Submission Converter for Law Tech Company
- Custom Software Development IT Managed Services Web Development
- $10,000 to $49,999
- Jan. 2020 - June 2021
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 5.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"All errors were appropriately logged and fixed within our timeline. Now our current product is quite well-rounded."
- Other industries
- London, England
- 1-10 Employees
- Online Review
- Verified
CubeZoo developed a submission converter for a law tech company. Their goal was to create an efficient tool that could be used by any law firm.
CubeZoo found great solutions to the client's complex issues. They pay close attention to detail. They also have notable people skills—they are always available and prompt with their responses. In the end, the client achieved a higher conversion rate with minimal errors.
The client submitted this review online.
BACKGROUND
Please describe your company and your position there.
I'm the CEO and main Partner at WeSub, a Technology Company focused on providing Law Firms with different online tools to assist them in their filings before Legal Directories (i.e. Legal Rankings) such as Chambers and Partners, Legal 500, Latin Lawyer, Leaders League, etc. I am also a Director and the main Partner of Harpa Legal Marketing, a consultancy that helps Law Firms with basically the same thing. The Tech Company (WeSub) I have set up will help my legal directory consultancy, other legal directory consultancies and Law Firms in general do the work that they have to do in order to get their legal rankings in a more efficient, organized and time-effective manner.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
For what projects/services did your company hire CubeZoo, and what were your goals?
We hired CubeZoo to develop a Submission Converter. Submissions are the documents Law Firms have to send the different legal directories with a series of informations related to their legal practice and the cases they have been handling in the past 12 months. For each legal directory (and there are at least 20 of them) they have to send one Submission. The information is often very similar (in terms of content) but changes a lot in terms of form (how it is requested, in which place it has to go on the documents, etc).
Essentially, we hired CubeZoo to develop a Submission Converter for the 2 main Legal Directories (Chambers and Legal 500). The Converter takes a word document, scraps all the information from it, categorizes it, and then passes it on to the second word template. That means that you can upload a Chambers Submission and download a Legal 500 Submission (without having to individually copy-paste all the information from one template to the other), or vice-versa. Our goal was to create an efficient tool that could be used by any law firm around the world to convert Chambers Submissions to Legal 500 Submissions in a matter of seconds.
SOLUTION
How did you select this vendor and what were the deciding factors?
We selected CubeZoo because they were able to understand the issue at hand and propose great and efficient solutions to the problem we were trying to solve. They knew how to scrap the word documents, what were the best libraries to use to develop the scrapper, and how to design a simple yet nice platform to host this product.
Describe the scope of work in detail, including the project steps, key deliverables, and technologies used.
I am not a CTO, so I cannot say much about the tecnical aspects of what was developed. The steps were as follows:
Scope
- Milestone 1: Convert Template A to Template B (=1 Conversion)
- Milestone 2: Overall Platform Infrastructure, including Password/Login, User Types/Access, Home Page, Document Download, Payment Methods
- Milestone 3: Convert Template A to Template C, D and E (=3 Conversions)
- Milestone 4: Remaining Conversions between Templates A, B, C, D and E (=16 Conversions)
- We also asled CubeZoo to develop the code from scratch, as we would like to see they would come up with solutions and create the basic infrastructure needed for the project without any previous bias, since we had had some previous attempts at this code which had failed. This was done to great success.
- We also asked them to build a code that did not connect the Front End to the Back End. This was done to great success.
- The code was in PHP and used a specific library suited for word documents. I think its called PHP Word something (haha, sorry I don't know these details very well).
- The project is working great and up and running. It can be used here: https://wesub.co.uk/ 6. We are so happy with their services that we are now developing a second stage of the project with them... a full-on Platform to store all the data needed to do the Submissions, so each Law Firm can store their cases and data along the year and use it as required.
How many people from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?
Nick - CEO and main contact in terms of client managment. Nick is very hands on and makes sure he knows what is being done at every level of the project. He is also very much available to answer questions and help steer the project forward. On a personal level, he is very amicable, friendly and attentive.
Louis - Senior developer and main strategist behind the project. He is very knowledgeable from the technical standpoint and was always able to answer all our technical questions with great acuracity. He is also a good problem solver and gave us different solutions to complex issues.
Stiaan - Developer and main executor of the project. He is very dedicated, helped us overcome a series of hurdles in the implementation of the project, and always gave us very prompt responses to our queries and requests.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Can you share any measurable outcomes of the project or general feedback about the deliverables?
We were able to launch the project within the required timeframe, which was very important for us due to the timing of some of the Submission conversions we needed to perform. We also had a high conversion rate, with minimal errors, which were very helpful. All errors were appropriately logged and fixed within our timeline. Now our current product is quite well-rounded.
Describe their project management style, including communication tools and timeliness.
They are great in terms of project managment. They are always available, even for ad hoc calls for us to ask a few questions, and were always prompt with their responses. I don't think an email ever went unanswered for more than 1 day... which is very good... especially considering we are not a particularly big client for them.
What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?
The way they found great solutions to complex issues and the way they treated us as if we were very important clients even though we know we are still relatively small. Their attention to detail, dedication towards their clients and hands-on approach, are very much appreciated in a sector where it is common for developers to be very bad at "people skills" and for response times to be very high.
Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?
They are not the cheapest developers out there... but we think they charge a fair price and deliver high-quality services, from both the technical and personal points of view.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
"They are great developers, planners, UX designers and project managers."
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
"They delivered everything in a timely manner, even though we were not their largest client."
-
Cost
5.0Value / within estimates
"They charge a fair price."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"I would not hesitate to recommend them to anyone that requires development work.