TestFort QA Lab

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Lead Product Manager of an AI robotics startup.

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Our company is a United States-based technology startup building AI-powered robotic systems and software for food production and automation.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• We engaged TestFort to support quality assurance for the software components of our AI-driven robotics platform and ensure system reliability as we scaled development.

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

• Online Search
• Recommendation

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• High ratings
• Pricing fit our budget
• Good value for cost
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

TestFort provided QA support for the software layer of our robotics system, including validation of workflows, data processing logic, and integration points. They executed functional and regression testing and helped us structure QA processes for a complex, evolving system.
Deliverables included test documentation, defect tracking reports, validation results and quality recommendations.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The collaboration improved our system reliability during both internal and field testing. TestFort helped us identify critical issues early in the development cycle, long before deployment, which reduced risk and increased confidence in each release.

As a result, our QA processes became more structured, predictable, and aligned with our engineering workflow.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

Project management was smooth and well-organized. TestFort delivered all items on schedule, communicated proactively and quickly adjusted to changes in development priorities.

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

Their ability to work with complex, non-traditional software systems stood out. TestFort QA Lab demonstrated strong analytical thinking and adaptability in a highly technical environment.

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

Everything was delivered as expected.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Talent Acquisition Manager at a B2B SaaS Company

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

We're a US-based B2B SaaS company developing a PR and media outreach automation platform for growing businesses and marketing teams.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• We hired TestFort to ensure the stability and quality of our SaaS platform ahead of frequent product releases, improve test coverage, and reduce production issues during scaling.

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

• Referral
• Recommendations

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

TestFort handled manual and automated testing for our web-based SaaS platform. Their scope included functional testing, regression testing before releases, API testing, and building automated test cases for core user flows.

Key deliverables included detailed test plans, automated regression suites, bug reports with clear reproduction steps, and release readiness reports.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

1. Reduced critical production bugs by over 40%.
2. Faster release cycles due to reliable regression testing.
3. Improved overall platform stability during peak usage.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

TestFort managed the project very professionally. All tasks were delivered on time, communication was clear, and they were highly responsive to our evolving priorities. They team adapted quickly to our release schedule and worked seamlessly with our internal team.

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

Their ability to combine strong QA expertise with a deep understanding of SaaS products was impressive. They understood our product logic and user experience.

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

No, we were satisfied with all aspects of this collaboration.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

 I am the Founder of a social networking company 

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

We are a video-based social platform that recreates the feeling of walking into a real event or bar by letting people meet, interact, and connect in real time through shared rooms, live activities, and authentic face-to-face conversations.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

While working on our web application, we needed to ensure it would perform flawlessly for any number of users, on any platform, and in any conditions.

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

Online Search

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• High ratings
• Pricing fit our budget
• Good value for cost
• Company values aligned
• Professionalism & Flexibility

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

One QA Lead + 35-50 QA Engineers assembled at our request for crowdtesting sessions.

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

The goal of the project was to see how the application would perform not in a lab environment,
but when interacted with by real users, with a focus on performance, usability, and functionality.
TestFort specifically involved QA engineers to ensure that users with different levels of
experience and technical proficiency tested the app. They also made sure to run the app on
different devices, operating systems, and browsers to cover the widest range of platform
combinations for compatibility validation.
Deliverables: Test reports, bug reports, release readiness reports, optimization
recommendations.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The platform went from behaving unpredictably with 30 consecutive users to supporting a
smooth real-time viewing and chatting experience for 100 or more consecutive users.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The testing sessions did not have a regular schedule and depended mainly on the app’s
development and deployment milestones, so we needed maximum flexibility and speed from
TestFort. That’s exactly what we got, as they quickly arranged each testing session, stayed in
touch before and during every event, and sent testing reports on the same day.

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

We were impressed by how quickly TestFort would meet our needs even on short notice. We’d
request a crowdtesting session and they would provide the whole team within two days or less.

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

There is nothing we would change about the way TestFort delivers their services and would like
to collaborate with them more closely as the project evolves further.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Program Manager of Mason America Inc

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Mason America provides a platform that combines purpose-built devices with a device management console to simplify the development, deployment, and scaling of dedicated smart devices for businesses

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• Enhancing software/product quality
• Identifying and reducing defects
• Ensuring comprehensive test coverage
• Lowering testing costs
• Freeing up internal resources

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

Online Search

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• High ratings
• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

1 Employee

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

Execution: Test environment setup, test case execution, CTS-verifier test case execution and defect management.
Reporting: Regular test reports and a final test summary.
Closure: Test completion and deliverable handoff.

Key deliverables were:

Test Reports
Defect Reports

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

• Reduced production defects
• Improved test coverage
• Faster release cycles
• Clear, timely reporting

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

Their project management is very effective. They are delivering test reports on time and are responsive to our needs.

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

I am impressed by their thoroughness in testing and clear, detailed reporting, which made it easy for our development team to address issues quickly. Their expertise, attention to detail, and commitment to delivering reliable results make them a strong partner for any organization seeking to enhance its quality assurance processes. We would not hesitate to recommend QArea to others.

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

To further enhance your value as a QA partner, we suggest TestFort consider offering more proactive strategic input. While we appreciate the strength of your testing execution, suggesting innovative testing methodologies could be very beneficial.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Chief Business Development Officer and Customer Success of a software company 

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

We provide full-cycle development and ongoing technical support to clients in the USA and Europe, helping them navigate complex industry challenges with scalable, innovative software.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• Mobile QA services

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

Referral

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• High ratings
• Pricing fit our budget
• Referred to me
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We found TestFort through industry recommendations after researching firms with specialized experience in financial application testing.

TestFort provided extensive QA support for a mobile banking solution, emphasizing functionality, security, and automated testing for Android devices. They delivered:

• Comprehensive functional test cases
• Security validation reports for financial-grade applications
• Automated test scripts for ongoing regression testing
• Stability checks across multiple Android versions and devices

The collaboration ensured reliable performance and security compliance of our mobile banking SDK, even through significant redesign stages.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

• Improved app stability, reducing crash rates significantly after automation implementation
• Passed critical security audits required by financial regulations
• Successful validation of SDK functionality across diverse Android environments

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

Their project management was proactive and reliable. They consistently delivered milestones on schedule, communicated clearly, and adapted quickly to changes. Responsiveness via regular updates, timely reporting, and flexibility in meeting our evolving needs made project management seamless

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

TestFort’s depth of expertise in mobile QA specifically tailored for financial apps stood out. Their proficiency in security-focused automated testing delivered clear value, especially their proactive suggestions that improved our internal QA processes

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

The collaboration was excellent overall. Initially, they could have spent more time aligning on detailed requirements to reduce minor back-and-forth communications. However, this was quickly resolved once regular communication patterns were established

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Marketing manager of Spendbase

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Spendbase is a SaaS subscription management platform that helps IT and finance teams optimize software usage and spending by automating management, identifying unused licenses, and negotiating better vendor terms.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• Implement automated regression tests to ensure that new features and updates do not introduce new bugs or impact existing functionality.
• Ensure seamless integration with other tools and platforms used by Spendbase customers, such as ERP and financial management systems.
• Assess the platform’s ability to scale efficiently, ensuring it can handle sudden increases in users or data without performance issues.

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

Referral

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• Great culture fit
• Good value for cost
• Referred to me
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

2-5 Employees

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

We had several important tasks to accomplish. One of them was to eliminate the possibility of errors or broken functionality after updates or the addition of new functions. We also wanted to make sure that our system would integrate seamlessly with clients' ERP and financial systems without any hiccups and could be easily scaled once our customer base grows. 
After initial consultations, TestFort QA Lab has developed a comprehensive testing strategy. They created automated test suites, which were integrated into our CI pipelines, validated integration points with external systems, and conducted load and stress tests to assess scalability. Throughout the project, the team documented everything they did and kept us in a loop by providing regular reports on their findings and activities. 

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The outcomes were actually “tangible”. After the implementation of automated regression tests, the number of bugs reported after updates has dropped by 15-20%. Also, the results of load and stress testing confirmed our platform’s ability to handle a 50% increase in user load and data volume without performance degradation. 

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

The team is very responsive. Whenever we had any questions, they were always ready to arrange a meeting to discuss what they’ve been doing and map out our further steps. Also, they worked within our budget, adjusting the workflow to meet our needs. 

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

We were definitely impressed with the team’s expertise. They know what they’re doing and they have extensive testing coverage, allowing them to spot and address even the most subtle issues that could’ve been missed easily. We also loved how the whole process was organized and managed. The team is proactive and highly knowledgeable. 

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

Can’t think of anything for improvements. We were more than satisfied with their work.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and position.

I am the Senior Engineering Manager, Quality of Dashlane

Describe what your company does in a single sentence.

Dashlane is a web and mobile app that simplifies password management for people and businesses. Dashlane empowers organizations to protect company and employee data while helping everyone easily log in to the accounts they need.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

What specific goals or objectives did you hire TestFort QA Lab to accomplish?

• Ensuring that new features performed flawlessly across various mobile devices and operating systems.
• Verifying the heightened security level of our password manager app, crucial to maintaining Dashlane's zero-breach record.
• Testing a complete redesign of our app across all platforms and implementing and stabilizing a unique password changer feature.

SOLUTION

How did you find TestFort QA Lab?

Online Search

Why did you select TestFort QA Lab over others?

• Pricing fit our budget
• Good value for cost
• Company values aligned

How many teammates from TestFort QA Lab were assigned to this project?

10-16

Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.

The scope of work TestFort QA Lab undertook was comprehensive and multi-faceted, focusing primarily on manual testing services. Here are some key deliverables I can share: Performance testing. They conducted extensive testing of new features across various mobile devices and operating systems, ensuring that all Dashlane users enjoyed a seamless and consistent experience, regardless of their device or OS. 

App redesign testing. Dashlane underwent a complete redesign of the app across all platforms. We talked TestFort QA Lab with testing this thoroughly, ensuring that the updated aesthetics and functionality did not compromise the app's performance or usability—password changer feature. Our unique feature is the password changer, and we needed QArea to ensure its implementation and stabilization went as planned. 

This involved rigorous testing to ensure it worked flawlessly. Language expansion testing. As we expanded our language offerings within the app, TestFort QA Lab's scope of work broadened to include testing for these additions. Throughout this process, TestFort QA Lab remained flexible, adapting their methodologies to align with Dashlane's agile development practices. They became an integral part of our extended team, demonstrating a commitment to our product's success.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

Faster release cycles. With TestFort QA Lab's thorough testing procedures in place, we were able to speed up the release of new updates and features. Improved usability and stability. The meticulous testing resulted in noticeable improvements to the usability and stability of our product. This led to a more reliable, user-friendly experience for our users, increasing overall customer satisfaction. Successful peak load management. 

To a great extent, thanks to TestFort QA Lab's diligent testing efforts, we successfully handled peak loads. Seamless new feature rollouts. QArea helped us to smoothly introduce new features across all devices and operating systems.

Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?

When we were looking for an outsourcing company, we knew we needed a team that can perform at the same high level of quality over several years period. We understood the importance of project management and the need for testing and quality assurance expertise. As such, we specifically requested that our team comprise one project manager and several QA engineers. Our collaboration was so successful, that in the scope of the following years, the team grew up to over 15 experts. 

TestFort QA Lab was able to accommodate any expert-related request and provided us with a dedicated team that was well-suited to our project needs. Our workflow was highly effective. Project management was maintained via Jira. Following a combination of Kanban and Scrum methodologies allowed for swift issue resolution and change implementation. Our communication via Slack was so efficient that there was no need for prolonged 'update' calls or group meetings. It was as though we were collaborating in real-time. Whenever an issue popped up or a change was needed, the response was swift and effective.

What was your primary form of communication with TestFort QA Lab?

• Virtual Meeting
• Email or Messaging App

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

TestFort QA Lab's commitment to our product stood out. They weren't just going through the motions — they genuinely wanted to deliver a secure, user-friendly password manager. They were always open to feedback, making necessary changes to improve the product and meet our high standards. On the rare occasion that we felt a team member wasn't quite the right fit, TestFort QA Lab swiftly and smoothly facilitated a change. Over the years, it became abundantly clear that they greatly value team development and management, investing significantly in these areas.

Are there any areas for improvement or something TestFort QA Lab could have done differently?

The project was eventually discontinued due to our decision to transition to automated testing and handle testing internally. We believe that the value of TestFort QA Lab's manual testing created a solid base for this transition. If I absolutely need to choose an area of improvement, I would say we wouldn’t mind more QA testers in different time zones for continuous testing throughout the day. However, as far as I know, now this issue is solved.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I am a Marketing Director at a company that provides advertising platform services.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire TestFort QA Lab?

Our company developed an updated version of the corporate website with new pages and features. We cooperated with TestFort to perform comprehensive quality assurance of the website and further prepare it for the release, as we didn’t want to take chances with the quality and appeal of our website to our customers.

SOLUTION

How did you select this agency and what were the deciding factors?

As a Ukraine-based company ourselves, we were determined to work with a local partner — this way, we wanted to ensure that the vendor’s outlook and work ethic perfectly matched our own.

We reviewed several profiles of potential vendors before making the decision. We were looking for a solid portfolio of relevant QA projects and a positive experience shared by previous clients. After the research, we settled on TestFort.

Describe the project in detail and walk through the stages of the project.

As we were getting ready to release the updated version of the website after a complete redesign, we were looking for full-cycle testing services that would deal with every aspect of the site and help us make sure it was ready to see the world.

After the initial introduction to TestFort, their QA team conducted a thorough review of the state of the application and the goals of the project. Then, two manual QA engineers began testing the website.

They used a comprehensive approach, consisting of functional, usability, compatibility, and UI testing, to verify the correct operation of the website. They also conducted performance testing and regression testing at different stages of the project.

Describe the recruitment process in detail.

For this project, we requested the help of two manual QA engineers to perform daily operations. A QA Lead was also employed on the project part-time to oversee the work in general.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the engagement that demonstrate progress or success?

Our goal for this project was to make sure the new version of our website was ready for the release, and this goal was achieved thanks to our cooperation with TestFort.

Their QA engineers identified and brought to our attention several bugs that could potentially tarnish the website’s performance and user experience. Thanks to being alerted to those bugs on time, we quickly took care of the issues to further improve the product.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

Throughout the entire process, the TestFort team stayed in touch with us through weekly calls with our extended team and daily meetings with the core team via Skype and Google Meet. The QA team was able to efficiently fit their operations into the Scrum methodology we used on the project, and regularly reported on the progress.

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

What impressed us the most about the TestFort team is their attention to detail and the fact that they approach the project with maximum precision. They work quickly and efficiently and will always go the extra mile to ensure the top-notch state of the product.

Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?

The project was completed within the previously discussed deadline and the team diligently followed the scope of testing initially outlined. We are happy with the results of our collaboration and there is nothing we would change about this experience.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I worked as Head of Product and UX at Diligences - software product company.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire TestFort QA Lab?

Our company decided to build a full-featured project management system to maximize the productivity of our in-house team as well as scale this solution up to an off-the-shelf product in the future. We had the resources to cover the planning, design, and development phases, but quality assurance and testing were decided to be given to a third-party vendor. So, we needed a software testing vendor to provide us with QA services, ideally ― with niche expertise in quality assurance for feature-rich team management applications.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor and what were the deciding factors?

We were looking to find an outsourcing vendor that provides full-cycle QA coverage but also allows its clients to choose particular testing types to focus on. After looking through the Clutch rating lists, reading the reviews, and checking a few websites with project portfolios, we decided to contact the TestFort team.

Describe the project in detail and walk through the stages of the project.

We wanted QA engineers from TestFort to provide us with a full-cycle quality assurance process including functional and non-functional testing on different web platforms (Web, macOS, Windows, Linux, and Chrome Extensions).

Our main concerns were UI/UX design, seamless work of all third-party integrations (the application has 28 of them), and stable performance after the implementation of new features which we planned earlier. Basically, we wanted TestFort to focus on usability testing to detect UI/UX weak points and potential high-level errors, integration testing, and regression testing after every new function added.

Technologies used on the project included Golang, MongoDB, Redis, MySQL, REST API, React, Electron, AngularJS, Node.js, CSS3, JavaScript, HTML5, and Jenkins.

How many resources from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?

We hired 3 QA engineers to test our application but also reached out to the TestFort DevOps engineer and UI/UX product designer for technical consultations.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The main outcome we got from working with their QA engineers is a polished and stable digital product. After the initial functional and non-functional testing was done, collectively with the TestFort QA team, we improved the time-tracking, automatic collecting of statistical data, real-time KPI monitoring, invoice metrics gathering, and many other crucial features of our application.

Also, the testing team provided full-coverage testing of all app integrations and we can now be sure that all 28 are working seamlessly. The project development is still ongoing, and we continue reaching out to TestFort for regression testing when another feature is scheduled for implementation.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

We organized the testing project course by Agile methodology and supported communication via email, Slack, and video conferencing software (Skype and Google Meet). We agreed to receive the reports on a weekly basis, and the QA team was very precise about the deadlines.

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

The first thing that stood out to us was the detailed description of all the services and testing types TestFort’s giving on their website. We wanted to be sure that a team of our choice is familiar with all steps and phases of the software testing life cycle, which we were lucky to find in TestFort employees. Also, this team was very flexible and agreed to provide us with specific QA services at our request in the future, after the main part of the project was completed.

Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?

We can only wish that TestFort continue growing and expanding their great team so that they would always have some testers available.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I am a Project Manager at Light IT. Light IT is a data science and software development company specializing in AI/ML solutions, web and mobile development, UX/UI design, business analysis, quality assurance, and IT consulting.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire TestFort QA Lab?

Our client, who earlier ordered an MVP version for their healthcare application, decided to expand the functionality of their digital product. After having analyzed the requirements, we realized that we will not be able to cover all the QA activities due to the long-term occupation of our engineers. So we needed a reliable QA partner.

What were your goals for this project?

Our goal was to find some, ideally ― skilled with healthcare-specific software development, and hire them for an independent testing project.

SOLUTION

How did you select TestFort QA Lab?

We’ve already heard of software testing engineers from TestFort in the past, and the feedback about their work was very positive. That’s why when we discovered the need to get an external testing service for our project, we thought of TestFort immediately.

We checked their portfolio and the areas of expertise they listed on their website and other platforms. They seemed to be a perfect fit, so we contacted them to see what they can offer.

Describe the project in detail.

We had to use an MVP of a healthcare application we developed earlier and turn it into a fully-featured telemedicine platform. Due to the complexity of such large and multi-level projects, we understood that we would need to collaborate with a highly experienced QA team.

Generally speaking, the scope of work for the TestFort QA engineers was to provide us with full-cycle independent testing of our healthcare platform, from architecture and codebase to performance, functionality, load, and security.

What was the team composition?

After having described our requirements for the testing process, TestFort manager provided us with a consultation and suggested that we hire 3 software testers with different areas of expertise. We agreed with the received info and ended up with a QA team of three: a QA automation engineer (who also acted as a team lead) and two manual software testers.

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?

The key outcome of our project with TestFort is the quality and stability of the telehealth platform we developed. Software testers we hired extensively checked the platform’s architecture and functionality.

They were diligent in their testing, provided clear bug reports, and made further recommendations on ways to improve the solution’s functionality and reliability. After having fixed these errors, we came out with a solid online healthcare solution that makes medicine more accessible for patients and easier to carry out for doctors.

How effective was the workflow between your team and theirs?

Our collaboration was very effective, and communication with the TestFort team was very clear. We organized our work on the project following the Scrum methodology. The QA team from TestFort followed it as well.

They also reported the results of their work on a weekly basis. Communication was organized with the use of email, Slack, and Zoom.

What did you find most impressive about this company?

We were impressed with how attentive the TestFort managers were to the information we sent them even before our first consultation. On our first call, the manager provided us with an action plan for future testing that only lacked a few specific details added.

This drastically shortened the team preparation time and we managed to start testing very quickly. Also, the technical and business qualifications of the TestFort employees were also way above the average level.

Are there any areas for improvement?

It would be great if TestFort expanded their team even more so that they’d have more testers available for third-party hiring.