Market Research & Branding Services for Consulting Firm
- Branding
- Confidential
- July 2012 - July 2013
- Quality
- 4.5
- Schedule
- 4.5
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
“They’re energetic and thoughtful, and their solutions are spot-on.”
- Other industries
- Oakland, California
- 1-10 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
MonogramGroup helped a business firm do market research and branding services for a client. Deliverables included a redesigned logo and website, new strategic and creative directions, and marketing collateral.
MonogramGroup did a great job collaborating with all involved parties, and their work ultimately exceeded expectations. Client-oriented and engaging, the team brought a unique balance of strategy and creativity to the project. They adhered to the deadlines and offered incredibly reasonable costs.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the CEO of Ashton212, a business impact consulting firm. We package teams of resources, from individual consultants to full-service agencies, to provide the entire service that a client is looking for.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with MonogramGroup?
Our client, a religious educational organization in the Bay Area, had planned to hire a separate research firm for the creative part of a rebranding project. However, when we pitched that we could do end-to-end services for them, they chose us. We were hired to facilitate a full rebranding of their organization, and we subcontracted MonogramGroup to work on behalf of this client. They held a big responsibility in the outcomes of the engagement.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
MonogramGroup was part of the team that we put together to execute this rebrand. They were involved in both the research and creative aspects of the engagement.
First, we did a comprehensive research project. Jackie (Partner/Research Director, MonogramGroup) led a research initiative against all of the organization’s stakeholders, conducted in person and over the phone. This allowed us to see that the problem stated in the proposal was not the true problem, and we showed this to the organization’s board of trustees.
Then, MonogramGroup, in collaboration with me as the engagement lead, made recommendations on the direction that we needed to go in from a creative perspective. We generated a new logo and created a strategic direction for the in-house marketing team.
We also worked with MonogramGroup on the website. They created the site’s wireframe and design direction, and then those were turned over to some internal resources. Our teams collaborated on recruitment models and made social media recommendations. Some collateral came out of this, including videos.
We ended up turning the client over to MonogramGroup for any further work they needed done.
What is the team composition?
Our main points of contact were Jackie, Scott (President, MonogramGroup), and Harold (Former Partner/Creative Director, MonogramGroup). Chip (Partner/Creative Director) also worked behind the scenes, and I occasionally met with a couple of junior team members who were part of the creative brainstorming process.
MonogramGroup had direct contact with the client; we didn’t stand between them. They were involved in the client’s pitch meeting with their board. We worked collaboratively, as we do at Ashton212 in the spirit of the engagement and making sure we have perspective, but MonogramGroup was very much front-and-center in client contact throughout the engagement.
How did you come to work with MonogramGroup?
I went to college with Jackie, Scott, and Harold. I knew that they were a collaborative team with end-to-end services, from research through strategy and creative execution. It was nice knowing that I wouldn’t need to worry about bringing in another research team. When hiring partners, I look for independent thinkers who don’t need guidance and who I’m confident will represent our brand to clients in a good way. We didn’t have to tell MonogramGroup how to work; they’re professionals at what they do.
One of the primary reasons we selected MonogramGroup was that they had experience in our client’s sector. They knew the spirit of the engagement and what we were trying to solve. My company seeks to find the experts that are well-versed in the client’s particular problem so that we can win engagements.
We’d spoken with MonogramGroup about other projects before hiring them for this one. As a marketing strategist, I’m looking for the thinking before the doing, and I knew that Scott had very strong instincts around branding. In my mind, he’s one of the best in terms of his ability to synthesize and make strategic recommendations, along with having a creative orientation from his design past. I also had full confidence in Jackie’s research abilities, as we’d actually worked together when we were both at different companies.
How much have you invested with them?
We spent more than $100,000 but less than $250,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
Our work together started in July 2012 and ran through July 2013.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
I’d say that in summary, they do good work. I’ve always been more than satisfied with their approach and execution. For a consulting firm or agency, the real win is whether you come back to work with them again, and I have with MonogramGroup. They’re an agency that I think highly of; they’re very skilled and motivated to do good work. The team takes great pride in the results. For example, Jackie is a fabulous researcher. She makes it easy for clients who may not have that level of expertise in research to understand what she does, how and why she does it, and what the results mean.
When Jackie, Scott, and I were brainstorming the results that we got, we had a lightbulb moment and knew what the results meant. When you have an opportunity with an agency to have a lightbulb moment, you know you’re onto something. MonogramGroup always looks at each client individually and considers what’s best for them. They’re energetic and thoughtful, and their solutions are spot-on.
When our partnership with the client ended, we left them in a very favorable position, and they were pleased with our work. I’d say we did a good job if we pleased a board of 30 members.
How did MonogramGroup perform from a project management standpoint?
MonogramGroup managed the budget and timeline, and they were never late. Those were partly my responsibilities as engagement lead, but they never under-delivered. They did exceptional work that went beyond my expectations. I think they were very excited about the potential of this client and where the work was going to go. They also had some experience in this sector before, so this was a fun project for them.
What did you find most impressive about them?
MonogramGroup is smart. I think there are a lot of agencies who don’t have a research component or a strategic lens to branding, and they rebrand for the sake of rebranding. I didn’t get that sense with MonogramGroup; they look at the client and think about what the best thing is that they can do for them. First, they start with the brand positioning, asking questions like what is the brand? What are they trying to accomplish? Then, they put the creative energy behind whatever is best for the client.
Their strategic energy gets embraced by the creative aptitude. They do better than good branding, which is born of Scott’s mentoring and coaching. Working with them, I always get the feeling that I’ll get something that has integrity and rigor to it, and that I’ll be able to justify why I’m making that recommendation to the client.
Are there any areas they could improve?
I haven’t worked with them in many years, so I wouldn’t critique them now. There were things we had to course correct in the moment. I could be critical of how things were presented, but at the end of the day, we got what we wanted, and we did a great job for the client.
Anytime subcontracting is involved, both companies need to adapt to how the other works. We didn’t experience a lot of grinding gears in that regard. There can also be the sense that, when working with a subcontractor, they’re an arm’s length away, but that was not the case with MonogramGroup. Sometimes agencies need to be encouraged to think on behalf of the client in addition to honoring their own design integrity, but those are real-time adjustments.
Any advice for potential customers?
Be active participants within the solution. Give MonogramGroup the room to be strategic and creative. Encourage them and be a good collaborating partner, because that energy ultimately gets the best result. In your work with any great agency, hold on for the ride; you might go in some directions that you hadn’t planned on going in order to get the desired outcomes. Trust that process.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.5Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
4.5On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"I think they could charge more. Living in California, having a Midwest agency was a gift. They stand to vary pricing based on their clients' location."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS