Platform Development for Technology Startup
- Custom Software Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Jan. 2017 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 4.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
“If anything wasn’t perfect the first time, Evozon fixed it and made it outstanding.”
- Other industries
- London, England
- 1-10 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
After finalizing the scope in partnership with the in-house team, Evozon designed and built a complex career search platform. They made informed technology selections and consulted on features such as swipe-based matching.
From the discovery phase to the end-to-end build and release, Evozon contributed greatly to every aspect of the platform. They identified innovative solutions and maintained open communication. The talented team demonstrated a consistent, enthusiastic commitment to delivering optimal results.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
I’m the director and founder of the Searchality Ltd., a technology startup.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Evozon?
We needed help with developing a new platform. Our goal is to be the leading career search platform for this niche segment. Before we were an established business, we pitched this project and hired Evozon to firm up our vision and build it from scratch.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
Evozon helped us scope the entire concept. My partner and I flew to their offices in Romania and we white-boarded the solution in partnership. Our platform is a global community for international and private schools and the teachers who work there. The process is equally transactional between candidates and schools that are hiring.
Evozon proposed a technical solution for our business problem. Together, we defined the functionality and a plan for development. They advised us on which features were cost-effective or unnecessary and helped us choose between a V1 or V2 and an alpha versus beta.
Evozon built the platform on a Firebase real-time database with Firebase Authentication. We leaned on their knowledge to select the right technologies. It’s coded entirely in JavaScript. They also used Node.js, Angular, Ember, and React Redux.
The platform has two sides with log-ins for teachers and schools. Matching functionality pairs candidates with open positions. Teachers can swipe left and right on jobs that fit their background. The sign-up and registration process prompts users to complete a social media-style profile and upload a photo. It also features a video. Teacher profiles include their personal site, CV, education, and professional experience. They can list up to five target positions based on qualifications and desired location. After the overview, there’s a longer section for educational philosophy. We also enable them to add personal details about marital status, children, and if their partner also needs a teaching job if they relocate.
A matching server runs in the background of the system. On the school side, profiles include website links, salaries, benefits, and curriculum. Hundreds of fields list details such as teaching load, school and class size, and expectations such as mentoring clubs or extracurricular activities. The system sends notifications about how many candidates match postings and how well they qualify. A sophisticated, yet simple drag-and-drop feature indicates relevant criteria. Clicking on a teacher’s profile notifies them of a school’s interest.
Evozon also helped to initiate our WordPress site, including the wireframe and design. Since we finished version one, we’ve been building on the business side. As we pursue round one fundraising, we’re investing in sales and marketing.
What is the team composition?
At first, we worked with senior project managers and designers, and a mix of junior and senior engineers. A few months into the project, the CTO got involved, which was a significant improvement. We could send him specifications or business problems to solve, and then have functional and efficient conversations about the best solution.
The team size varied based on the phase, from the usual 4–5 resources to a high of 10 one peak month. During the initial design-heavy periods, we primarily worked with a UX designer. She coordinated with the frontend developers. Evozon has a whole team for backend development and testing.
How did you come to work with Evozon?
A technology company I used to work for had a team in Romania. One of the members left to join Evozon.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve spent just over $100,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started the project in August 2017 and finished version 1 in December 2018. The project ran well over the timeline and budget, but we hold equal responsibility for the delay.
Our current contract with Evozon covers the first few months of 2019 management and maintenance. We’re in talks about how to move forward. They learned so much from this project that they understand our platform better than anyone. We would like to build version two together.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
Evozon’s overall output was truly excellent. The user profiles are beautifully designed. Since the team is relatively small, we sometimes struggled with the variance between engineers. Despite that tension, the results always wound up being generally high quality. If anything wasn’t perfect the first time, Evozon fixed it and made it outstanding.
We set out to build a solution that significantly improves the simplicity and speed of international school recruitment. It works: when a new school created their account recently, we were able to share high-quality candidates with them 45 minutes after they completed the setup process. Through our platform, we sent the school the candidate's references, profile, and skills to review. Candidates were invited to interview less than 90 minutes after the school first registered with us.
How did Evozon perform from a project management standpoint?
Without a set scope, we had to delegate responsibilities between our teams. After a few months of a learning curve, one core teammate got involved who made progress go smoothly. We’ve had three project managers so far, and the most recent one is particularly excellent.
Starting to use a Codebase ticketing system improved our workflow. We held weekly standup meetings. The past year of working together has been especially smooth and enjoyable.
What did you find most impressive about them?
Evozon has some absolute rock star developers and top-notch teammates. The CTO is amazing. Our challenging project took much longer to build than anyone anticipated. Even during tough times, they maintained their energy and enthusiasm for our platform. They take pride in their work.
Are there any areas they could improve?
Building a platform as a startup isn’t easy, and we all learned a lot along the way. They planned effective processes for adding features and signing off on enhancements, but they didn’t always stick to these processes. Some teammates are better at this than others, so it’s something they could work on a bit.
Do you have any advice for potential customers?
Take the time to clarify the scope and requirements before starting. Make sure Evozon understands both the technical and business challenges. As a highly intelligent team, they’ll probably find a solution once they grasp the problem. Making time for weekly standup calls was helpful, too.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
4.0On time / deadlines
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS