been reflected better in their estimates."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I have already recommended them.
Platform Rebuild for Hair Products Company
Custom Software Development
$200,000 to $999,999
Nov. 2017 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"They thoroughly understand and anticipate business issues to then work through solutions proactively."
May 21, 2018
CEO, Hairstory
Eli Halliwell
Advertising & marketing
New York City, New York
1-10 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
After completing several trial projects, DataArt (formerly Logicify) completely rebuilt an open-source web platform. They integrated the site with relevant software and developed a product wizard. They also helped modify the UI.
Their forward-thinking development approach enabled them to deliver a nearly bug-free platform at launch. Website bounce rate has decreased by 50% and customer cart abandonment is down as well. DataArt (formerly Logicify) persistently engages challenges and regularly works late to accommodate a time zone difference.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the founder and CEO of Hairstory. We sell haircare products.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Logicify?
I initially engaged them to complete smaller projects that revolved around creative problem-solving by applying technology. For example, I first had to create a widget so I could make my reviews searchable. They did a great job with that, so I continued to give them work over the next year. Eventually, I hired them to rebuild my entire technology platform.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Our platform consisted of white label software that we reskinned with our brand. However, it was entirely someone else’s engine and that made it difficult and expensive to customize. Logicify had a deep understanding of our platform because they had been implementing a reporting software capable of reaching into the database. They also had a working knowledge of our business processes and data structure, so we asked them to develop a unique platform.
To begin the research phase, Logicify conducted a detailed evaluation of other software platforms like Shopify and Magento. After considering the options, we ended up choosing an open-source solution.
During the sprint-based development cycle, they implemented everything on the platform and customized it to our business needs. They integrated the site with our new payment provider and plugged in tax software. They also coded the site to interact with our warehouse systems, order processing, data analytics, and reporting software. Regarding design, they made adjustments to the UI but essentially replicated our previous frontend so the site could retain a similar UX.
A crucial piece of the project was the development of product wizard that could help customers identify and purchase the right items for them. It’s a sophisticated set of functions with a notable amount of technology behind it. Logicify built it from the ground up and were instrumental in its UI design.
What is the team composition?
We worked with their CTO on the initial project scoping and currently have a project manager as our primary point of contact. We also interact with the development team.
How did you come to work with Logicify?
I had been frustrated with our previous technology situation for some time. I reached out to a technologist colleague who was looking to outsource a software engineering team. While he ultimately decided not to outsource, he interviewed Logicify and was impressed with they offered. He suggested I talk with them and the relationship evolved from there.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve probably spent around $300,000–400,000 in total.
What is the status of this engagement?
Our current project with them began in November 2017 and the work is ongoing.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We were able to launch the platform with nearly zero issues on day one. Logicify watched over the site for the first couple days and quickly addressed any error reports that occurred. They’re on top of every detail. As a result, we’ve experienced a huge increase in user engagement. Since the launch of the product wizard within the latest version of the platform, our bounce rate has fallen from 70%–20%. The percentage of customer cart abandonment is down as well. We also expect to see an increase in customer retention, but that has yet to manifest.
How did Logicify perform from a project management standpoint?
They’re consistently on-time and within budget. We communicate via Google Hangouts and Slack. They accommodate the time zone difference by having stand-up meetings with us end of every day. This allows us to hear from every developer and ask questions directly. Their whole staff speaks English, so we’re able to build relationships with them easily. They frequently work into the evening hours to complete the tasks we assign.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They thoroughly understand and anticipate business issues to then work through solutions proactively. They don’t just wait for us to come across a problem to fix it. Considering different scenarios during the development process enables them to deliver products with far fewer bugs than vendors we’ve worked with in the past.
Are there any areas they could improve?
They’re conservative when setting timelines, but I respect that because the quality they deliver is very high. They figure out a way to provide everything I ask from them.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Take the time at the outset to make sure the Logicify team understands your business needs. Build a relationship by jumping onto Google Hangouts and talking to them. That’s what we’ve done and now there’s mutual respect and admiration between both parties.
RATINGS
5.0
"We couldn’t have pulled off the rebuild without them."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"They utilize an extensive QA process."
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"They’ve never missed an important deadline."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"They cost a fraction of what I was paying with other firms."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I’d recommend them without reservation.
CMS Development for E-Learning Platform
Custom Software Development
Confidential
Oct. 2013 - Ongoing
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"They're building things the right way—they do not take shortcuts and they don't build sloppy code."
May 14, 2018
VP of Product & Tech, eChalk
Dave Milne
Education
New York City, New York
11-50 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
DataArt (formerly Logicify) conducted the frontend and backend engineering of a learning management system and a CMS. They provide ongoing maintenance for platforms that streamline group communication and task management.
Defect rates and support ticket numbers have dropped since the introduction of the new technology. User responses have been favorable, a credit to Logificy’s code quality. Communication has been efficient and constructive toward the project’s success.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the VP of eChalk. We are a software company that builds systems for K-12 schools in the United States. We build online learning communities.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Logicify?
We didn’t have the expertise in-house to build the MVP versions of our applications. We wanted to develop a learning management system—an online and blended learning environment for schools, which consists of calendars, homework assignments, real-time assessments, and grade books that can be viewed by parents, teachers, and students at the same time. Additionally, we wanted to develop a CMS for K-12 schools. We envisioned a platform that enabled as many editors for portions of the website as necessary because they need to be able to delegate and distribute that responsibility, while also tracking the activity of certain groups.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
They were involved from the beginning in the backend and frontend engineering and project management. They were instrumental in helping us with the organization of our Agile methodology and processes, and they helped streamline and lead our scrum meetings. In the building of our platforms, we have C# all throughout the backend. Our frontend, however, is split between AngularJS for our learning management system, and we use ASP.NET MVC for our CMS. For our data tier, we use PostgreSQL, MongoDB, and MemcacheDB. Also for the backend, we've built the entire product line in the Amazon Cloud, so we've used a bunch of their tools: their SNS, Amazon DNS services, Route 53, and the S3 storage. We've also done work with Beanstalk and Terraform to control and build environments properly.
What is the team composition?
At the height of the project, we had 22 people on the team, and 17 of those came from Logicify. We've been assigned project managers and junior project managers.
How did you come to work with Logicify?
When we first found them, we were looking at a small MVP, a small Node.js project, for a freelancer to do. Logicify gave us an outline of what they’d like to do with it, and we worked on a trial basis to determine if we were amicable business partners. We were impressed with the outcome of that project and have been utilizing them much more since then, particularly on these large projects.
What is the status of this engagement?
We began working together in October 2013, and they provide ongoing development.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We’ve had extremely low defect rates, and we do not have customers calling with problems. Our support desk tickets have dropped dramatically since implementing the new product. We’ve been very happy with the quality of the work we’ve gotten from Logicify.
How did Logicify perform from a project management standpoint?
They've been keeping us focused and on track. They're making sure we're asking the right questions for what we want out of our project. They are based in Ukraine and Poland, so we use Jira for our project management, and we use Confluence for our documentation. On a day-to-day basis, we’ll use Skype, and we use Google Hangouts for our stand-ups. At times we've met in person in New York for bigger summits or kickoff meetings.
What did you find most impressive about them?
All of the developers have hit the ground running, and the quality of the code they have produced for us is the most impressive thing. They're building things the right way—they do not take shortcuts and they don't build sloppy code.
Are there any areas they could improve?
No, Logicify has always answered the call for what we’ve required.
Any advice for potential customers?
My advice would be to treat them as a partner in the process and not as the additional hands to do the code. Look at them as a holistic team that can work with yours and provide QA and development at the same time.
RATINGS
5.0
"They’ve been very helpful from the beginning to help us grow and mature."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"Their services are top-notch, and the quality of their code is quite exceptional."
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"We were on time or early for many of our projects."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"The value of their services is unparalleled with what I could find in local providers."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I have already recommended them.
Angular Development for Digital Marketing Company
Custom Software Development
$10,000 to $49,999
Jan. 2017 - Apr. 2018
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
4.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“The quality of work they provided led to a relatively short QA testing period.”
May 14, 2018
CEO, Virtual Native
Joshua Martyn
IT Services
Portland, Oregon
1-10 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
DataArt (formerly Logicify) developed a payment gateway application, including frontend and backend development and QA testing, using Jaison, Java, and Angular.
DataArt (formerly Logicify) provided high-quality development services, leading to clean code that was mostly bug-free and passed through QA testing quickly. Responsive and professional in communication, their team stayed on top of milestones and worked well directly with the client.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I'm the president and owner of Virtual Native, which provides an array of services, from digital marketing to web application development and everything in between.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Logicify?
Originally, we were working with another team located in India on an AngularJS project, but the engagement was not a good match for both our company and our client. To save our relationship with the client, we looked for another vendor with better QA standards.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Logicify worked on a complex application built for new merchants within the payment gateway space. After providing the requirements, they created the frontend interface for logging in, as well as the application itself, using Jason, Java, and Angular to communicate with the client's backend. They provided about a thousand hours of service over a period of eight or nine weeks.
What is the team composition?
We worked with five people, including a project manager, some Angular programmers, backend developers and architects, and an HTML developer.
How did you come to work with Logicify?
I believe they approached us about a year and a half ago. We gave them some smaller projects to work on to see how they would deliver and decided to work with them on this larger project based on their performance.
How much have you invested with them?
We invested between $25,000–$30,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with them in January 2018 and completed the work in April.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
In addition to delivering the project on time and close to budget, the code was clean and mostly bug free. The quality of work they provided led to a relatively short QA testing period.
How did Logicify perform from a project management standpoint?
They were very responsive throughout the engagement, utilizing Zoom for meetings, Slack for chatting, and Jira for project management.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They were able to understand the project quickly. They also communicated well and professionally directly with our client, despite the client's lack of organization.
Are there any areas they could improve?
No. I don't have any complaints.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
I recommend going into the relationship with a clear scope and schedule. They have very talented resources, but aren't a big company, so it's important to give them some lead time so they can schedule it in appropriately.
RATINGS
5.0
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
Cost
4.0
Value / within estimates
"They're competitive compared to US companies, but pricier for an Indian company."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
Server Development & UI/UX for Media Platform
Mobile App Development
$50,000 to $199,999
July - Aug. 2014
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
4.5
Cost
4.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
"They were by far the best-outsourced company I’ve worked with."
Apr 27, 2018
Former CTO, BlastOut
Chris Leow
Arts, entertainment & music
United Kingdom
1-10 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
DataArt (formerly Logicify) developed the server-side components of an Android app using Node.JS and a Django web framework. They also helped with the redesign of the app's UX/UI.
Event organizers and users have provided very positive feedback on the app. DataArt's (formerly Logicify's) ability to tailor personalized solutions and integrate into a business' workflow contributed to a smooth engagement. Their team immediately addressed bugs and produced clean, testable code at a reasonable value.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the former CTO of BlastOut, a mobile app which allows users share photos and comments for events in a localized space using geolocation/geofencing.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Logicify?
We needed Logicify to develop the backend of our app.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
First, their account manager met with us to understand our business problems and tailored a plan specified to our needs. Then, Logicify developed our server-side components that powered the platform using Node.JS and a Django web framework. They configured the servers to be compatible with our geolocation and photo-sharing features.
Their team also helped us with our redesign of the app’s UX/UI and managed the project behind the scenes.
What is the team composition?
I worked mainly with the account manager and the project manager.
How did you come to work with Logicify?
We put an SOS out on a free-lancing platform for a backend developer. Logicify contacted us back and immediately impressed us with their thorough communication. They took the time to understand our problems and we could tell they were very technically competent.
How much have you invested with them?
We invested around $70,000–$80,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started in April 2013 and ended the engagement in August 2014.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
The app was very well received by event organizers and event goers. They addressed any bugs immediately and made sure the code was maintainable and testable—which was an unusual, but welcome addition from an outsourced partner.
How did Logicify perform from a project management standpoint?
Their project manager set the scope of the work and we used Jira to track the process. They communicated with us via Skype daily, lasting 10–15 minutes or more. We shared status reports from one side to the other and we always well updated on developments and anything that was going on. They were always available for any questions or requests.
What did you find most impressive about them?
We were impressed by their communication standards and their painstaking commitment to integrate into our workflow.
Are there any areas they could improve?
No, they were by far the best-outsourced company I’ve worked with.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
They are consummate professionals, so don’t be afraid to let them take control of some of the process.
RATINGS
5.0
"They were very good."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
Schedule
4.5
On time / deadlines
"They consistently met scheduling expectations, although sometimes things slip, which is understandable."
Cost
4.0
Value / within estimates
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I already recommended them to another company, who had a positive experience as well.
Application Development for Conjoint Analysis Company
Mobile App Development
$50,000 to $199,999
Feb. 2017 - Mar. 2018
5.0
Quality
5.0
Schedule
5.0
Cost
5.0
Willing to Refer
5.0
“I could not have done this without them or imagined getting a better technical partner to build the application.”
Apr 27, 2018
CEO, EPIC Conjoint
Matthew Johnston
IT Services
Dublin, Ireland
1-10 Employees
Phone Interview
Verified
DataArt (formerly Logicify) developed B2C-intended, cloud-based iOS and Android MVP apps centered on complex statistical and graphing functionality, with an eye toward maximizing UX. They continue to iterate on the apps.
DataArt's (formerly Logicify's) knowledgeable, experienced team built virtually bug-free MVP apps. Their affable, proactive, and curious approach continues to serve them in good stead, as does their reasonable pricing and familiarity with U.S.-based firms.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this
client over the phone. Below is an edited
transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the CEO of EPIC Conjoint. We are a cloud-based market research company specifically developing an application to conduct conjoint analysis. Our target customers are large B2C brands like banks, telecom and insurance firms. Conjoint analysis is when companies test pricing and product features within a market sample of customers before launching.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Logicify?
We needed help developing the cloud based iOS and Android applications, complete with rigorous statistical algorithms and analysis capability.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Logicify conducted backend and frontend app development on both iOS and Android platforms and assisted with the user algorithm graphing capabilities. App development included a feature that allows respondents to complete surveys on any platform or operating system.
What is the team composition?
The team, headed by a project manager, consisted of around eight to 10 members, including two engineers, graphic designers, and a quality assurance expert with a Ph.D. in mathematics. The team grew and shrunk with the project’s various phases, which, from a cost perspective, was reassuring.
How did you come to work with Logicify?
They and three others were all referred to us. We sent all four bidders requirement documents, and Logicify quickly set up a meeting with us. Logicify researched our firm and industry well beforehand and were very keen in understanding our ambitions and the context of our customers. They pointed out that they had also worked with another survey company based in the States.
How much have you invested with them?
We have invested more than $100,000 total.
What is the status of this engagement?
The minimum variable product (MVP) began in mid-February 2017 and was delivered in mid-July of that year. Since then, we have gone through three additional iterations enhancing the applications and foresee this partnership as lasting long-term.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We have had good sales numbers thus far and there have been no noticeable problems from users, thanks to an intuitive and foolproof front-end design.
How did Logicify perform from a project management standpoint?
Logicify performed fantastically. The project management was top-notch and knew exactly what a startup like ourselves needed. They used Jira and Slack plugins to create a very visible and transparent method of communication, providing me, who does not come from a tech background, with the transparency I required. Bugs were very infrequent, but when they occured, Logicify’s reaction time was really quick; they often were investigating the problem before I was even aware a problem had occurred.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They were interested, passionate, and keen to getting their heads around a relatively new subject for them, that being conjoint analysis. They proactively challenged us in the right ways, constantly suggesting and recommending how we could do things even better.
Are there any areas they could improve?
No, we had a very good relationship with them. It’s like I have at team I can call; they’re very approachable and very responsive.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
They appreciate detailed specifications and face-to-face meetings, so if you can make those accommodations, you'll be on the right track.
RATINGS
5.0
"I could not have done this without them, and could not have imagined getting a better technical partner to build the application."
Quality
5.0
Service & Deliverables
"They were very responsive from the get-go. They did their homework on conjoint analysis before meeting and we hit the ground running."
Schedule
5.0
On time / deadlines
"Every demonstration has led to a pilot, which has meant incredible success."
Cost
5.0
Value / within estimates
"They were one-quarter of the price of other bidders."
Willing to Refer
5.0
NPS
"I am in a startup innovation research hub here myself and will recommend them every opportunity I get.
If you’re not seeing exactly what you need here, send this company a custom message.
You can talk about your project needs, price, and timeline to get started on your project.