Web Redesign & Development for Restaurant Engagement Co
- Web Design Web Development
- $10,000 to $49,999
- Jan. 2024 - Sep. 2025
- Quality
- 0.5
- Schedule
- 0.5
- Cost
- 0.5
- Willing to Refer
- 0.5
“They failed on every stated value.”
- Other industries
- Vancouver, British Columbia
- 11-50 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
Digital Silk was hired by a restaurant engagement solutions company to redesign and develop their WordPress website. This included the creation of nine unique landing pages.
Digital Silk failed to deliver the project on time, taking over 13 months instead of the promised 3–4 months. They also demonstrated poor project management, communication, and responsiveness, and the client raised over 300 issues, most of which were related to QA.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and position.
I am the CEO of Craver
Describe what your company does in a single sentence.
Branded guest engagement solutions for Restaurants and Coffee Shops.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What specific goals or objectives did you hire Digital Silk to accomplish?
- Wordpress Website Redesign and Build
SOLUTION
How did you find Digital Silk?
Online Search
Why did you select Digital Silk over others?
High ratings
How many teammates from Digital Silk were assigned to this project?
2-5 Employees
Describe the scope of work in detail. Please include a summary of key deliverables.
Wordpress Website Design and Development, including 9 unique landing pages, strategy and design and development of all pages.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What were the measurable outcomes from the project that demonstrate progress or success?
Timeline Performance
Promised: 3-4 months (sales process) → 6 months (kickoff call)
Actual: 13+ months before termination
Result: 3× longer than original estimate, 2× longer than revised estimate
Quality Assurance Failures
Design Phase Issues Raised: 200+
CAT Phase Issues Raised: 100+
Total Issues: 300+ (Digital Silk admitted this volume was "extraordinary")
Bug Rate: 74% of all tickets raised were bugs (confirmed by Digital Silk in May 21, 2025 call)
Expected Bug Rate: Should be close to 0% reaching client
Time to Resolution
Responsive Design Issues:
First raised: March 26, 2025
Finally resolved: August 2025
Time to fix: 5 months for issues on standard screen sizes (13" MacBook Pro)
Training Deficiencies
User Error Rate: 21% of all tickets resulted from inadequate CMS training
Expected Rate: Should be minimal with proper training
Basic Functionality Failures:
March 11, 2025: No components saved at CAT handover, preventing page creation
This is fundamental CMS functionality that should have been configured before client handover
Project Management Failures
Billing Disputes: 3 separate attempts to charge for overages caused by Digital Silk's mismanagement:
October 2024: "All 30 communication hours gone" (no prior warning)
January 2025: "70 hours over budget"
August 2025: 5-hour quote for URL issue (client could actually fix themselves)
Resolution: All charges dropped after root cause analysis proved internal failures
Communication Breakdowns:
June 2025: Request for 1:1 call ignored 3 times, requiring CEO escalation
November 2024: Weekly calls unilaterally cancelled, replaced with "lengthy, confusing email threads"
Post-Launch Issues
Admin Access: Not provided at launch; required follow-up request one week later
Account Status: Both our team accounts were locked when access was finally granted
Final Outcome
Project Status: Terminated in September 2025
Migration Timeline: Less than one month after launch, moved to new provider
Reason: "Continuing with your team was no longer tenable"
Cost of Failure
Time Cost: 13 months of delayed launch
Resource Cost: Your team functioned as unpaid QA department
Business Cost: Lost business opportunities from delayed launch
Relationship Cost: Partnership terminated, references being contacted to warn against Digital Silk
Success Metrics (None Achieved)
❌ On-time delivery
❌ Quality standards met at handoff
❌ Effective training and knowledge transfer
❌ Transparent project management
❌ Professional communication
❌ Client satisfaction
❌ Long-term partnership (project goal stated in proposal)
The only "measurable outcome" is complete project failure across every dimension.
Describe their project management. Did they deliver items on time? How did they respond to your needs?
Timeline & Delivery Performance
Consistent Failure to Meet Deadlines
Quoted: 3-4 months (sales process)
Revised at kickoff: "Unlikely" – closer to 6 months
Actual: 13+ months before termination
Result: More than 3× the original estimate
No Accountability for Delays
Despite the massive timeline overrun, Digital Silk's response was to claim the client received "an excellent, high-quality deal with substantial savings" rather than acknowledging the failure to deliver on time.
Communication & Responsiveness
Opaque Ticketing System (April 2025)
The client raised serious concerns about their ticket management approach:
No transparency: System was completely opaque
Manual updates only: Had to wait for email updates from project coordinator
No tracking: Client received no log of submitted tickets
No visibility: Couldn't track what tickets were outstanding
Result: Client had to maintain their own concurrent ticket tracking system (duplication of work)
Unilateral Decision to Cancel Regular Communication (November 2024)
After implementing weekly calls to speed up resolution:
Action: Project manager unilaterally cancelled the calls because "they took too much time"
Replacement: Lengthy, confusing email threads for relatively simple issues
Impact: Significantly delayed the project and cost both parties more time
Repeated Dismissal of Escalation Requests (June 2025)
When client raised serious concerns about project direction:
Request: 1:1 call with project manager to resolve issues
Response: Request ignored 3 times
Escalation: Eventually required escalation to both CEOs
Assessment: "This kind of escalation simply shouldn't happen during a project, especially one that is suffering from chronic delays"
Response to Client Needs
Quality Issues Dismissed or Delayed
March 2025: Client raised concerns about responsive design on standard screen sizes
April 2025: Escalated about "significant gaps in the QA process" and requested a call
Response: Call happened, but QA issues were never resolved
May 2025: Tickets resolution call revealed:
74% of all tickets were bugs (acknowledged by Digital Silk)
Client asked for alternative to raising tickets
Their response: No viable alternative provided
Conclusion: "This volume of bugs simply shouldn't be reaching the client at all"
June 2025: Major escalation about:
Lack of progress on responsiveness issues
Developer's dismissal of client emails
Client request: 1:1 call to resolve
Response: Refused the call
Resolution Timeline: Issues first raised in March weren't resolved until August – 5 months later
Chronic Pattern: Blame Shifting
When Called Out on Poor Management
October 2024 – Communication Hours Overage:
Told "all 30 communication hours are already gone" with no prior warning
When client pointed out mismanagement, they dropped the charges
January 2025 – 70 Hours Over Budget:
Claimed "70 hours over the initial budget" and asked for payment
After root cause analysis showed their failures, charges dropped
August 2025 – URL Change Issue:
URLs changed from /app/ to /merchant/ without approval
Quoted 5 hours of dev time to fix
September 2025: After pushback, developer admitted client could fix it themselves in CMS
Instructions provided didn't work, client solved it independently anyway
In COO's Response to Complaint:
Blamed "client's content upload" for CAT issues
Claimed responsive design "followed approved specification"
Called overages "complimentary work" (ignoring they were caused by their failures)
Characterized client feedback as not reflecting "full context"
Basic Project Management Failures
March 2025 – Components Not Saved
At CAT handover, none of the components were saved, so client team couldn't:
Add any modules
Create any new pages Assessment: "This is basic functionality that shouldn't be caught by the client"
September 2025 – No Production Access Shared
After site went live:
Never shared production admin panel access
Client had to specifically request it
Received it one week later
Both client team members' accounts were locked when finally provided
Accountability & Ownership
Zero Ownership of Problems
Every time client identified a problem caused by their team:
They either ignored it (June escalation)
Delayed fixing it (5 months for responsive design)
Tried to charge client for it (3 separate billing attempts)
Blamed client for it (COO's response citing "content upload")
"Good Faith" vs. Reality
Their claim: "At every step, we acted in good faith, maintained transparent communication, and devoted substantial effort"
The evidence:
Ignored escalation requests 3 times
Cancelled regular communication calls
Opaque ticketing system with no visibility
No warnings before budget overruns
74% bug rate reaching client
5 months to fix standard screen size issues
Pattern of Mismanagement
The core issue: "Woeful project management from start to finish"
The evidence shows:
Chronic understaffing or poor resource allocation (74% bug rate)
Inadequate QA processes (300+ issues, 5-month resolution times)
Poor communication systems (opaque ticketing, cancelled calls)
Defensive rather than solution-oriented responses (blame shifting)
No proactive management (reactive firefighting only)
Missing basic handoff procedures (no components saved, no admin access)
Inability to meet commitments (3× timeline overrun)
Summary
Did they deliver items on time? No. 13+ months vs. 3-4 months quoted.
How did they respond to client needs?
Dismissed concerns (developer's dismissal of emails)
Delayed responses (5 months to fix issues)
Ignored escalation requests (3 ignored requests for calls)
Blamed the client (COO's response)
Tried to charge for their own mistakes (3 separate attempts)
Project Management Grade: F
The irony is that their proposal emphasized three core values:
Project Ownership – They took no ownership of failures
Transparency – Opaque systems, no warnings on overages
Results – 13 months, 300+ issues, terminated relationship
They failed on every stated value.
What was your primary form of communication with Digital Silk?
- Virtual Meeting
- Email or Messaging App
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
Absolutely Nothing!
Are there any areas for improvement or something Digital Silk could have done differently?
Refer to previosu sections.
RATINGS
-
Quality
0.5Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
0.5On time / deadlines
-
Cost
0.5Value / within estimates
-
Willing to Refer
0.5NPS