B2B Platform Dev for Wine Company
- Custom Software Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Feb. 2018 - May 2019
- Quality
- 1.0
- Schedule
- 2.0
- Cost
- 2.5
- Willing to Refer
- 0.5
"They could have been more flexible and reactive to the issues that arose."
- Consumer Products
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Briisk was hired to create the front-and backend of a B2B networking platform. This review includes the vendor's response.
Numerous bugs led to a delayed launch of a solution upon which stakeholders' revenue depended. Briisk began the partnership with enthusiasm, but a lack of transparency and the use of legacy technology led to distrust. Internal associates expended more resources than they originally anticipated.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the founder and CEO of a company in the wine industry.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Briisk?
The goal was to create a B2B platform that would provide a network for all of the different types of businesses in the wine industry around the world.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
They built the backend in Elixir version 1.4, even though the latest version is 1.8. Instead of developing the web solution on the same version, they built it on version 1.6. The frontend was developed in Angular version 5, even though 7 is the latest version. Also, they were still learning two of the coding languages they used, and they made the decision to use those languages without advising me about their lack of expertise.
What is the team dynamic?
There was a high turnover rate regarding both project managers and developers, and I had many video calls with their leadership about that problem. I worked with the CTO, who is a co-owner, and I also worked with the co-CEO, who is a co-owner as well.
How did you come to work with Briisk?
I found them by doing research on Clutch and Google and then speaking with three independent references that had worked with Briisk in the past. I also went to Poland to interview Briisk and met their development and ownership team in their office.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve invested between $50,000–$200,000 with the team.
What is the status of this engagement?
We launched the project in February 2018, and we decided to end the engagement in May 2019.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
How did your relationship with the vendor evolve?
The project started out well, as they were very enthusiastic at the beginning. However, during the next five months, complications mounted, and we began to get frustrated.
How did Briisk address the challenges that arose?
After our initial negotiations completed, it seemed they weren’t interested anymore. They weren’t keen to help us, despite the fact we were paying them on a monthly basis. They could have been more flexible and reactive to the issues that arose. There were persistent bugs on the application that were not resolved.
Describe the impact this engagement has had on your business.
The partnership has had a tremendous impact on internal stakeholders, as we couldn’t generate revenue until we had a stable product. The original timespan was four months, but the work lasted over a year and a half. We had to bring on additional resources and then find a new company that could redo their work. That new provider used more flexible, secure, and updated versions of the technologies so we could re-launch the solution.
I observed careless mistakes throughout the engagement, which led to a need for further resources. The database structure they created on PostgreSQL created business problems because it wasn’t built on a scalable or flexible format. Their choice to use Elixir version 1.4 caused security flaws. Also, coding in languages they were still learning complicated the project.
How was project management handled?
We had to change the project manager three times, including trying the co-CEO and CTO as project managers. This led to various challenges. Also, Briisk didn’t pay attention to detail.
Is there anything that the vendor did well or that you would consider a strength?
No. If I compare them with another firm, we could have gotten similar work for better price/quality, and we wouldn't have had to spend the additional resources.
In what specific areas can they improve?
If they want to compete and succeed in the market, they need to treat their clients more seriously. They could have been more transparent about the versions of technologies they used. Also, they could have granted us permission to Bitbucket, as we found out late in the process that we had “read only” access to our code and IP property. A company that wants to succeed should be an added value to the company that’s hiring them, not a detriment.
Company Responses
The vendor responded on June 18, 2019.
From the beginning, our team was keen on helping the client by engaging marketing strategists, researching solutions and tools and quoting on different options. We did this to help move project forward and did not charge for the additional consultancy. The team involved had a proven record of several projects developed in given technologies. Hence, it’s hard to say they did not have enough technical knowledge or expertise.
After delivering the agreed scope within five months and within the budget, our CTO was pushing the client to go to the market and test the application with real users. That’s when tensions started as additional features and requirements kept on coming, and they questioned the solutions that we agreed on. Even though the client left us 5 stars on Clutch initially, the review was unfortunately removed soon before the launch of the application.
From five maintenance options, the client decided on the smallest package of 2.5 hours a month. We believe this was the source of conflict as our team was no longer able to serve the client with the consultations and availability that the client was used to during the development phase. The new maintenance manager followed the agreement quite strictly.
We are aware we could have reacted quicker to the tensions or could have been more assertive towards some of the imposed solutions. Our other reviews prove that the capabilities and expertise of our team go far beyond the note of this unjust opinion.
RATINGS
-
Quality
1.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
2.0On time / deadlines
"It lasted a year and a half, and the project was supposed to be completed in four months."
-
Cost
2.5Value / within estimates
"This rating is based on what we’ve already negotiated with a new firm."
-
Willing to Refer
0.5NPS