Fast and reliable IT solutions

CodeRunner IT is a Web and Mobile Application development company located in Poland. Our speciality is delivering world-class business solutions and innovative Web and Mobile products to its international client base.

Our mission is simple: make technology an asset for your business not a problem.

Our focus areas include:

  • Software Outsourcing
  • Reengineering and Refactoring
  • Data Mining
  • Business Analytics
  • Clouds and SaaS Development
  • Software Quality Assurance
  • Software Defined Networks
 
$25,000+
 
< $25 / hr
 
10 - 49
 Founded
2014
Show all +
Coquitlam, Canada
headquarters
other locations

Portfolio

Key clients: 

Local: Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Human Device, MusicArt

Global: Cube.ITG, Bank Zachodni WBK S.A., IGG Canada, PocketSocial Technologies Inc., Ayatas Technologies

Reviews

Sort by

Native iOS Development for Software Development House

"It was definitely worth every penny."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
 
Jul. 2016 - Jan. 2017
Project summary: 

CodeRunner IT was hired to do a full stack development of a native iOS application as well as manage all aspects of the project and test it throughout the course of it's development.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Wroclaw, Poland
Owner, Software Development House
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

CodeRunner IT delivered a well-functioning iOS application that came in on time and remained cost-competitive. The few bugs that came up were resolved, and the company plans to work with CodeRunner IT in the future given the experience they had with them over the course of the project. 

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

We are a software house, offering IT services to clients all around the world. I am the owner.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with CodeRunner IT?

We had no capacity in our team to develop a native iOS application. Our client was interested in a couple of products. Others were delivered by our team. However, we do not develop native iOS apps. Hence, we reached out to CodeRunner

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

The scope was design and programming of a mobile iOS app. The service that was provided was native iOS development and project management of this development as well.

How did you come to work with CodeRunner IT?

I've known the owners from my university days, and I trust them. It was a first project we've outsourced with them.

How much have you invested with CodeRunner IT?

It was about $10000.

What is the status of this engagement?

It is done now. The timeline was a bit more stretched than originally planned – from July 2016 until January 2017.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?

The result was a well-functioning iOS app. I guess there were a couple of bugs on the way but, overall, the service was on a decent level.

How did CodeRunner IT perform from a project management standpoint?

I'd say no issues there.

What did you find most impressive about CodeRunner IT?

Nothing comes to my mind, to be honest.

Are there any areas CodeRunner IT could improve?

They could maybe do more testing. However, as I said, there weren't too many bugs after all.

5.0
Overall Score I will continue working with them in the future.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They were on time.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    The costs were as expected.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    There were very few bugs overall.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    It was definitely worth every penny.

Virtual Reality Development on Android

"There were no problems. All deadlines were met. Often outsourcing companies have problems with that."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.0
Willing to refer: 
4.5
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
Project summary: 

CodeRunner IT was contracted to help create a prototype of an Android application for a company that works in the sphere of virtual development.

The Reviewer
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The client was happy with CodeRunner IT's work. They noted that there were no issues integrating into the client's workflow, and consistently met project deadlines.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

VR Global is based in US and Europe. We’re a software company creating sales and marketing solutions utilizing virtual development. I am the Chief Executive Officer of the European branch.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with CodeRunner IT?

We were researching native development on Android.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

We used them for R&D [research & development] for creating the prototype on Android combining rendering engines that we’ve developed trying to make Android applications.

How did you come to work with CodeRunner IT?

They were referred by to us by a colleague of mine.

How much have you invested with CodeRunner IT?

Around $10,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We completed it at the beginning of 2016.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?

We were happy with working with them. They followed up on the project. There were different parts of the innovation and they handled it well. It was a research project.

How did CodeRunner IT perform from a project management standpoint?

It wasn’t overly complicated. They just integrated into our workflow. It went pretty well.

What did you find most impressive about CodeRunner IT?

There were no problems. All deadlines were met. Often outsourcing companies have problems with that.

Are there any areas CodeRunner IT could improve?

No.

4.5
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 4.5 NPS
    Willing to refer

Social Application Development for Android Platform

“They weren't too difficult to work with.”

Quality: 
3.5
Schedule: 
4.0
Cost: 
3.5
Willing to refer: 
3.5
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Dec. 2015 - Mar. 2016
Project summary: 

CodeRunner IT developed a mobile social media app for Android. The project involved developing the backend while implementing the UI elements from the provided designs.

The Reviewer
CEO, Social Media Application
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

While the first version of the app had all the expected features, the debugging phase took longer than expected, mostly due to misunderstandings with the requirements. Regardless, the app was completed on time and currently has around 5,000 downloads on the Play Store, with an average rating of 4.4.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your organization.

We're a startup making a social app for connecting people through social media. It's a mobile app for people to share interests and find new people to do stuff together.

What is your position?

I am the CEO.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What business challenge were you trying to address with CodeRunner IT?

We needed to develop an Android version of the app with a quick turnaround. We made an iOS version, and we realized we needed Android, too. We don't have an internal Android team.

SOLUTION

Please describe the scope of their involvement in detail.

They finished the first version of Android based on our design. The technical design was up to them. They followed our UI [user interface] design guide and our requirements to make the app. They were good at engaging with us. We didn't get involved in the architecture design part of it. The first thing we saw was the first node, which looked like what we were expecting. The next step was then debugging. Maybe because we didn't monitor them tightly, later on we had some issues. Working remotely, there's the issue of communication of the requirements. Our requirements were not super defined. A couple of things we thought would be common sense had to be clarified later.

Could you provide a sense of the size of this initiative in financial terms?

It was $30,000 Canadian [approximately $23,000 USD]. The app is about 30 megabytes.

What is the status of this engagement?

It's complete. It was a three-month engagement from December 2015 to March 2016.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Could you share any statistics or metrics from this engagement?

We have 5,000 downloads [as of August 2015]. The rating on Google Store is a 4.3 or 4.4. The debugging period was expensive. We had to fix those. The performance was not the best. There was an issue with the original design where we didn't spend enough time checking things. It's OK for a first release but, after that, we did have to redo stuff.

How did CodeRunner IT perform from a project management standpoint?

It was OK. There was some stuff that wasn't specifically stated in the spec, but I thought was common sense that people should know. But, they wanted it very detailed. If something is not on the spec, they don't do it.

What distinguishes CodeRunner IT from other providers?

In general, they were on time and willing to fix the feedback we gave them. They weren't too difficult to work with.

Is there anything CodeRunner IT could have improved or done differently?

The initial design period was limited, so it resulted in some quality issues that we had to fix later. Maybe we should have had a provision in terms of the design before they proceeded to the next stage. The whole thing was fast paced.

4.0
Overall Score
  • 4.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 3.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 3.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    The reasons [for this rating] are what I already stated.
  • 3.5 NPS
    Willing to refer
    It depends on the level of the project. I think for a smaller project, it would work. If they have more time, they can handle it. A smaller project would have fewer time constraints. But, for more challenging projects, it's something to reconsider.

Web Development for IT Configurator

"We were happy with their quality and services."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
Project summary: 

CodeRunner IT was hired to do software development for a company in the banking sector. The project was done almost entirely in Java.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Wrocław, Poland
CEO, IT Configurator
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

CodeRunner IT provided good-quality work for the cost, and the client plans to continue work with them moving forward. 

BACKGROUND

Please describe your organization.

Our company is an IT [information technology] configurator. Our clients come from banking, insurance, and financial backgrounds.

What is your position?

I am the CEO of Core Services SP. z o.o.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What business challenge were you trying to address with CodeRunner IT?

We were developing our application for the banking sector. We outsourced the software development from CodeRunner IT to our team.

SOLUTION

Please describe the scope of their involvement in detail.

It was resource outsourcing in this case – mostly software development. The software development they did for us was based on Java.

How did you come to work with CodeRunner IT?

It was a previous relationship with CodeRunner IT.

Could you provide a sense of the size of this initiative in financial terms?

The cost of the imitative was roughly $5,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

It's been ongoing on for three years. We have finished some pieces of the project.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

How did CodeRunner IT perform from a project management standpoint?

We were happy with their quality and services. This is why we are continuing to work with them.

What distinguishes CodeRunner IT from other providers?

It would be the value of the services that they provide.

5.0
Overall Score We had a good experience with them. They have very skilled team that worked on the project. There were no problems when people were replaced with new ones.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They provide good-quality work for the cost.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer