Could you share any statistics or metrics from this engagement?
We have 5,000 downloads [as of August 2015]. The rating on Google Store is a 4.3 or 4.4. The debugging period was expensive. We had to fix those. The performance was not the best. There was an issue with the original design where we didn't spend enough time checking things. It's OK for a first release but, after that, we did have to redo stuff.
How did CodeRunner IT perform from a project management standpoint?
It was OK. There was some stuff that wasn't specifically stated in the spec, but I thought was common sense that people should know. But, they wanted it very detailed. If something is not on the spec, they don't do it.
What distinguishes CodeRunner IT from other providers?
In general, they were on time and willing to fix the feedback we gave them. They weren't too difficult to work with.
Is there anything CodeRunner IT could have improved or done differently?
The initial design period was limited, so it resulted in some quality issues that we had to fix later. Maybe we should have had a provision in terms of the design before they proceeded to the next stage. The whole thing was fast paced.