Native Dev for Business Productivity App
- Mobile App Development
- $50,000 to $199,999
- Oct. 2016 - Ongoing
- Quality
- 5.0
- Schedule
- 5.0
- Cost
- 4.0
- Willing to Refer
- 5.0
"Accedia has been great, from the NDA agreement to the invoicing, project management, and issue-handling."
- Other industries
- Bristol, England
- 1-10 Employees
- Phone Interview
- Verified
Accedia helped develop a native iOS app with an SaaS backend, a collaboration platform built using Node.js and a MySQL service. They inherited old code and put together a secure, multitier AWS infrastructure.
Accedia has helped iterate on the app quickly and establish product market fit. They’re a highly productive team that not only fixes bugs, but responds to user feedback and delivers new results consistently. Accedia is professional and efficient, and they act as an extension of internal teams.
A Clutch analyst personally interviewed this client over the phone. Below is an edited transcript.
BACKGROUND
Introduce your business and what you do there.
Meetzoo is a startup Software-as-a-Service [SaaS] business. We provide a backend platform and app for users, with a goal of transforming the way in which people interact during business meetings. We’re connecting people’s existing calendars to social media within our collaboration platform, allowing them to have better continuity and thought-connection during meetings.
OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE
What challenge were you trying to address with Accedia?
Accedia led the development of our SaaS with a native iOS app with an AWS backend, that provides a collaboration platform built using Node.js and a RDS/MySQL service. They inherited MVP code and put together a secure, stable product while also releasing important new features.
SOLUTION
What was the scope of their involvement?
We worked with a technical architect from their side, who handled product design. We were developing exclusively for the iOS platform at that point in time. The backend was an Amazon Web Services-hosted infrastructure [AWS] using Node.js for the web services platform. We were using Amazon Relational Database, which is essentially a MySQL service. Accedia needed to put together an infrastructure which was both secure and multitier, making sure that we met things like the OWASP [Open Web Application Security Project] best practices around the web services and database. The platform also needed to be scalable, with an N+1 redundancy application server, making sure that the application was essentially stateless across app servers.
This is strictly a backend service—the collaboration platform which all the apps talk to, and use to exchange data. The frontend was simply an app, but there were a couple of web interfaces, namely a password reset form, email initiation pages, and so on. There is no main web UI; it’s simply a native mobile app with a SaaS backend.
How did you come to work with Accedia?
I’ve worked with other outsourced companies, from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic as well as India. My personal preference is always to near-source in Eastern Europe, and I’ve generally had good experiences with these countries as not only is their English very good, but there is a great cultural fit too and staff retention is high.
I came across Accedia after making inquiries in my previous business about a JavaScript framework called Kendo UI. I asked the manufacturer of this framework, a company called Telerik (which has now been acquired by Progress Software), if they could provide experts who could help us evaluate whether Kendo UI would be a right choice for us. They provided the name of Accedia as an expert team. I was very impressed with them and the work they did for me, so, when I later on had an opportunity to outsource for my new startup, they were my choice.
How much have you invested with them?
The total cost is in the region of $100,000.
What is the status of this engagement?
We started working with Accedia in October 2016. The project is ongoing.
RESULTS & FEEDBACK
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the impact of the engagement?
We’ve had a very positive reception to the app. One of the key things in the early stages of a startup business, when it’s establishing product market fit, is to quickly iterate the app. While Accedia allowed us to release an app to the store in April 2017, we continue to release new features every month, which is amazing.
We continue to release products, which is amazing. Fixing bugs is one thing, but it’s something else to listen to the user community, and provide enhancements and differentiated features, based on their feedback. I’ve never had such a high-productivity team.
How did Accedia perform from a project management standpoint?
I’ve had a personal relationship and direct contact with everyone on the team, which was vitally important. I’ve worked with businesses which operated as black boxes, which I found disconcerting. What was great about Accedia was that they were an extension of my own team, with no differentiation between my employees and theirs. I knew each one of them, and spoke to them every day.
What did you find most impressive about them?
I’ve worked with much larger companies than Accedia, as well as with smaller companies. What a client looks for is dependent on the size of their own business. If I had a huge company, I may have very different requirements than if I were a small startup. Personally, I want a company which appreciates my business, and which views the revenue as a large-enough aspect of what they’re doing. This was a part of my choice when going for a group the size of Accedia, but I equally didn’t want a company so small as to not have the professional attitude and support required.
When outsourcing, we’re not just outsourcing 2-3 developers, a tester, and a project manager, we’re outsourcing all other parts of management. Accedia clearly has great competencies, between the technical side, the commercial side, and the project management. Each of these is done professionally and efficiently.
I’ve dealt with companies in the past which, although great technically, didn’t invoice on time, or didn’t follow things up properly. Accedia has been great, from the NDA agreement to the invoicing, project management, and issue-handling. I know it can be tough for small, growing businesses to do, but, whatever Accedia is doing, they’re doing it right.
Are there any areas they could improve?
From a customer point of view, I would like to see more evidence of a mentoring culture within their company. Like any business, Accedia will have very experienced people at the top, but, as they grow, they will have to bring in more young and inexperienced members, and train them. I believe this does happen, but it’s not transparent from the customer’s perspective. I would quite like to know if, for example, they have a weekly triage of my project with the gurus within the company, perhaps producing a report on what they’ve thought about. I’ve never come across a company with this approach, but, if anyone could do it, Accedia would be the one.
RATINGS
-
Quality
5.0Service & Deliverables
"It was tough, because they had an inherited codebase and problems. Accedia had a great attitude in dealing with this."
-
Schedule
5.0On time / deadlines
"They’ve delivered under great, unreasonable pressure from me, at times."
-
Cost
4.0Value / within estimates
"I’m an entrepreneur, and I don’t want to spend any money, but Accedia offers very good value."
-
Willing to Refer
5.0NPS
"I have done so on many occasions, and have no hesitations.