Web Development for Energy Management Provider
- Web Development
- Confidential
- Jan. 2008 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 4.0
- Cost
- 4.5
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"They are our development team."
- Energy & natural resources
- Saint Paul, Minnesota
- 11-50 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Ackmann & Dickenson partners with the client for internal software development. They augment the company by assigning resources to work on various projects such as application management or development.
Ackmann & Dickenson built the client's first start-up app and MVP in 100 days, and the client has been with them since. They provide overall knowledge of the marketplace and technologies, quick turnaround times, and a collaborative team approach.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your organization.
EnergyPrint provides energy management services to engineering and contracting companies that serve commercial buildings. We gather, input, validate, and report on utility bill analytics for our contracted customers in order for them to find ways of improving buildings and saving energy.
What is your position?
I am one of the founders and currently the president and CEO.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What business challenge were you trying to address with Ackmann & Dickenson?
We started working on the concept for our company in 2008-2009. We wanted to take the millions of data points that are collected from utility bills and deliver cost, consumption, and carbon metrics for buildings' energy usage, using a simple reporting mechanism. We committed to answering simple questions for our customers: Is the building getting better or worse? Are there savings opportunities? Did the money spent for improving a building pay off in terms of energy savings?
We turned to Ackmann & Dickenson with the problem of processing a large amount of data and delivering simple business metrics. We needed a database and a data model which would allow us to mine that model. We also needed to build a simple application that would act as a delivery vehicle.
SOLUTION
Please describe the scope of their involvement in greater detail.
We're a service and software company, but we have no internal software developers. Ackmann & Dickenson is our strategic partner in this area. They are our development team, so assigning them specific tasks for projects matters less than having an integrated relationship and a development roadmap.
We handle our business analysis services internally and build our own project scopes, but when it comes to actually working on a project, Ackmann & Dickenson will assign us the resources to implement. This includes everything from application maintenance to the actual developers.
We wanted to iterate over the life of our product, and to have a process in which our beta customers and business team would be part of the same team as the developers, sharing ideas and feedback as the product was being built. We preferred making iterations in small sprints and getting back to our beta clients in order to see if that was what they wanted. With Ackmann & Dickenson, we went through a 6-week planning phase, after which we built the first phase of the application in 100 days. We chose them because they were a design-build kind of company, and they were willing to become a part of our team and morph their processes with ours, offering us a strategic solution for taking our product to market. Ackmann & Dickenson's flexibility and adaptability mattered very much. Their understanding of the Agile process and knowledge of how that iterative methodology works were strong.
When we initially hired Ackmann & Dickenson, they were a startup company. The first developer they hired works as our lead developer to this day. We've been with Ackmann & Dickenson since they were young, and we've grown up together. The business sense offered by their principals – as well as their ability to understand that every project was unique in terms of people involved and what the intentions for that particular product or application were – mattered a lot. Ackmann & Dickenson was very flexible, yet held their ground for the more important items from a technological or security perspective. When it came to learning about a new industry (neither one of their owners had worked in the energy management field), Ackmann & Dickenson was very open. We've brought Ackmann & Dickenson to meetings with our clients, and I was impressed with how they handled themselves from a business perspective and how they emphasized the fact that they were a part of our team.
How did you come to work with Ackmann & Dickenson?
We looked at three different companies which came to our attention through referrals. I have a background in marketing and communications, so I knew many people who had built websites and applications for their companies. I called them and came up with names for three companies which we met. We had discussions about what we were doing and the required deliverables. We looked both at each vendor's previous work, as well as their general work process. Ultimately, we selected Ackmann & Dickenson because the other candidates required a period of 3-6 months for creating requirements, after which they would spend the same amount of time actually developing the software.
Could you provide a sense of the size of this initiative in financial terms?
Sorry, this is confidential.
What is the status of this engagement?
We've been working with Ackmann & Dickenson on an ongoing basis since 2009. They are a very important part of our team.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Could you share any statistics or metrics from this engagement?
During our startup phase, the fact that Ackmann & Dickenson was able to build an application in 100 days and get us to a viable and marketable product quickly was a huge achievement. This is the main reason for continuing to use them. When we have a new development phase for additional functionality, the scope is often as comprehensive as it would be for a new application development. I'm impressed with the fact that, when we are ready to build something, Ackmann & Dickenson will be quick in putting resources together and can deliver in a matter of weeks or months. The iterative process used by Ackmann & Dickenson is a perfect fit for us.
How did Ackmann & Dickenson perform from a project management standpoint?
My product manager works with Ackmann & Dickenson on a day-to-day basis. At a high level, because of our way of engaging with Ackmann & Dickenson, we handle a lot of the project management internally and interface with the developers directly, which is unusual for this type of relationship. From a project development and estimation standpoint, Ackmann & Dickenson has always been very efficient and partnered with us to document scope and timelines.
What distinguishes Ackmann & Dickenson from other providers?
Ackmann & Dickenson's overall knowledge of the open source world, of how applications integrate with each other, and their constant search for faster solutions have made them stand out. There have been many times in which we thought we'd have to custom-develop a feature from the ground up, only to have Ackmann & Dickenson produce a solution or idea which was already in the marketplace. For example, we initially thought that we'd have to build our own charts and graphs, but Ackmann & Dickenson proposed an existing library and customized it. We eventually selected a product called High Charts. There have been many opportunities in which we thought that we'd have to spend much more on development, but Ackmann & Dickenson brought us open-source solutions. We've appreciated their overall knowledge of the application marketplace and mobile technologies, and figuring out how not to rebuild the wheel. We didn't have to own every piece of intellectual property in the world, but rather we adapted and absorbed what was already available, making it our own.
Is there anything Ackmann & Dickenson could have improved or done differently?
The challenges we've had are not unique to Ackmann & Dickenson. There will always be difficulties when working with an outside partner in terms of obtaining resources exactly when they're needed. We've had many occasions of doing last-minute planning for a development cycle that was to start the following week. Sometimes, it will take a while to obtain the resources which we need. We've always favored the developers which are familiar with our code, instead of having to teach new people about the work. This is typical for outsourcing and code development in general.
We've had to develop project management and product management internally because we needed to own the process from an intellectual property perspective and also because we thought that we'd handle the task better in-house. This isn't really a weakness of Ackmann & Dickenson, but rather a strength for our company. Ackmann & Dickenson's business acumen comes from how they use technology in order to deliver against a business need. This is the reason for continuing to work with them 8 years later. I can't buy this knowledge through simply hiring a person. Ackmann & Dickenson has a team of 35 developers who constantly work on the latest, greatest stuff. We've morphed into doing the things which we needed to do so that we could best consume what Ackmann & Dickenson offers. We manage the product roadmap and handle most of the project management, while the business acumen, application infrastructure, and technology infrastructure are Ackmann & Dickenson's responsibilities.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
4.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
4.5Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS