Full Stack Development for Experiential E-commerce Site
- E-Commerce Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Oct. 2016 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 3.5
- Schedule
- 4.5
- Cost
- 3.5
- Willing to Refer
- 4.0
"We were especially very pleased with the way that they worked, and the speed at which they worked."
- Information technology
- Canterbury, England
- 11-50 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Clarion Technologies optimized and maintains a complex existing e-commerce website. Providing backend and frontend development and design, they coded functionalities and optimized mobile responsiveness.
Clarion successfully delivered a number of complex code elements, but their frontend designs are sometimes subpar. Strengths include speed and ability to meet deadlines; project management overall has improved since the project began.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
The company is an online prepaid retailer. We sell flying and driving experience days to our customer base, and then work with individual experience retailers to market their products and attract demand. I’m the head of e-commerce for the business, doing digital functions in terms of marketing, usability, site functions, and so on.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Clarion Technologies?
The needs of the business were to find an outsourced development house that could take a complex website, one that has been around for quite some time, and build it up. We needed a team to be responsive to our needs, make this site as user-friendly as possible, and be an emergency resource should the site go down.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
It's been quite a mix. It's been everything from refining the operations of the site, such as reducing things like page loads, and working on making the functionality on the site slicker. They've been an emergency resource when the site's gone down, and they've been there to alleviate our problems with the way the site works. Again, they've been on hand to be able to help fix those problems. It's providing almost a full stack of development resource in terms of backend and frontend development, as well as frontend design. It's really a whole range of services.
They have been adding additional functionality to our on-site sort function. They have been looking at making the page loads faster through JavaScript, etc. They have organized our site and looking at the sizes of images. They have also been working on providing different functionality on the way that the site looks and feels on a mobile site as opposed to the desktop site.
At the moment, I didn't think we've got them to implement any specific third-party technologies. We will be doing so very shortly in terms of on-site search. We're also looking at third-party payment provision as well. But in terms of implementation of other technologies, not so much. The original site database was built on SQL on a .NET platform.
How did you come to work with Clarion Technologies?
I wasn't involved in the recruitment of Clarion. They have been in place long before I joined the business seven months ago.
How much have you invested with Clarion Technologies?
The total cost is confidential but at the moment we have two full-time developers and one project manager who's only working on the site.
What is the status of this engagement?
I started working with them when I joined the business seven months ago. The work is ongoing.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
Could you share any evidence that would demonstrate the productivity, quality of work, or the impact of the engagement?
Their work has contributed to a site receiving hundreds of thousands of monthly visitors. It's not the biggest site, but not unreasonably small either.
How did Clarion Technologies perform from a project management standpoint?
Despite the fact that we have a project manager, we've been using mostly with the developers directly. When I joined, there wasn't a great deal of structure to the way that we interfaced with them: it would be ad hoc, either by Skype or by email, and we would get in touch with requirements. It came to me to start to build some structure around that, logging what was being asked of the developers and recording our conversations for our records and for theirs, in order to get into a place where we know there's a bit more visibility in terms of what the developers are doing on any given day, and the priorities that are assigned therein. I'm not entirely sure of the way that they work internally. I believe they work on a sprint schedule. We don't assign a schedule to them. I believe that the sprinters who are there— the project managers—would assign the way that they work on the tasks.
There's no doubt that the developers work very hard. They have produced quite a lot of work and on usually quite tight deadlines. When I initially joined, a lot of the work they did was very good. We were especially very pleased with the way that they worked, and the speed at which they worked. I've worked with a lot of businesses and a lot of developers over the years, and they’re certainly pretty quick. There's no question that they do work pretty hard.
Recently, there have been more issues with the quality of the work coming through. For example, we got a product feed, and there have been numerous issues with not only the way the product feed is formatted but the way the data has been pulling into it. There have been issues with some of the doorways and some of the requests for how specific data was handled. Equally, there have been questions about the quality of some of the settings on the frontend development work in terms of the way the website handles mobile and desktop. The functionality was built directly onto the page rather than being coded within the style sheet. Overall, they are very capable, but there recently have been times when they're having issues with some of the work they have produced.
What did you find most impressive about Clarion Technologies?
One thing they did recently for me was to add reviews to the product listing pages to allow us to sort by function. We spent quite a time working on that, and the end result of the work they did, in terms of the way that it looked and functioned, was very good. It was quite a complex bit of coding. In fact, they were relying on a third-party plug-in to be able to pull the data and then to render effectively on the listing pages, and then also to sort by order to rank those. I wouldn't say there weren't any issues; the end result was overall pretty decent. There have been a number of instances like that, either small tweaks or changes that we asked for that, that they happened to do effectively and very quickly.
Are there any areas Clarion Technologies could improve?
I have questions around the overall quality of coding they have done in terms of design and frontend development. We've had a few instances where the code has been showing to be ineffectively used. Equally, the look and feel of the current site, which is done using their in-house frontend developer, wasn't especially good in terms of the look and feel and the way it renders across different browsers. I would be keen to them to understand how they develop their frontend developers and to make sure that they are kept up-to-date with some of the latest best practices in terms of the frontend side, especially to make sure that the code is as clean as it could be.
RATINGS
-
Quality
3.5Service & Deliverables
"<p>The quality of service has been overall very good. The quality of deliverables, less so.</p> "
-
Schedule
4.5On time / deadlines
"<p>They're readily available by email and Skype. They come back to me very quickly when needed. The reason it’s not a 5 is because of the service level agreements for a certain amount of hours.</p> "
-
Cost
3.5Value / within estimates
"<p>When you're comparing it to be able to find the same level of development resource in the UK, Western Europe, or the United States, prices have been going up recently. That's much due to their local inflation as much as anything else.</p> "
-
Willing to Refer
4.0NPS
"<p>They are good developers overall. I've worked with a lot worse, and those were good UK-based developers.</p>