Digital product development

We are a digital product development company that brings our customers ideas into reality. From product design to delivery, we help our customers succeed. 

For over 10 years we have enthused our customers with the right balance of entrepreneurial spirit and pragmatism, delivering outstanding results in their digital transformation efforts, involving both mobile and web development,

 
$25,000+
 
$50 - $99 / hr
 
10 - 49
 Founded
2008
Show all +
Port Orange, FL
headquarters
  • 1917 Goldenrod Way
    Port Orange, FL 32128
    United States
other locations
  • Cra 43B # 16-41. Oficina 803
    Medellín none
    Colombia
  • 1917 Goldenrod Way
    Port Orange, FL 32128
    United States

Portfolio

Key clients: 
  • UK Space Agency, Satellite Applications Catapult, Charity Job, Transcends,  Global Process Management, Ministry of Mines and Energy of Colombia, National Hidrocarbons Agency of Colombia (ANH), National Mining Agency of Colombia (ANM), Mining and Energy Planning Unit of Colombia (UPME), Colombian Geological Survey (SGC)

Reviews

Sort by

Web Platform Dev for Local Government Agency

"They are very well-prepared and always up-to-date on the latest technology."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
4.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$200,000 to $999,999
 
2016 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Celerik migrated a web platform using Microsoft Visual Studio in a .NET framework with an Oracle database.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Medellin, Colombia
IT Analyst, Municipio de Envigado
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The migration has been highly successful and the new platform is accessible and user-friendly. Celerik is a communicative and reliable team and they bring sharp technical expertise to their partnerships.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I am an IT analyst at a local government agency.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Celerik?

I hired them at first to develop a module of the previous platform. More recently, they supported the migration of a web platform for investment projects, management, and purchase programs.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

They used Microsoft Visual Studio with .NET framework on an Oracle database.

What is the team composition?

We worked with two developers, a project manager, a web designer, and an app architect.

How did you come to work with Celerik?

The platform we had before was very complex and we couldn’t support it anymore, so we needed to migrate. We found them right at the moment that we were planning to do this, so we decided to work with them on the project.

How much have you invested with them?

We’ve spent around $600,000. 

What is the status of this engagement?

We’ve been working together for six or seven years.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

It has been very positive on a functional and administrative level. The platform is easy to use and has saved us a lot of work.

How did Celerik perform from a project management standpoint?

They were always in touch through emails, WhatsApp, phone, and in person. I received great personal support from them. They have always been reliable and very close to us when we have needed it.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Their human quality and technical knowledge stood out. They are very well prepared and always up-to-date on the latest technology.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No. The costs of their services are high for us as a government agency, but worth it. 

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Custom Software Dev for Satellite Applications Company

" I know that we would want to work with them again."

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
4.0
Cost: 
4.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Confidential
 
Feb. 2017 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Celerik built a user-facing component of a geospatial visualization, alerting, and reporting tool according to user stories and non-functional requirements.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Oxford, England
Jerome Jones
Solutions Architect, Satellite Applications Catapult
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Internal stakeholders are pleased with the engagement. Celerik’s project management style is both well-structured and flexible. It’s been easy to collaborate with them, as they offer a variety of daily updates. They’re a personable team that doesn’t hesitate to ask questions or offer insight.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

We are a not-for-profit technology accelerator, who's primary goal is to build the UK economy in space through projects around the world alinging with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. My role is essentially the Technology Authority on the project - taking overall ownership and responsibility of the solution, as such, I managed the relationship with Celerik.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Celerik?

Two reasons: 1) To build a complex geospatial visualization, alerting and reporting tool, according to agreed user requirements 2) To manage many in-country partner relationships

What were your goals for this project?

Details are confidential, but they are about delivering long-term impact in Colombia, according to the UN Sustainable Development Goals

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

Experience, network, flexibility, and eagerness to work with us. The choice was extremely easy as Celerik were the best partners possible.

Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.

They facilitated stakeholder meetings and helped us identify end users. From this, they worked with our User Centred Design team to identify and solidify user stories as part of a larger user requirements document.

Celerik then took these and started building the complex geospatial visualisation, alerting and reporting system for the end users, according to the user stories and the non-functional requirements highlighted by our team.

What was the team composition?

Juan Carlos, the CEO was our primary contact during the early phases, but as we went through design, definition and then development, our primary contacts changed accordingly to the head of UX, Product Manager, Technical Architect and, then, the Engineering Director.

The team size did change, slightly, according to need and Celerik were incredibly flexible and reactive to the changing needs of the project.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

As the project is ongoing, there are no specific metrics, but the overall "feel" and the general sense of the vendor throughout our company is very positive and I know that we would want to work with them again.

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

Celerik were delivering part of an overall solution - the most visible part, that the end-users would interact with, so this was high-profile and needed to be carefully managed. Celerik have deeply embedded and formal processes for managing work that dove-tailed with our processes very well. If they hadn't then they were entirely open to flexibility and would have changed accordingly.

The collaboration was through Microsoft Teams, Slack, Azure DevOps etc. They provided a nightly build and an integration end point, plus surfaced the results of the nightly test runs. We had no problems with the language barrier - their English was perfect and we utilised diagrams and whiteboarding sessions when in-country to help us understand.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

Flexibility, friendliness, open to change and to work with us on that, but also I was very impressed with their willingness to question and to put forward alternative ideas, where appropriate - something I am extremely open to and welcome.

Are there any areas for improvement?

No, they have been perfect to work with

5.0
Overall Score
  • 4.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Mobile SaaS Solution for IT Company

“They made sure the deliverables aligned with our vision.”

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
4.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Aug. 2016 - May 2017
Project summary: 

Celerik provided mobile application development for iOS and Android. They developed a cloud-based end-to-end solution using Azure, working on its architecture, security, set up, and user stories.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
North Haven, Connecticut
Brian Pause
VP of Product Management, Transcends
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The team delivered an excellent solution, working hard to ensure they managed expectations and met the requirements throughout. They tracked the work well and understood the complexities of the project, adhering to its budget and overall aim.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I’m the VP of product management for an IT company.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Celerik?

We needed help with mobile app development, work on Azure Cloud, and API management expertise.

What were your goals for this project?

To develop a SaaS-based business model for mobile RFID devices, in order to enable easier, more accurate, and semi-automated inventory fulfillment, invoicing, and cycle counts.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

We selected them based on their prior work and our relationship with their owners.

Describe the project in detail.

We needed an end-to-end cloud-based mobile solution for Android and iOS RFID devices. Their work included architecture, security model, documentation, user stories, design, development, unit testing, Azure Cloud setup & configuration, and knowledge transfer.

What was the team composition?

There was a project manager, an architect, a technical lead, a designer, and some developers.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Celerik did an excellent job managing expectations throughout, ensuring they had the capability the user stories we required, based their measure velocity and our project budget. They made sure the deliverables aligned with our vision for the product.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

We used tools like GroupHub, Skype, and CloudForge to manage the documentation, product backlog, and communication. It worked well, considering our teams were in different locations.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

I was impressed by their willingness to always do the right thing and their ability to keep an open mind, taking time to see all perspectives.

Are there any areas for improvement?

Sometimes they underestimated on the level of effort that a story would require. However, the team always found ways to overcome this and correct the problem.

5.0
Overall Score I'm looking forward to working with them again on our next project.
  • 4.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They're great at managing expectations.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    Tremendous ROI.
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They always focused on doing the right thing.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    Excellent focus on partnerships and building relationships.

Design & Dev for Engineering Consulting Services Company

"They offered great support, attending our requirements with top priority."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
4.5
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Feb. 2013 - Feb. 2019
Project summary: 

Celerik created and deployed a web app that serves multiple in-house teams and various projects across the world. They created real-time progress tracking functionality, historical data collection, and more.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Greymouth, New Zealand
Daniel Calderon Villegas
CTO, Global Process Management Ltd
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

By transforming a paper-based process into a fully digital solution the company has a greater ability to revise its performance and make better decisions, setting itself above competitors thanks to Celerik’s efforts. Regular feedback loops and direct contact with the development team stood out.

The client submitted this review online.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I’m currently the CTO of a company that provides engineering consulting services for the personal care manufacturing industry. We commission equipment and machinery and deploy full-scale production assets to our customers around the world. I’m responsible for developing technology solutions for internal use as well as customer-facing solutions.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Celerik?

Our equipment and process checkout system was paper-based, and the number of simultaneous projects and multiple teams across the world created the need for a more efficient and data-driven system. This will allow us to better serve the projects and develop continuous-improvement opportunities by collecting historical data of projects and results.

What were your goals for this project?

The main objective was to develop a software solution that allows our users to follow a systematic approach while commissioning equipment on the field. Additionally, we wanted to create visibility for our customers so that they can track the project’s progress in real-time. Finally, we needed to collect historical success/failure data that will allow us to make better decisions on the following projects.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

Celerik is in the same city as we are. I had worked with their team before, so the decision to start the project with them was made right away.

Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.

They designed, developed, and released a web app for the company's internal use that allows our engineering team to commission machinery startup projects in a systematic approach. The application is a combination of a task management system and a score-card dashboard project reporting system. They took care of deployment, maintenance, and support throughout all stages of the project.

What was the team composition?

The team was made up of a team lead and three or four developers that took care of different areas of the application. Our in-house team was always in direct contact with the lead developer and account manager for new requirements and support.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

By going from a paper-based system to a fully digital system, we gained significant and measurable results. By collecting historical data from each project, we were able to compare the performance of different teams and make data-based decisions to succeed in following projects. Our clients also trust us more since we were able to create visibility into their project's status. This has helped us differentiate our services from competitors.

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

We used an agile approach and regularly met with the development team to provide feedback on features and add progressive requirements to the application. This was effective as we could increase our functionality while having the application work seamlessly from its early stages of development.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

Having direct contact with the development team at all levels improved communication efficiency. They offered great support, attending our requirements with top priority.

Are there any areas for improvement?

They’re always improving their processes, which is something all companies have to do. I can't think of anything specific I would suggest them to work on at the moment.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 4.5 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Mobile App Development for a Nonprofit Job Board

"Celerik often over-delivered on their promised services. If we had a request beyond our scope, they’re happy to do it."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
June 2018 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Celerik built an MVP for a mobile app for a nonprofit job board. Using wireframes and blueprints, they made the app for iOS and Android with search filters and email alert features. The project is ongoing. 

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
United Kingdom
Claire Devilard
Product Manager, CharityJob
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The app has yet to launch, but Celerik has delivered on all requirements. The team produces high-quality code on time and at excellent prices. Despite some delays and issues due to time differences, they lead a smooth collaboration thanks to constant communication and an excellent work ethic.

A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I'm a product manager for CharityJob, a specialized job board for charities in the UK. 

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Celerik?

The majority of our traffic is from mobile users. We surveyed our core users—both candidates and recruiters—about what features we could provide to improve their experience. One option was a mobile app, which was overwhelmingly their top request. We engaged Celerik to help us create an MVP of an app.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

Celerik built the MVP for both iOS and Android devices. We provided wireframes and blueprint designs early on, and their team used the materials to guide development. The app allows users to search for jobs via location and other search filters. Users can view listings, save them, and apply via a web-view. It also provides a job alerts function. As an MVP, the app doesn’t have full access to all of our job board’s features. We wanted to meet the minimum requirements based on user feedback.

What is the team composition?

We work with Juan (CEO, Celerik), Daniel (CTO, Celerik), and 3–4 developers. Juan and Daniel are our main points of contact. 

How did you come to work with Celerik?

When we were looking for outsourced companies to build the app, our CTO reached out to a former developer of ours. They recommended Celerik to us.

How much have you invested with them?

We’ve spent £8,000 (approximately $10,000 USD).

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working together in June 2018. Celerik’s portion is mostly finished, but the project is still ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We have yet to launch the app, but Celerik has delivered all the materials we need to get started. Our CTO is pleased with the quality of their code. We plan to measure our traffic, the number of downloads, and user interactions through the API connected to the app.

We look forward to receiving feedback through user testing after the app's launch. Celerik’s part is mostly done, but we will likely reach to them for future development needs.

How did Celerik perform from a project management standpoint?

Their team managed our project brilliantly. Our focus was split between a lot of projects, and we often got back to them late in communication and deliverables. Celerik remained patient while staying on top of us to make sure we produced updates and met our deadlines. We had weekly phone calls to share progress. Celerik even offered to have us participate in their regular stand-ups. This was our first experience with an outsourced company where we completed a full project together. We’re satisfied with the collaboration.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Celerik often over-delivered on their promised services. If we had a request beyond our scope, they’re happy to do it.

Are there any areas they could improve?

Time zone differences caused issues with communication sometimes. The project also took longer than expected, but most delays came from our side. Otherwise, I can’t think of anything. Celerik was an excellent partner to work with.

Any advice for potential customers?

Be open and available to Celerik’s level of communication. It will make the project more successful.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    The project took longer than expected in part due to delays on our side.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    Celerik’s services were far less expensive than similar agencies in London.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer