Web Dev & Design for Coding School
- Web Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- June 2016 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 4.0
- Cost
- 4.5
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"...their team is positive, fast to respond, pleasant and easy to work with."
- Education
- New York City, New York
- 51-200 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Cantilever built a WordPress website and CMS that allowed an online school to display their courses. They provided architecture, development in JavaScript and HTML, and ongoing maintenance.
The new website's polished design drew higher conversion rates, and its powerful CMS allowed internal staff to make continuous improvements. Cantilever's reliable communication, easygoing attitude, and responsive planning set them apart. They always offered thorough advice and explanations.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I am the Director of Marketing at the Flatiron School. We are a coding school and have both online and in-person classes to teach people how to learn to code.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Cantilever?
Our website is quite complex in that we are directing people from our site to our products so that they are able to get started with a coding course. We have an engineering team on staff, but they are more focused on building out our product.
We were looking to outsource a reliable company to help us maintain and build a new version of our site. As we launched new courses, we needed to build it again from the ground up. Diverting the in-house engineering resources to take on this task would have slowed down the process.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
In terms of our website, Cantilever actually came in and did a series of interviews with the staff to understand our needs. Then we started to build things out. They did the original design and thought about the architecture of the site, working in collaboration with marketing. They also worked with our product team to think about all the complexities of how the site interacts with our products.
After we rolled that project out, it was still a static site. They used JavaScript, HTML and CSS. We ended up switching the design aesthetic of the site and did a design overhaul, which they helped to implement.
With the CMS aspect of the project, Ty [President, Cantilever] took a similar approach and asked us about things we needed out of the CMS. It became clear that we needed a lot of flexibility. They ended up building quite a robust CMS in WordPress that would make us really self-sufficient. There were hiccups along the way, some back and forth, but we ended up being really pleased with it. This has been a really great project for us, and as a marketing team, we are able to update the site ourselves. Andrew, one of the WordPress engineers they have on staff, was our point person there.
I really like the CMS because we are a school and have really intense programs with a lot of information to display. Our pages were becoming really long, un-wieldy scrolls, and Cantilever developed some dynamic units that allow the user to toggle between two things. The interactions were quite complex, designed by our in-house designer, but they implemented them and made sure it was flexible. The units they developed could be used across different programs and use cases. I thought they did a great job of building the flexibility into the CMS with some of these dynamic complex layers.
Overall, we have ramped up and down with Cantilever when we have bigger needs, page rollouts, and site redos. We have had them on a larger retainer, and now we are in more of a bug fixes and maintenance mode. They recently moved us over to WP Engine for our server. It has been helpful to have them managing and keeping things up to date.
What is the team dynamic?
We worked with Ty as well as Andrew. I have also had interaction with people from the accounting department.
How did you come to work with Cantilever?
Our co-founder had worked with Ty before and trusted him and Cantilever. We recognized they were on the more expensive side, and a more premium service, but given the complexity of our project, we didn’t want to risk going to a cheaper and less reliable solution.
How much have you invested in them?
We have spent at least $100,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
I personally started working with them in June 2016, and the work is ongoing.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Our first version that launched added a lot of new features to our site. The site was more robust as we added so many new courses and more things to do. We saw our conversion rate increase. Moving into the second version, it had a new sleeker design, and again, we saw the conversion rate increase. We have been excited about that.
With the CMS, we have been able to continue to increase our optimizations of the site, as we have the flexibility to run tests on our own in addition to making changes. The CMS functionality has been a real win in allowing us to be more agile, a little bit smarter, and to optimize on our own time. It has been good.
How did Cantilever perform from a project management standpoint?
Communication has been really good. They are very responsive and it has been awesome for us. They are very easy to work with and keep us in the loop, jumping on calls when we need. We have refined our process overtime working with them. We used to do a lot over Slack, but they recently moved to using Basecamp, allowing things to be more trackable. It has been a learning process, but overall it has been good.
We had a couple hiccups with one of our larger projects which was poorly scoped, as we didn’t have some of the right stakeholders in the early conversations. The fault was really on both sides. They definitely followed through to the scope, but it was just off.
What did you find most impressive about them?
They are really nice to work with. Ty and his team are awesome and they are great communicators. Sometimes when you work with a contractor there is tough communication, but their team is positive, fast to respond, pleasant and easy to work with. It has been a win overall.
Are there any areas they could improve?
We encountered some of the same challenges anyone would with any contractor, occasionally not knowing the right stakeholder for what, or not looping in the right people into the conversation. Sometimes things get lost in translation when you are working with an outside party and there have been times we have had to clarify things by jumping on a call.
One of the main challenges, which is probably a bit of a fault on our side as well, has been figuring out the right relationship between marketing, the engineering and product team and the Cantilever team. It is more of making things clearer on who to go to for what on our end, and better stakeholder management on their end.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
"They were really great."
-
Schedule
4.0On time / deadlines
"There have been a couple times we were a bit late, but usually it is really great and on time."
-
Cost
4.5Value / within estimates
"They are on the pricier side, but you get what you pay for."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"I would definitely recommend them.