Rebranding for Chemical Company Undergoing Merger
- Branding
- Confidential
- July 2017 - Sep. 2018
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 4.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"The process was very efficient since we were essentially two small teams working together."
- Other industries
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- 1,001-5,000 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
DeSantis Breindel performed a full-scale corporate rebrand for the merger of two large chemical manufacturing companies. They performed extensive internal research before delivering a logo and full brand book.
The work completed by DeSantis Breindel was met with extremely positive feedback, pleasing all project stakeholders and exceeding expectations. Their team demonstrated great care throughout the process, taking time to understand the culture and maintaining constant communication.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
We’re specialized in specialty produce-grade chemicals for the manufacturing industry. It’s a company of about 800 million in sales, serving companies in automotive, steel, aluminum, machinery, and other industries dealing with metal.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with DeSantis Breindel?
Part of the plan was to help us with rebranding. We were in the process of merging with another company that was based in the US and in the same field of activity as Quaker. We closed the deal just a month ago, and are a leader in the field of process-grade solutions for the manufacturing industry. We needed to be able to successfully integrate the two companies under one comprehensive ethos and brand.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
The whole focus was the rebranding of the company. The first step was to assess, both internally and externally, what the rationale for the new brand would be. We went through a number of different processes, including interviews with key senior executives in both companies, meetings in different regions and segments of the companies, surveys, and interviews with a small number of high-level customers to assess their views on the corporate brand.
We also formulated the ethos of these brands, and what we should put forward for each one. The key elements for each were the corporate brand, the verbal expression (including the tagline), and all the visual expressions of the brand, including every template and material we could think of. All of that was eventually analyzed and approved by the executive team of the company in the form of a comprehensive brand book.
What is the team composition?
It was a small team of 4–5 people, and we had a single point of contact. The project manager tracked the process and made sure we were progressing according to plan. They put a lot of time and thought into understanding the business and culture of both legacy companies, and they drove the graphic design work. We also had a commercial contact at DeSantis Breindel, but they had a lighter touch, obviously.
How did you come to work with DeSantis Breindel?
We looked at around five companies with different proposals, and we selected two frontrunners. We had meetings with them and they delivered their speeches. We benchmarked cost versus potential performance, and we felt comfortable with DeSantis Breindel because of the specialization of the company in corporate rebranding, and also because of the size of their company. They weren’t too small—like a two-man show—but they also weren't too big. We felt they would prioritize us.
Finally, we felt extremely confident in the working team. They listened to our needs and understood our culture, and, at the same time, they were pushing their suggestions, even at the pitch level, clearly but not boldly. They wanted to make it clear from the start that they would listen to us, but they would also help us make decisions rather than just doing whatever we wanted because we were the customer.
What is the status of this engagement?
The proposal was in July 2017, and the final recommendation was in September 2018, although we did a bit of additional work after that.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We haven’t done an internal first-launch survey, as we’ve just launched and are in the middle of all kinds of opportunities, from commercial to procurement, production, etc. The feedback’s been extremely positive so far, however. It worked really well in the spirit of the combination, and we’ve received a lot of good feedback on that, especially the tagline, “Forward together." It’s short and sweet, and globally understandable. It works in English and can be gotten in French as well. It works pretty well with our customers. I haven’t heard specifics from them, but I also didn’t hear anything negative, as we were fearing had we gone too bold or too different.
This was really helpful during the technical elements of the transition. The new logo has elements of both old ones, so it wasn’t completely unrecognizable to customers seeing it printed on our products. We’ve had small technical issues, but it’s been good overall.
We launched some of the branding from day one internally, so the brand was highly visible. The feedback we received internally was extremely positive. We’ve gotten good feedback from distributors as well. We’ve had no issues from their side, so far.
How did DeSantis Breindel perform from a project management standpoint?
The project spanned more than a year and a half, for internal reasons. We had to get approval from all kinds of external bodies. I was disappointed by the fact that we had three different project managers during this time, but I have to say that all three of them were excellent. The kind of project we were running could’ve gone wrong very quickly, but they were very diligent. I think we were a bit unfortunate to have those project management changes, but, in the end, they didn’t have an impact on the project. We received very high quality from the team working at DeSantis Breindel. I would score them higher had we not had those changes, but it was really just an annoyance, rather than an issue.
What did you find most impressive about them?
What's most impressive is the quality of their people and the genuine effort they put into understanding our company and business, which are pretty complex. We employed another agency 5–6 years ago, just for a refresh of our brand at the time, and not a merger. Compared to them, DeSantis Breindel really understood the heart and soul of this company and tried to differentiate on the people, the services, and the products.
DeSantis Breindel got the idea of our positioning, which is more on solutions, services, expertise, and customer-centricity, rather than products. They’re dedicated to articulating this positioning, and this has come through in both the verbal and visual elements of their work.
Are there any areas they could improve?
We exchanged feedback pretty well, so there’s nothing serious. I wasn’t very convinced by the first visual elements we received. Some of the graphic design and videos provided weren’t good, but we discussed it and they adapted quickly. They delivered a second round that was better than what we could’ve imagined.
Do you have any advice for future clients of theirs?
All these projects require some time to set up a broad range of deliverables. That enables DeSantis Breindel to navigate through the organization and through the customer base pretty wisely, with tact and confidence. This worked very well in getting us customer participation for interviews. Clients shouldn’t hesitate to bring DeSantis Breindel in and present a set of thick orders. They will deliver above expectations.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
"We had different contact points across the project, but the quality of the project management was always excellent."
-
Cost
4.0Value / within estimates
"They weren’t the cheapest, but they weren’t “out of the roof”. It’s good value for money."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS