OCTA

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

Project manager for CATIDU -International transport companies chamber-.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire OCTA.dev, and what were your goals?

Developement of shared platform for stakeholders involved in supply chain for hazmat, especially chemicals. Get a PMV to show all involved companies main benefits and potential.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor and what were the deciding factors?

We prepared an auction, based on referrals from partners, and we balanced Background-Flexibility-Price.

Describe the scope of work in detail, including the project steps, key deliverables, and technologies used.

Platfom had a main administration from transport chamber, to include hazmat goods givers, transport companies & assets, and goods receivers. Once they were accepted, they can list all available assets to operate and permits from many areas & certificates. They can handle raw data and images, and show only necessary information to third parts, to both guarantee legal certificates and preserve confidencial company data.

How many people from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?

• Project manager
• technical support and developement
• partner-functional consultant

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any measurable outcomes of the project or general feedback about the deliverables?

Good job, outcomes were mainly as planned. Timeline was also according to forseen. Design was super nice, adapted to new trends.

Describe their project management style, including communication tools and timeliness.

Their management style was flexible and goal-oriented, working on processes throughout. Communication was very fast, using tools for support and bugs. Also appreciate having an user to check developements.

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

Closeness to the project and involved with results. Quick deliveries as well.

Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?

Somehow fast in some areas to define background developement, and lack of discussion on a few issues that we don't 100% agree.

BACKGROUND

Please describe your company and your position there.

I am the cofounder of Prezzta, a fintech company focused on serving the credit business. We create a platform for loan and credit card onboarding and management, where customers can manage all their loan applications and approved products from a unique system, encompassing their whole life cycle.

OPPORTUNITY / CHALLENGE

For what projects/services did your company hire OCTA.dev, and what were your goals?

We hired Octa.dev team to help us improve the platform, adding new issues as well as fixing exisiting bugs.

SOLUTION

How did you select this vendor and what were the deciding factors?

We have worked with their partners previously, and we already knew their virtues.

Describe the scope of work in detail, including the project steps, key deliverables, and technologies used.

It is an ongoing project, where the scope is defined on a weekly basis. Each time we try to understand priorities so to tackle them asap, for what we relay on both our them and Octa.deb

How many people from the vendor's team worked with you, and what were their positions?

2 - Plataform Arquithecture & Developer

RESULTS & FEEDBACK

Can you share any measurable outcomes of the project or general feedback about the deliverables?

We have an excellent opinion about the team who help us keep improving

Describe their project management style, including communication tools and timeliness.

They have helped define the working scheme, so they are part of the success and failures of it.  They are an active part of the project management style.

What did you find most impressive or unique about this company?

They got involved in all areas of our platform and we trust their team.

Are there any areas for improvement or something they could have done differently?

There are always different views on how things should have been done. We believe that everybody should learn from experience, correct the mistakes we all make, and make things better when similar situations arise.