UX & UI for Data Virtualization Firm
- UX/UI Design
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Nov. 2018 - June 2019
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
“The human factor was an important piece, and working with them was extremely easy.”
- Other industries
- Palo Alto, California
- 201-500 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Slide UX conducted user interviews to complete a feasibility analysis of user flows. Then, they redesigned the UX to transition platform modules from desktop to web-based software. They delivered using Zeplin.
Although the product is still in development, the work garners superb user feedback. The friendly team delivered effective project management with weekly status updates and responsive communications. They adapted quickly to understand the technical specifications and produced high-quality results.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the director of product management at a software vendor for data management and integration. We have a single product, and this product has different modules. Some are more technically oriented for developers, and some are more business-friendly for end users. I coordinated the process of working with people from the development side to gather requirements, and then finding the right agency and explaining the scope of the project with them.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Slide UX?
We’re transitioning from desktop to web-based software, and we needed a UX agency to help us with that transition.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Slide UX worked on the two most important modules of our platform: the developer studio and a business catalog for business users.
They did an initial feasibility analysis for one of the products. They helped us conduct interviews with existing users to see their pain points with user flows. They drafted the interview questions, and we made tweaks to cover all the technical aspects. They conducted the interviews and then prepared a summary presentation with video clips of users describing the pain points of the software along with recommendations to address them. Then, we went through a complete redesign of the UI to move from the existing standalone application to a web-based one and to modernize its look and feel.
We had a set of interviews at the beginning of the project and another one halfway through to show existing customers what we were working on and ensure that our existing customer base was understanding and happy with what we were doing.
For the design, we wanted to get an analysis of specific screens, which had to cover a variety of application elements. Slide UX also created a design guide for the basic components. We chose 12 screens for each application totaling 24 screens with the corresponding variations. They delivered notes, comments, and a style guide in Zeplin.
What is the team composition?
We worked with 5–6 people from their team, including a project coordinator, who focused on the overall relationship. We also had a project manager, who was present at every meeting and kept on top of everything. A graphic designer worked on screens and the style guide. The designer had an assistant who joined us for some of the meetings; I also worked with her directly. Two usability experts conducted the interviews and usability analysis, one for each application.
How did you come to work with Slide UX?
We found them on Clutch, and they came up on the top three list in our research. We knew their name, and we also knew people who strongly recommended that we work with them, especially because they had worked with Slide UX on similar processes. When we talked to them, we could see they had a lot of relevant experience, which tipped the scales in their favor.
How much have you invested with them?
The initial estimation was $200,000–$250,000, but we came in below the estimate at $170,000–$180,000, which was nice. They were accurate with their estimations, but we were working on two applications, and some of the design elements and feasibility analysis were shared between the two, which reduced the individual work for each application significantly.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with Slide UX in November 2018 and wrapped up in June 2019.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
They provided the design and the guidelines for it, and we’re currently working on development. The feedback so far has been excellent, but it’s still too early to gauge the impact on our business.
How did Slide UX perform from a project management standpoint?
They treated it like a proper project with follow-ups and milestones. We had a project file with all the dependencies between tasks, breakdowns, and task assignations. We touched base every 1–2 weeks to make sure we weren’t being delayed or had a critical problem. The project management was surprisingly good.
They used Microsoft Project to share critical project files with us in PDF form. We used Asana for everyday communication and tracking tasks, and we had informal communication on Slack. They were open to having meetings with screen sharing anytime it was necessary. They provided a status update every week as a single-page PDF detailing how far we were into the project and how much had been spent of the time and budget.
What did you find most impressive about them?
The communication was extremely fluid, and they were nice and helpful, especially in the beginning, when we didn’t know what to expect. They were open to all of our questions. The human factor was an important piece, and working with them was extremely easy. That’s always appreciated.
We liked the quality of the deliverables. It’s always an iteration, especially with a technical product, and it’s hard to capture the nuances of the interface, but we worked that out through several iterations, especially on the more complex screens. I explained the technical aspects of the product to their designers, and they were good at understanding them.
Overall, we were happy with the human relationship and the results of the work, from the design to the look and feel, the process, the iterations, and how it all worked out.
Are there any areas they could improve?
They matched our expectations. The project was extremely technical, so we had to go back and forth more than expected in the beginning. Translating technical terms into laymen’s terms was a challenge, but they caught up quickly. Other than that, everything worked out smoothly. The personal relationship with them was fantastic. They were quick to respond any time we had a question.
Do you have any advice for future clients of theirs?
Clients should make sure the requirements are clear and understandable, including the use of illustrative videos. We did that, and we made the software available to them. That helped a lot, especially with the more complex parts of our software. Once the scenario was clear, translating our functionalities into particular screens was easy. They were also eager to start with design, but it was good to have the prep work and smooth the complexity.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
"We were thrilled with the whole relationship."
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"We did a thorough analysis, and Slide UX came with a competitive price and had a much nicer portfolio than their competition."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS