Children Nonprofit Mobile Application
- Mobile App Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Quality
- 4.0
- Schedule
- 4.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"They weren’t just like our app developer robot, they really were giving suggestions and listening."
- Other industries
- Redwood City, California
- 11-50 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Ebbex adapted an existing SurveyMonkey assessment into an app. This included creating storyboards, graphic design, and back-end interface. The team also designed a tutorial within the app to help new users.
Ebbex’s method of communication reduced the margin for misunderstandings. The end of the project was a bit short on time, but the team was diligent in making sure all pieces of the application worked together.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company.
We are an independent organization that works a lot like a nonprofit. We receive government money in the state of California through Proposition 10, and we fund programs for young children, [up to age] 5.
What is your role and responsibilities?
Executive director.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What was your goal for working with Ebbex?
Our goal was to take a kindergarten readiness assessment, and change it from being administered in Survey Monkey to an app.
SOLUTION
Please describe the scope of their work.
There was quite a bit of different services involved. I’m not sure what the usual app development includes, but ours included the development of the actual app, like storyboards and those sorts of things. Then, we also had to create a book to use in the app, so there was some graphic design around that, and some of the objects within the assessment.
There was also work on not just the reports that would be generated by the app, but also the interface that we would use on the backend to receive data. Finally, there was a tutorial created within the app to help kindergarten teachers use it.
What was your process for selecting Ebbex with which to work?
One of the new pushes here is we are required to look at different contractors just as part of our mandate. We used to go with just the traditional people apply or bid process. We give the scope of work, and we go with the lowest bidder.
But, that has really gotten us into trouble, so now one of the things we do is we research about where the bids should be, and give ourselves a range. Then, we start to ask for recommendations from people we work with whom have similar projects as ours.
We base our selection on several criteria: Falling within the bid price when we go to them, if we feel comfortable when we meet with them, we can hire them. Also, if they have received a good recommendation from someone that we know and trust, we consider vendors strongly.
Can you provide a ballpark dollar figure for the size of the work that they’ve done for you?
The cost form our end was reduced because we’re a nonprofit serving children. They greatly reduced the cost to $50,000. I would say the work time has really been large. I don’t really know how many hours it took them, but just working with us on the storyboards and wireframes. We probably spent more than 160 hours on that.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What were the results of the project?
The work is still ongoing. Kindergarten teachers used it this year, and we’ve used this year’s data to create reports. Now, we have a bit of money in the budget around the app, to do some tweaks to some of the language, and update some of the reports, and get greater usability from the backend for our team.
I feel that the app launch was successful. I feel like working with them was good. I felt as though our team and their team meshed well. One of the things that I see within our business is, when we try to take on a project like this, the translation often doesn’t happen very well when we talk about wanting something on the backend.
For example, lots of times we have to make databases, or these [Microsoft] Excel sheets on steroids, with crazy macros. When you see the product come back to you, you’re like, "yeah, that’s what I asked for but that’s not what I needed at all." So, it’s this really weird "lost in translation" from our program world to the technical world.
I felt like, although these were some of those issues, in general, because of the way they worked with us, we were able to overcome a lot of that misunderstanding that happens. I really think that it saved a lot of extra work because we were able to communicate so well with one another, and were responsive on both sides.
Is there anything unique about them that really makes them stand out, compared to other companies?
We work with quite a few vendors of all kinds, everything from our landscaper, to the people that keep our computers up to date, to the man that makes our database. I can say that, as a director of an organization, there’s really only a few that stay on your list after you’ve worked with them on a project like that, that you would go back to them. I really think that kind of excellence is not ordinary. I actually think even being really good is not ordinary, so it’s not often that we come across a group that we would absolutely stick with, or work with them again.
I feel as though Ebbex is that group. I also felt a sense of partnership from them, that it wasn’t just them doing work for us. They were our partners in it. They wanted it to succeed. They weren’t just like our app developer robot, they really were giving suggestions and listening. It was a real pleasure to work with them.
Looking back on the work so far, is there any area that you think they could improve upon or something that you might do differently?
I think we were so focused on the tangible app part, just what it looked like and being simplistic, which is the hardest of all things, and being consistent, and all those sorts of things. I really feel like we left the report part too far at the end of the process. We got a little squished for time at the end but, all things considered, I think that’s learning on both sides.
The other thing that’s really interesting for us is that, I use apps every single day and I’m always having to update them. This is the first time we’ve made an app, so I really didn’t get the idea that there has to be all those updates. Because an app is basically like a monster with a million working parts, and so now I get why there’s so many updates. I had just not processed it before.
So, I feel like they were really tedious about trying to work at making all the pieces work.
RATINGS
-
Quality
4.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
4.0On time / deadlines
"As far as everyday deadlines that needed to happen, they are right on it. They’re also very good at communicating in a timely way. The only issue that we had was a group issue, about not working on the reports as soon as we should have."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"They were willing to take on a complicated app for a small amount of money."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"I’ve already recommended them.