Ruby On Rails Web Development Firm

Amoniaс OU engaged in full cycle web development. From absolutely small MVP applications to large-scale products with millions of end-users.
Our main idea is to free our partner from daily routine work, give possibility on focus on growing business and new clients.
For our company each client is unique, we provide him with his personal service.
We will not just write clean code at the client’s request.

Our team will engage in the customer's business processes and find an effective way of automating everyday tasks.
The company uses edge technologies like Ruby on Rails, PostgreSQL, Docker, Vue.js etc.

 
$5,000+
 
$25 - $49 / hr
 
10 - 49
 Founded
2014
Show all +
Tallinn, Estonia
headquarters
other locations

Portfolio

Key clients: 

We have deep expertise in developing content marketing platforms since we've delivered such projects for Natify Oy and Calcus Oy. Another worth mentioning project - automated expense claims platform - has been built for Renance - Automated Financial Services Oy. For the Finnish startup Contakti we've built the all-in-one web decision for customer support. Check all our cases at https://amoniac.eu/works/

The Supplier Portal platform was developed For ComBuyIt. Main Idea is a connection between the store and other online stores of goods and gift cards. So, the process of order execution is fully automated. The platform includes a variety of integrations that make orders process clearly and quickly. Like an example, when an order arrives at ComBuyIt, the Supplier Portal automatically sends it to the vendor, who, after receiving and processing sends order back to buyer. To gift cards automated generation, it connected to the Retain24 API. For all transactions, Supplier Portal automatically generates credit notes and invoices. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/supplier-portal.

CRM system integration for the Klienditugi company with third-party publicly available databases, which allows saving time on independent manual research of counter parties. Thanks to integration, the process of updating information for users of the CRM system is automated. Information on counterparties is provided in the current time, taking into account their financial condition, location, and other data. This allows to very quickly and clearly make decisions about cooperation, given the position of the client in the market. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/klienditugi-crm-integration.

Bids.сom Shopify App

<p>Integration of the Bids.сom e-shop with one of the leading and largest vendors was created to fully synchronize orders and eliminate manual enclosures during each purchase operation. The application is fully integrated into the Shopify admin panel and then works automatically 24/7. An option to conduct auction sales was implemented in the Bids.com store. It has an absolutely classical scheme and understandable to the end user. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/bids-om-shopify-app.</p>

AdOptimizer is an application that works automatically 24/7, completely controlling banner ads of users. For an application, one-time settings are sufficient, with which it will clearly work, disabling ineffective impressions, overcoming advertising platforms, thereby helping customers to more effectively use advertising web space. The app provides clear reporting on which you can fully rely, thereby removing a lot of manual work. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/adoptimizer.

Receipt Camera

An application that automates the process of reimbursing claims for expenses. As a rule, storing packs of checks is an unpleasant practice for both employees and responsible accountants, because they are constantly lost and can simply get confused. Receipt Camera records all expenses by recognizing checks through a mobile or desktop interface. The application itself adds the cost, VAT, accounting centers and accounts to the expense claims form, after which the employee sends the form to an accountant who checks and approves the form with one click. The payment is automatically sent to the employee on his current account. Receipt Camera allows saving time on manual filling out forms and reporting by both an employee and a responsible accountant. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/receipt-camera.

Pridac Shopify App

For Pridac company was developed a solution that allowed Amanda AI to connect to the online store on the Shopify platform. Amanda allows to easily set up ads in Google via the Shopify admin panel, without going into the application separately and downloaded from the Shopify app store. When installing, the user has the opportunity to immediately build their advertising directly for those products and countries that need it. The application allows not to adapt messages locally, all translations are performed automatically and as accurately as possible. The Dashboard option allows to manage the budgets of advertising campaigns, namely, to watch the income and expenditure figures for campaigns, compare them and, as a result, optimize. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/pridac-shopify-app.

Onalytics

Onalytics is ​​an application that improves the company's SEO processes and helps the web resource to take a higher position vs. competitors. The application integrates with Google Analytics in accordance with parameters set in advance and provides clear recommendations for the company's next actions on the web space. Onalytics compares average indices of customers and competitors on such parameters as visitor management, conversions, search traffic, PPC traffic, social networks traffic, mobile devices and gives general and priority recommendations in the summary analytical report. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/onalytics.

Natify

A paid media platform that links personalized content to a target audience using software technology. The Natify application delivers personalized advertising directly to accounts using machine learning algorithms and a widget of sponsored content, thereby greatly increasing the level of engagement. When a potential client visits his favorite site, Natify determines his interests and the stage of the buyer’s journey and shows him the adjusted article or video through the widget. Thus, key account decision makers get the suitable content at a suitable time. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/natify.

Lindström

To Lindström, the concept of a new cloud-based Enterprise Resource Planning system was developed, that control and optimize the flow of resources between company departments. New concept provides the same functions as the previous system, but solves the problem of a slow interface, thanks to the use of the latest technologies. It controls the flow of material, financial and human resources within the company, has separate convenient interfaces for logistics, accounting, and production, and works both in the browser and on the desktop. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/lindstrom.

Contakti

Contakti is a cloud-based web service that collects all incoming customer requests in one inbox. The service allows not to be distracted separately to different resources to check incoming requests, but to use only one resource, with built-in chat capabilities in real time, sending SMS, callback service and voice support. The service runs on any browser from any device and allows to significantly save time on processing customer requests. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/contakti.

Cloud Checker

Cloud Checker is a service that allows saving financial resources of the company to optimize the use of remote servers. If a company rents remote servers from different cloud services, Cloud Checker will allow using exactly as many resources as the company needs in real time. The service provides excellent analytics, which allows to completely abandon manual reporting. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/cloud-checker.

Calcus.Tech

A service that allows delivering only the advertising that is interesting to the final audience. Calcus.Tech handles a massive number of requests, thereby guaranteeing not only speed but also quality. The application itself has built-in targeting options that allow content to be delivered to precisely those channels that correspond to the main goals of the campaign. According to targeting settings, content that previously downloaded by the manager to the admin panel of the application is automatically distributed to the target channels. Explore the detailed case description at https://amoniac.eu/works/calcus-tech.

Reviews

Sort by

Web Development for Job-Seeking Platform

"Their response time is the fastest that I’ve seen with any company."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
May 2018 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Working from provided mockups, Amoniac OU developed a website for a job-seeking platform that utilized Ruby on Rails for the backend and Vue.js for the frontend.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Finland
Eemeli Hamara
CEO & Founder, Workant Oy
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The website’s prototype has drawn positive reviews from job seekers and employers. Amoniac OU features an attentive and experienced team, capable of organizing the full life cycle of building a website. 

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I am the founder and CEO of Workant, a job-seeking platform.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Amoniac OU?

I needed an outsourced development team to build my company’s website.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

I provided Amoniac OU with basic mockups of what I wanted, but I wholly rely on their team to coordinate the development. The backend utilizes Ruby on Rails while the frontend operates with Vue.js.

What is the team composition?

I’m working with about five people.

How did you come to work with Amoniac OU?

In my search for a vendor, I found their website and learned they had worked with several Finnish companies before, which was a promising sign considering I, too, am in Finland. I was impressed with the quality of their portfolio, and I selected them after I had the opportunity to speak with their CEO.

How much have you invested with them?

I’ve spent between $10,000–$25,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

Our engagement began in May 2018 and remains ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

I have received promising feedback on the prototype from employers and job seekers alike.

How did Amoniac OU perform from a project management standpoint?

I only have one point of contact, which streamlines all communication efforts. We keep in touch via Jira and Skype, and they are always prompt in their responses.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Their response time is the fastest that I’ve seen with any company. I know I will receive a reply to any of my messages in a timely manner.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No, everything has been satisfactory to this point.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

I’d recommend starting your engagement with a smaller project to determine if your companies are a good fit for each other.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    They have met all deadlines so far.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
    They charge a reasonable price.
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    For the price, the quality of their work is great.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    I don't have a bad thing to say about them.

Web App Prototyping for Cloud Service Firm

"They understood their task so rapidly we didn’t even need technical descriptions." 

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
 
Nov. 2018
Project summary: 

Amoniac OU built a prototype of a web app using Ruby on Rails and Material-IU. The system aggregates and displays the cost of various cloud service-providers and recommends the most cost-effective option.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Shenzhen, China
Ruslan Dautov
CEO, HPCD Lab
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The platform has already attracted both users and investors. Amoniac OU provided prompt responses and comprehended the job at hand quickly. They deftly handled geographic separation and had a deep understanding of project requirements.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I’m the founder and CEO of HPCD Lab, a cloud services-optimization company.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Amoniac OU?

We needed to develop a prototype of our web app with a Ruby on Rails backend and a Material-UI frontend.

What were your goals for this project?

We wanted to develop the prototype quickly based on a small technical description.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

We considered 10 teams and based our decision on their price, portfolio, communication skills, and experience level.

Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.

The prototype displays non-optimal cloud service providers and recommends a cost-reducing option. It displays a customer’s total savings and is connected to a third-party payment system.

What was the team composition?

We worked through a project manager.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

First, we already have potential clients. Second, two large companies are considering investing in our prototype.

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

We used GitHub for code and Skype for communication. They always responded quickly, even though we were in different time zones.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

They understood their task so rapidly we didn’t even need technical descriptions.

Are there any areas for improvement?

They should start supporting more technology stacks like Python and machine learning systems.

4.5
Overall Score
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Shopify App Dev for Marketing Automation Company

"They understood what we wanted to do and drove the project forward without us having to micro-manage them." 

Quality: 
4.5
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
 
Aug. 2018 - Dec. 2018
Project summary: 

Amoniac OU developed the frontend of a Shopify app based on existing wireframes and specifications.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Stockholm, Sweden
Torkel Öhman
CTO, Pridac
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Though the app isn’t available publically yet, it was praised internally for being intuitive and accessible, regardless of users’ technical experience. Amoniac skillfully handled multiple changes and updates and displayed top-level adaptability. Customers can expect a proactive, independent team.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I’m the founder and CTO of Pridac. We’re a digital marketing automation firm that works with Google Ads and Google Shopping.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Amoniac OU?

We wanted to launch our Google engine on Shopify via an embedded app.

What were your goals for this project?

Our goal was to make the experience as seamless as possible, with little to no knowledge or configuration necessary for the customer.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

We met with five different vendors. After speaking with Alex (CEO, Amoniac OU), we decided to go with Amoniac because they were flexible and could work a lot on their own; our project management time was limited.

Describe the project and the services they provided in detail.

They developed the frontend of the app in Shopify while we built the backend. We also provided them with specifications and wireframes. Because we wanted the app to be accessible, it only takes four steps to use.

What was the team composition?

We worked with two people from Amoniac, which simplified communication.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

We hoped to launch the app before 2019, and we’re right on schedule. The app is as simple to use as we hoped, so we’re very happy with the result.

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

At first, we had weekly meetings, but they later became bi-weekly. It was an agile project, and we changed, updated, and removed elements of the project over time.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

They’re flexibility and cost were outstanding. They understood what we wanted to do and drove the project forward without us having to micro-manage them.

Are there any areas for improvement?

No, not that I saw.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.5 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Custom Google Analytics Tool for Digital Marketing Company

“Amoniac OU kept the process as smooth as we could have wished for.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Less than $10,000
 
June 2018 - Nov. 2018
Project summary: 

Amoniac OU fully developed a customized tool for Google Analytics based on in-house designs.  The app lets website owners compare their performance against the market competition along with in-house utility.

The Reviewer
 
51-200 Employees
 
Nottingham, United Kingdom
Tim Cameron-Kitchen
Head Ninja, Exposure Ninja
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Amoniac OU maintained a stable workflow and composure while rapidly building and implementing the app at an optimal speed. The tool they delivered was very well received internally and functions precisely according to the specifications. Organized and knowledgeable, they performed at a high level. 

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I’m the head ninja at Exposure Ninja, the company that commissioned this project.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire Amoniac OU?

We hired Amoniac OU to build a custom Google Analytics app. Our company wanted to create a tool that allowed business owners to compare their website's performance against that of their competitors. We had no idea what was possible and were very pressured for time.

 It was critical to find a development team that understood what we needed. We needed a company that could work self-sufficiently, applying creative thinking to fill in the gaps as needed.  

What were your goals for this project?

Our engagement focused on building a public tool we could use to help website owners and for lead generation. 

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor?

After reviewing Amoniac OU’s application, we spoke on Skype. Their previous work clearly indicated that they knew how to build functional solutions that looked good. We took the leap and hired them.

Can you go into detail about the services they provided and the scope of the project?

We provided the design and explanation of the logic our product required. Amoniac OU executed the rest of the end-to-end project, working based off my fairly loose descriptions.

What was the team composition?

We worked primarily with Alex (COO and Business Development, Amoniac OU) and Alyona (Project Development Manager, Amoniac OU).

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any information that demonstrates the impact that this project has had on your business?

Our company thinks the tool the team delivered is great. We haven't launched it yet, but the functionality is exactly what we wanted. Amoniac OU kept the process was as smooth as we could have wished for. 

How was project management arranged and how effective was it?

Amoniac OU is exceptionally responsive. They’re very skilled at understanding the meaning behind our requests.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

Amoniac OU has outstanding organization and quality of work. I was impressed by how relaxed they remained while completing the project as quickly as possible.

Are there any areas where they can improve?

There are none that I can think of.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

Software Development for Online Shopping Platform

“Amoniac was interested in the whole industry and our processes to give us the best product for our needs.”

Quality: 
4.0
Schedule: 
4.5
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$10,000 to $49,999
 
Jan. - June 2018
Project summary: 

Amoniac developed a bespoke portal for an insurance company. They built the entire front- and backend with several linked APIs. Everything they built was customized to the project.

The Reviewer
 
1-10 Employees
 
Malmö, Sweden
Category Manager, Online Shopping Platform
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

The business model is based upon this software and its success has increased revenues. Amoniac communicated regularly through multiple channels, adjusted to changing requirements and met specifications.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

We develop IT software for insurance companies. I am a category manager for our accounts.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Amoniac?

We don’t have an internal development team, so we outsource various jobs to appropriate partners.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

The project began as a request for a simpler API for a large European retailer and progressed into a whole portal with several APIs. They developed the entire front- and backend and the APIs. It was specific to the insurance industry, so everything was customized to the project.

What is the team composition?

We worked with a project manager and a few developers at different stages of the project. The team fluctuated between three and five people.

How did you come to work with Amoniac?

We found them through Upwork. They had good reviews and the price was right. We had a good feeling about them from the beginning and felt they’d be the right partner. After the first stage, we decided to continue working with them as the project grew.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent about $15,000.

What is the status of this engagement?

We started working together in November or December 2017. The bulk of the work was finished by May or June 2018 and they’re currently working out any remaining bugs.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

Our figures are very good and our revenues have increased. Our business model is based on the software they provided, so it has to perform very well. Our revenues are linked to it directly, which is a good indication of its success. We work closely with our partners who use it. Everyone is very happy with the work.

How did Amoniac perform from a project management standpoint?

Our project manager is very good. Our specifications changed a lot throughout the project but they met our requirements. We’re more than satisfied and will continue to work with them in the future.

We communicated through Slack, Skype, and Jira. We used Trello in the beginning but switched to Jira. We communicated daily, especially during peak development.

What did you find most impressive about them?

They were keen to understand the whole process, even outside of the software itself. Other companies we’ve worked with take directives very literally but Amoniac was interested in the whole industry and our processes to give us the best product for our needs.

Are there any areas they could improve?

We’re a small, agile company and it was easier for us to establish personal and professional interaction. There’s always room for growth and they may not have the resources yet to work with very large companies.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Give them as much information as you can at the beginning to save time and expense. They would work well with anyone.

4.5
Overall Score We’re very happy with their work but there is always a little room for improvement.
  • 4.5 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
    The timeline was off a couple of times but I never had issues when scheduling meetings.
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 4.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
    They sometimes needed more time to assure the quality we required. We’re very satisfied with their deliverables.
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer
    They are good partners.

Custom Software Dev for Bookkeeping Software Company

“Their commitment and straightforwardness are impressive.”

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
Confidential
 
2015 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Amoniac has provided backend development in several areas, including Apache Cordova, Ruby on Rails, and JavaScript. At present, they’re building an AI model for purchase invoice booking.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Finland
Founder, Bookkeeping Software Company
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

High precision in following a code of conduct, clear communication, and the ability to identify more efficient methods continues to nurture the ongoing relationship. Amoniac’s branching process and thorough QA ensures virtually bug-free, in-parallel development.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

I’m the founder of a bookkeeping software company. We make software that automates manual, routine work within the scope of bookkeeping, including expense claims and order purchasing.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Amoniac OU?

We had a beta version which I’d developed myself, but I needed a more professional approach. We started working with Amoniac very early on as our outsourced partner in order to save time and make development more scalable. We have our own internal developers, but initially, our platform required a lot more work.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

They started with Apache Cordova development, which is basically a hybrid application. Afterwards, they began working on our web app which is built on Ruby on Rails using various JavaScript frameworks. We later hired a QA person through them, which is how our partnership started.

Since then, we’ve continued working with them. We’ve expanded the work to another service for which they are building an artificial intelligence model for purchase invoice booking. We’ve utilized their company’s entire skill set.

The initial project, which we’re still working on, is a B2B expense claims app that’s integrated with different software. They helped with the frontend, but I did most of it. All of the backend was their responsibility, including the integration for the bookkeeping software.

What is the team composition?

There have been 5–6 people from their team working on our projects over time. They mostly work remotely, and their team ranges from senior to junior level. I utilize their development and QA skill sets. They have quite a few people working in outsourced marketing for them as well, but I haven’t engaged with them on this yet.

How did you come to work with Amoniac OU?

We were using an open-source software for our app which one of their team members created.

What is the status of this engagement?

We began working together in 2015, and the relationship is ongoing. Originally, this was supposed to be a one-time project, but we now view Amoniac as a strategic partner. I plan on continuing our engagement.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

We’ve been very satisfied. I’ve asked them to follow Google’s code of conduct for Rails, which we’re using, and they follow this quite rigorously. They employ branching in their development process, as well as QA, and it’s all working well. There are seldom any bugs in production.

How did Amoniac OU perform from a project management standpoint?

I haven’t experienced any problems with their project management. Their English is sometimes too straightforward, which requires a bit of adapting, but it hasn’t become a problem because they are very clear when it comes to communication. We also have daily calls if needed.

The work is project-based, and we always collaborate with them within the scope of the user story, which they guarantee a time estimate and price for. As we’ve progressed, I found this model to be quite time consuming, so I wanted them to create the user stories themselves. We changed to an hourly fee, so they now log and bill those hours directly.

What did you find most impressive about them?

Their commitment and straightforwardness are impressive. Some vendors will only do what they’re told, but Amoniac questions ideas and tries to think of more more appropriate methods. I admire this about them. They have a moderately-sized shop, but we still feel like a valued customer. We’re not afraid of someone quitting, and I feel like I can count on them to replace a resource if necessary.

Are there any areas they could improve?

I can’t identify anything they need to improve, but it would be great to have in-person meetings more often. We currently only meet 1–2 times per year.

Do you have any advice for potential customers?

Make sure to Google the technologies they plan on using to make sure they are popular enough that other people can work on them. Always make sure that the developers follow some sort of code of conduct. There are good examples on Google’s website for each code library.

5.0
Overall Score
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer

CMS for Content Marketing Firm

"They do what they promise and deliver what's been agreed."

Quality: 
5.0
Schedule: 
5.0
Cost: 
5.0
Willing to refer: 
5.0
The Project
 
$50,000 to $199,999
 
Aug. 2017 - Ongoing
Project summary: 

Amoniac produced a content distribution platform, building it with Ruby on Rails. Intended to improve customer campaigns, the platform is still in development but outlook is positive.

The Reviewer
 
11-50 Employees
 
Helsinki, Finland
Olli Malia
Founder, Calcus.com
 
Verified
The Review
Feedback summary: 

Their strong work performance includes speedy delivery and perfect adherence to the needs of the project. Effective solutions and excellent communication cements Amoniac as a valuable partner, allowing them to rise above other Rails developers.

BACKGROUND

Introduce your business and what you do there.

Calcus.com does content marketing and native advertising in Finland. We have a turnover of about €3 million [$3.5 million USD] and work with most of the top 500 Finnish companies, as well as smaller companies. We do separate campaigns for these companies every year. I'm the founder.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What challenge were you trying to address with Amoniac?

We’re building a platform to distribute content. I'd heard positive things about Amoniac and the way they worked. We hadn’t done any other development previously, so working with them has been helpful.

SOLUTION

What was the scope of their involvement?

The platform will deliver content to various media on the Internet. We are automating processes that are currently manual, so we can do better campaigns for our customers. The platform is built with Ruby on Rails.

What is the team dynamic?

The main contact has been Alex [Lead Developer, Amoniac], who manages the team. The primary objective has been delivering the components on the software.

How did you come to work with Amoniac?

They worked with another Finnish company, which is how I heard about them. They had good references, and everybody had nothing but positive things to say. I spoke with a few developers in Finland, but it seemed easier with Amoniac.

How much have you invested with them?

The project will cost €50,000 [$58,780 USD].

What is the status of this engagement?

We started the project in August 2017, and it is ongoing.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?

The platform is nearly finished; everything seems to be working as it’s supposed to. We haven’t had any problems so far, just a few minor things still to fix. Overall, it’s good, with no big issues.

How did Amoniac perform from a project management standpoint?

We have no problems with communication. If I have a question, I go on Skype and get a reply immediately. We have an open conversation all the time.

What did you find most impressive about them?

The speed at which they deliver is faster and more effective than other experiences I’ve had. After only a few days, we could already see the improvements they made. They do what they promise and deliver what's been agreed.

Are there any areas they could improve?

No. I’m very pleased with their work, and we’ll be working with them in the future.

5.0
Overall Score The cooperation has been a success. Everything we've agreed to do with them, they've delivered. They're fast, effective, and easy to work with.
  • 5.0 Scheduling
    ON TIME / DEADLINES
  • 5.0 Cost
    Value / within estimates
  • 5.0 Quality
    Service & deliverables
  • 5.0 NPS
    Willing to refer